On Tue 14 October 2003 12:30, Andy Polyakov wrote:
Meet the players in the field:
- block buffer which provides for read-ahead, I/O requests'
slicing and coalescing;
- value returned by READ CAPACITY command, hereafter simply READ
CAPACITY;
- actual lead-out position;
Rules of the game
On Tue 14 October 2003 12:30, Andy Polyakov wrote:
Meet the players in the field:
- block buffer which provides for read-ahead, I/O requests'
slicing and coalescing;
- value returned by READ CAPACITY command, hereafter simply READ
CAPACITY;
- actual lead-out position;
Rules of the game
On Wed 8 October 2003 05:09, Rob Bogus wrote:
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
Esteemed gurus,
if anyone is able to shed some more light on this kernel problem
I'd appreciate it. It's been going on for years.
When reading the whole of an iso9660 filesystem from a cd or
dvd, I often get I/O
On Wed 8 October 2003 13:03, Rob Bogus wrote:
Well, it could be a bad CD ;-) I just tried using dd on my old
burner (real SCSI), my recent burner (ATAPI+ide-scsi), and the
52x reader only (ATAPI+ide-cd) and a Redhat 2.4.18-24.8.0 kernel,
and no error on any of them. I can't try a 2.6 kernel
On Wed 8 October 2003 20:28, Gregoire Favre wrote:
Hello,
a DVD burn ended like this:
Track 01: 4387 of 4449 MB written (fifo 99%) [buf 100%]
2.0x.
See below.
Total translation table size: 0
Total rockridge attributes bytes: 0
Total directory bytes: 0
Path table size(bytes): 10
Max
On Wed 8 October 2003 05:09, Rob Bogus wrote:
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
Esteemed gurus,
if anyone is able to shed some more light on this kernel problem
I'd appreciate it. It's been going on for years.
When reading the whole of an iso9660 filesystem from a cd or
dvd, I often get I/O
On Wed 8 October 2003 13:03, Rob Bogus wrote:
Well, it could be a bad CD ;-) I just tried using dd on my old
burner (real SCSI), my recent burner (ATAPI+ide-scsi), and the
52x reader only (ATAPI+ide-cd) and a Redhat 2.4.18-24.8.0 kernel,
and no error on any of them. I can't try a 2.6 kernel
On Wed 8 October 2003 13:41, Lourens Veen wrote:
On Wed 8 October 2003 13:03, Rob Bogus wrote:
Well, it could be a bad CD ;-) I just tried using dd on my old
burner (real SCSI), my recent burner (ATAPI+ide-scsi), and the
52x reader only (ATAPI+ide-cd) and a Redhat 2.4.18-24.8.0
kernel
On Tue 7 October 2003 00:06, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
Esteemed gurus,
if anyone is able to shed some more light on this kernel problem
I'd appreciate it. It's been going on for years.
snip
This state of affairs is not really acceptable. Does anyone know
what the problem is caused by, and what
On Tue 7 October 2003 00:06, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
Esteemed gurus,
if anyone is able to shed some more light on this kernel problem
I'd appreciate it. It's been going on for years.
snip
This state of affairs is not really acceptable. Does anyone know
what the problem is caused by, and what
On Tue 23 September 2003 07:19, Matthew Beale wrote:
snip
ps, i dont think i'm actually on this list, so please CCthe
webpage isnt very helpful in contacting the list..
You men the page at
http://www.fokus.gmd.de/research/cc/glone/employees/joerg.schilling/private/cdrecord.html
On Sat 19 July 2003 15:20, Joerg Schilling wrote:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 18 18:22:22 2003
http://www.securiteam.com/exploits/5ZP0C2AAAC.html
So, what we have here is someone installing an old version with
a=20 known vulnerability, writing an exploit for it, and
bragging about=20
On Fri 18 July 2003 17:35, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Old-Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.securiteam.com/exploits/5ZP0C2AAAC.html
This is just a very very old one that has been fixed on May 3th
(3.5 months before the posting you you refer has been made).
It could thus nopt be
On Fri 20 June 2003 14:45, Joerg Schilling wrote:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 19 14:35:41 2003
The main point is that with e.g. dvdrecord, you do not have the
freedom to use the program for the announced purpose because it
only works for outdated drives and there is no support.
Surely
On Thu 19 June 2003 14:25, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 01:14:34PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 18 16:03:00 2003
Well, cdrecord-ProDVD definitely is free for private and
research/educational use.
s/free/libre/
Do you really
On Tue 10 June 2003 15:32, Joerg Schilling wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The system is dedicated for writing...
Both the writer and media are 52x capable, but when cdrecord
displays progress it only comes up to 25x. All the drives have
UDMA enabled and each has it's own IDE bus (two
On Sun 1 June 2003 11:58, Karl-Heinz Herrmann wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to upgrade to a recent cdrtools on linux 2.4.16 (and
21-rc6, SuSE7.x+new kernel) PIII Dell I8k laptop and ran into
following problem:
cdrecord is unable to set RR-scheduler (permission denied)
Could be me, but don't you
On Wed 28 May 2003 12:45, Joerg Schilling wrote:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 28 11:06:54 2003
[EMAIL PROTECTED] alpha]# uname -a
Linux alfonz.agenda.si 2.4.19 #1 pon avg 12 14:49:02 CEST
2002 alpha unknown
cdrtools were compiled on this system using RPM. The spec
file is
On Wed 28 May 2003 17:36, Joerg Schilling wrote:
From: Lourens Veen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, not having the build system in the printed header is
really=20
^^
??
going to cause cdrecord
On Thu 29 May 2003 09:29, Bob Buick wrote:
I'm a bit of a newbie and have been getting the following message
whenever I try to write, or blank a CD-RW in xcdroast with
Mandrake 9.0.
cdrecord: Warning: controller returns wrong size for CD
capabilities page.
I read the man file an hunted
On Wed 26 March 2003 13:23, ehab samir aziz wrote:
I have read README and README.compile adn I do not
know which one I should follow first ?
I need smake to compile install file as written in
section how to compile in README.compile there is no
file called install in cdrtool driectory but
On Mon 24 March 2003 21:36, ehab samir aziz wrote:
I tried to install cdrecord after tar -xvf
cdrtools-2.0 but it seems that I should have gcc
compiler to compiler some files . Really I do not have
That would surprise me. Jörg uses Solaris himself, and
README.solaris (did you follow the
On Sat 22 March 2003 17:43, ehab samir aziz wrote:
how to chose the right version of cdrecord for my
cd-writable ASUS 24x10x40x . and where can I find the
tutorial of using cdrcord for my Solaris 8
The latest stable version (2.0, available from
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/) should work
Jörg,
(short synopsis at the bottom if you're very much in a hurry)
I've been looking at the cdrecord website for a bit, and noticed
that it is quite chaotic. Specific information is hard to find, and
everything is thrown together on one page in random order. Also
several pieces of
On Sun 23 March 2003 22:18, ehab samir aziz wrote:
I can not find ver 2 in this folder the maximum I can
find cdrecord-1.09.tar.gz .
cdrecord is now part of the cdrtools package. You'll want to use
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/cdrtools-2.0.tar.gz
HTH,
Lourens
--
GPG public key:
On Fri 21 March 2003 23:29, Joerg Schilling wrote:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 21 22:32:42 2003
A much more realistic idea is why there is no source for
cdrecord-ProDVD:
=09Commercial companies steel my work and sell it secretly.
Two observations:
1) Apparently, cdrecord doesn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri 28 February 2003 23:13, Wai Lui Fung wrote:
Hey,
I have RedHat with kernel 2.3. I just installed a plextor CDRW
(shown below). But whenever I try to burn CDs with the command
cdrecord file.iso the following error shows up. It perplexes me
On Fri 7 February 2003 04:08, Maxx Excaliber wrote:
I have a Yamaha CRW4416S, with the latest firmware (1.0j) and I
have been unable to make CDs on this computer since I upgraded
the kernel back when I was running RedHat 7.1. I stopped using
the updated kernel because of these problems. I
On Sun 2 February 2003 03:25, Rob van Nieuwkerk wrote:
Hi Jörg,
Jörg wrote:
cdda2wav is the best currently known DAE tool.
People report even better quality than with EAC.
In contrary to cdrdao, cdda2wav handles nearly 100% of even all
play protected disks. Just use cdda2wav -paranoia
On Sun 2 February 2003 19:04, Joerg Schilling wrote:
From: Lourens Veen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
Isn't that CD supposed to be copy protected? I think I heard=20
something about that. Anyway, I did a little search, and there
are=20
There is nothing like a copy protected audio CD. The Audio CD
On Mon 13 January 2003 17:52, Joerg Schilling wrote:
From: Matthias Riese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disesteeming the work of other people does not prove anything
you claim. And the interest of lost of people in the
project proves the contrary wrt to the need for the project.
It proves that the
On Thu 9 January 2003 22:21, Matthias Riese wrote:
Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Matthias Riese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would never recommend unmaintained software that is
known not to work correctly for many drives - see the
mailing lists for this project.
On Tue 19 November 2002 23:02, Robert Timm wrote:
hallo. i have a problem:
when ever i try to write on a cd i get the following output:
bash-2.05a# cdrecord dev=0,0,0 -data
/mnt/data/media/mp3/Incubus/*
Cdrecord 1.9 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2000 Jörg
Upgrade to the latest
On Friday 01 Nov 2002 10:42 pm, Tom Crane wrote:
I followed up Jorg's suggestion of firmware updates for the Aopen
but there appear to be none for that drive. Any suggestions for a
workaround to force readcd to read only the true data/2048
sector-size?
Failing that, perhaps you could create
On Monday 28 Oct 2002 7:07 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lourens Veen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
snip - have explanation of how to submit bug reports when an
error occurs
Well, this kind of crash handler is just a signal handler - some
code which is executed when the operating system tells
On Thursday 24 October 2002 16:59, Marcos Lorenzo wrote:
Is there any graphical frontend for cdrecord? I mean apart from
xcdroast or gcdmaster. Just something like Nero for linux because
I want to turn on my PC only on Linux xD
Which one(s) do you like/use and why?
I like K3B a lot. XCDRoast
On Monday 21 October 2002 16:50, Markus Wagner wrote:
snip
This was the first time I really needed help with cdrecord, and I
am sure I described my problem detailed enough, so that other
people can understand it. Especially the second question should
be of great interest, because it reveals
On Sunday 06 October 2002 21:53, Andreas Mueller wrote:
Hi,
cdrdao-1.1.7 is available from:
http://sf.net/projects/cdrdao
This release is mainly triggered by the libedc_ecc license issue
that recently came up. The affected code has been replaced by a
GPL compliant implementation.
And
On Tuesday 24 September 2002 13:25, Joerg Schilling wrote:
From: Lourens Veen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...] explanation
I've just re-read the LICENSE file in the libedc directory of=20
cdrtools, and it doesn't mention distribution at all, only
use.=20 Does this mean that I do have
On Sunday 22 September 2002 21:46, Andreas Mueller wrote:
On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 19:01, Mike A. Harris wrote:
[...]
Therefore, I will restrict the GPL license for cdrdao so that
section 2 of the GPL will not apply to the libedc_ecc code. I
will shortly prepare a new cdrdao release
On Sunday 22 September 2002 23:15, Andreas Mueller wrote:
On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 22:47, Lourens Veen wrote:
On Sunday 22 September 2002 22:30, Joerg Schilling wrote:
From: Lourens Veen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
However, as libedc is not GPLd the viral part of the GPL
does not apply
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 13 June 2002 12:09, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Please be more polite to other people!
Why did you choose to introduce these harsh words? I never used
them!
The main problem with most (maybe all???) Linux developers is
that they
On Monday 10 June 2002 21:37, Art wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
From: Art [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The system will produce copies using CloneCD under Win95,
so we know that there is no problem with the hardware.
Then we get a bunch of error messages:
cdrecord: Input/output
101 - 143 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
