Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-18 Thread Patrick Dixon
... and if in doubt, always go for the 'professional' version. -- Patrick Dixon www.at-tunes.co.uk Patrick Dixon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=90 View this thread:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-18 Thread ModelCitizen
You lot just need to get out more. MC -- ModelCitizen Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too? Transporter Naim NAP 250 PMC OB1s. http://www.last.fm/user/ModelCitizen

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-18 Thread P Floding
Patrick Dixon;181429 Wrote: ... and if in doubt, always go for the 'professional' version. Oh, I never realized.. I'll take your advice then! ;-D -- P Floding No, I didn't ABX it. And I won't even if you ask me. (Especially not if you ask me.)

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-18 Thread Phil Leigh
ModelCitizen;181432 Wrote: You lot just need to get out more. MC Can't - too busy downloading the entire 24-bit 88.1Khz Linn catalogue! -- Phil Leigh Phil Leigh's Profile:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-18 Thread Bob Bressler
Phil Leigh;181397 Wrote: LOL no, but you may wish to consider the variety of supported interfaces, the capability for future upgrades, height, width depth and noise floor, options for remote control etc. Balanced operation is generally desirable, as is good imaging and wide dynamic range.

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-17 Thread P Floding
slimkid;180921 Wrote: I'm not asking for more details. I'm asking for the details that would quantify and/or qualify the findings. And yes, you right, no one here has to deliver anything. Just like the priest doesn't actually have to prove that god really exists. However, this is a

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-17 Thread 95bcwh
P Floding;181325 Wrote: There is no general concensus on what sounds good and what sounds like sh*t. LOL...I wonder, what would it take for people to accept the fact that there is NO consensus in this hobby?? When you look for a wife, do you have to find consensus among people that your

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-17 Thread Phil Leigh
95bcwh;181380 Wrote: LOL...I wonder, what would it take for people to accept the fact that there is NO consensus in this hobby?? When you look for a wife, do you have to find consensus among people that your wife is the prettiest in the world? :) LOL no, but you may wish to consider the

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-16 Thread Patrick Dixon
regalma1;180887 Wrote: I'm curious whether this was using the digital outs or the analog (analogue)Both IIRC regalma1;180887 Wrote: I still have a hard time believing that digital in/digital out is going to sound different. It just runs contrary to my understanding. Maybe jitter is

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-16 Thread Ben Diss
tomjtx;180920 Wrote: 95bcwh;180712 Wrote: Tomjtx had a beef with Bolder, so you can ignore his opinion about Bolder's product. 95, you are so out of line I'm not even sure how to respond, other than to say your posts apparently define your character. Robin, Just to set the

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-16 Thread jmourik
slimkid;180921 Wrote: Just like the priest doesn't actually have to prove that god really exists. Hey, we had a thread on this, religion and audiophilia. Though it's probably easier to convince someone that a modded SB3 sounds better than a SB3, than to convince someone that your God is better

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-16 Thread tomjtx
Ben Diss;180988 Wrote: tomjtx;180920 Wrote: It's not surprising that you didn't hear a difference between the stock SB3 and Bolder SB3 when used with the Lavry. Since the Lavry retimes the incoming signal, jitter becomes less important. -Ben That's a good point, Ben,

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-16 Thread Patrick Dixon
regalma1;181052 Wrote: Patrick Dixon;180963 Wrote: Both IIRC Here are the measurements we did a while ago http://www.at-view.co.uk/sb2_jitter.htm - they're clearly different, so you just have to figure out what that does to the sound now ;-) Now that is what I mean. I really

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-15 Thread Patrick Dixon
I heard a Boulder modified SB2 with a fancy interconnect and Boulder PSU against an SB+ the other week. Although the Boulder SB2 is much better than a standard SB3, everyone agreed the SB+ was better still. -- Patrick Dixon www.at-tunes.co.uk

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-15 Thread 95bcwh
Tomjtx had a beef with Bolder, so you can ignore his opinion about Bolder's product. If he say he cannot hear a difference between the digital out of a stock squeezebox and the digital out of a Bolder Modified squeezebox + PS, then there're only two possibilities: 1) He need to get his ear

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-15 Thread ceejay
95bcwh;180712 Wrote: Tomjtx had a beef with Bolder, so you can ignore his opinion about Bolder's product. 95bcwh - I don't have an opinion to offer on the relative merits of these mods etc but I am getting *very* *very* bored with your sniping and feuding on this forum. In his post,

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-15 Thread Robin Bowes
ceejay wrote: 95bcwh;180712 Wrote: Tomjtx had a beef with Bolder, so you can ignore his opinion about Bolder's product. 95bcwh - I don't have an opinion to offer on the relative merits of these mods etc but I am getting *very* *very* bored with your sniping and feuding on this forum.

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-15 Thread adamslim
In the interests of openness we should also mention that Patrick is the creator of the SB+, so is hardly disinterested. While there are strong hints (picture of product, link to website), it's not totally obvious! :) (PS Patrick I may still be interested in getting one, but it'll be a month or

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-15 Thread F-100
Patrick Dixon;180705 Wrote: I heard a Boulder modified SB2 with a fancy interconnect and Boulder PSU against an SB+ the other week. Although the Boulder SB2 is much better than a standard SB3, everyone agreed the SB+ was better still. What is the SB+? Can you share more info on this SB+?

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-15 Thread slimkid
making your opinions credible. All of you, who claim that there is/isn't difference. Wether in moding or in linear PSU, cables or anything. How abot telling us exactly: - what music was playing during the comparisons - what aspect of sound at what part of music piece was taken into consideration

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-15 Thread regalma1
I heard a Boulder modified SB2 with a fancy interconnect and Boulder PSU against an SB+ the other week. Although the Boulder SB2 is much better than a standard SB3, everyone agreed the SB+ was better still. I'm curious whether this was using the digital outs or the analog (analogue) I still

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-15 Thread P Floding
slimkid;180880 Wrote: making your opinions credible. All of you, who claim that there is/isn't difference. Wether in moding or in linear PSU, cables or anything. How abot telling us exactly: - what music was playing during the comparisons - what aspect of sound at what part of music piece

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-15 Thread 95bcwh
Folks, I'm NOT here to convince people to buy mod, I'm not paid enough to be a salesman of mod, I'm enjoying what I have and I'm happy. Audio is like cigars and wines, people tastes are not universal, better is a highly subjective word. When you read people saying that A sounds better than B

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-15 Thread regalma1
Hopefully we are talking about reds;) Seriously though, I could have stated things better. Before I run out and spend all that money I need to be reasonably convinced that it actually makes a difference. Then with enough description I can decide if different in this case is better, or at least

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-15 Thread tomjtx
95bcwh;180712 Wrote: Tomjtx had a beef with Bolder, so you can ignore his opinion about Bolder's product. 95, you are so out of line I'm not even sure how to respond, other than to say your posts apparently define your character. Robin, I didn't have a tiff with Bolder at all. Wayne

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-15 Thread slimkid
P Floding;180903 Wrote: More details won't make anything more credible. Just more like a review in any glossy hifi magazine. Perhaps that is what you think of when you say credible? Anyway, it can be useful to keep in mind that no-one here has to deliver anything to anyone. It is all a

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-15 Thread Skunk
regalma1;180913 Wrote: When the review of a bottle of wine starts out saying it has the flavor of cherries I'm off to the next review. If that one says full bodied with big berries then I know two things, one is that the two wines are different, and I will probably prefer the latter.

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-14 Thread sonofcolin
Yes. I have digital mods performed by Bolder. I think it's a great upgrade to a stock SB3, which is already very good. The difference is not subtle! -- sonofcolin sonofcolin's Profile:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-14 Thread tonyptony
Same. I sent mine in last year for the digital mods and was very pleased with the result. Blacker backgound and less hard sounding. I just sent it back for a digital mod improvement that Wayne identified after I had the original mod done. Hoping to get it back early next week. -- tonyptony

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-14 Thread tomjtx
The only way to know is to listen to a stock SB side by side with a modded one. Any modder should be wiling to send you a demo unit to listen to and you can decide for yourself. If you level match the the 2 you can switch back and forth on your pre amp until you don't know which is which. If

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Modding the Squeezebox

2007-02-13 Thread mmg_fan
Has anyone had their SB modded by Bolder? Just wondering if its worth it... http://www.enjoythemusic.com/magazine/equipment/0206/midmonth/bolder_modified_slimdevices_squeezebox.htm -- mmg_fan mmg_fan's Profile: