Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GK failover call display

What Alex describe is one of the reason that the "+" sign doesn't appear due to the H323 native behavior. Another reason is the GW ios version and the phone load. You may refer to the below link on why proctor lab PSTN can display the "+" sign. http://onlinestudylist.com/archives/ccie_voice/2010-M

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA hairpin @ BR1, call drop if call from HQ or PSTN

to do. > > thanks > -adil > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:27 PM, ShinGei Yong wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> May i know where is your outbound dp for mva#1999? >> What is the purpose of 1998 ? >> >> TIA >> Shingei >> >> >> On Wed, J

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA hairpin @ BR1, call drop if call from HQ or PSTN

Hi, May i know where is your outbound dp for mva#1999? What is the purpose of 1998 ? TIA Shingei On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Adil Shaikh wrote: > Forgot to add that HQ and BR1 phones are sccp. > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Adil Shaikh wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I have configured

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME background with only 2 files

You better to be familiar on how to write the List.xml script without referring to any doc during ur attempt. Not that too difficult, get yourself typing the below stuff 10times per day till the exam. Shingei. On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Chris Green wrote: > Hi All, > > For CME Backgr

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPPM on cisco7961 didn't alert

of hostname (Apparently, I >>> miss that part when I reverted my VMware snapshot), remember I saw this >>> solution from OSL discussion before. >>> >>> HTH >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Alex >>> >>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:2

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPPM on cisco7961 didn't alert

t. =( All other components > are working. > > > On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 12:59 AM, ShinGei Yong wrote: > >> Guys, >> Pls ignore this mail, has managed to figured out the caused. >> >> thanks >> Shingei. >> >> >> On Sat, Dec 25,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME presence - BLF speed dial vs. monitor button

Hi All, Adom provided a useful link indicated that BLF SD didn't work with DND prior to CME 7.1 "In versions earlier than Cisco Unified CME 7.1, BLF monitoring does not provide notification of status changes when a monitored directory number becomes DND-enabled." What i tested today was, i've 2 s

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] DND on UCME SIP Phone

Guys, Facing problem on sip phone DND on UCME. Has configured dnd on individual pool,has enabled "dnd-control" under ephone template, but DND feature still unavailable through Device Configuration >> Call Preference >> DND and of course DND softkey not appear. Mac address is 001E.F728.2C0C Type

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP BR1 registration problem

My Fren, Your PSTN rtr, the isdn port that connected to your BR1 site, "isdn emulate-network" are missing from serial interface 0/1/0:23. regards Shingei On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Ahmed Ellboudy wrote: > Still did not solve it . > > Any idea? > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Ahmed Ellboudy | C

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab 5 Question 4.2 CUE SRST

s Ochieng wrote: > That's why i had wondered what the purpose is. I don't see a way unless you > want to match all PSTN except HQ/BR1 numbers then translate those to go to > VM and let thw HQ/BR1 go through the normal CFB and CFNA > > > On 11 April 2011 09:16, ShinGei Yong wrote:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab 5 Question 4.2 CUE SRST

ecting > number. > > On 11 April 2011 07:47, ShinGei Yong wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm following up the same question that i posted last month, regarding the >> PSTN call diversion >> to BR2 CUE Voicemail during SRST.I was got confuse by the que

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab 5 Question 4.2 CUE SRST

hould meet the requirement. > > > On 8 March 2011 18:05, ShinGei Yong wrote: > >> Hi Rogers, >> >> Yes, and again, as stated below, i'm able to achieved CFB and CFNA during >> SRST, >> so in other words,the required dial-peer and setting to route call

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper + CUBE (WB2 Lab1 4.2)

Hi Alex@ncs, While observing your config,i noticed that you've 3 zone defined under GK, which are UCM,UCME& VIA. If i remember correctly,ur R3 which is ur CME site should registered to UCME instead of zone VIA right? Also, what is your region configuration on that pointed to GK? Thanks Shingei.

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPMA Manager does not get info window

Hi, Has anyone encounter this weird behavior, the IPMA manager icons doesn't appear on the phone display via EM. The same phone is able to display the icons if that ext is configured as "manager". Phone firmware all downloaded from UCM 7.01,and model is 7961G,should not have any compatibility issue

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 4 - Dial plan question

Hi, Another "0" is your outbound PSTN dialing access code.Something like ur HQ and BR1, used 9 as a PSTN access code. Make sense? Thanks Shingei On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Randall Crumm wrote: > HI I was just looking over V2 L4 and have a question > > > > In 2 .3 it says LD calls in Spai

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab 7 Question 3.2 MVA

urces >> in the RDP CSS. But I never said that you need to put that DN in >> PT-INTERNAL, put that in PT-XLATE-MVA and try it out. >> >> Sincerely >> >> *Roger Källberg* >> CCIE #26199 (Voice) >> Consultant >> Cygate AB >> Eric Perssons väg 21,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab 7 Question 3.2 MVA

this without > having an internal partition in the CSS that I applied on RDP. > but then obviously it breaks task 3.1 requierement to show the number: > +447976852817 > > If you find out what the problem is, let us know mate, > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:33 AM, ShinGei Yong wr

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voiec View Authentication issue

power off on phones as well. Still no luck. > > Regards > > > Sent from my iPad > > On Mar 22, 2011, at 3:04 AM, ShinGei Yong wrote: > > Can you change your authentication path? > > Instead of pointing to your 202.128, changed it to your UCME ip address, > whi

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Troubleshooting remote bandwidth

Hi Friderich, You may also give a shoot on "debug ras", which provide the information about the type of msg send/receive and the source and destination ip address. In your case, hopefully a BRJ should seen from ur remote GK. Thanks Shingei. On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Friderich Claude wrot

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voiec View Authentication issue

Can you change your authentication path? Instead of pointing to your 202.128, changed it to your UCME ip address, which is your 202.1 Thanks Shingei On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Prashant Patel wrote: > Hi Amit, > > Do you have the following in the CME config > > no ip http secure-server >

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab 7 Question 3.2 MVA

Hi, I've gone thru the entire OSL list regarding the problem as i'm facing, but unfortunately didn't manage to get the answer. MVA has configured on BR2 gw,the remote destination manage to call in to MVA# and authenticated successfully. When press option#1, which make a call to either internal or

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE/CME MWI config

Hi Michael, Please refer to the link below Integration CUE and UCME 3.0 and later Troubleshooting CUE MWI Problem

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH across GK-controlled trunk?

Hi Michael, I believe you may just ignored that part"The br2 phone need to be registered with cucm,not with cme" This condition is valid only when you have centralized multisite deployment in non-fallback/fallback mode. As per your configuration,obviously this is a distributed multisite deployme

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] No ISDN debug out?

t; > On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 1:54 PM, ShinGei Yong wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I'm facing an issue, which i've BR2 GW registered with HQ UCM as H323 GW. >> When i enabled the "debug isdn q931"on BR2-RTR,there is no output from >> console/terminal >&g

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] No ISDN debug out?

Hi I'm facing an issue, which i've BR2 GW registered with HQ UCM as H323 GW. When i enabled the "debug isdn q931"on BR2-RTR,there is no output from console/terminal while PSTN call to BR2 phone,but i can view the output when making call from BR2 internal phone to PSTN. In simple words, no inbound

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Wb lab 6 ---- HQ call BR-2 CUE failed

of the doc you are looking at? Shingei On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Erwan Erwan wrote: > I refer to the Guide, it is CUE and dialpeer point to CUE 3600 > > --- On *Wed, 3/16/11, ShinGei Yong * wrote: > > > From: ShinGei Yong > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Wb

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Wb lab 6 ---- HQ call BR-2 CUE failed

Hi Erwan, Did you follow the instruction on the WB completely? Or you modified the question? The WB is requested a UCME integration with CUC with SIP, not CUE, and user mailbox should be located on CUC not CUE. You need a sip dialpeer to point to CUC with some additional configuration. So, can co

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] 8.9 magnitute Earth Quake hit North Japan - CCIE Candidates in Japan please take note.

Hi All, A gently reminder to all ccie candidates who booked or intend to Japan ccie lab. Japan major airports Narita and Haneda have been evacuated and stop operation. Source: CNN Asia Tsunami warning issued for at least 5

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM vs QOS SRNDs

Hi George, When you said "both would be an acceptable answer on a lab",you mean real exam lab or practice lab? Personally think there's only one acceptable value,but of course both might accepted during exam. If not wrong (and this topic has been bring up multiple times in OSL or Ask the expert)B

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Local Lab and Remote Lab

Kiwi, So confidence to nailed it? Gd Luck to you!!! Shingei On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Jon 1992 wrote: > Tokyo is remote, however speeds are pretty impressive. > Bangalore, India lab is a bit slow I heard. > > *From:* Ki Wi > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 09, 2011 12:47 AM > *To:* OSL Qu

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab 5 Question 4.2 CUE SRST

et CFB and CFNA, setup > CUE sip settings. For HQ and BR1 to access BR2 setup CFUR > > On 8 March 2011 16:05, ShinGei Yong wrote: > >> Hi Roger, >> >> As stated below, i'm able to achieved that PSTN caller routed to VM when >> CFB and CFNA. >> Alsothere&

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab 5 Question 4.2 CUE SRST

You need to setup CFB & CFNA in an SRST situation, so that it sends the > call over PSTN to CUC VM. > > Sincerely > > *Roger Källberg* > CCIE #26199 (Voice) > Consultant > Cygate AB > Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ > > ---

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab 5 Question 4.2 CUE SRST

Hi, The question stated,caller from PSTN "CAN BE" routed to VM when there's WAN outage at BR2. Internal caller from HQ or BR1 must be able to reach BR2 phone and forward to VM if no answer. To me,there are two meaning of the sentense 1. PSTN caller routed to VM immediately when there's WAN outag

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS

do not support "mls qos" commands. > > -Pablo Meneses. > > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:31 AM, George Goglidze wrote: > >> have you configured "mls qos trust dscp" on switchports??? >> if this command is not present, the dscp gets rewritten to default 0. &

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS

Hi All, I've question regarding to the WAN QoS. I've HQ and BR2 sites setup, BR2 router equipped with HWIC-4ESW and 2 ipphone connected. 1. I configured the class-based FRTS on the BR2-RTR as below. Initially the RTP traffic didn't match the class-map (DSCP) as defined, until i re-configure it wit

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Pressing Message button during SRST

Hi Kiwi, What is the ANI when the call arrive HQ GW? Shingei On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Friderich Claude wrote: > You should have first in telephony-service or call-manager fallback the > command voicemail 5888 > > And a dial-peer : > > > > dial-peer voice 5600 pots > > translation-profi

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUC - CUCME - SCCP Integration - MWI issue on SIP Phones !!!!

My fren, Friderich is doing CUC integration with UCME, not CUE. Is there any reason that you mwi server to be 202.1 instead of CUC address? Shingei On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Romain wrote: > Isn't your CUE at 10.10.202.2 ? That is the IP you need for your mwi server > instead of .1 > >

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] cBarge in SRST:cbarge softkey not appearing

n the > > shared line was answered by another ip phone" > > Do you mean when you press the shared line on the phone or you want it to > appear in idle state? > > On 25 February 2011 17:42, ShinGei Yong wrote: > >> Hi Tamer, >> >> Thanks for the link

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] cBarge in SRST:cbarge softkey not appearing

t; Check following post: > > http://www.voiceie.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=002799 > > it’s saying that cbarge and sharde line privacy are supported only in > cme/srst 7.1 not owr version 7.0 > > > > Best regards, > > Tamer Ismail > > > >

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] cBarge in SRST:cbarge softkey not appearing

s I know, we can’t achieve cbarge in SRST. > > > > Best regards, > > Tamer Ismail > > > > *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: > ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *ShinGei Yong > *Sent:* Friday, February 25, 2011 1:33 PM

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] cBarge in SRST:cbarge softkey not appearing

Hi, I'm trying the cbarge during SRST. I've privacy turn off on my two 7961 ipphone, and has assigned a ephone template with softkeys remote-in-use cbarge newcall. Somehow when SRST,the softkeys "cbarge"doesn't appear on the phone when the shared line was answered by another ipphone with the same

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RE : BUG ????? QoS with MLP LFI

Hi Caro, So what you're trying to said is that,this MLP LFI issue could be potentially caused by the non-genuine WIC instead of an IOS bugs? shingei On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:22 AM, mihal caro wrote: > > The interfaces > > 90% of the WIC-1T interfaces that are on ebay are fake they don't come

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Phone Service at remote site issue

sponse. Shingei On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:37 AM, amit batra wrote: > Try reset your BR2 Phones.. > > Do you have CME or SRST configure on BR2 Router ??? > > > > --- On *Thu, 2/10/11, ShinGei Yong * wrote: > > > From: ShinGei Yong > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Pho

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM/Unity Express MWI

Hi, Ensure that you have the correct CSS assigned to the CTIRP and CTI port, which the CSS can "view"all your internal phone DN. Also,remember to associate both above to your CUE jtapi user. Shingei On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Edwin Dotson wrote: > I have a CUCM with Unity Express config

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Phone Service at remote site issue

Hi, Im encounter a weird issue.I've configured a few phone service such as IPPA,Voiceview,IPMA, then assigned to ipphone across HQ and BR2 sites. Problem is,when i press the services button on HQ phone, the service appear as it's configured,but for BR2 phone, it show no services configured.Not just

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA pin not recognize?

Hi, I'm having issue on the MVA while calling from PSTN phone(act as mobile) The setup is like below: SiteC(PSTN#)-->SiteC_GW-->FR(WAN)-->SiteA-GW-->SiteA_UCM The VXML configured on siteC gw bring me to the MVA service on UCM and prompt for the PIN, no RDP prompted, as the calling no# matched the

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco 7961 not register to SRST during fallback

Hi, I've couple of 7961G ipphone unable to register to SRST during fallback.The SRST rtr is running on IOS 12.4(22)T2, HQ-RTR(config)#do sh call-manager-fallback CONFIG (Version=7.0(1)) = Version 7.0(1) I've CIPC running on a console machine managed to registered to SRST gatew

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Called # manupulation under SRST circumstance

Hi, I've below setup, BR2 as a mgcp gw with fall-back configured. dial-peer voice 9001 pots description *** SRST TO US *** destination-pattern 9001[2-9]..[2-9].. port 0/0/0:23 prefix 001 ! num-exp 5... 90012123945... num-exp 1... 90016178631... ! When in fallback mode,BR2 users dialed the

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab 1 UCCX Scripting issue

Hi, Maybe someone has done this can provide a hints. I'm currently doing Vol2 lab1,uccx scripting.According to PG, there should not have any CSQ defined in the script, but when uploaded to UCCX Apps,there is a CSQ defined. Why there is this discrepancy? 2nd question,why do we need CSQ and phone ag

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Phone View UC

Hi Francesc, What is the phone model you're using? 1st or 2nd gen? CUC is supported only on 2nd gen of Cisco IP Phone, "A supported Cisco Unified IP Phone model, with the supported Cisco Unified Communications Manager version firmware installed. The following IP Phone models are supported: 7941G,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Order of endpoints in "show gatekeeper" commands output

Hi Prashant, So you think the IOS version and the type of trunk under UCM will affect the sequence display from the "show end regis" command? Hi Miron, Apologize that to hijack your thread for the question Shingei. On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 3:50 AM, Miron Kobelski wrote: > 12.4(24)T2 > > > >

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP-IP GW Unable to call India

Hi Shrini, Personally i don't think the tech-prefix 1# will caused the call fail,as the debug shown,the decision tree will go to the next selection which is Zone prefix if tech prefix match failed,and also,tech prefix used for differentiate the type of voice or video GW within or outside a zone.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP-IP GW Unable to call India

Hi Shrini, Can you paste the debug "gatek main 10" on PSTN router? Just want to ensure that the called number reach PSTN GK with correct digit. Thanks Shingei. On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Shrini wrote: > Hi All, > > I am working on IPIPGW and below is my config. > > When I dial India n

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP LLQ priority value calculation

Hi Shrini, The example you give was the RSVP calculation.In your example you calculated all the calls (total 4 calls)in worst case scenario,which is 40kbps per calls. I'm not very agreed with your calculation, as per SRND pages 3-65 stated: To provision 4 G729 streams: (3*24) + 40 =112kbps Only

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP LLQ priority value calculation

Hi, Take your example,my calculation for LLQ would be: (3 calls x 26.8kbps) + (1 call x 40kbps) = 120.4kbps ==>121kbps I provision the first 3 calls in L2 bandwidth calculation,then i'll used L3 bandwidth calculation for the 4th call,which is the worst case. So i'll configure the PQ with above

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Mobile Voice Access

Hi Shrini, What about your UCM configuration? 1.> is your H323 GW registered with UCM? 2.> what is your dialing behavior internally?4 or 10?if is 4, then your in & outbound dp should be 4 digit patten as well instead of 10. Please provide more info Shingei On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Shrini

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Mobile Voice Access

on HQ and it should work. > > Thanks all. > Shrini > > *From:* ShinGei Yong [mailto:shingei.y...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Sunday, January 02, 2011 6:42 AM > *To:* Shrini; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Mobile Voice Access > > Hi Shrini, >

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab 6 Question 4.2 Hardcode UCM Trunk Port

Hi, How can i hardcode the RAS port that used by the UCM trunk to register with GK to the port number that i want instead of the dynamically choose of by the system? I know you may put in the device name (gk-trunk) under UCM service param,but that's for port 1719 and 1720. Any clue? Shingei _

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX AA

Hi Gregg, If you're sure that the aa.aef is invoked while a call is placed to the trigger, are you using a customized "aa.aef" or the original aa.aef? can you check whether the audio file (AAWelcome.wav) is on stored on the prompt directory. I can't recall the exact path,but should be something li

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPPM on cisco7961 didn't alert

Guys, Pls ignore this mail, has managed to figured out the caused. thanks Shingei. On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 4:36 PM, ShinGei Yong wrote: > Hi, > I've configure the IPPM on cisco 7961 phone, > everything works smooth other that the message receive alert. > It doesn't &quo

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPPM on cisco7961 didn't alert

Hi, I've configure the IPPM on cisco 7961 phone, everything works smooth other that the message receive alert. It doesn't "ring" when there is a mgs come in from CIPC or other IPPM.i've set the "audible alert" to ON but still got no luck. Another IPPM phone encounter the same issue, so don't think

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 5 Task 2.3

10 at 2:45 PM, CCIE wrote: > I can't speak to what the PSTN should send. You should contact ipx if you > need to. I don't have the lab to reference right now but just work with what > you have. The concepts are the same. > > > On Dec 22, 2010, at 12:34 AM, ShinGei Yo

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 5 Task 2.3

Hi Brian, I posted the same question on last month,which regard to the same question no#, but didn't get any response. Hi Jeff, If i'm understand the question correctly, it's asked to displayed 10 digit while omitting the preceding 0 from PSTN,which mean,the PSTN WILL send the 11 digit ANI,but a

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab 8 Question 7.1 HA

ote: > Hi Shin, > > Use "dial-plan pattern" > > HTH > Prashant > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 9:21 AM, ShinGei Yong wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The question asked to configure BR1 to allow certain call during SRST >> failover >> without the

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab 8 Question 7.1 HA

Hi, The question asked to configure BR1 to allow certain call during SRST failover without the use of voice translation rule, but the PG solution was achieved it with translation-rule. Can anyone explain the meaning of this discrepancy? TIA Shingei. ___

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Router stop function after apply auto qos

Hi, Has anyone encounter the same error as mine? Once i applied the command "auto qos voip fr-atm", the router just stop respond.You may still enter any command, but you won't get any result. Below is the error msg: The error showing that is a memory problem, i've a 128MB DRAM installed. The route

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab 8 Question:Create Trunk or Gateway?

Hi, The question request that the call from HQ to BR2 must utilize CUBE and vice versa. PG given the solution by using a Trunk(non-gk controlled),but what i've done was configured the CUBE as a H323 GW in CUCM, and pointed the RP to this GW which achieved the same result. >From Cisco doc "CUBE an

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Call forward to UC failed

hanks Shingei 2010/12/8 "Farkas Péter" > VM Pilot should have a CSS that can reach the hunt pilot for VM ports. > > try add PT-UC-VMPILOT to CSS-UC-VMPORT > > Peter > - Original Message - > From: ShinGei Yong > Date: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 12:02 pm

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Call forward to UC failed

gt; > > 2010/12/8 ShinGei Yong > >> Hi Kobel, >> >> i believed is already stated there, the CSS-INT-DN which comprised ( >> INT-DN and UC-VMPILOT) as well >> >> >> Shingei >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Miron Kobelski

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Call forward to UC failed

your issue. > > regards > kobel > > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:39, ShinGei Yong wrote: > >> Hi Kobel, >> >> Below is the setup: >> >> 5600/PT-UC-VMPILOT >> 5601/PT-UC-VMPORT >> 5602/PT-UC-VMPORT >> >> 5001/PT-INT-DN (Phone B) &g

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Call forward to UC failed

estination as a number, you need to also configure > proper forwarding CSS. > if you configured forwarding for the line using the VM checkbox, you also > need to have proper CSS in VM pilot. > > HTH > kobel > > > 2010/12/8 ShinGei Yong > > Hi, >> >> Yes,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Call forward to UC failed

et checkbox on cfna and cfb in line configuration? > > 2010 12 8 10:44 пользователь "ShinGei Yong" < > shingei.y...@gmail.com> написал: > > Hi, > > I'm facing an issue which is either cfna or cfb failed on phone A when > > caller B call to

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Call forward to UC failed

Hi, I'm facing an issue which is either cfna or cfb failed on phone A when caller B call to caller A. Both the phone A and B able to access to their voicemail box in UC by pressing the voicemail button and enter correct pin. Both the phone is able to dial the Pilot number directly without issue. U

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Adding subscriber problem - need ideas

Hi Wael, What version of UCM are you installing? CUCM or CUCMBE? Shingei. On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Wael Agina wrote: > Dears, > > I added it already on pub using its IP address. > Also I activated most needed services. > Do you ask for specific service to be started ? Almost most ser

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Intercluster Question.

Hi, Something just in my mind regarding to the intercluster design. Scenario A: Two different clusters, cluster A with UCM and H323 GW, and cluster B with UCME & H323 GW. Without using CUBE or GK, can i configure ICT on UCM (without gk-controlled) and point to the UCME address for call to cluster

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 7, Task 4.4

quirement? Shingei On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Jones, Brett wrote: > Hi Shingei, > > You need to disable the last rule in the "restriction tables" > > > Message: 5 > Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 19:39:51 +0800 > From: ShinGei Yong > To: ccie_voice@onlinestud

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 7, Task 4.4

Hi, I'm currently facing the problem in which UC response with "You cannot be transfer to this number..." during the opening greeting. Steps done according to the PG, which check the option "Allow Transfer to Number not associated with user or call handler", but still no luck. Some test applied w

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SNR - Remote in Use

Hi Brett, What about pressing the line button that turned into red manually? I believe that will change the state to "Remote in Use". This question been posted before, and ppls claimed this is the expected behavior. Shingei. On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Jones, Brett wrote: > Hi All, > > C

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] + Dialing issue

Hi Shrini, Can you ensure that the UCM mgcp config pump into the gateway correctly? Do a " sh ccm-manager" to verify. Shingei On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 2:01 AM, Shrini wrote: > Hi Iftikhar, > > In the translation pattern 9.1[2-9]XX[2-9]XX --> > > under calling party transformation select th

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab 5 Question 2.3 Call Routing

Hi, According to the WB question no# stated above, PSTN will send the calling (ANI) number as 02059432785, the PG on page 63 described about this as well, but in fact, the ANI only sent in as 2059432785 while call to HQ. I capture the debug q931 as below: Progress Ind i = 0x8583 - Origina

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Integration Commands

Hi, Here you go... http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps5520/products_configuration_example09186a0080289ef0.shtml Ensure you have correct license file for CUE. TIA Shingei On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:09 PM, ccieiwillb wrote: > Hi Experts, > > I was wondering if anyone happened to h

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS Issue Lab 4 & 5 Vol 2

Hi Mazin, Thanks. I'm totally agreed with your calculation, but just to emphasize that how you treat the remaining bandwidth in % calculation. As long the *remaining* is *equally* shared, then i believe we got the point. And you got the point. :) TIA Shingei On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 4:10 AM, Maz

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS Issue Lab 4 & 5 Vol 2

Hi Greg, I think Amr is referring to the WB question that require the remaining bandwidth of 80% (after deducted the 20% for PQ on queue1) to be equally shared between Q1 and Q2. In this case, neither Q1 4/(4+4) nor Q2 4/(4+4) will get 50%. Q1 and Q2 will get 40% each, i believe this achieve what

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 3 Task 2.4, Calling Party Transformation

PH5 Globalization Configured + CngPTP Xform PH5 call PH2 Main LCD Display: 5005, Missed & Received Entry: 5005 <-- Weird? Vice versa for PH2 call PH5 TIA Shingei. On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:20 AM, ShinGei Yong wrote: > Hi Prashant, > > Thanks fo

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 3 Task 2.4, Calling Party Transformation

n the phone. Also > make sure the phone calling party css only sees that partition in which you > have the transformations. > > HTH > Prashant > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:46 PM, ShinGei Yong wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm trying to configure the CngPT

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 3 Task 2.4, Calling Party Transformation

Hi all, I'm trying to configure the CngPTP to transform (locallize) the calling party number from E164 to 4 digit as per WB3, task2.4 stated. I managed to transform the calling display to 4 digit, but some how the missed and received call also displayed the 4 digit calling number instead of E164.

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Layer 2 Overhead brainstorm

Hi all, This is obviously an old question has been repeated N times, but varies & varies answer anywhere. According to the QoS SRND, page 1-15 stated: * Multilink PPP (MLP) add 13bytes of layer 2 overhead. * Frame Relay adds 4 bytes of Layer 2 overhead; Frame Relay with FRF.12 adds 8 bytes. My

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GK VIA zone

Hi, Finally able to figured out what caused this behavior. Guys, just ignore this stupid question from me. regards, Shingei On Aug 31, 2010 4:46pm, shingei.y...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I've 3 routers which is HQ-RTR, BR1-RTR & BR2-RTR, The HQ-RTR configured as GK as well as CUBE. When i do

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] GK VIA zone

Hi, I've 3 routers which is HQ-RTR, BR1-RTR & BR2-RTR, The HQ-RTR configured as GK as well as CUBE. When i do a "show gatekeeper endpoints", GK shown that CUBE, BR1-RTR and BR2-RTR registered correctly, but the "zone name" for the registered devices become VIA instead of their origin zone.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ip phone on layer 3 interface

Hi Angel, I'm trying to achieve the same setup which connect my 7961 to cisco 2801 fa0/1, but the phone never get register and showing "Configuring IP..." I configure a DHCP pool, from the debug i can see that the phone is sending the DHCPD and the server did response and offered an IP address t

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol1 Lab 11A UnityConnection with AA

Hi, I'm trying to create a call handler with lab 11A requirement. Everytime when i made the call to AA no# 5000, the Greeting will broadcast that "Sorry, <> is not available." Is this the normal system behavior because the "Caller Hear" option has selected to System default greeting? I tried reco

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Real time tracing of IP phone activity

Hi, I'm trying to do a real time tracing of ip phone activity, for example; when the phone goes off hock, the line seized, CUCM sending the signaling and tone etc... I'm using RTMT --> Real time tracing --> View real time data to do so but unsuccessful. Anyone know which services should be select

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD prompts

Hi, You may refer to this old post: http://www.mail-archive.com/ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com/msg06974.html hope that help On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:41 PM, wolfsrudel wrote: > yes, they are valid. > au files are plain g711ulaw PCM. > > hth > > On 6/9/10, Angel Perez wrote: > > > > Hi all: >

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 1 Lab 13 - CUCM + CUPS Presence

Hi Matthew, I'm encounter a very similar problem as you, which the CUPC status not shown anything. From the "Show server Health" from CUPC, the process halt at the "Presence" status, symptom is it keep connecting & disconnecting. I've configured the proxy under the proxy domain, and i can login t

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fwd: Failure of Adding subscriber-VM Server 2.0 - Closed

; Remember that cucmbe is a single server solution and you cannot add any new > subscriber to the cluster, it's like an standalone cluster by itself and > hardened to work with the intended server infrastructure, > > HTH, > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:34 PM, ShinGei Yong wr

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fwd: Failure of Adding subscriber-VM Server 2.0

Opps, the message bounce back due to the file size restriction. Gang, you may request the capture log file from me if you willing to help. Thanks. Shingei. -- Forwarded message -- From: ShinGei Yong Date: Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:02 PM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Failure of

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Failure of Adding subscriber-VM Server 2.0

nstead of a hyphen? > > Any chance you had applied a patch to the PUB previously and it's no longer > version 7.0.1.11000-2? I've never tried installing a sub with a different > version so I'm not sure what the error would be that is generated in that > scenario. > >

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Failure of Adding subscriber-VM Server 2.0

at 9:35 PM, Berry, Matthew J. wrote: > Good point, Roger. CUCM Pub needs something to validate against. > > - Sent from my Blackberry > > -- > *From*: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com < > ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE VOICE LAB 3 new locations unveils..

Hi all, Just to share this info to all voice lab candidates...Another 3 new locations available: Bangalore, India Hong Kong PRC, and Beijing PRC It sound great for those who resident in Asia, maybe. Official Link: http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/le3/ccie/voice/lab_exam.html __

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fwd: LAB 1A CME phone not registering

forwarded to all. -- Forwarded message -- From: ShinGei Yong Date: Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:01 PM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB 1A CME phone not registering To: "Berry, Matthew J." Hi Randall, Can you do a "debug tftp events", to check what are

  1   2   >