Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> Em 31-07-2013 05:01, David B. escreveu:
>> The mandb command should be:
>>
>> mandb -c /opt/jdk/man
>>
>> rather than:
>>
>> mandb -c /opt/OpenJDK/man
>>
>
> This is my mistake. I had noticed before, but forgot to include in the
> discussions with Bruce.
OK, I'll fix
Em 31-07-2013 05:01, David B. escreveu:
> The mandb command should be:
>
> mandb -c /opt/jdk/man
>
> rather than:
>
> mandb -c /opt/OpenJDK/man
>
This is my mistake. I had noticed before, but forgot to include in the
discussions with Bruce.
--
[]s,
Fernando
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/ma
The mandb command should be:
mandb -c /opt/jdk/man
rather than:
mandb -c /opt/OpenJDK/man
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 03:38:35PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>
> Thanks, ĸen.
>
> For gnucash, the patch provided by Armin was and is responsible for it
> to work. His support was decisive for Andy to reconsider putting it back
> to the book. Believe this patch was Armin's first contribu
Em 11-07-2013 22:15, DJ Lucas escreveu:
>
> Run Firefox from a terminal and see if this is the save writ as this one:
> http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1495
>
> --DJ
>
Of course. I was so impacted by the problem, I forgot the most basic
procedures.
Thanks, DJ.
--
[]s,
Em 11-07-2013 20:14, Ken Moffat escreveu:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 05:52:05PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> Instructions in BLFS for OpenJDK were very robust. Originally, by DJ, I
>> think last update was from Bruce, cannot remember if Armin or Ken
>> touched it.
>>
>
> Not me - I've nev
DJ Lucas wrote:
>Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>>Instructions in BLFS for OpenJDK were very robust. Originally, by DJ,
>I
>>think last update was from Bruce, cannot remember if Armin or Ken
>>touched it.
>>
>>Unfortunately, since icedtea-2.4.0, problems started.
>>
>>First, the icedtea-2.4.0-ad
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>Instructions in BLFS for OpenJDK were very robust. Originally, by DJ, I
>think last update was from Bruce, cannot remember if Armin or Ken
>touched it.
>
>Unfortunately, since icedtea-2.4.0, problems started.
>
>For all versions, I have been using book's patches, just
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 05:52:05PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> Instructions in BLFS for OpenJDK were very robust. Originally, by DJ, I
> think last update was from Bruce, cannot remember if Armin or Ken
> touched it.
>
Not me - I've never used it. The reason the versions are so far
beh
Em 11-07-2013 18:04, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
...
>> For all versions, I have been using book's patches, just renaming
>> according to the icedtea's version.
>>
>> icedtea-2.4.0-add_cacerts-1.patch was first to finally fail a
>> chunk (hope this sentence is written in a
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> Instructions in BLFS for OpenJDK were very robust. Originally, by DJ, I
> think last update was from Bruce, cannot remember if Armin or Ken
> touched it.
>
> Unfortunately, since icedtea-2.4.0, problems started.
>
> For all versions, I have been using book's patches, j
Instructions in BLFS for OpenJDK were very robust. Originally, by DJ, I
think last update was from Bruce, cannot remember if Armin or Ken
touched it.
Unfortunately, since icedtea-2.4.0, problems started.
For all versions, I have been using book's patches, just renaming
according to the icedtea's
Le 15/03/2013 01:25, DJ Lucas a écrit :
> On 03/13/2013 05:02 AM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
>>
>> You can add gcc, tested on both 64 bit and 32 bit.
>>
>> I also built openjdk starting from the gcj jvm, using upstream ant and
>> ecj binaries.
>>
>> If anybody is interested, I can share the instruction
Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Only to report a bug. In openJDK instructions, the book says this command:
>
> export PATH="PATH:/opt/OpenJDK-1.7.0.9-bin/bin
>
> It should say:
>
> export PATH="$PATH:/opt/OpenJDK-1.7.0.9-bin/bin
OK, thanks. Fixed in revision 10941.
-- Bruce
--
http://
Hi,
Only to report a bug. In openJDK instructions, the book says this command:
export PATH="PATH:/opt/OpenJDK-1.7.0.9-bin/bin
It should say:
export PATH="$PATH:/opt/OpenJDK-1.7.0.9-bin/bin
Otherwise, ln, ls, etc don't work anymore unsil logout and login.
Regards,
JPM
--
http://linuxfromscra
On 10/19/2012 05:54 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> Previous attachment had a line out of order and with a typo.
>>
>> []s,
>> Fernando
> Thanks. That's helpful. Right now I'm running tests, but that takes
> quite a while.
>
> I think we should change the book to do a 'make
Before replying below, sorry for the long lines.
Only now remembered to reformat.
--- Em sex, 19/10/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
> De: Bruce Dubbs
> Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK-1.7.0.9 (was: iced tea)
> Para: "BLFS Development List"
> Data: Sexta-feira, 19 de Outubro de
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> Previous attachment had a line out of order and with a typo.
>
> []s,
> Fernando
Thanks. That's helpful. Right now I'm running tests, but that takes
quite a while.
I think we should change the book to do a 'make download' to get the aux
files. I also think the pa
Previous attachment had a line out of order and with a typo.
[]s,
Fernando
OpenJDK-1.7.0.7-to-1.7.0.9-some-differences-2012.10.19.log
Description: Binary data
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above in
Hi, Bruce,
No tests run, but package installs again, just changing the instructions in the
book about the packages that will be automatically download.
Patches applied with some displacements.
Installed also IcedTea-Web-1.3
# java -version
java version "1.7.0_09-blfs"
OpenJDK Runtime Environme
On 06/08/2012 01:21 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I was able to build and test openjdk. The results are OK, but I'm
> disappointed in the number of issues that are not addressed upstream.
>
> I used:
>
> #!/bin/bash
>
> export DISPLAY=:20
> Xvfb :20 -screen 0 1x1x24 -ac&
> echo $!> Xvfb.pid
> make jt
On 06/11/2012 01:49 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> On 08-06-2012 03:21, Bruce Dubbs wrote:> I was able to build and test
>> openjdk. The results are OK, but I'm
>>> disappointed in the number of issues that are not addressed upstream.
>>>
>>> I used:
>>>
>>> #!/bin/bash
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> On 08-06-2012 03:21, Bruce Dubbs wrote:> I was able to build and test
> openjdk. The results are OK, but I'm
>> disappointed in the number of issues that are not addressed upstream.
>>
>> I used:
>>
>> #!/bin/bash
>>
>> export DISPLAY=:20
>> Xvfb :20 -screen 0 1x1x2
On 08-06-2012 03:21, Bruce Dubbs wrote:> I was able to build and test openjdk.
The results are OK, but I'm
> disappointed in the number of issues that are not addressed upstream.
>
> I used:
>
> #!/bin/bash
>
> export DISPLAY=:20
> Xvfb :20 -screen 0 1x1x24 -ac&
> echo $!> Xvfb.pid
> make jt
I was able to build and test openjdk. The results are OK, but I'm
disappointed in the number of issues that are not addressed upstream.
I used:
#!/bin/bash
export DISPLAY=:20
Xvfb :20 -screen 0 1x1x24 -ac&
echo $!> Xvfb.pid
make jtregcheck -k 2>jdktest-errs |tee jdktest
kill -9 `cat Xvfb.pid`
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> DJ,
>> The book calls for icedtea-2.2-generate_cacerts-1.patch, but it's
>> missing. Should it be icedtea-2.2-add_cacerts-1.patch?
>
> Another problem.
>
> The instructions say:
>
> "begin by extracting the IcedTea package and changing into the extr
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> DJ,
> The book calls for icedtea-2.2-generate_cacerts-1.patch, but it's
> missing. Should it be icedtea-2.2-add_cacerts-1.patch?
Another problem.
The instructions say:
"begin by extracting the IcedTea package and changing into the extracted
directory."
tar -xf icedtea
DJ,
The book calls for icedtea-2.2-generate_cacerts-1.patch, but it's
missing. Should it be icedtea-2.2-add_cacerts-1.patch?
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 06/06/2012 11:09 AM, DJ Lucas wrote:
>On 06/02/2012 09:32 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
>> Okay, so digging into the test results on the new OpenJDK/IcedTea, the
>> following jdk test failures can be ignored while testing on icedtea-2.2:
>>
>> Just append the following to icedtea-2.2/test/jtreg/exclud
On 06/02/2012 09:32 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
> Okay, so digging into the test results on the new OpenJDK/IcedTea, the
> following jdk test failures can be ignored while testing on icedtea-2.2:
>
> Just append the following to icedtea-2.2/test/jtreg/excludelist.jdk.jtx
> to actually skip the tests
>
Thank you for your reply, DJ.
On 04-06-2012 16:43, DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 06/04/2012 01:15 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> 1.7 is not a supported Java bytecode version!
> Looks like this has been fixed upstream, but may require a backport.
> When was the current version of LibreOffice released?
On 06/04/2012 01:15 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> 1.7 is not a supported Java bytecode version!
Looks like this has been fixed upstream, but may require a backport.
When was the current version of LibreOffice released? You can try to get
rid of the bytecode check in configure.ac, and then do
I forgot to mention that building libreoffice-3.5.4.2, I discovered that
./autogen.sh fails with OpenJDK (this or previous version) and IcedTea-
Web-2.1, when --with-java switch is passed.
Tail of log (with previous OJDK, but similar with current):
checking the installed JDK... checked (JDK 1.7.0
On 03-06-2012 00:20, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> DJ Lucas wrote:
>
>> I'll try and get an i686 build done on Monday or Tuesday (and book
>> updated at that time).
>
> Thanks for your hard work on this DJ. I think it's the most difficult
> single section of the book. It's certainly the most significa
DJ Lucas wrote:
> I'll try and get an i686 build done on Monday or Tuesday (and book
> updated at that time).
Thanks for your hard work on this DJ. I think it's the most difficult
single section of the book. It's certainly the most significant
outstanding ticket.
-- Bruce
--
http://linu
Okay, so digging into the test results on the new OpenJDK/IcedTea, the
following jdk test failures can be ignored while testing on icedtea-2.2:
Just append the following to icedtea-2.2/test/jtreg/excludelist.jdk.jtx
to actually skip the tests
On 17-05-2012 23:28, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> I hope to be able to start java sometime later tomorrow.
>
>-- Bruce
>
>
FWIW, I remembered another use I have for java: the yearly federal tax
income adjustment declaration (Declaração de Ajuste Anual de Imposto de
Renda) here is made using one
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> Have no clue, without xscreensaver, tests are still bad, only one failure
> less:
>
> $ grep "Test results"
> /home/fernando/Downloads/blfs/OpenJDK-1.7.0.3-2012.05.17.log
> Test results: passed: 144
> Test results: passed: 3,647; failed: 448; error: 10
> Test resul
/14/2012 10:38 AM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>>>>>> --- Em seg, 14/5/12, DJ Lucas escreveu:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> De: DJ Lucas
>>>>>>> Assunto: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK downloads
>>>>>>> Para: "BLFS Development
t;> --- Em seg, 14/5/12, DJ Lucas escreveu:
>>>>>
>>>>>> De: DJ Lucas
>>>>>> Assunto: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK downloads
>>>>>> Para: "BLFS Development List"
>>>>>> Data: Segunda-feira, 14 de Maio de 2012, 2:16
>>
On 17-05-2012 04:11, DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 05/16/2012 08:22 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> On 14-05-2012 20:26, DJ Lucas wrote:
>>> On 05/14/2012 10:38 AM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>>>> --- Em seg, 14/5/12, DJ Lucas escreveu:
>>>>
>>&g
On 05/16/2012 10:52 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> On 16-05-2012 22:22, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> On 14-05-2012 20:26, DJ Lucas wrote:
>>> On 05/14/2012 10:38 AM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>>>> --- Em seg, 14/5/12, DJ Lucas escreveu:
>>>>
&
On 05/16/2012 08:22 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> On 14-05-2012 20:26, DJ Lucas wrote:
>> On 05/14/2012 10:38 AM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>>> --- Em seg, 14/5/12, DJ Lucas escreveu:
>>>
>>>> De: DJ Lucas
>>>> Assunto: [blfs-dev]
On 16-05-2012 22:22, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> On 14-05-2012 20:26, DJ Lucas wrote:
>> On 05/14/2012 10:38 AM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>>> --- Em seg, 14/5/12, DJ Lucas escreveu:
>>>
>>>> De: DJ Lucas
>>>> Assunto: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK dow
On 14-05-2012 20:26, DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 05/14/2012 10:38 AM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> --- Em seg, 14/5/12, DJ Lucas escreveu:
>>
>>> De: DJ Lucas
>>> Assunto: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK downloads
>>> Para: "BLFS Development List"
>>> Da
Pierre Labastie wrote:
>Le 15/05/2012 01:26, DJ Lucas a écrit :
>>
>> Okay, well this is gonna be ugly compared to typical book
>instructions,
>> but: x86_64 production bin file is in place. It no longer includes
>> IcedTea-Web. I have not built on i686 yet. Help would be appreciated
>> here, but
Le 15/05/2012 01:26, DJ Lucas a écrit :
>
> Okay, well this is gonna be ugly compared to typical book instructions,
> but: x86_64 production bin file is in place. It no longer includes
> IcedTea-Web. I have not built on i686 yet. Help would be appreciated
> here, but I'll get to it in a few days if
On 14-05-2012 20:26, DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 05/14/2012 10:38 AM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> --- Em seg, 14/5/12, DJ Lucas escreveu:
>>
>>> De: DJ Lucas
>>> Assunto: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK downloads
>>> Para: "BLFS Development List"
>>>
On 5/14/12, DJ Lucas wrote:
> Heh, no I'd shoot myself if subjected to it for too long. Just meeting
> the most minimal requirements for a Java rebuild, and for that, a decent
> WM was not high prioritybut will be in about 10 minutes. That's
> still 190 packages in (-LFS packages included but
On 05/14/2012 07:21 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 06:26:56PM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote:
>
>> I suspect a
>> number of them are related to running in twm (windows not automatically
>> anchored in awt tests).
>>
> I know we include twm for a minimal build of xorg, but I didn't
> think
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 06:26:56PM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote:
> I suspect a
> number of them are related to running in twm (windows not automatically
> anchored in awt tests).
>
I know we include twm for a minimal build of xorg, but I didn't
think anybody used it for a completed system. Obviously
On 05/14/2012 10:38 AM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> --- Em seg, 14/5/12, DJ Lucas escreveu:
>
>> De: DJ Lucas
>> Assunto: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK downloads
>> Para: "BLFS Development List"
>> Data: Segunda-feira, 14 de Maio de 2012, 2:16
>> I'm get
--- Em seg, 14/5/12, DJ Lucas escreveu:
> De: DJ Lucas
> Assunto: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK downloads
> Para: "BLFS Development List"
> Data: Segunda-feira, 14 de Maio de 2012, 2:16
> I'm getting prepared to commit
> OpenJDK (IcedTea-2.1) to the book,
> however, I
DJ Lucas wrote:
> I'm getting prepared to commit OpenJDK (IcedTea-2.1) to the book,
> however, I wanted to ask for opinions on how to do the downloads. The
> IcedTea tarball only contains the build environment. The makefile will
> download the needed files as part of the build process (alternate
>On Mon, 14 May 2012 00:16:33 -0500
>DJ Lucas wrote:
>
> I'm getting prepared to commit OpenJDK (IcedTea-2.1) to the book,
> however, I wanted to ask for opinions on how to do the downloads. The
> IcedTea tarball only contains the build environment. The makefile
> will download the needed files
I'm getting prepared to commit OpenJDK (IcedTea-2.1) to the book,
however, I wanted to ask for opinions on how to do the downloads. The
IcedTea tarball only contains the build environment. The makefile will
download the needed files as part of the build process (alternately you
can use the "dow
56 matches
Mail list logo
