[bug #65152] Documentation on format of netboot grub.cfg file name with MAC address is incorrect

URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65152> Summary: Documentation on format of netboot grub.cfg file name with MAC address is incorrect Group: GNU GRUB Submitter: zinga Submitted: Fri 12 Jan 2024 02:02:17

Possible Multiboot2 documentation error

Good afternoon, The possible error can be found in section 3.6.12 of https://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/multiboot2/multiboot.html In the framebuffer tag of the Multiboot2 information structure, the reserved space listed between frambuffer_type and color_info is listed as "u8". However, in

[bug #63832] Links in documentation invlaid

URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?63832> Summary: Links in documentation invlaid Group: GNU GRUB Submitter: moody Submitted: Fri 24 Feb 2023 10:02:56 AM UTC Category: Documentation Se

[bug #62456] grub-install documentation is truncated or too succint

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #62456 (project grub): This bug is still present in grub2 version 2.06-2ubuntu12 from 'Ubuntu 22.10 Kinetic Kudu Beta' ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #62456] grub-install documentation is truncated or too succint

URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?62456> Summary: grub-install documentation is truncated or too succint Project: GNU GRUB Submitted by: eurbah Submitted on: Sat 14 May 2022 12:43:20 AM UTC Category: Documen

[bug #62004] Documentation not up-to-date

URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?62004> Summary: Documentation not up-to-date Project: GNU GRUB Submitted by: hxppdv Submitted on: Mon 07 Feb 2022 07:29:36 PM UTC Category: Documentation Se

[bug #58934] No documentation on grub scripting syntax

URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?58934> Summary: No documentation on grub scripting syntax Project: GNU GRUB Submitted by: g10 Submitted on: Mon 10 Aug 2020 09:40:43 PM UTC Category: Documen

[PATCH] Correct documentation devicetree subsection title

Noticed reading the manual -- cheers vicente From b9b57d1e58ca61fa5f48d1b29b45f3ed053e7fe9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vicente Jimenez Aguilar Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 10:36:01 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Correct documentation devicetree subsection title Signed-off-by: Vicente Jimenez Aguilar

[bug #52625] Unclear grub-install documentation

URL: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?52625> Summary: Unclear grub-install documentation Project: GNU GRUB Submitted by: saltyhorse Submitted on: Fri 08 Dec 2017 12:25:50 PM UTC Category: Documen

[bug #51656] Typo in parttool documentation

Update of bug #51656 (project grub): Status:None => Fixed Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #1: Fixed, thanks.

[bug #51656] Typo in parttool documentation

URL: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?51656> Summary: Typo in parttool documentation Project: GNU GRUB Submitted by: saltyhorse Submitted on: Fri 04 Aug 2017 10:21:33 AM UTC Category: Documentation Se

[bug #51085] grub-mkstandalone documentation is incomplete

URL: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?51085> Summary: grub-mkstandalone documentation is incomplete Project: GNU GRUB Submitted by: lseki Submitted on: Mon 22 May 2017 02:30:48 PM UTC Category: Documen

[bug #49290] Add commands with cli only documentation to the main documentation

Update of bug #49290 (project grub): Severity: Major => Ordinary ___ Follow-up Comment #1: Unless you intend it as tracking bug - patches are welcome. No need to collect everything, you can

[bug #49290] Add commands with cli only documentation to the main documentation

Update of bug #49290 (project grub): Priority: 5 - Normal => 3 - Low Planned Release:None => 2.03+ ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #49290] Add commands with cli only documentation to the main documentation

URL: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?49290> Summary: Add commands with cli only documentation to the main documentation Project: GNU GRUB Submitted by: iankelling Submitted on: Fri 07 Oct 2016 03:02:37 AM GMT Ca

[bug #38140] Inaccurate documentation for Xen CMDLINE options

Update of bug #38140 (project grub): Status:None = Fixed Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #38140] Inaccurate documentation for Xen CMDLINE options

URL: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?38140 Summary: Inaccurate documentation for Xen CMDLINE options Project: GNU GRUB Submitted by: gigatux Submitted on: Tue 22 Jan 2013 08:41:01 GMT Category: Documentation

missing documentation for the source command

Hi, I just wanted to point out that the source command in grub2 isn't documented. I found this command very helpful, so I think it should be. Cheers Matthias ___ Bug-grub mailing list Bug-grub@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub

documentation compressed twice

Just noticed that http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grub.html.gz appears to be compressed twice. Take care, -- steve ___ Bug-grub mailing list Bug-grub@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub

[bug #32886] documentation should refer to terminal_input and terminal_output, not terminal

URL: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?32886 Summary: documentation should refer to terminal_input and terminal_output, not terminal Project: GNU GRUB Submitted by: dkg Submitted on: Tue 22 Mar 2011 07:28:12 PM EDT Category

[bug #32886] documentation should refer to terminal_input and terminal_output, not terminal

Additional Item Attachment, bug #32886 (project grub): File name: 32886.patchSize:1 KB ___ Reply to this item at: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?32886 ___ Message sent

[bug #32030] Missing low level installer (or documentation)

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #32030 (project grub): Just add (hd0) /dev/mapper/raid-vmtest to device.map ___ Reply to this item at: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?32030 ___ Message sent

[bug #32030] Missing low level installer (or documentation)

Update of bug #32030 (project grub): Status:None = Fixed Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #2: The documentation

[bug #32030] Missing low level installer (or documentation)

URL: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?32030 Summary: Missing low level installer (or documentation) Project: GNU GRUB Submitted by: hadmut Submitted on: Sun 02 Jan 2011 11:00:12 PM GMT Category: Installation

[bug #29578] No documentation on parttool

___ Follow-up Comment #1: I've committed documentation for the parttool command to 'info grub'. Here's the text: -- Command: parttool partition commands Make various modifications to partition table entries. Each COMMAND is either a boolean option, in which

[bug #29578] No documentation on parttool

URL: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?29578 Summary: No documentation on parttool Project: GNU GRUB Submitted by: colanderman Submitted on: Fri 16 Apr 2010 06:31:36 PM GMT Category: Documentation Severity

GRUB documentation

to suggest that images get installed in /boot/boot . Is this they way it is meant to be ? Thanks, Jeremy Dawson PS I think one of my main difficulties with the GRUB documentation (which could be easily fixed) is that the word install is used for two totally different things, and is often ambiguous

Re: GRUB documentation

this:    # grub-install --root-directory=/boot /dev/hda This would seem to suggest that images get installed in /boot/boot .  Is this they way it is meant to be ? Thanks, Jeremy Dawson PS I think one of my main difficulties with the GRUB documentation (which could be easily fixed) is that the word

[bug #27602] GRUB 2 tries to install documentation without texinfo

URL: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?27602 Summary: GRUB 2 tries to install documentation without texinfo Project: GNU GRUB Submitted by: neo_the_user Submitted on: Mon 05 Oct 2009 06:35:43 AM GMT Category: Installation

[bug #27602] GRUB 2 tries to install documentation without texinfo

Update of bug #27602 (project grub): Assigned to:None = cjwatson Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #1: Fixed, thanks:

[bug #9838] [docs] Documentation spelling fixes

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #9838 (project grub): a bit more then 4 years have now passed since this patch was submitted and with that the report touched. Any plans to apply it or should this report just get lost in the archives? ___ Reply

[bug #9838] [docs] Documentation spelling fixes

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #9838 (project grub): Feel free to do so after reviewwing the patch. Grub legacy is missing maintainer atm and ther is no activity on that side. ___ Reply to this item at: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?9838

[bug #9838] [docs] Documentation spelling fixes

Update of bug #9838 (project grub): Status:None = Fixed Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #4: Commited but I kept

[bug #13335] Documentation: Missing information on getting Grub to work with DDO

Update of bug #13335 (project grub): Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #1: Unfortunately we do not currently have the resources to track down this kind of requests. Please

[bug #3813] lacking info documentation on mkbimage

Update of bug #3813 (project grub): Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #1: mkbimage isn't present in GRUB 2 ___

[bug #9838] [docs] Documentation spelling fixes

Update of bug #9838 (project grub): Summary: Documentation spelling fixes = [docs] Documentation spelling fixes ___ Reply to this item at: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?9838

GRUB documentation error

The Grub info page for the terminal statement says that the --timeout argument is specified in seconds. It is, in fact, minutes. ___ Bug-grub mailing list Bug-grub@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub

Re: After all documentation about grub, yes I need help with multiboot with grub

Web Clark (RR) wrote: To zero the MBR S/N, boot your favorite linux CD and run the following command: dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda bs=1 count=4 seek=440 This of course zeros /dev/hda. For another disk, put /dev/hdb, etc. That's interesting Web Clark (RR). I've recently added the dd

Re: After all documentation about grub, yes I need help with multiboot with grub

adrian15 wrote: Tomislav Vucic wrote: Hello, I found GRUB very helpfull, but I need to do one more thing, but how??? first of all I have 3 OS-s (2 of them are win xp, plz don't ask why, and third is Ubuntu 6.06 as default for booting) Questions: *How to hide one xp partition from another

After all documentation about grub, yes I need help with multiboot with grub

Hello, I found GRUB very helpfull, but I need to do one more thing, but how??? first of all I have 3 OS-s (2 of them are win xp, plz don't ask why, and third is Ubuntu 6.06 as default for booting) Questions: *How to hide one xp partition from another with grub? **Is it possible to do so if I have

Re: After all documentation about grub, yes I need help with multiboot with grub

Tomislav Vucic wrote: Hello, I found GRUB very helpfull, but I need to do one more thing, but how??? first of all I have 3 OS-s (2 of them are win xp, plz don't ask why, and third is Ubuntu 6.06 as default for booting) Questions: *How to hide one xp partition from another with grub? **Is it

bug in documentation, or missing number on section: parameter savedefault

Hello, i wants to trim my grub so that the last OS boots. for this i have modified the config file according to the documentation but it dont works in the usenet nobody can't help me. now it works for me but i think it is not good documentated. there is this part13.3.33 savedefault — Command

documentation typo

Dear bug grub, I realize this is not your preferred way of receiving bugs, but I got a warning on the certificate for the Bug Tracking System. Anyway, this is no big thing. It'll probably just throw off first time users.

Re: documentation typo

Herta Van den Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi Herta, http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/html_node/Installing-GRUB-natively.html tells you to enter grub find /boot/grub/stage1 to find the partition that contains the /boot directory. Looks like a typo to me. This command works

[bug #13335] Documentation: Missing information on getting Grub to work with DDO

URL: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=13335 Summary: Documentation: Missing information on getting Grub to work with DDO Project: GNU GRUB Submitted by: None Submitted on: Wed 06/08/2005 at 09:18

[bug #12245] /etc/mtab dependancy not noted in documentation.

Update of bug #12245 (project grub): Status:None = Wont Fix Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #1: The dependency on

[bug #12245] /etc/mtab dependancy not noted in documentation.

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #12245 (project grub): Beautiful response, just what one expects from a dedicated professional. Diff has a dependency on mtab? Of course mount does, but IT IS DOCUMENTED. I didn't ask for the dependency to be removed, but rather TO BE DOCUMENTED.

[bugs #12245] /etc/mtab dependancy not noted in documentation.

URL: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=12245 Summary: /etc/mtab dependancy not noted in documentation. Project: GNU GRUB Submitted by: None Submitted on: Tue 03/08/2005 at 01:45 Category: Documentation

Grub2 Documentation.

have been looking for this documentation quite a lot, Any link would be much appreciate it, Thaks in advanced, -- John A. Espinal A. Comware S.A. ___ Bug-grub mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub

Re: Grub2 Documentation.

to GRUB2? Sorry, is a very simple question, but I have been looking for this documentation quite a lot, GRUB 2 is a new project that is not yet ready for production use. If you were just looking for GRUB Legacy (which is what most people use) you can use the documentation from `http://www.gnu.org

[bugs #9838] Documentation spelling fixes

by: Ville Skyttä On: Sat 07/31/2004 at 23:09 Category: Documentation Severity: Major Priority: 5 - Normal Item Group: Non-software Error Resolution: None Assigned to: None Originator Name: Originator Email: Status: Open Release: CVS 2004-08-01 Reproducibility: Every Time Planned Release

Re: documentation issue

this isnt a support address but would still at this moment consider it a issue. Steve - Original Message - From: Sergey Matveychuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Steven Hartland [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 9:57 AM Subject: Re: documentation issue Steven

Re: documentation issue

Steven Hartland wrote: The grub examples for FreeBSD don't work. The setup for FreeBSD should instead be something like: root (hd0,2) chainloader +1 As noted here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-February/034664.html You wrong. It's works for 4.x (UFS file

documentation issue

The grub examples for FreeBSD don't work. The setup for FreeBSD should instead be something like: root (hd0,2) chainloader +1 As noted here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-February/034664.html This e.mail is

Re: Minor El Torito documentation edits

On Monday 26 April 2004 19:33, Christian Jones wrote: I've written just a few extra notes in the manual on making a bootable CD-ROM, mostly a few extra words about compatibility and some clarifications on what's optional. Thanks for your contribution. I've applied your patch to the CVS

Re: Minor El Torito documentation edits

Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: As for your problem, I suspect that it might be just because your CDROM drive is assigned to hd31 (0xb1) and GRUB has a problem with dealing with this. So I will try to emulate the same situation using the grub shell, although I have no time at the moment to do this. I

Re: Minor El Torito documentation edits

At Mon, 26 Apr 2004 10:33:30 -0700, Christian Jones wrote: For booting from a CD-ROM, GRUB uses a special Stage 2 called [EMAIL PROTECTED] All you need to have in your bootable CD-ROM -are this @file{stage2_eltorito} and optionally a config file [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only GRUB files you need

Minor El Torito documentation edits

I've written just a few extra notes in the manual on making a bootable CD-ROM, mostly a few extra words about compatibility and some clarifications on what's optional. The only real change is using -boot-load-size 4 instead of -boot-load-size 1. For me, it doesn't break anything (although it

Re: GRUB documentation in Gentoo Handbook

that it was Good. (oo) Sven Vermeulen (__) http://www.gentoo.org Documentation PR pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Bug-grub mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub

Re: GRUB documentation in Gentoo Handbook

On Thursday 08 April 2004 15:14, Sven Vermeulen wrote: Gentoo is installed through a chrooted environment. Why do you use chroot for this? I see no reason. I don't have this error when running grub-install from a live system so I guess it is due to the chroot (sorry, don't have a spare box to

Re: GRUB documentation in Gentoo Handbook

will utilize them to overcome difficulties in installing a boot loader. Hi Okuji, Thanks for the feedback. I'll take a look at the GRUB manual/faq and update the GRUB documentation in our installation instructions to use grub-install rather than the prompt method. I'll also include the links

GRUB documentation in Gentoo Handbook

Hello, [Cc: to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am the official maintainer of GNU GRUB, and I'd like to talk about the handbook on www.gentoo.org. In this page: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1chap=9 you give information on how to make use of GRUB. But I see some important

Documentation

when I didn't use elf. and used a flat binary file. It didn't work when I used elf. This is not a big issue, I can easily work arround it. but it is either poor documentation or not sticking to your own specifications. Grub is good software in all other respects but not adhering to specifications

Problems with grub documentation

Hello I recently installed grub (grub-0.92-7) and I would like to report a problem with the info file. In the section on invoking grub-install it says that you can give: grub-install --grub-shell "grub --read-only" device I tried this and it didn't work. It said that "grub --read-only"

Re: Problems with grub documentation

--- Eric Kvaalen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think that sentence should be gotten rid of in the info file. Why? In your opinion, if a program has a bug, the documentation should be fixed instead of the code? I can't understand. There are also a lot of other things in the info file

Bug or not enough documentation ?

not a bug, but you can add this on your documentation ? (never add a '#' after the password) Thanks -- -- CYBERDECK Solutions de bornes interactives et d'crans d'information

boot floppy documentation question

The docs say: # cd /usr/share/grub/i386-pc # dd if=stage1 of=/dev/fd0 bs=512 count=1 1+0 records in 1+0 records out # dd if=stage2 of=/dev/fd0 bs=512 seek=1 153+1 records in 153+1 records out # Considering the fact that 'stage1' is 512 bytes anyway, wouldn't it be simpler to specify: cat

Documentation problem

Version 0.91 The Configuration section of the manual says: To enable the menu, you need a configuration file, `menu.lst' under the boot directory. We'll analyze an example file. I understood this to mean I could create my file as /boot/menu.lst and it would be picked up. I found it only

GRUB documentation

Hello I was converting the GRUB documentation (version 0.5.96.1) from TEXI format to Windows HLP format for personal use. The makertf program (http://sourceforge.net/projects/makertf/) generated numerous messages which may point to problems in the documentation. The details are listed below

Re: Documentation]

from CVS sounds like the go, probably easier to automate. On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 03:38:22PM -0600, Gordon Matzigkeit wrote: Jason Thomas writes: JT Are we able to add the grub documentation to the website in html JT format and maybe text.gz or text.zip format for people to view or JT

Re: Documentation]

Jason Thomas writes: JT Are we able to add the grub documentation to the website in html JT format and maybe text.gz or text.zip format for people to view or JT download online?? It is possible to do that. The attainable ideal is to automatically regenerate the HTML and others from

Documentation]

Gordon and others, Are we able to add the grub documentation to the website in html format and maybe text.gz or text.zip format for people to view or download online?? This would be helpful for directing people to instructions when there systems are all screwed up and can't access

Re: A tangential plea for documentation

From: Matthias Granberry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: A tangential plea for documentation Date: 24 Feb 2001 04:02:06 -0600 In some of the .S files that ship along with the GRUB (stage1.S in particular), there is a line at the start of the file reading: /* -*-Asm-*- */ I'd bet nearly

Bug#77138: grub: The documentation doesn't describe the way grub counts devices

, and is not adequately explained in the documentation. Bob -- -- System Information Debian Release: woody Kernel Version: Linux bobspc 2.2.14 #1 Fri Apr 7 20:44:23 EDT 2000 i586 unknown Versions of the packages grub depends on: ii libc6 2.1.94-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries

documentation

Hi, The web pages and documentation for grub state that grub supports openbsd. Grub does not support any modern version of openbsd. The lines stating they should should probably be removed to avoid confusion. ___ Bug-grub mailing list [EMAIL

Bug#42273: marked as done (Documentation files removed in update of grub)

-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Documentation files removed in update of grub Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Package: grub Version: 0.5.92 The (very useful) HTML documentation in /usr/doc/grub/docs disappeared

Bug#42242: marked as done (grub: GRUB no longer includes HTML documentation)

by digriz.jon.net with local (Exim 3.02 #1 (Debian)) id 11AaDs-0002FV-00; Sat, 31 Jul 1999 09:34:52 -0500 From: Jon Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: grub: GRUB no longer includes HTML documentation To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.2.2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 09

evolution or revolution (was: Re: documentation question)

Right now I am completely consumed by designing and building infrastructure for GRUB 1.0. If I understand correctly, it means that the current source tree is comdemned to die. If so, it looks like I'm wasting my time in fixing the details (like the docs and user interface issues -- I have a

Re: evolution or revolution (was: Re: documentation question)

From: Alessandro Rubini [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: evolution or revolution (was: Re: documentation question) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2000 08:43:10 +0200 If I understand correctly, it means that the current source tree is comdemned to die. If so, it looks like I'm wasting my time in fixing

Re: evolution or revolution (was: Re: documentation question)

If I understand correctly, it means that the current source tree is comdemned to die. Your understanding is correct, but whether your work (as well as my work) is meaningless depends on your standard of value. I myself don't think I'm wasting time, because: [...] Well, hard features are

Re: evolution or revolution (was: Re: documentation question)

Alessandro Rubini writes: Right now I am completely consumed by designing and building infrastructure for GRUB 1.0. AR If I understand correctly, it means that the current source tree AR is comdemned to die. If so, it looks like I'm wasting my time in AR fixing the details (like the

Re: evolution or revolution (was: Re: documentation question)

AR Or will figure only prvide the low-level library for GRUB, thus AR adding portability without changing much of the program? Exactly. Very good. AR It isn't clear at all whether multi-platform support (or at least AR infrastructure) is planned or not. It is planned. The first

Re: documentation question

OKUJI Yoshinori writes: OY At the moment, I'm the primary programmer and the manual OY writer. Most changes are made by me, and my approvement is mostly OY necessary to apply patches to the CVS, while Gordon has the same OY (or stronger) right theoretically. OY Gordon is the primary

Re: documentation question

One of my objection is the absolutely pc-centric attitude of both documents, which can be smoothed at no cost. [...] I disagree. The mechanism to boot up a computer varies from architecture to architecture very much, so basically any boot loader depends on the system architecture the

Re: documentation question

From: Alessandro Rubini [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: documentation question Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 23:02:15 +0200 For example, most workstations and some personal computers (such as SparcStation and iMac) has a built-in firmware program, while IBM PC has BIOS instead. There's

Re: documentation question

From: Alessandro Rubini [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: documentation question Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2000 00:28:59 +0200 /alessandro, guessing how many developers are currently hacking grub.. Should I answer this? :) I hope so. I'd like to know how my irrelevant stuff is taking time from

documentation question

Hi all. Given the low traffic of this list, I'm throwing in some fuss. While reading the documentation, I found a few bugs of various degrees down to wish-list. While I didn't yet write down my corrections, I'd like to post a patch file to the documentation maintainer, to avoid cluttering

Re: documentation question

From: Alessandro Rubini [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: documentation question Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 16:47:48 +0200 One of my objection is the absolutely pc-centric attitude of both documents, which can be smoothed at no cost. Since I run 10 different platforms, I feel this as a bug: the fact

Hurd and Grub - WWW and Documentation

think we can afford duplicated efforts for some time to come - at least - it would be somewhat wasteful, wouldn't it. Now - what do you think? Any comments? Am I making sense? While I am at it - going through the archives of the HURD mailing lists in order to add to the documentation would be a task

Re: Hurd and Grub - WWW and Documentation

wasteful, wouldn't it. I think what you say is basically right. OTOH, I think that of the current sites about the Hurd, each one can serve a specific purpose without much overlap. While I am at it - going through the archives of the HURD mailing lists in order to add to the documentation would

Re: Hurd and Grub - WWW and Documentation

On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 06:57:10PM +0200, Dirk Ritter wrote: OTOH, I think that of the current sites about the Hurd, each one can serve a specific purpose without much overlap. Let's put it this way - I am all for people who put any kind of effort in something GNU-related but if the

Re: Hurd and Grub - WWW and Documentation

Hi Dirk, From: Dirk Ritter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Hurd and Grub - WWW and Documentation Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 18:57:10 +0200 (CEST) I won't care if there were thousands of people doing something HURDish but that is not the situation we are in. What's worse - the situation we

Re: Hurd and Grub - WWW and Documentation

Hello Marcus Brinkmann! On Tue, 4 July 2000 at 23:02:14, you wrote: Well, I can only say that we all keep in touch with each other, and lack of coordination is only indicating lack of time, not missing agreement or lack of good will. Then the GNU'ed world at large is still in a pretty

Re: Grub documentation non-existent

In addition to the EMACS and TkInfo interfaces pointed out there is another console interface with Lynx like bindings called pinfo (i.e. you can use the arrow keys to traverse links). 0.5.9 is the latest Gnome-help-browser is also capable of viewing info-documents. This question "How the

Re: Grub documentation non-existent

and, of course: kdehelp /usr/info/grub.info.gz or similar, will work nicely under KDE environments. Peter Astrand wrote: In addition to the EMACS and TkInfo interfaces pointed out there is another console interface with Lynx like bindings called pinfo (i.e. you can use the arrow keys

Grub documentation non-existent

, a decent postscript page, or some documentation (sgml would be great) other than this abomination call info that I cannot figure out. The SOB who came up with info needs to be strung up by the family jewels and left to rot. Please publish some decent, usable GRUB documentation or tell me where I can

Re: Grub documentation non-existent

page, GRUB is not simple command executable, so the information how to use GRUB is too long to put in man pages, I think. a decent html page, a decent postscript page, or some documentation (sgml would be great) Have you failed to generate DVI version of info files? suzuki

Re: Grub documentation non-existent

On 4/22/00, David A. Bandel wrote: :Please publish either decent man page, a decent html page, a decent :postscript page, or some documentation (sgml would be great) other than :this abomination call info that I cannot figure out. I've been nicely lurking here for a while, not being

Re: Grub documentation non-existent

fo browser. If it would help you, we try to publish all documentation on the GNU web pages at http://www.gnu.org/manual/. Grub is probably not listed since it's considered alpha software, but I think it would be a good idea to publish the most recent version of the Grub documentation anyway.

Grub documentation non-existent

Hello David A. Bandel! On Sat, 22 April 2000 at 07:26:46, you wrote: The man page is just a little too sparse and points to INFO. That is the correct way if there is a man page at all in addition to the Info documentation. I don't know who the emacs-using moron is that invented info

  1   2   >