On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 08:47:20PM -0500, John D. Giorgis wrote:
> I am deeply and personally offended that you would describe opponents
> of gay marriage as calling for a, quote, "massacre" of homosexuals.
Uh oh, JDG's offended. I feel more censorship attempts coming on...
--
Erik Reuter ht
Kevin Tarr asked
> G. D., were you out of the country for a while? What's going on there? I
> saw some bizarre images on TV about the SK government, yet it was only
> covered once on PBS news hour. Asking what you can add or clarify.
-
As a matter of f
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 09:22:59PM -0500, John D. Giorgis wrote:
> Not just continuously. But gratuitously. (cf Erik Reuter's response
> to one of my posts this weekend.)
And if I said I am offended by talk of people being offended by certain
character sequences? Would you stop your whining?
-
Julia Thompson wrote:
> Trying to think of something that T&A would hurt, and I'm drawing a
> blank right now.
---
Apparently, just a little "T" hurt the eyes and senses of good taste of
thousands of Superbowl halftime viewers.
George A
Matt Grimaldi wrote:
>
> The very first episode (aired on Showtime) had full frontal nudity.
>
> How's that for T&A?
>
> -- Matt
>
> not that I mind... ;-)
--
THAT was a good episode ;-)
George A
Gary Nunn wrote:
>
> > and yes more T&A in Stargate would be nice, perhaps good old
> > RDA hooking up with some sweet alien loving like kirk... I
> > mean was their a alien Kirk didnt do?
> > -Nick Lidster
>
> If memory serves, the producers DID throw some T&A into SG-1 a few years
> ago when th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 3/15/2004 8:31:53 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > Is there some real consideration that planetoid will officially be
> > considered a planet, or was it just newspaper cluelessness?
> >
> > -bryon
> >
> >
>
> In the f
Matthew and Julie Bos wrote:
>
> On 3/16/04 8:12 PM, "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Now you know why the leading causes of teen pregnancy are bathrooms
> > and open windows, and why younger neoconservatives resemble older
> > progressives. Its also why Ann Coulter is so mean.
"Ronn!Blankenship" wrote:
>
> At 02:27 PM 3/16/04, Julia Thompson wrote:
> >"Ronn!Blankenship" wrote:
> > >
> > > At 10:53 PM 3/15/04, Robert Seeberger wrote:
> > >
> > > >- Original Message -
> > > >From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROT
On 3/16/04 8:12 PM, "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now you know why the leading causes of teen pregnancy are bathrooms
> and open windows, and why younger neoconservatives resemble older
> progressives. Its also why Ann Coulter is so mean. If you had to get a
> full wax every othe
At 02:27 PM 3/16/04, Julia Thompson wrote:
"Ronn!Blankenship" wrote:
>
> At 10:53 PM 3/15/04, Robert Seeberger wrote:
>
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 10:09 PM
> >Subjec
At 04:23 PM 3/16/04, Deborah Harrell wrote:
Example: Last week somebody trolled big-time; while I
ignored it on-line (as did 'most everyone, except for
a few noting "troll!"), I *thought* "What a remarkable
case of cranio-rectal dystocia!" ;}
That's a new one to me. I've heard "intussception"
"Ronn!Blankenship" wrote:
>
> At 11:34 PM 3/15/04, Robert Seeberger wrote:
>
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Ronn!Blankenship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 11:13 PM
> >Subject: Re: DEFENDERS OF THE SANCTITY OF MARR
At 11:34 PM 3/15/04, Robert Seeberger wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Ronn!Blankenship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 11:13 PM
Subject: Re: DEFENDERS OF THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE
>
>
> Mmmpfh, mmpfh, MFFPH!
>
Gee Ronn,
In a message dated 3/16/2004 9:23:33 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Trying to think of something that T&A would hurt, and I'm drawing a
> blank right now.
>
> Julia
>
I'm trying to think of why it takes a steak on Sunday
Vilyehm Teighlore
__
"G. D. Akin" wrote:
> I had heard about Atlantis being geared to a younger audience. I supposed
> that means dumbed down science and more explosions and faster MALFs (is it
> MALF??). Of course T&A hardly ever HURTS anything . . .
What does MALF stand for, anyway?
Trying to think of something
>With the number of posts to read in the last couple of days, I'm surprised
>anyone finds the time to post. I can't... Make that couldn't.
>
>Regards, Ray.
>
>253 to go.
LOL, 363 Race ya :-)
Dee
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/br
- Original Message -
From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 9:08 PM
Subject: Re: Abstinence education Re: Liberal Talkradio Network To
LaunchMarch 31
> At 02:50 PM 3/16/2004 -0800 Deborah Harrell wrote:
>
First a very poor statement, to get it out of my head: There are a few
hundred million people who do think the world has gone to hell, and it
started 1400 years ago. Maybe you've seen their work?
I'm not claiming the world is going to hell since there is no such place.
If our society doesn't re
Media Type: book
Title: Leigh Hunt
Author: Thompson, James R.
Condition: Good. No dust jacket. Ex-Library. Full X-lib.
marks, little or no evidence of circulation.
Twayne's English authors series; TEAS 210. Unknown
printing. 176 p
At 02:50 PM 3/16/2004 -0800 Deborah Harrell wrote:
>> First, the is no a priori religious connection to
>> abstinence. There are a
>> number of very sound reasons for strongly advising
>> high school students - and younger, to not have sex.
>
>As I have clearly advocated in various posts. But
>t
At 09:36 PM 3/16/2004, you wrote:
http://www.click2houston.com/entertainment/2925553/detail.html
rob
Plus all the middle eastern/Muslim countries that want to show the movie?
Iran, Egypt, Syria, Lebanon. Saudi Arabia is dropping it's ban against
images that show a Prophet* so the movie can
G. D., were you out of the country for a while? What's going on there? I
saw some bizarre images on TV about the SK government, yet it was only
covered once on PBS news hour. Asking what you can add or clarify.
Kevin T. - VRWC
Too lazy to find on my own
__
At 06:34 PM 3/16/2004 + Alberto Monteiro wrote:
>And it's also ironic that in the USA you made a lot of jokes with
>frenchpeople, and those that chickened were the so-called macho
>spanish :-)
I think you're right, Alberto the French clearly must have felt that
they were being outdone, be
At 10:57 AM 3/16/2004 -0600 Horn, John wrote:
>The issue here in many people's minds is given what we've learned
>about the intelligence, folks don't think that Bush "believed it to
>be true". That it was a convenient story to get what he wanted.
My, how far have we come from four years ago whe
A new poll suggests fears that "The Passion of the Christ" would
trigger anti-Semitism were unwarranted.
A nationwide survey conducted for the Institute for Jewish and
Community Research finds that 83 percent of Americans familiar with
the film say it's made them neither more nor less likely to bla
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/17/business/17oil.html?ei=5062&en=94bee42c92ab9276&ex=1080104400&partner=GOOGLE&pagewanted=print&position=
http://tinyurl.com/ywqal
The Justice Department has opened an inquiry into whether executives
at the Royal Dutch/Shell Group violated any laws by failing to t
http://www.click2houston.com/entertainment/2925553/detail.html
A new poll suggests fears that "The Passion of the Christ" would
trigger anti-Semitism were unwarranted.
A nationwide survey conducted for the Institute for Jewish and
Community Research finds that 83 percent of Americans familiar wit
At 03:11 PM 3/16/2004 -0330 Travis Edmunds wrote:
>However true that may be Doug, it still does not downplay in the least, the
>fact that SOME people find swearing offensive. And if SOME people do find
>swearing offensive (combined with swearing generally being frowned upon on
>this list) then f
At 10:29 AM 3/16/2004 -0800 Gautam Mukunda wrote:
> John Kerry
>claimed that all Republicans - and from the context
>it's clear that he was talking about Republicans in
>general - were crooks.
Actually, my reading of the context was worse than that to me Kerry was
strongly implying that Bush
Jim Burton wrote:
>
> On Mar 15, 2004, at 4:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > BTW anyone see the Enterprise Season Final? Enterprise is getting its
> > ass
> > kicked... Very cool.
> >
>
> My local station decided to pull it for the current season, the
> bastards!
>
> Is Enterprise
Jan Coffey
> Can explain why. T&A has allways been a big part of Sci-Fi and Sci-Fi
> fandom.
>
> So much so, that furrism is a direct offshoot of sci-fi fandom.
>
> There was a lot more skin back in the STOS days. Kirk was getting
> some way more often that Archer. Even Picard and Rieker were gett
Steve Sloan II wrote:
>The Fool wrote a particular word every paragraph:
>> FUCK
>> FUCK
>>
>I've heard claims that men think of sex every x-number
>of seconds. Is this proof? ;-)
Well, *I've* heard that the more one talks about it, the less one is
getting it. Which is this actually proof of?
Gary Nunn wrote:
> I also fear that the original series will go downhill, especially with
> Richard Dean Anderson's role being greatly diminished. I read an article
> a few months ago that said Richard Dean Anderson would still be on the
> series, but in a greatly diminished role so that he could
Gary Nunn wrote:
>
> As much as I hate to interrupt all of the love that is flowing back and
> forth on this list, I was wondering if anyone has been following
> Stargate?
>
> You gotta love the conversation they had about the Simpson's. :-)
>
> I am not quite sure where they are going with this
> because African-Americans can play in the major
>leagues and vote and hold office in the deep South and marry anyone
>they want?
Actually, they cannot.
They cannot marry someone of the same sex - especially not in the deep
South. ;-)
> The arguments being made now against same-sex marriag
At 10:59 AM 3/16/2004 -0600 Horn, John wrote:
>> From: John D. Giorgis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Indeed, I believe that even the US Supreme Court found that
>> he was required
>> to testify. Or do you perhaps believe that the President
>> should make his
>> own interpretation of the laws
At 08:49 AM 3/16/2004 -0800 Gautam Mukunda wrote:
> I want a
>cite on Bush's ads, since I don't think he's ran any
>that say that, and I generally know what his ads say -
>and it should be a better cite than Salon Magazine.
According to ABC's The Note, Bush's first campaign ads were just released
Some of the people who made those predictions are now very unhappy
with the culture they live in.
Big deal. Do YOU think the world has gone to hell because Jews aren't
discriminated against, because African-Americans can play in the major
leagues and vote and hold office in the deep South and m
- Original Message -
From: "Deborah Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: Emulation (was: Federal Marriage Amendment)
> > Robert Seeberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > From: "Deborah Harrell"
>
> From: Deborah Harrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > it still does not downplay in the least, the
> > fact that SOME people find swearing offensive...
>
> I find the use of common swear-words unimaginative and
> quite unimpressive...and a couple _are_ offensive to
> me, such that I simply delet
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "The Fool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Tom Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The world is not going to go to hell (unless, like that woman
quoted
> above, you think it already will). The world did not go to hell
when
> they stopped discriminating against Jews, it
> From: Travis Edmunds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> whatsoever. Which is not true. As you might know, the bombings
themselves
> may have started a dangerous new trend in terrorism. Namely,
influencing
> the politics of whole countries. And the potential ramifications
of that
> are grim indeed. Not
Dan Minette wrote:
>
> I've taught sex education courses that included the following.
>
And this is a falsehood.
> "The only way to be 100% sure of not catching a STD is abstinence. Having
> sex only with a single long term partner that you know did not have an STD
> is the next most effective.
- Original Message -
From: "Deborah Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: Abstinence education Re: Liberal Talkradio Network To Launch
March 31
> [Of course, _incorrect_ use of condoms fails not onl
From: Tom Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The world is not going to go to hell (unless, like that woman quoted
above, you think it already will). The world did not go to hell when
they stopped discriminating against Jews, it did not go to hell when
slavery was abolished, it did not go to hell when
> > Deborah, how do you feel about Abstinence being
> > included in sex ed as an _equal option_?
>
> I thought I made that clear
Sorry, I was off email for 10 days and came back to 23k [sic] emails ^_^
> Off To Ride A Pony Now Maru ;D
No fair!
--
Off To Label Sketches Of 14th Century Itali
> "Miller, Jeffrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Deborah Harrell
> > As I have clearly advocated in various posts [teen
abstinence from sex]. But
> > there certainly _is_ a connection to *abstinence
> only*
> > programs -- which are the ones I referred to.
> I don't think there /has/
The state of Oregon has begun to recognize and authorize legal same-sex
marriages. (Oregon law does not define marriage as between a man and a
woman, saying only that it is restricted to men and women over 17. A
judge ruled that meant the state could not refuse to recognize same-sex
marriag
In a message dated 3/16/2004 3:58:56 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >Or is Adirondak terrestrial but poisonous?
>
> Or even worse off that Horst. Or they DID start a colonies on both
> Adirondak
> and Horst but dropped Adirondak in negotiations with the GIM. Or ...
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Horn, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Kevin Tarr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > http://www.bcaplan.com/cgi/purity.cgi
> >
46.
But if asked "why," I doubt I would have so high.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailma
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Deborah Harrell
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 02:50 PM
> To: Killer Bs Discussion
> Subject: Re: Abstinence education Re: Liberal Talkradio
> Network To LaunchMarch 31
>
>
> > "John D. Giorgis" <
> Robert Seeberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: "Deborah Harrell"
> > Democrats 'sex-crazed pantywaists.' :P
> Shouldn't the "sex crazed" have their panties 'round
> their knees? At the least?
Ro-BER-er-ert!
Now that's taking snippage too far! You've given some
brand-new brineller th
On Tuesday 2004-03-16 11:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The quotes from GU2 have internal problems.
>
> > GU2: page 135
> >
> > When it was determined that the ecosphere would collapse without
> > intervention, the Institute decided to turn Horst over to a new tenant.
> > The next race in
> >
> "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 02:09 PM 3/12/2004 -0800 Deborah Harrell wrote:
> >I am likewise incensed that *my* tax dollars go to
> >fund abstinence-only programs (which in MN at least
> >have failed to prevent teen pregnancy - see my post
> >on the ENABL report), and faith
> 6. Why does every culture SG-1 encounters speak English?
Yeah, I chuckle about it, too, but let it slide. I like how Farscape handled it, but
there just some practical limitations to the format. *shrug*
> One other minor nit I have with the show is the iris. Inbound teams
> certainly have
> Travis Edmunds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it still does not downplay in the least, the
> fact that SOME people find swearing offensive...
I find the use of common swear-words unimaginative and
quite unimpressive...and a couple _are_ offensive to
me, such that I simply deleted several posts
From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DEFENDERS OF THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 23:09:24 -0500
2) !!!BILL CLINTON WAS IMPEACHED FOR PERJURY, NOT
ADULTERY!!
- Original Message -
From: "Travis Edmunds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 3:45 PM
Subject: Re: Stargate SG-1
>
> >From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PR
Travis Edmunds wrote:
>
> It is sad really that Spain has bent under pressure. Like the subject line
> says: "Terrorists WIN..." And that's the team I was hoping would lose.
>
And it's also ironic that in the USA you made a lot of jokes with
frenchpeople, and those that chickened were the so-calle
Dan Minette wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ronn!Blankenship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 11:15 PM
> Subject: Re: New Pentagon Papers Author
>
> > At 11:02 PM 3/15/04, Dan Minette wrote:
> >
> > >Let me make
"Ronn!Blankenship" wrote:
>
> At 10:53 PM 3/15/04, Robert Seeberger wrote:
>
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 10:09 PM
> >Subject: Re: DEFENDERS OF THE SANCTITY OF MARRI
Edward Luttwak, an opponent of the Iraq war and an
accomplished scholar of international security, wrote
in the New York Times today on what happened in Spain.
It's worth reading.
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/16/opinion/16LUTT.html
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
h
--- Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, he was criticizing Daschle's comments that were
> critical of Bush last
> summer.
Then he was wrong to do so.
>
> So, let me get this straight, you would actually
> suggest that Daschle
> should be thrown out of the Senate and then
> convicted on t
- Original Message -
From: "Gautam Mukunda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: New Pentagon Papers Author
> --- Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The head of the RNCC equated the actions of the
>
--- Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The head of the RNCC equated the actions of the
> Democrats with treason.
> The word "treason" wasn't used, but "giving aid and
> comfort to the enemy"
> is close enough to "or in adhering to their Enemies,
> giving them Aid and
> Comfort" in my book.
>
From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Stargate SG-1
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 13:39:55 -0500
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 02:39:37PM -0330, Nick Lidster wrote:
> to me a more plauseable explinatio
From: Doug Pensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Terrorists Win in Spain
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 22:34:32 -0800
John wrote:
It is worth noting the a majority of the world's industrialized
democrac
I just came across this article in EETimes - it's pretty interesting if
you're curious for more details about what the exact problem was that
crippled the Mars Spirit rover, what kind of software/hardware it runs on,
or how they figured the problem out.
(Yeah, this was an article from Feb 23rd,
The quotes from GU2 have internal problems.
> GU2: page 135
>
> When it was determined that the ecosphere would collapse without
> intervention, the Institute decided to turn Horst over to a new tenant. The
> next race in
> line was Humanity, which wasn't in a position to look a gift hors
From: "ritu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Killer Bs Discussion'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Terrorists Win in Spain
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 20:32:06 +0530
Travis Edmunds wrote:
> It is sad really that Spain has bent under pressure. Like the
> s
- Original Message -
From: "Gautam Mukunda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: New Pentagon Papers Author
> --- Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > All I am arguing for is the proposition that bot
From: Doug Pensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Call for administrative action
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 23:25:29 -0800
Nick wrote:
I'm not suggesting that this will put this issue to rest,
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 02:39:37PM -0330, Nick Lidster wrote:
> to me a more plauseable explination would be that it signals back a
> green or red for go or no go.
No, that only works going back to the iris stargate. They go through a
lot of stargates other than the home one, and they don't alway
At 10:31 AM 16/03/04 +0530, you wrote:
Mike Lee wrote:
> > Let's say, Kerry wins the US
> > Presidential elections. He is going to dramatically alter the
> > US response to terrorism. Would that too count as a win for
> Al-Qaeda?
>
> They'll think it is.
They as in AQ?
I am not so sure of that. I
--- Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All I am arguing for is the proposition that both
> Democrats and Republicans
> have been irresponsible in overstating how evil
> their rivals are. You seem
> to be arguing that only Democrats have been.
>
> Dan M.
No, I'm arguing that Democrats have
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: Stargate SG-1
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 08:01:21AM -0500, Gary Nunn wrote:
>
> > One other minor nit I have with the show is the
Robert Seeberger wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 10:09 PM
Subject: Re: DEFENDERS OF THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE
A big giant THANK YOU to Robert Seeburger for posting the fl
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 08:01:21AM -0500, Gary Nunn wrote:
> One other minor nit I have with the show is the iris. Inbound teams
> certainly have a great deal of faith that someone at the base didn't
> fall asleep at the switch. I mean, if I were going through that gate
> and knew that there was a
- Original Message -
From: "Gautam Mukunda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 7:19 AM
Subject: Re: New Pentagon Papers Author
> --- Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Technically, probably not. But, do you think whe
> From: John D. Giorgis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Indeed, I believe that even the US Supreme Court found that
> he was required
> to testify. Or do you perhaps believe that the President
> should make his
> own interpretation of the laws independent of the judiciary?
IIRC, the SC's decisi
> From: John D. Giorgis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >He lied to Congress while performing a constitutional duty
> (State of
> >the Union address).
>
> It isn't a lie if you believe it to be true
The issue here in many people's minds is given what we've learned
about the intelligence,
> From: Gautam Mukunda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> In fact, I believe that Baghdad will be renamed George
> Bush City next week, if my secret memo from the Vast
> Right-Wing Conspiracy is correct.
>
> I believe that my personal profit-sharing as a junior
> member of the VRWC from the oil revenu
--- Doug Pensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You most certainly can. Bush's first campaign ad
> (last fall) said:
> "people are attacking the president for attacking
> the terrorists."
> directly calling into question the patriotism of
> people that oppose the
> invasion of Iraq. And how
At 09:07 PM 3/15/2004, you wrote:
On Mar 15, 2004, at 4:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
BTW anyone see the Enterprise Season Final? Enterprise is getting its ass
kicked... Very cool.
My local station decided to pull it for the current season, the bastards!
Is Enterprise being carried on
...and does an interview:
http://tinyurl.com/2me3y
(NY Times
"I think they had a set mind," Mr. Blix said on NBC's "Today" show as he
began a 10-day American book tour in the week marking the first year
anniversary of the United States-led invasion.
"They wanted to come to the conclusion that t
Gautam wrote:
No, I'm sure Doug didn't know.
No I didn't know. If she is an anti-Semite, then I'm sorry I posted the
article and will view articles from Salon with skepticism in the future.
Salon is defending her here:
http://www.salon.com/letters/editor/2004/03/15/smear/
"Kwiatkowski's rig
At 11:26 PM 3/15/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 3/15/2004 8:31:53 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Is there some real consideration that planetoid will officially be
> considered a planet, or was it just newspaper cluelessness?
>
> -bryon
>
>
In the full ar
Kevin Tarr wrote:
>
> http://www.bcaplan.com/cgi/purity.cgi
>
> I had 40.
>
> Kevin T. - VRWC
> Failed again
>
14. Many of the questions were just a bit too
strongly worded to get a 'yes' vote.
-- Matt
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo
"Horn, John" wrote:
>
> > From: Julia Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Then there's the trick where you remove your underwear
> > without removing
> > the shorts you're wearing over them. If you're not wearing
> underwear,
> > you can't do that trick. :)
>
> I've seen that one with a
- Original Message -
From: "Ronn!Blankenship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 11:15 PM
Subject: Re: New Pentagon Papers Author
> At 11:02 PM 3/15/04, Dan Minette wrote:
>
> >Let me make a suggestion for those of us on both
> and yes more T&A in Stargate would be nice, perhaps good old
> RDA hooking up with some sweet alien loving like kirk... I
> mean was their a alien Kirk didnt do?
> -Nick Lidster
If memory serves, the producers DID throw some T&A into SG-1 a few years
ago when the introduced Vanessa Angel as
- Original Message -
From: "Ronn!Blankenship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 11:13 PM
Subject: Re: DEFENDERS OF THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE
>
>
> Mmmpfh, mmpfh, MFFPH!
>
Gee Ronn, I didn't know you cared!
xponent
If Y
--- Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Technically, probably not. But, do you think when
> Republican leaders
> accuse the Democrats of giving "aid and comfort to
> the enemy" it is only
> because they are going against the wishes of Bush?
>
> Dan M.
Technically? That's a pretty big diffe
John wrote:
It is worth noting the a majority of the world's industrialized
democracies supported us in Iraq.
It's also worthy of noting that most of the _people_ in those nations did
not support us in Iraq, including the people of Spain. It's also worthy
of noting that some of the countries w
Nick wrote:
I'm not suggesting that this will put this issue to rest, but I think
it's a good first response to list-unrest.
It's like the swear words that people find offensive; the bigger the deal
you make of them, the bigger the deal they actually are.
--
Doug
Off to the high desert for a fe
At 11:41 PM 3/15/2004 -0500 Tom Beck wrote:
>> Did he do it under oath in a court of law?
>
>He lied to Congress while performing a constitutional duty (State of
>the Union address).
It isn't a lie if you believe it to be true and British Intelligence
*stiil* stands by that report.
And sur
From: "Jim Sharkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Humor: REM meets LotR
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 21:02:34 -0500 (EST)
Got pointed to this on theonering.net, and I thought it was pretty clever.
http://greenbooks.theonering.net/m
--- Tom Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just like defenders of Bush try to point out that
> Clinton was also a
> draft-dodger. Perhaps, but Clinton didn't go around
> posing like a macho
> idiot or lie to the American people in order to
> launch an aggressive
> war of conquest.
In fact, I
Travis Edmunds wrote:
> It is sad really that Spain has bent under pressure. Like the
> subject line
> says: "Terrorists WIN..."
Juan Cole's latest entry rebuts this charge rather comprehensively:
http://www.juancole.com/2004_03_01_juancole_archive.html#107942407001890
750
Professor Cole als
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
