Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-30 Thread Rich
On 2007.11.29. 23:53, John Stoffel wrote: >> "mark" == mark bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > mark> => I've got a plan to sit down and sketch out more consistent and clear > mark> => set of commands for manipulating bacula from the command line. > Anyone > mark> => else like the 'bcli'

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-29 Thread John Stoffel
> "mark" == mark bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: mark> => I've got a plan to sit down and sketch out more consistent and clear mark> => set of commands for manipulating bacula from the command line. Anyone mark> => else like the 'bcli' name? mark> => mark> No! No! This will only exac

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-29 Thread mark . bergman
In the message dated: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:13:18 EST, The pithy ruminations from "John Stoffel" on were: => [SNIP!] => Shon> here, I wouldn't have come as far as I have. For instance, the => Shon> full abilities of the commands aren't well documented. It => Shon> required searching th

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-28 Thread John Stoffel
Shon> Like I said its a rant. Probably a poor choice to post, but I've Shon> really been having some inexplicable problems lately and kirk'd Shon> out something bad this morning. Setting up Bacula to test Shon> certain things went relatively smoothly. Its been setting it up Shon> for production th

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-22 Thread Foo Bar
--- Ralf Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=bacula&searchon=names§ion=all&suite=etch-backports > http://wiki.links2linux.de/en/index.php/PackMan_repo_instructions_for_Debian/Ubuntu_(en)#Debian_4.0_.28etch.29 Thanks, I will take a look at this. ___

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-22 Thread Ralf Gross
Foo Bar schrieb: > > > all set up (I can't get BAT to compile for example, hopefully the > > Debian > > > stable package will be updated soon). > > > > > > > Debian stable will never get the new version until Lenny is released as > > stable. I've used the testing and sid packages in Lenny without

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-22 Thread Foo Bar
--- Robert LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/21/07 7:11 AM, "Foo Bar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > all set up (I can't get BAT to compile for example, hopefully the > Debian > > stable package will be updated soon). > > > > Debian stable will never get the new version until Lenny

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Chris Lee
t;Of Dan Langille >Sent: Wednesday, 21 November, 2007 07:19 >To: bacula-users >Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula > >On 21 Nov 2007 at 8:07, Shon Stephens wrote: > >> Ok. This is a rant and you can remove it from the list if you want to >> later. I

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread John Drescher
> > It required searching the bacula-users posts to discover > > that I could do "label slots=1-12 pool=scratch barcodes". > > There's no need to label blank tapes. Just "add" the entries to the > appropriate pools, apply matching barcodes and update slots. When bacula > encounters a blank tape whi

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Alan Brown
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Wes Hardaker wrote: > I doubt he's unique. I constantly think to myself "wow, bacula is > really cool; but why isn't it doing that?" So do I - and then usally find out I've set it up wrong, or that users are doing stupid things (like "chown -R /path/to/directory/") which re

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Alan Brown
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Shon Stephens wrote: > For instance, the full abilities of the commands aren't well > documented. They're there, just that you do have to read the entire manual BEFORE starting to set it up. groking why it does things is 3/4 of the effort. once you umderstand the philosoph

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Sean Cardus
> >> Bacula is incredibly complex to setup. Its taken 4 months and > >> its still not working correctly. > > DL> You are unique. > > I doubt he's unique. I constantly think to myself "wow, bacula is > really cool; but why isn't it doing that?" > > The configuration is complex to set up (but wit

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread David Gardner
IM: dgardner09 "Everything is a learning experience, even a mistake." - Original Message From: Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: bacula-users Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 8:02:57 AM Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] All the prob

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Flak Magnet
My experiences differ vastly from yours. I have found Bacula to be extremely flexible, approachable and robust. There is a fair bit of complexity in making sure everything works together properly but IMO it is neither disfunctional nor unnecessarily complex. What complexity does exist is nece

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Robert LeBlanc
On 11/21/07 7:11 AM, "Foo Bar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > all set up (I can't get BAT to compile for example, hopefully the Debian > stable package will be updated soon). > Debian stable will never get the new version until Lenny is released as stable. I've used the testing and sid packages

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Robert LeBlanc
On 11/21/07 9:02 AM, "Wes Hardaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Final word: I love bacula and wouldn't switch away from it if I had a > choice. But I'm still on the learning curve, and it isn't small. But > very very worth it. Thanks again! I've seen Bacula as an enterprise level product.

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Wes Hardaker
> "DL" == Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Bacula is incredibly complex to setup. Its taken 4 months and its >> still not working correctly. DL> You are unique. I doubt he's unique. I constantly think to myself "wow, bacula is really cool; but why isn't it doing that?" The confi

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Janco van der Merwe
Guys, Sorry, but - there must be a but - I deal with this sort of people everyday and it has come to a point where being nice and keeping quite is not a solutions anymore. Ok, I do understand that Bacula can be difficult some times but that is why this list is theream I wrong? I also have h

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread DAve
Janco van der Merwe wrote: > Shon, > > If it took you four months to figure out how Bacula works maybe you > shouldn't be allowed near any computer! Everyone is entitled to their opinion, including me. However, continued belittling of Bacula, Bacula developers, Bacula users, the Bacula disenchant

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 21.11.2007 15:43,, Janco van der Merwe wrote:: > Shon, > > If it took you four months to figure out how Bacula works maybe you > shouldn't be allowed near any computer! Janco, calm down please! Even if you or others don't agree with Shon don't resort to name-calling! Bacula as a whole - an

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Shon Stephens
Like I said its a rant. Probably a poor choice to post, but I've really been having some inexplicable problems lately and kirk'd out something bad this morning. Setting up Bacula to test certain things went relatively smoothly. Its been setting it up for production that has presented its biggest ch

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Janco van der Merwe
Shon, If it took you four months to figure out how Bacula works maybe you shouldn't be allowed near any computer! There are ways and means to do things in Bacula and let me tell you this if you couldn't do it or find a way you are really incompetent and again should be allowed to operate a PC. I

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Shon Stephens
Like I said its a rant. Probably a poor choice to post, but I've really been having some inexplicable problems lately and kirk'd out something bad this morning. Setting up Bacula to test certain things went relatively smoothly. Its been setting it up for production that has presented its biggest ch

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Foo Bar
--- John Drescher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have mostly problems with documentation and the learning curve, which > is > > especially going to be a problem for those that will use it once I get > it > > all set up (I can't get BAT to compile for example, hopefully the > Debian > > stable p

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread John Drescher
> I have mostly problems with documentation and the learning curve, which is > especially going to be a problem for those that will use it once I get it > all set up (I can't get BAT to compile for example, hopefully the Debian > stable package will be updated soon). > BAT is a very recent addition

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread John Drescher
> > > > Basically I can't see that its useable for anything more than backing > > up a single system, and even then better be careful. > > > I backup 50+ computers over gigabit network with the director, > database and storage on different machines. Actually I have several > bacula-sd machines beca

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Foo Bar
--- Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 21 Nov 2007 at 8:07, Shon Stephens wrote: > > > Ok. This is a rant and you can remove it from the list if you want to > > later. I just have to vent. > > > > Bacula is incredibly complex to setup. Its taken 4 months and its > > still not working

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread John Drescher
> Ok. This is a rant and you can remove it from the list if you want to > later. I just have to vent. > > Bacula is incredibly complex to setup. Its taken 4 months and its > still not working correctly. > > If you would have asked questions about the problems you were experiencing we would have hel

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Ludovic Strappazon
Shon Stephens a écrit : > Ok. This is a rant and you can remove it from the list if you want to > later. I just have to vent. > > Bacula is incredibly complex to setup. Its taken 4 months and its > still not working correctly. > > Things that should be easy that Bacula makes overly complex: > > Lab

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 21.11.2007 14:07,, Shon Stephens wrote:: > Ok. This is a rant and you can remove it from the list if you want to > later. I just have to vent. I don't think your mail will be removed as that's rather difficult with a mailing list :-) > Bacula is incredibly complex to setup. Its taken 4 mont

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Dan Langille
On 21 Nov 2007 at 8:07, Shon Stephens wrote: > Ok. This is a rant and you can remove it from the list if you want to > later. I just have to vent. > > Bacula is incredibly complex to setup. Its taken 4 months and its > still not working correctly. You are unique. > Things that should be easy th