[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Upsampling

2006-08-27 Thread cliveb
Patrick Dixon;131267 Wrote: Correct - although you still need the analogue filter, it's much a much less demanding spec. OK, just to make sure I've understood this correctly. Say we have a 44.1kHz signal. Putting it through a non-oversampling DAS, the repeated spectra start at 44.1kHz. If we

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Tried the 63.0 (mute) attenuation thing........

2006-08-27 Thread Deaf Cat
JohnnyLightOn;131048 Wrote: I tried this tweak and there's a clearly-audible difference, but - for me - not a clear improvement. As was mentioned by Deaf Cat, it does smooth the sound out, but at the expense of the vocals becoming slightly recessed. I also noticed that along with the

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Upsampling

2006-08-27 Thread ezkcdude
I think it's really a matter of semantics. Oversampling is performed solely for the purpose of reducing the harmful effects of brickwall filters. Upsampling is really a form of sample rate conversion, and is necessary for systems that have asynchronous timing (i.e. input and output clocks are

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] How much difference do you think a new DAC would make for my system

2006-08-27 Thread totoro
You can see what my current system is in my sig. My current upgrade plans for the next 6 months or so are: 1. GIK acoustics corner bass traps (maybe home brew if I can get some 705 cheaper, but it doesn't look like I can). 2. Rel strata subwoofer (I think the current rev is 5). 3. Maybe some

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] How much difference do you think a new DAC would make for my system

2006-08-27 Thread Pat Farrell
totoro wrote: 1. GIK acoustics corner bass traps (maybe home brew if I can get some 705 cheaper, but it doesn't look like I can). Have you looked at Real Traps? Ethan is a good guy and his stuff is better looking than anything I can make, and not all that expensive. 3. Maybe some treble

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Tried the 63.0 (mute) attenuation thing........

2006-08-27 Thread P Floding
JohnnyLightOn;131048 Wrote: I tried this tweak and there's a clearly-audible difference, but - for me - not a clear improvement. As was mentioned by Deaf Cat, it does smooth the sound out, but at the expense of the vocals becoming slightly recessed. I also noticed that along with the

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 directly connnected to a preamp - is that recommended?

2006-08-27 Thread sbn
Hi, i've just had an SB3 for some weeks now, and in fact it's the only audio source that I use right now. The improvemnt in sound quality made me think that my amplifier is now the weakest part of my setup (old cheap sony 5.1 receiver) - and therefore, i'm considering buying a new amplifier. But

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: How much difference do you think a new DAC would make for my system

2006-08-27 Thread totoro
Thanks for the suggestions. I'm definitely doing the room stuff first, no matter what. The back wall is already covered with bookshelves. I was thinking of putting the bass traps behond the speakers. The thing about the GIK traps is that they're 140 instead of 350-- which makes them appealing.

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 directly connnected to a preamp - is that recommended?

2006-08-27 Thread Pat Farrell
sbn wrote: i could use the same money on a high quality power amplifier... Good idea. Can you recommend connecting it directly, without any additional volume control? I've read that somebody warns against this (blows speakers if volume is set too loud etc) Yes. With anything connected

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Preamp Volume Control - how does it work?

2006-08-27 Thread sbn
Hi, I'm just wondering about how the Preamp Volume Control attenuation works. I can see that it only impacts the analog outputs, so my first guess was that it was using some kind of analog volume control, controlled by the slimserver... But then i read about all these guys noticing a diffent

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Preamp Volume Control - how does it work?

2006-08-27 Thread Pat Farrell
sbn wrote: I can see that it only impacts the analog outputs, so my first guess was that it was using some kind of analog volume control, controlled by the slimserver... There is nearly nothing analog in the SqueezeBox. Its a digital box. Sean and others can correct me, but I would expect

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Preamp Volume Control - how does it work?

2006-08-27 Thread andy_c
sbn;131587 Wrote: Hi, I'm just wondering about how the Preamp Volume Control attenuation works. I can see that it only impacts the analog outputs, so my first guess was that it was using some kind of analog volume control, controlled by the slimserver... But then i read about all

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Tried the 63.0 (mute) attenuation thing........

2006-08-27 Thread seanadams
P Floding;131503 Wrote: Perhaps the CEO can shed some light on this It's called the placebo effect. If you can only hear (or measure) something like this in the absence of scientific controls, then it's your imagination. It works exactly the same way that a sugar pill can ACTUALLY CURE all

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3 directly connnected to a preamp - is that recommended?

2006-08-27 Thread Skunk
sbn;131574 Wrote: I've read that somebody warns against this (blows speakers if volume is set too loud etc) but then I discovered the Preamp attenuation feature, and I guess that this will get me some extra safety, so i'm not accidentially blowing my speakers or what? Yes the CEO warns

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3 directly connnected to a preamp - is that recommended?

2006-08-27 Thread Pat Farrell
Skunk wrote: The preamp attenuation feature should not be thought of as a safety net. A glitch, that might cause white noise for example, would likely be at full volume and not the desired attenuated volume. So if you want to go the direct to power amp route, you need an external attenuator,