Re: OpenOffice 2.1 Final Part

2006-12-27 Thread Stef Bon
Stef Bon wrote: > Hello, > > at this moment it's compiling. It looks good so far. > > > Till soon I hope... after this build. It's still compiling. I think it > started at 14.00, it's now 18.45. > > Stef Bon > > > yesterday it was finis

Re: OpenOffice 2.1 Final Part

2006-12-23 Thread Stef Bon
m... (I'v got openldap installed and firefox without ldap; Futher kde and java) If erverything goes ok I'll report. And not I'll report also. Till soon I hope... after this build. It's still compiling. I think it started at 14.00, it's now 18.45. Stef Bon -- http://li

Re: Problems with glib-2.10.3.

2006-07-16 Thread Stef Bon
Wilco Beekhuizen wrote: > > Did you use "--enable-fast-malloc=full" when configuring any kde packages? > This switch in combination with glib>=2.9. gives gslice errors. I did use this flag, but found the sollution you're suggesting earlier on the web. After recompiling kdelibs-3.5.3 without thi

Problems with glib-2.10.3.

2006-07-16 Thread Stef Bon
, and relink all symlinks to this version in the /usr/lib directory. Anybody having the same trouble? Stef Bon -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: More gtk+ woes

2006-07-16 Thread Stef Bon
ouble with this downgrading. So I had to install them again. So, look in the config.log file for the exact reason. Stef Bon The Netherlands > > Arnie > > -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: kdm setup

2006-06-30 Thread Stef Bon
Dan Nicholson wrote: > On 6/29/06, Dale Ogilvie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't use kdm, but we should probably have info on this in the book. > The hint seems more complicated than necessary (no offense, Stef). > I'm not familiar with kdm, but it's pretty simple to wrap the session > with d

Re: libdrm and nvidia videocard

2006-06-28 Thread Stef Bon
Dan Nicholson wrote: > On 6/28/06, Vladimir A. Pavlov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> First, thanks for the hint, I'll give it a try. But I have a few >> questions. >> >> On, Wednesday 28 June 2006 10:19 Stef Bon wrote: >> > You'll have to in

Re: libdrm and nvidia videocard

2006-06-27 Thread Stef Bon
Dan Nicholson wrote: > If you do install both, beware > that there will be duplicate files at /usr/lib/libGL.* and > /usr/include/GL/*. > > Also, if you ever want to install Xgl, it needs Mesa around. And if > you ever use a non-NVIDIA card, you'll need Mesa. I've installed X 7.0/7.1 and use the

Re: Problem with NVidia GL libraries

2006-05-24 Thread Stef Bon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Architecture: x86_64 > Any help? Which NVIDIA drivers. 7174, 8756, 8762? Stef Bon > > Michael Uleysky > -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: About kde.sh and qt.h.

2006-01-17 Thread Stef Bon
e environment variable QTDIR needs to be set (when building packages that depend on qt). You have to do this via a dedicated file qt.sh in /etc/profile.d. Stef Bon -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: About kde.sh and qt.h.

2006-01-15 Thread Stef Bon
Ken Moffat wrote: >> > Wrong list ? Suggesting that something should be in the book probably > belongs on blfs-dev. Wrong list? Could be, maybe blfs.devel then? Stef -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe:

About kde.sh and qt.h.

2006-01-14 Thread Stef Bon
Hello, some time ago I wrote an article about scripts qt.sh and kde.sh in de /etc/profile.d directory No reply. I'm curious why? Not interesting? Missed it? Forgot it? Any reaction is good. Stef Bon -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ:

Use of kde.sh and qt.sh in /etc/profile.d.

2006-01-04 Thread Stef Bon
Hello, I'm using KDE-3.5 and QT-3.3.4, installed in /opt/kde-3.5 and /opt/qt-3.3.4 resp: /opt/kde -> kde-3.5 /opt/kde-3.5 /opt/qt -> qt-3.3.4 /opt/qt-3.3.4 In the /etc/ld.so.conf file I've added the lines /opt/qt/lib and /opt/kde/lib. Now to set the paths right, I've created the files: /etc/p

Re: JDK-1.5.0 Build Fails

2006-01-04 Thread Stef Bon
Alessandro wrote: > Alle 21:05, domenica 1 gennaio 2006, Dan McGhee ha scritto: >> I'm trying to build JDK-1.5.0_05 using SVN. I just build LFS 6.1 on my >> laptop and have gcc-3.4.3 installed. The build fails with a series of >> messages containing the phrase "does not give a valid preprocessin

Re: Problem installing jdk-1.5.0.

2005-12-28 Thread Stef Bon
Stef Bon wrote: > > I've gcc-3.4.3, and follow the instructions to install jdk-1.5.0. > Everytime I get the same error after trying a few times: > after some time (approx 1.5/2 hours make halts) I can add this: reading the patch jdk-1.0.5-xorg-6.8.1-1.patch it says that Xo

Re: OO2 and ldap compiling errors

2005-12-01 Thread Stef Bon
> But I don't think I have any ldap support in firefox ? I installed all > and only the required softwares ... > > I have found no way to disable this ldap support in OO2, should I install > it ? What you want. If Firefox is found, the OO configure script assumes you want the ldapheaders from fir

Re: Still problems compiling OpenOffice 2.0

2005-11-26 Thread Stef Bon
Hurray DJ Lucas wrote: >> >> Thanks a lot, it's building again and vcl is passed already!!! >> > > Great! Let us know how it works out. :-) > The build has finished! Hurray!! Stef Bon Voorburg The Netherlands -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman

Re: Still problems compiling OpenOffice 2.0

2005-11-25 Thread Stef Bon
ing 0.17 or > 0.18? This patch _should_ fix you right up I believe. Be sure to do an > 'rm -rf vcl/unxlngi6.pro' before patching and the build should continue. You're right. I have pkg-config 0.17.2. I have the patch for this, but simply forgot to apply it. (I've two

Still problems compiling OpenOffice 2.0

2005-11-24 Thread Stef Bon
it's the compiler. Before compiling openoffice I've installed gcc-3.4.3. So I'm compiling OO with gcc version 3.4.3. Before I had gcc-3.4.1, and compiled gdk and gtk with it. Can somebody help me with it. Stef Bon Voorburg the Netherlands -- http://linuxfroms

Re: Compiling OpenOffice without gcc-4.*?

2005-11-19 Thread Stef Bon
On Sunday 13 November 2005 23:09, Stef Bon wrote: > > When looking for the file > > InvalidAuthenticationMechanismException.idl > > it isn't there in my source tree. > > I've searched the Internet, and did not found anything. > > Anybody seen this befor

Re: Compiling OpenOffice without gcc-4.*?

2005-11-13 Thread Stef Bon
ource tree. I've searched the Internet, and did not found anything. Anybody seen this before? Stef Bon > > -- DJ Lucas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: During Xorg

2005-11-13 Thread Stef Bon
On Sunday 13 November 2005 17:06, Ali Servet Donmez wrote: > Hi, > > ### Information ### > > I'm following blfs-book-6.1 after than LFS-BOOK-6.1. > > I'm on "Chapter 25. X Window System Environment" > > "Xorg-6.8.2". > > To get rid of the dependencies i've installed: > > - FreeType-2.1.10 > - Expat

Re: Compiling OpenOffice without gcc-4.*?

2005-11-12 Thread Stef Bon
> > Good to hear. I'll make a note in the hint then. Just to clarify, this > was done with gcc-3.4.3 (LFS-6.1), correct? > > -- DJ Lucas Can I install gcc-3.4.3 on my LFS/BLFS 6.0 system? I've gcc-3.4.1 as native compiler. Can I install the gcc-3.4.3 as the native compiler without problems. I

Compiling OpenOffice without gcc-4.*?

2005-11-09 Thread Stef Bon
Hello, I see that one of the patches to compile OO 2.0 has to do with gcc version 4. I do not have gcc 4 on my computer(LFS 6.0) , but I do have j2sdk 1.5.0, compiled with another compiler (gcc-3.4.3). Can I compile OO 2 right away or do I need I patch for my native compiler (gcc-3.4.1)? Stef

Re: NVIDIA driver and kernel >= 2.6.13.

2005-10-30 Thread Stef Bon
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > > Which version of udev? > My version of udev is 0.63. Stef Bon -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

NVIDIA driver and kernel >= 2.6.13.

2005-10-29 Thread Stef Bon
vidia /sbin/modprobe --ignore-install nvidia \ && /usr/X11R6/lib/nvidia/makedevices.sh to /etc/modprobe.conf and mkdir /usr/X11R6/lib/nvidia cp makedevices.sh /usr/X11R6/lib/nvidia Now it works fine! (I choose the /usr/X11R6/lib directory to create a subdir nvidia, looks a good place

Re: Problem with CUPS

2005-09-13 Thread Stef Bon
rting of the job, I get: Error: > client-error-not-possible. > I tried lpr File.txt but I get the same thing. > Where is this problem from and what can I do to solve it? Thanks for > your help. In my case a tmp directory has to exist in /var/spool/cups. Is it there. This happened to me,

Re: NOTIC TO WHOEVER KEEPS SENDING PAYPAL LETTERS

2005-06-07 Thread Stef Bon
; The right way to deal with them is to get the spam filter on the LFS > lists fixed. Just searching for 'Dear Paypal' or Dear Ebay' will do > most of it. > > R. Hi, Why not install CLAMAV with CLAMSMTP? All phishing mail will get intercepted. Stef Bon -- http://linu

Re: bootscripts for BLFS.

2005-05-25 Thread Stef Bon
Andrew Benton wrote: > Stef Bon wrote: >> Hello, >> >> in the development of LFS the bootscripts are enhanced. The bootscripts >> for BLFS are not compatible anymore with LFS-bootscripts-3.2.1. > > How are they not compatible? > >> The version the l

bootscripts for BLFS.

2005-05-25 Thread Stef Bon
Hello, in the development of LFS the bootscripts are enhanced. The bootscripts for BLFS are not compatible anymore with LFS-bootscripts-3.2.1. The version the latest BLFS-bootscripts are compatible with are the LFS-bootscripts-2.2.1. Could the latest BLFS bootscripts be used with the latest LFS b

Re: Nvidia drivers for Gnome 2.10, X 6.8.2, Kernel 2.6.11.6

2005-04-22 Thread Stef Bon
Steve Brown wrote: >> After I ran the NVIDIA-BLAH-BLAH-7174-BLAH-BLAH.run >> that I downloaded from their site, it removed the old drivers that >> were installed, built the new interface for my kernel, and loaded the >> new drivers. Actually, I ran modprobe nvidia to get the module loaded, >> and

Re: 1 a day sexual health dynamo

2005-04-22 Thread Stef Bon
Richard Snow wrote: > > What this has to do with linux from scratch? :) This is spam. Don't pay attention. Stef Bon -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: Iptables and linux-libc-headers-2.6.11

2005-03-15 Thread Stef Bon
Andrew Benton wrote: > Stef Bon wrote: >> Well a solution is to make a directory /usr/src/linux/include, >> which is a real directory, not a symlink to somewhere. >> >> Now put in here the symbolic links asm and linux which are pointing to >> /usr/linux/include

Re: Iptables and linux-libc-headers-2.6.11

2005-03-15 Thread Stef Bon
Andrew Benton wrote: > Stef Bon wrote: >> Well a solution is to make a directory /usr/src/linux/include, >> which is a real directory, not a symlink to somewhere. >> >> Now put in here the symbolic links asm and linux which are pointing to >> /usr/linux/include

Re: Iptables and linux-libc-headers-2.6.11

2005-03-15 Thread Stef Bon
ion is to make a directory /usr/src/linux/include, which is a real directory, not a symlink to somewhere. Now put in here the symbolic links asm and linux which are pointing to /usr/linux/include/asm and /usr/linux/include/linux (in that order). (these links are pointing to an ab

Re: Samba slow to start on boot

2005-03-08 Thread Stef Bon
t to ldapserver. Two things went wrong: - the ldap password was not stored yet with smbpasswd -w secret - the ldap server did not startup at all hope that helps Stef Bon -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page