I've thought about it but never got it organized. There are numerous
administrative issues, such as: who is the legal entity that will
contract with the colo provider? what do you as a co-op do when a member
can't pay? Who will spend the several hours every month forever
consolidating the fund
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 12:46 -0400, Ian Darwin wrote:
> > Full Rack30A 110V AC Power
> A 1U server would cost $2199/n. If n=48, that's $45/month, which seems
> quite good
> I'm sure there are other issues to consider...
What you've not factored in is power and cooling.
A typical 1U server cons
Great idea.
I will occupy 1u right away with a strong desire to go with 5U in next 3
months. Is anyone else in?
Only looking for quality providers though.
-Bruce
> Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 12:23:35 -0400
> From: sajm...@gmail.com
> To: biz@taug.ca
> Subject: [biz] Idea about Shared Co
Definitely on that. We use the APC in-row cooling at 151 Front.
-Original Message-
From: John Lange [mailto:j...@johnlange.ca]
Sent: May 6, 2009 1:37 PM
To: biz@taug.ca
Subject: Re: [biz] Idea about Shared Co-Location
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 12:46 -0400, Ian Darwin wrote:
> >
I have to agree with Ian on this one. The TAUG is not a business entity and has
no legal standing.
Therefore, we (whoever that might be) could'nt sign any contracts on behalf of
TAUG because we don't
in the legal sence exist. Sorry to be such a kill-joy but that's the way it is.
PS If you want s
n ajmeri
> Cc: biz@taug.ca
> Subject: Re: [biz] Idea about Shared Co-Location
>
> I've thought about it but never got it organized. There are numerous
> administrative issues, such as: who is the legal entity that will
> contract with the colo provider? what do you as
setup a conference call for those who may be interested in
pursuing this further.
Regards,
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Apache [mailto:apa...@tsx3.computeradvocacy.com] On Behalf Of Henry
L.Coleman
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 1:52 PM
To: biz@taug.ca
Subject: Re: [biz] Idea about Shar
On Wed, 6 May 2009, saurin ajmeri wrote:
I have pricing from one of the colo provider which is
Full Rack30A 110V AC Power
Remote Switch PDU
100 Mbps Dedicated Unlimited Unmetered Bandwidth
$2199/month
People might be interested in Cernio, a co-op ISP that is about to move into
151 Front St, a
> in pursuing this further.
>
> Regards,
> Bill
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Apache [mailto:apa...@tsx3.computeradvocacy.com] On Behalf Of Henry
> L.Coleman
> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 1:52 PM
> To: biz@taug.ca
> Subject: Re: [biz] Idea about Share
carriers, or direct
> peering with their ISP.
> >
> > It might be best to setup a conference call for those who may be
> interested in pursuing this further.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bill
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Apache [mailto:apa...
result of either direct peering with those carriers, or direct
> peering with their ISP.
>>>> It might be best to setup a conference call for those who may be
> interested in pursuing this further.
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Bill
>>>>
>>>
ay, May 06, 2009 6:23 PM
To: saurin ajmeri
Cc: biz@taug.ca
Subject: Re: [biz] Idea about Shared Co-Location
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I would have to find out where they got their cabinets made. They are quite
nice!
I'm currently co-locating with Beanfield Technologi
hought... :)
-Bruce
> Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:38:55 -0400
> From: sajm...@gmail.com
> To: t...@communicatefreely.net
> CC: biz@taug.ca
> Subject: Re: [biz] Idea about Shared Co-Location
>
> I've thought about it but never got it organized. There are numerous
> admini
On Wed, 6 May 2009, Bruce N wrote:
Does it even have to be an established co-op? If 40 people from this list want
to even sign up for 1U each then we can take that offer and sign 40 good deals
right there for every 1U without any administrative costs and overhead or
headache to any of us. No
No - I think that he's saying that the "We all pick one person" means that
we all choose the same hosting provider, who has a business that provides
all the protections against liability, and knows how to price the service to
take into account the churn of customers, etc...
I think the co-op is on
On Wed, 6 May 2009, Erik Turk wrote:
I think the co-op is one method of providing the desired service. Another way
is for us to
say to existing providers - hey, we have 40 people who want this type of
service - what
Then you are just 40 individuals. With your own bandwidth constrains, withou
.com; biz@taug.ca
> Subject: Re: [biz] Idea about Shared Co-Location
>
> On Wed, 6 May 2009, Erik Turk wrote:
>
> > I think the co-op is one method of providing the desired service. Another
> > way is for us to
> > say to existing providers - hey, we have 40 peopl
ike what you mentioned never
> happen and still you get a better rate than going in individually.
>
>
>
> Again, just a thought.
>
>
>
> -Bruce
>
> > Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 22:34:23 -0400
> > From: p...@xelerance.com
> > To: er...@bbn.ca
> > CC: het..
elerance.com; er...@bbn.ca; biz@taug.ca
> Subject: Re: [biz] Idea about Shared Co-Location
>
> So is this a go or no go? I'd be interested in placing a box or two out
> there if we can make something work.
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:35 AM, Bruce N wrote:
>
>
cated servers
> even if required.
>
>
>
> -Bruce
>
> > Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 16:26:21 -0400
> > From: skooby...@gmail.com
> > To: het...@hotmail.com
> > CC: p...@xelerance.com; er...@bbn.ca; biz@taug.ca
> > Subject: Re: [biz] Idea about Shared Co-Location
g for co-location, shared, dedicated hosting?
-Bruce
> From: boying...@gmail.com
> Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 22:18:14 -0400
> Subject: Re: [biz] Idea about Shared Co-Location
> To: het...@hotmail.com
> CC: skooby...@gmail.com; p...@xelerance.com; er...
Bruce
> > From: boying...@gmail.com
> > Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 22:18:14 -0400
> > Subject: Re: [biz] Idea about Shared Co-Location
> > To: het...@hotmail.com
> > CC: skooby...@gmail.com; p...@xelerance.com; er...@bbn.ca; biz@taug.ca;
> k.ma...@aqua
hotmail.com
>
>
> Anyone else looking for co-location, shared, dedicated hosting?
> -Bruce
> > From: boying...@gmail.com
> > Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 22:18:14 -0400
> > Subject: Re: [biz] Idea about Shared Co-Location
> &g
hosting?
> -Bruce
> > From: boying...@gmail.com
> > Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 22:18:14 -0400
> > Subject: Re: [biz] Idea about Shared Co-Location
> > To: het...@hotmail.com
> > CC: skooby...@gmail.com; p...@xelerance.com; er...@bbn.ca; bi
to see this happening really quick. I think you should add
> your name even if you are looking for Dedicated hosting rather than
> co-location because we can even get aggregated co-lo + dedicated servers
> even if required.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
&
z@taug.ca; k.ma...@aquariustel.com
> Subject: Re: [biz] Idea about Shared Co-Location
>
> Oh, I thought I had replied to this.
> I'm also looking for a home for one HP DL380.
>
> I'd be in for 2Us
>
> Regards,
> Alex Kink
>
> On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Bruce N wrote:
Levy
> Date: Tue, May 12, 2009 at 12:38 AM
> Subject: Re: [biz] Idea about Shared Co-Location
> To: Dave Donovan
>
>
> Put me on as well... I already host there but I'd consider moving .We have
> one server, and we are putting 1 more in this summer.
>
>
Hi Guys,
Seems like we got two more people on the list now.
te...@..1urusslevy@...1uboying...@..1usajmeri@1U
k.ma...@1u skooby...@..1u br...@..1u
alex.k...@..2u jag_bas...@.6uIf we partner up with Jag
Forwarded for Graham, since he is not on the list and his reply bounced.
Paul
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 12:30:07 -0700
From: Graham Freeman
Cc: saurin ajmeri , biz@taug.ca
To: Paul Wouters
Subject: Re: [biz] Idea about Shared Co-Location
On 06 May 09, at
Count me in also 1-2u
Sent from my iPhone
On May 14, 2009, at 10:31 PM, Bruce N wrote:
Hi Guys,
Seems like we got two more people on the list now.
te...@..1urusslevy@...1uboying...@..
1usajm...@1u k.ma...@1u skooby...@..
1U br...
t; , "",
"", "", "",
""
Sent on : 05/14/2009 10:45:19 PM
Subject : [biz] Re: [on-asterisk] RE: [biz] Idea about Shared Co-Location
Count me in also 1-2u
Sent from my iPhone
On May 14, 2009, at 10:31 PM, Bruce N wrote:
>
> Hi Gu
il.com; sajm...@gmail.com; te...@octothorp.org;
> russl...@gmail.com
> From: who...@harmac.com
> Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 23:28:40 -0400
> Subject: RE: [biz] Re: [on-asterisk] RE: [biz] Idea about Shared Co-Location
>
>
>
>
>
> What are we looking at for price (clos
a; boying...@gmail.com;
> skooby...@gmail.com; er...@bbn.ca; k.ma...@aquariustel.com;
> alexk...@gmail.com; jag_bas...@hotmail.com; sajm...@gmail.com;
> te...@octothorp.org; russl...@gmail.com
> > From: who...@harmac.com
> > Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 23:28:40 -0400
> > Subjec
.com, sajm...@gmail.com,
te...@octothorp.org, russl...@gmail.com
Subject
Re: [on-asterisk] RE: [biz] Re: [on-asterisk] RE: [biz] Idea about Shared
Co-Location
I suppose you can pencil me in for a 1u, once pricing is set I will know
better...
J
From: TianLu
t; alexk...@gmail.com, jag_bas...@hotmail.com, sajm...@gmail.com,
> te...@octothorp.org, russl...@gmail.com
> Subject
> Re: [on-asterisk] RE: [biz] Re: [on-asterisk] RE: [biz] Idea about Shared
> Co-Location
>
>
>
>
> I suppose you can pencil me in for a 1u, once pricing is
otmail.com;
> k.ma...@aquariustel.com; russl...@gmail.com; sajm...@gmail.com;
> skooby...@gmail.com; soar...@gmail.com; stl...@gmail.com; te...@octothorp.org
> From: who...@harmac.com
> Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 08:26:01 -0400
> Subject: [biz] Re: [on-asterisk] RE: [biz] Re: [on-asterisk] RE: [biz
l.com;
te...@octothorp.org
Subject: RE: [biz] Re: [on-asterisk] RE: [biz] Re: [on-asterisk] RE: [biz] Idea
about Shared Co-Location
Good Evening,
I feel like I am spamming the list now :) Sorry! Seems like there is quite
enough interest for co-location here. I am listing people once agai
37 matches
Mail list logo
