Good analysis. He' basically saying that the too big to fail argument is
bogus, as long as the government is equipped and prepared to take over such
big corporations in receivership. It's a sort of perverse irony that, in
allowing corporations to become really big, we have to prepare government
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
I thought Taos started as an artists' colony? I guess I thought that was a
big thing there. Maybe that's one of my romanticisms of New Mexico from a
youth of watching Hollywood classics like Twins.
It was pretty big, and there are still a
*oh damn, that's funny:
http://tinyurl.com/cjve2
*
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f
Archive:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
...
The counter point is what again?
In the government of this commonwealth, the legislative department
shall never exercise the executive and judicial powers or either of
them: the executive shall never exercise the legislative and judicial
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
You still did not answer the question. I will ask again.
If a police officer sees a driver exhibiting behavior consistent with those
who are driving drunk, even if this particular driver is not breaking any
laws, should the police officer
RoMunn wrote:
When I think of regulation, then, I see an organization in the government
that has the ability to take management control of even very large
institutions if it becomes necessary.
Well that's the whole lost half of anti-trust.
The half we still have is monopoly protection, the
Heh, yeah, I will use this word a lot.
Robert Munn wrote:
*oh damn, that's funny:
http://tinyurl.com/cjve2
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
Denny wrote:
Do you honestly believe that a cow that didn't want to be seen, would
be in the herd?
You haven't read much about 9/11 have ya? As for your counterpoint,
you made my point: signs. I already gave you the first few, the rest
are matter of simple investigation.
So still no
Heh!
I've always had a special spot in my heart for Nietzsche... probably
helped that I had people tell me, swear to god, that my soul was in
danger by reading his work.
Andromeda was kind of fun too.
--
What then in the last resort are the truths of mankind? They are the
irrefutable errors
RoMunn wrote:
I'm not saying I have the right answer. What I know for sure is that giving
science free reign without any thought to ethical or moral considerations is
an invitation to unthinkable evil in the name of science. If we can all
agree that there needs to be some limit somewhere on
no, it's democratic. it's not an economic problem, it's a political problem.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Gruss wrote:
RoMunn wrote:
I'm not saying I have the right answer. What I know for sure is that
giving
science free reign without any thought to ethical or moral
Hey, how are you, man? You've had some tough stuff come your way recently,
no?
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Bruce Sorge sor...@gmail.com wrote:
Heh, yeah, I will use this word a lot.
Robert Munn wrote:
*oh damn, that's funny:
http://tinyurl.com/cjve2
This one makes me laugh :
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=eat%20a%20bag%20of%20dick
Only I say bowl instead of bag usually. The definition was better for bag tho.
--
From my own being, and from the dependency I find in myself and my
ideas, I do, by an act of reason,
I don't know what he's up to but we definitely needed a stall for anything.
My fear back in the Fall was that if the top banks failed, all hell would
break loose almost overnight. We seem to be past that probability, so now we
can get down to figuring out what the hell to do.
On Sat, Mar 14,
lol, i've never heard that one
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:25 AM, denstar valliants...@gmail.com wrote:
This one makes me laugh :
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=eat%20a%20bag%20of%20dick
Only I say bowl instead of bag usually. The definition was better for bag
tho.
And I'm ready to predict you're totally wrong.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Gruss Gott grussg...@gmail.com wrote:
::sigh::
I'm ready to make a prediction: before the end of 2009 Obama will
nationalize at least the top 20 banks.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
Denny wrote:
Do you honestly believe that a cow that didn't want to be seen, would
be in the herd?
You haven't read much about 9/11 have ya? As for your counterpoint,
you made my point: signs. I already gave you the first few, the rest
But those of strong character are willing to face facts.
Gussy is up anyway you want Gruss.
Quack quack.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
OK, let's take it a step further. In your Utopia...a police officer
observes someone driving in a manner consistent with a drunk driver, but,
because this driver did not break any laws, and in your Utopia, police only
catch criminals and not actually try to prevent crime, he does not do
Just to be clear Scott. You are drawing a parallel between appearing to
drive drunk (a crime) and appearing Muslim (not a crime)?
Or is appearing Muslim the same as appearing to be a terrorist?
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Scott Stroz boyz...@gmail.com wrote:
Wire taps are a far stretch
Wow, you truly are that dense.
Once again.'Muslim' would be one piece in a much larger puzzle. One
thing drunk drivers do is have difficulty in maintaining a constant speed,
does this mean that everyone who has difficulty maintaining a constant speed
is driving drunk? No. Do I think a
And I am saying that if you focus too much on Muslim then
a) you harass a lot of innocents, possibly unconstitutionally
depending on how it is done
b) you miss the really dangerous and organized terrorists who are
smart enough not to wave red flags.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Scott
I never said we need to 'focus' on 'Muslim' but, I donl't think it should be
excluded from any profile becasue it might offend some people.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
And I am saying that if you focus too much on Muslim then
a) you harass a lot of
::eyeroll:: and I never said it should be excluded from any profile
because it might offend some people. I said behavior is a far more
useful criterion than ethnicity or gender.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Scott Stroz boyz...@gmail.com wrote:
I never said we need to 'focus' on 'Muslim'
yesh
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Charlie Griefer
charlie.grie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
they get really cranky when you put too mush stuff in them I just
broke two different ones...
you need firmer stuff.
--
I
fair enough -- it's your project.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Robert Munn cfmuns...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm tired of trying to figure out a name that isn't totally goofy or that
someone else isn't already using, it's ridiculous. We only have so many
words in human language, if we keep
Embudo Station is for sale?
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:33 AM, denstar valliants...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
I thought Taos started as an artists' colony? I guess I thought that was a
big thing there. Maybe that's one of my romanticisms of New
Taos is a pueblo originally and still is. The classic multi-storied
pueblos that you see in a lot of cliche-art are usually Taos Pueblo in
shape. I am not certain of the dates for Taos specifically but if it
follows the pattern of the other pueblos it's been there since
somewhere between 1000 and
I am telling you...'Schwa'
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 1:11 AM, Robert Munn cfmuns...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm tired of trying to figure out a name that isn't totally goofy or that
someone else isn't already using, it's ridiculous. We only have so many
words in human language, if we keep making
Then maybe we just misunderstood each other.
However, Michael Grant and Denstar seem to want it excluded. If that is
incorrect, then it would seem I misunderstood them as well.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
::eyeroll:: and I never said it should be
I believe they are concerned about the civil liberties portion as well
as the effectiveness issue. If I am reading them correctly. I don't
think anyone is saying that if a man in a turban rushes at you with a
knife shouting about Allah that you should not consider yourself in
danger and take
See, I the way I see it, the profiles used to catch the McVeighs would be
different than those used to catch the Al Queda type terrorists. I was not
advocating that we use only one profile for a terrorist.
Are there different 'types' of terrorists? I would say yes. The Timothy
McVeigh type
You are right. I don't get why Muslim Extremists want to kill me solely
because I an an 'infidel'.
I don't get why some people think I am wrong for making statements like I
did, but have no problem with the leaders of a nation saying that another
nation should be wiped of the earth and claim the
You need to give serious thought to branding in choosing a name. My
first requirement would be whether the domain is available for that
name. Colony.com is a perfume gift site.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Robert Munn cfmuns...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm tired of trying to figure out a name
lol, i know. i bought cfcolony.org. all the debate about colonies is making
me like michael g's ant colony branding idea more and more.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Maureen wrote:
You need to give serious thought to branding in choosing a name. My
first requirement would be whether
Great list Scott...I might have to pass this on to some people I know.
On Mar 13, 2009, at 11:12 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
Came across these recently. Funny thing is, I think both lists are
funny
because they are true.
25 Ways to be a Good Conservative
1. You have to believe that trade
A good crop today; saw three:
JESUS LOVES YOU - Everyone else thinks you're an asshole
Good Riddance Bush - The End of an Error
Sorry W, I'm the decider. Dems in 08.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important
sigh. All right. You are ignorant and proud of that. Next.
I didn't have time for the discussion in the first place and I
definitely don't if you aren't trying to discuss this in good faith.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Scott Stroz boyz...@gmail.com wrote:
You are right. I don't get why
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
A good crop today; saw three:
PHANTOGRAM
Although it's a laptop sticker ;-)
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release
I kinda like CFColony - I can see a logo made of ants crawling thru
the letters, and maybe the colors changing as the row of ants moves.
And you could use ant images for the buttons.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Robert Munn cfmuns...@gmail.com wrote:
lol, i know. i bought cfcolony.org.
Denny wrote:
Are you honestly suggesting that 9/11 occurred because we didn't pay
enough attention to the attackers skin color, or apparel, or place of
worship?
I'm not suggesting it I'm saying it's documented fact; but I'm also
saying you list is only a partial one.
The nights before the
:-\
Welp.I guess I am neither a conservative nor a liberal.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f
Mo wrote:
And I'm ready to predict you're totally wrong.
Game on!
Me: nationalization is coming within 2009.
You: it's not.
Loser has to post praises about the winner.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most
RoMunn wrote:
no, it's democratic. it's not an economic problem, it's a political problem.
Uhhh ... isn't that a little socialist?
So when the government taxes us, and uses those funds to ensure moral
oversight, you're saying that's not socialist?
Because hopefully you can see where
it's a US dichotomy
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Vivec gel21...@gmail.com wrote:
:-\
Welp.I guess I am neither a conservative nor a liberal.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Gruss Gott grussg...@gmail.com wrote:
Mo wrote:
And I'm ready to predict you're totally wrong.
Game on!
Me: nationalization is coming within 2009.
What you said was before the end of 2009 Obama will nationalize at
least the top 20 banks., not just that
RoMunn wrote:
break loose almost overnight. We seem to be past that probability, so now we
can get down to figuring out what the hell to do.
Well we're not though; The danger last fall was *systemic* failure.
The banks are still in deep shit and here's why:
On the left half of the bank
Mo wrote:
What you said was before the end of 2009 Obama will nationalize at
least the top 20 banks., not just that nationalization was coming.
Yeah ... Im not sure of the number but let's be clear:
nationalization is already here. Banks have been going into
receivership in big numbers
You had me at I'm
On 3/14/09, Gruss Gott grussg...@gmail.com wrote:
Denny wrote:
Are you honestly suggesting that 9/11 occurred because we didn't pay
enough attention to the attackers skin color, or apparel, or place of
worship?
I'm not suggesting it I'm saying it's documented fact; but
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
OK, let's take it a step further. In your Utopia...a police officer
observes someone driving in a manner consistent with a drunk driver, but,
because this driver did not break any laws, and in your Utopia, police only
catch criminals and
::eyeroll:: and anyone who doesn't agree need to grow a pair. Got it ;P
For the benefit of Google and other humor-impaired enitites, yes I am
being sarcastic.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Scott Stroz boyz...@gmail.com wrote:
You had me at I'm
On 3/14/09, Gruss Gott grussg...@gmail.com
I can see that too. If anyone knows a designer willing to donate some time
to make it happen, please let me know. I have a ton of stuff on the to do
list if anyone wants to contribute...
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Maureen mamamaur...@gmail.com wrote:
I kinda like CFColony - I can see
sounds about right to me. i don't necessarily call it nationalization,
though. to me, nationalization implies that decisions are made for political
reasons as much for economic reasons. for instance, i would call it
nationalization if the government took over a bankrupt gm with the express
I and the wife have some family obligations in Denver Co from March 23rd
Through April 4nd. That being said we should have lots of free time in the
evening/weekend and are hoping to hop into some conferences, seminars, classes
or even a meet-up group or two. I am big into ColdFusion, CSS,
That changes the whole picture then, doesn't it. You clearly
predicted that the top 20 banks would be nationalized. I disagree -
as several of the top 20 banks, notably Wells Fargo, are quite
solvent, so there would be no need to nationalize them. Now you wanna
quibble and only include those
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 6:13 PM, denstar valliants...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you think a red-light camera prevents more crime than a uniformed
officer, in a marked car, on the side of the road?
Ummno. But I am not really sure what that has to do with the analogy
with drunk drivers.
All laws contain some form of moral or ethical (and by extension moral)
judgment, whether good or bad. But that doesn't mean all laws are socialist.
Take the FDA. They enforce strict rules on food products, rules based on
ethical and moral judgments about food safety. Is the FDA socialist? I
lol. Now that right there is Monty Python kind of funny.
*It takes a strong person to be an anonymous internet bigot.*
What will they think of next?
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Gruss Gott grussg...@gmail.com wrote:
Denny wrote:
Are you honestly suggesting that 9/11 occurred because
Send me your font and color preferences and I'll see if my son will do it.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Robert Munn cfmuns...@gmail.com wrote:
I can see that too. If anyone knows a designer willing to donate some time
to make it happen, please let me know. I have a ton of stuff on the to
What I have on the back of my going to work beater:
My other ride is your mom.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Casey Dougall
ca...@uberwebsitesolutions.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
A good crop today; saw three:
PHANTOGRAM
Ants... strength...
How about an ant carrying a big cf logo? or an ant carrying a puzzle piece
with the cf logo on it.
CFColony : *Strength in numbers.*
CFColony : *All ants, no uncles. (wakka wakka wakka)*
**
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Maureen mamamaur...@gmail.com wrote:
I kinda
Mo wrote:
That changes the whole picture then, doesn't it. You clearly
predicted that the top 20 banks would be nationalized. I disagree -
as several of the top 20 banks, notably Wells Fargo, are quite
solvent, so there would be no need to nationalize them.
How do you know that? You've
Grant wrote:
What will they think of next?
A radiological dirty bomb?
Mmmm ... maybe another multiple hotel attack from an international
waterway. You live close to one of those don't you?
Maybe natural gas pipelines ...
But whatever it is, you'll be surprised.
You pro-terrorist bigot.
As always, you read only want you believe beforehand. I have been quite
clear for years that I am not religious and religion has no place in
government or regulation of any sort.
What you totally fail to understand, it seems, is that ethics are founded in
morals. Without basic moral guidelines,
Dana wrote:
::eyeroll:: and anyone who doesn't agree need to grow a pair. Got it ;P
Opinion is something you agree with, I'm telling you the facts.
And facts are something you either acknowledge or feign ignorance of.
~|
You're not at all familiar with how research is done these days are you. I
don't have the time nor the inclination to teach you something you really
should know if you're going to be bloviating about this. I suggest you start
at the NIH site and continue from there. I would also do a google
I stand by my earlier statement then. I disagree.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Gruss Gott grussg...@gmail.com wrote:
nationalized = receivership.
So, I'll stand by the top 20 going into receivership
~|
Adobe®
Did you do the experimentation or were you a subject of the experiments? ;)
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Larry Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com wrote:
You're not at all familiar with how research is done these days are you.
I
don't have the time nor the inclination to teach you something
the opposite of anti-muslim is not pro-terrorist.
just like rock-headed is not equal to strong minded.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Gruss Gott grussg...@gmail.com wrote:
Grant wrote:
What will they think of next?
A radiological dirty bomb?
Mmmm ... maybe another multiple hotel
sounds good to me. i like blue and green (and brown or black for the ants,
red ants are evil, evil I tell you!). credit will, of course, go to everyone
who contributes...
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Michael Grant mgr...@modus.bz wrote:
Ants... strength...
How about an ant carrying a
Grant wrote:
the opposite of anti-muslim is not pro-terrorist.
Wait a minute ... who's anti-muslim?
I'm anti-terrorist and since you seem to tolerate and defend terrorism
... well, you must be pro-terrorist.
~|
Adobe®
Dave Chapelle needs to model a character after you.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Gruss Gott grussg...@gmail.com wrote:
Grant wrote:
the opposite of anti-muslim is not pro-terrorist.
Wait a minute ... who's anti-muslim?
I'm anti-terrorist and since you seem to tolerate and
is the to-do list out there where people can look at it?
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Robert Munn cfmuns...@gmail.com wrote:
I can see that too. If anyone knows a designer willing to donate some time
to make it happen, please let me know. I have a ton of stuff on the to do
list if anyone
MUFFINS
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Richard Dillman rdill...@gmail.com wrote:
I and the wife have some family obligations in Denver Co from March 23rd
Through April 4nd. Â That being said we should have lots of free time in the
evening/weekend and are hoping to hop into
Gah. You are still conflating ethnic prejudice with behavioral
reasonable cause.
/me wanders off
Yes, what *about* everyone's rights? What about the Constitution?
You think it's cool to randomly stop people and ask them for their
papers?
No, I am not advocating that people be randomly
not yet, some of it is on paper and some of it is in my head. my current
task is to get that stuff out there. i am also going to create a baseline
app in a git repository and make that available so people can start playing
with it. i just made something of a baseline app (with no ui to speak of
Innocent until proven guilty applies until someone shows reasonable signs of
an illegal action. My example was decided by the police as being a
reasonable sign of a drug buy. Note the term reasonable. To bring it into
the conversation, being Muslim or looking like a Muslim alone is not a
k -- no promises as i am pretty maxed for the next few days but I will
try to at least look at the list once you get it up
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Robert Munn cfmuns...@gmail.com wrote:
not yet, some of it is on paper and some of it is in my head. my current
task is to get that
OK, so Petraeus says an Iraq-style surge is not feasible there. Where
do we
go from here, then? He is asking for more military but especially more
civil
infrastructure support for what I can only call nation-building.
Regardless
of how history judges Bush's decisions on Iraq and
Larry wrote:
What I want can be expressed here:
http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/index.html
I'm not at all familiar with this, but what's to stop a privately
funded company from doing whatever the hell it wants? Genentech, for
example.
I mean legal or no they will do what they want, but
in flex for a swf that is loafing another swf. Struggling with an
article that keeps talking about the loading swf and I can't tell if
it is is loading the the other swf or being loaded.
Wondering if there is something I don't know. It does happen ;)
Bah. Aythnig wrong with parent and child in this context?
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
in flex for a swf that is loafing another swf. Struggling with an
article that keeps talking about the loading swf and I can't tell if
it is is loading the the other
Grant wrote:
Dave Chapelle needs to model a character after you.
You get that show on your terrorist-lovers network?
Weird.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
Denny wrote:
Are you honestly suggesting that 9/11 occurred because we didn't pay
enough attention to the attackers skin color, or apparel, or place of
worship?
I'm not suggesting it I'm saying it's documented fact; but I'm also
saying
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 6:13 PM, denstar wrote:
Do you think a red-light camera prevents more crime than a uniformed
officer, in a marked car, on the side of the road?
Ummno. But I am not really sure what that has to do with the
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Michael Dinowitz wrote:
Innocent until proven guilty applies until someone shows reasonable signs of
an illegal action. My example was decided by the police as being a
I get it-- two white boys in an expensive looking car deserved to be
pulled over if they're
86 matches
Mail list logo
