I don't even have a passport :-D
-Original Message-
From: Maureen [mailto:mamamaur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 12:58 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Plummeting Marijuana Prices Create A Panic In Calif.
I travel with my passport even if I'm only going to the corner groc
I travel with my passport even if I'm only going to the corner grocery.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Correction Maureen...take your ID and your Birth Certificate if you visit
> AZ...
~|
Order the Ado
I still have yet to see where the leftie commentators have outright lied
about stuff...so I would disagree with that Kris. I think someone found 1
example from Randy Rhodes...whom I really have no opinion of since I never
heard her before, whereas Beck and Limbaugh do it several times on a daily
When have Beck or Limbaugh said anything bipartisan?
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 3:21 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: More on AZ
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> Well that certainly didn't sound biased. I have
The difference is that its federal immigration officials that are trained in
this matter and specialize in immigration law enforcement rather than any
government official who may or may not have any training in dealing with
this issue at all according to the AZ law. That would be like saying that
Correction Maureen...take your ID and your Birth Certificate if you visit
AZ...
-Original Message-
From: Maureen [mailto:mamamaur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 2:54 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Plummeting Marijuana Prices Create A Panic In Calif.
There are parts of Ariz
I got an error on trying to insert a row into a table with identity column
using cfgrid html bind onchange.
My component
it's fascinating to see its programming but... ah, as long as you aree
having fun, I guess
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:25 PM, denstar wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Dana wrote:
>>
>> I'm telling you Denny -- you're bringing logic to a stupid fight.
>>
>
> Heh. It's *all* logic.
>
> R
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> I'm telling you Denny -- you're bringing logic to a stupid fight.
>
Heh. It's *all* logic.
Relatively.
:)p
I see it sorta like dancing. There is no real goal to speak of.
Well, besides feeling good and having fun.
If Sam feels good and is ha
I'm telling you Denny -- you're bringing logic to a stupid fight.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:42 PM, denstar wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Sam wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:00 PM, denstar wrote:
>>
Ah so you think the whole surveillance idea thing is new, started with
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:00 PM, denstar wrote:
>
>>> Ah so you think the whole surveillance idea thing is new, started with
>>> Bush.
>>
>> No. What happened under his leadership was especially bad though.
>
> And now it's worse because of what h
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
>> "I just find it interesting that both sides of the debate accuse each other
>> of the same thing through the same thought process."
>
> Ding, ding, ding! We have a winner.
People tell me moral relativism is bad. That there *are* such thi
well, the road is on the AZ side is all I am saying ;P there is
something that goes south on the California side but it looks pretty
sketchy
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Well, you could swim across, but it might take a while.
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Dana wrot
Well, you could swim across, but it might take a while.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> ah so you would get there by *boat*... that's what I was wondering, thanks.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
h
ah so you would get there by *boat*... that's what I was wondering, thanks.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> The Arizona/California border runs through the middle of Lake Havasu.
> Access to the Arizona side from Highway 95. Boat trips across to Cali
> are nice.
>
> On Tue, Ma
Ok it worked really well.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Medic wrote:
> I'm trying one right now called R-Drive Image 4.7. It's a free 15 day fully
> functional trial. So far so good. It's copying one drive to the other. I'll
> let you know if it works as expected.
>
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2010
The Arizona/California border runs through the middle of Lake Havasu.
Access to the Arizona side from Highway 95. Boat trips across to Cali
are nice.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> If that's actually *in* California, that is doable, yes. I only know
> of it as the best exit for
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> It's not clear. Words are missing or something. A direct quote from Stupid
> User?
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Antholo
It's not clear. Words are missing or something. A direct quote from Stupid User?
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Nope, the law you refer to exist, Reyes is complaining that AZ made a
> law on top of fed law, calling it out, yet so did CA.
>
> Apply this to CA law about people arr
Nope, the law you refer to exist, Reyes is complaining that AZ made a
law on top of fed law, calling it out, yet so did CA.
Apply this to CA law about people arrested:
Why does a state have to call that out? Why cant it just follow the
federal law like you said for the past seventy years?
Is t
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:00 PM, denstar wrote:
>
>>> Ah so you think the whole surveillance idea thing is new, started with
>>> Bush.
>>
>> No. What happened under his leadership was especially bad though.
>
> And now it's worse because of wh
huh? You are comparing a laew that requires officers to detain
suspected aliens to another that says arrestees' immigration status
should be verified.
You're babbling and so is everyone else trying to channel Stupid User.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Are you talking about the
Are you talking about the law for the last 70 years or just the calling out :)
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> did you read the link you sent? It applies to prisoners after arrest.
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusi
If that's actually *in* California, that is doable, yes. I only know
of it as the best exit for cheap gas
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Lake Havasu would be a nice trip if you just want to touch California.
> It's beautiful.
> http://www.golakehavasu.com/
>
> On Tue, May
I realize that necessity is the mother of invention but... why are you
using an xp machine as a server?
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Matthew P. Smith
wrote:
>
> I am using an xp machine for my server with mapped drives to the wwwroot on
> it.
>
> Several times, especially today, I will dro
Lake Havasu would be a nice trip if you just want to touch California.
It's beautiful.
http://www.golakehavasu.com/
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> We're staying in Sedona. We plan on visiting the Grand Canyon and the
> Painted Desert (we did the Sky-Walk over the cany
beyond compare.
awesome software.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-c
never mind -- I just look another look and there there's no realistic
alternate to 40 as far as I can tell, even if you spend the night in
the area. Must be why I keep driving through the Mojave anyway.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Dana wrote:
> from the north rim?
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 a
did you read the link you sent? It applies to prisoners after arrest.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Dana wrote:
>>
>> I don't think it's too likely I'll be arrested. Just supposing I am I
>> doubt they will think I am Mexican.
>
> So you're afr
from the north rim?
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> That's a 15hr drive
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Dana wrote:
>>
>> There is literally nothing on the California side of the border for
>> about 200 miles up I-40. Not even a cell phone signal for most of the
>> way to B
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> I don't think it's too likely I'll be arrested. Just supposing I am I
> doubt they will think I am Mexican.
So you're afraid to drive through AZ but have no trouble living in CA
with teh same laws. Very strange.
> I am impressed at the way these
That's a 15hr drive
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> There is literally nothing on the California side of the border for
> about 200 miles up I-40. Not even a cell phone signal for most of the
> way to Barstow. If you are going to the Grand Canyon anyway there may
> be a back roa
I don't think it's too likely I'll be arrested. Just supposing I am I
doubt they will think I am Mexican.
I am impressed at the way these guys are staying on script though. Did
you send them Sarah Palin's Facebook notes too?
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Hmmm...looks like CA
There is literally nothing on the California side of the border for
about 200 miles up I-40. Not even a cell phone signal for most of the
way to Barstow. If you are going to the Grand Canyon anyway there may
be a back road that will take you to Death Valley perhaps.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:10 P
I liked the attribution, personally
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> Well that certainly didn't sound biased. I have a great deal of respect for
> agenda-free journalism.
> Great work.
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Sam wrote:
>
>>
>> http://www.facebook.com/notes.php?id=
Good point, he's not nearly as bad as Arianna Huffington or reading
the garbage on her site :P
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Kris Sisk wrote:
>>*sneaks away humming to self*
>
> To be fair he's no worse (or better) than any other political
> commendtardtator, comentator.
~~
>http://huff.to/cONCVE
>
>Apparently his ratings has hit an all time low.
>
>or is he simply no longer reactionary and violent enough now that there's
>the Tea Party?
>
>;-)
>
>*sneaks away humming to self*
To be fair he's no worse (or better) than any other political
commendtardtator, comen
Glenn Who?
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> http://huff.to/cONCVE
>
> Apparently his ratings has hit an all time low.
>
> or is he simply no longer reactionary and violent enough now that there's
> the Tea Party?
>
> ;-)
>
> *sneaks away humming to self*
>
~~~
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> Well that certainly didn't sound biased. I have a great deal of respect for
> agenda-free journalism.
So you stand by the politician's that do what you accuse Rush and Beck
of doing in the name of bi-partisanship? Or something like that?
> Great
Well he is right about one thing. Arizona's immigration law that has everyone
in an uproar has been on federal books for a very long time.
That said I could really do without the bias. I don't like Obama either but
good grief.
~
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> http://huff.to/cONCVE
>
> Apparently his ratings has hit an all time low.
>
> or is he simply no longer reactionary and violent enough now that there's
> the Tea Party?
he's a one-trick pony and there are new acts in town.
I think it's like a five hour drive to hit the Mohave.
There is the London Bridge and Colorado River. I think Harry Reid's
house is on the way.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "There are parts of Arizona that are magnificent - the Grand Canyon, Painted
> Desert, Sedona.
"There are parts of Arizona that are magnificent - the Grand Canyon, Painted
Desert, Sedona. I love to visit there."
We're staying in Sedona. We plan on visiting the Grand Canyon and the
Painted Desert (we did the Sky-Walk over the canyon three years ago; that
was interesting). The CA day trip
Well that certainly didn't sound biased. I have a great deal of respect for
agenda-free journalism.
Great work.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> http://www.facebook.com/notes.php?id=24718773587
>
> On Fox News this morning, State Department Spokesman P.J. Crowley
> became the thi
my point exactly
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "make sure you take your birth certificate."
>
> Why, I don't look hispanic.
>
> *snicker*
>
>
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://ww
Hmmm...looks like CA has the same law it's boycotting
http://hotair.com/archives/2010/05/17/la-city-councilman-blasts-az-law-for-provisions-in-ca-penal-code/
Better carry your papers Dana.
This one's too funny. LA want's to boycott AZ.
Can you say "rolling blackouts?" :)
http://hotair.com/ar
http://www.facebook.com/notes.php?id=24718773587
On Fox News this morning, State Department Spokesman P.J. Crowley
became the third Obama administration official in short succession to
admit that he hadnt actually bothered to read Arizonas 10-page long
secure the border bill before condemning
There are parts of Arizona that are magnificent - the Grand Canyon,
Painted Desert, Sedona. I love to visit there.
However, western Arizona and the part of California adjoining Arizona
has little to offer for a day trip unless you're into desert. Most of
the action is on the coast, or in the m
gotta love this line:
Of course, that's more than his competitors -- MSNBC's "Hardball"
(528,000), CNN's "Situation Room" (481,000) and HLN's "Showbiz
Tonight" (197,000) -- combined...
I watched him once and didn't like him. I used to listen to him on the
radio and liked him then.
On Tue, May 18
http://huff.to/cONCVE
Apparently his ratings has hit an all time low.
or is he simply no longer reactionary and violent enough now that there's
the Tea Party?
;-)
*sneaks away humming to self*
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion A
I am using an xp machine for my server with mapped drives to the wwwroot on
it.
Several times, especially today, I will drop the mapped drive connection,
and I am unable to remote desktop to the machine. When I switch my monitor
over to the machine, the default screen saver is up.
I've googled
"make sure you take your birth certificate."
Why, I don't look hispanic.
*snicker*
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
I'm trying one right now called R-Drive Image 4.7. It's a free 15 day fully
functional trial. So far so good. It's copying one drive to the other. I'll
let you know if it works as expected.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> if you found a free one let us know how you like it
>
>
haha, nice. Took me a second.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> No balls?
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Medic wrote:
> >
> > Unix? Never heard of it.
> >
> >
>
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology n
No balls?
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> Unix? Never heard of it.
>
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoff
Or a drivers license
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> make sure you take your birth certificate.
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/d
Unix? Never heard of it.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dd_(Unix)
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Medic wrote:
> >
> > I have no idea how to do this. I have a hard drive that's starting to go.
> I
> > want to make an image of it a
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dd_(Unix)
Ditto. I use dd for this kind of thing all the time. It's on most Linux live
CDs.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Di
if you found a free one let us know how you like it
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> Google is my friend. nevermind.
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Medic wrote:
>
>> I have no idea how to do this. I have a hard drive that's starting to go. I
>> want to make an image of i
make sure you take your birth certificate.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "While there may be a legal difference, in practice it's the exact same
> thing. Assessing property tax in a way that favors yourself and at another
> group's expense."
>
> You do realize that m
people usually use Norton Ghost. I don't know a free one, but that
doesn't mean one does not exist.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> I have no idea how to do this. I have a hard drive that's starting to go. I
> want to make an image of it and put it on another drive so I don't
Google is my friend. nevermind.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Medic wrote:
> I have no idea how to do this. I have a hard drive that's starting to go. I
> want to make an image of it and put it on another drive so I don't have to
> reinstall windows and all the software. Is there a free util
> I have no idea how to do this. I have a hard
> drive that's starting to go. I want to make an
> image of it and put it on another drive so I
> don't have to reinstall windows and all the
> software. Is there a free utility to do this?
It's not free, but I've used Acronis True Image in the past
"While there may be a legal difference, in practice it's the exact same
thing. Assessing property tax in a way that favors yourself and at another
group's expense."
You do realize that most people vote in a way that favors themselves?
Anyway, at the time of the vote, everyone got the benefit. T
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dd_(Unix)
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> I have no idea how to do this. I have a hard drive that's starting to go. I
> want to make an image of it and put it on another drive so I don't have to
> reinstall windows and all the software. Is there a
I have no idea how to do this. I have a hard drive that's starting to go. I
want to make an image of it and put it on another drive so I don't have to
reinstall windows and all the software. Is there a free utility to do this?
~
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
> IQ is not a prerequisite vote. Most voters can't see 2 years down the road,
> let alone 30.
100% agreed there. The same district that elected Cynthia McKinney in
Atlanta proceeded to elect a successor who thinks Guam is going to tip
over
"If they had no idea of the long term consequences I'd add stupid to that
list."
IQ is not a prerequisite vote. Most voters can't see 2 years down the road,
let alone 30.
"The voters were doing the exact EXACT same thing you claim caused the
uproar in the first place."
Not quite. Tax assess
\b([\d]{1,10})(\.\d0)\b
\b = word boundary
([\d]{1,10}) = find digits at least 1 char long to 10 chars long
(\.\d0) = find a decimal point followed by 1 digit, followed by a zero
\b = boundary again to make sure that 999.901 doesn't pass.
On May 18, 2010, at 11:30 AM, G Money wrote:
>
> On T
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Chris Stoner wrote:
>
> Try this: [0-9]{0,10}(\.[0-9][0]){0,1}
>
> Haven't tested it throughly, but looks like it works. At the very least
> will give you a starting point. Im sure there is a more elegant way to do
> it but this should be ok. Or not.
>
Hey C
>Nope, I am not this Stoner you speak of. To tie into a recent thread, I
>vehemently deny the existence of me. I also deny the existence of regular
>expressions as an obvious conspiracy to make developers feel bad about
>themselves.
Don't feel bad. I suck at regex to. Fortunately I very rarely
a multi-conspiracy post, and merely about regular expressions.
freakin' stoner sheeesh :)
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Chris Stoner wrote:
>
> Nope, I am not this Stoner you speak of. To tie into a recent thread, I
> vehemently deny the existence of me. I also deny the existence of regul
Thanks Stone man.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Chris Stoner wrote:
>
> Try this: [0-9]{0,10}(\.[0-9][0]){0,1}
>
> Haven't tested it throughly, but looks like it works. At the very least
> will give you a starting point. Im sure there is a more elegant way to do
> it but this should be ok
Nope, I am not this Stoner you speak of. To tie into a recent thread, I
vehemently deny the existence of me. I also deny the existence of regular
expressions as an obvious conspiracy to make developers feel bad about
themselves.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Ras Tafari wrote:
>
> STONER!!!
STONER!!!
:)
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Chris Stoner wrote:
>
> Try this: [0-9]{0,10}(\.[0-9][0]){0,1}
>
> Haven't tested it throughly, but looks like it works. At the very least
> will give you a starting point. Im sure there is a more elegant way to do
> it but this should be ok. Or
Try this: [0-9]{0,10}(\.[0-9][0]){0,1}
Haven't tested it throughly, but looks like it works. At the very least
will give you a starting point. Im sure there is a more elegant way to do
it but this should be ok. Or not.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:51 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> I'm terrible at regu
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
> I don't see that you can call the people who voted for this 30 years ago
> corrupt. Shortsighted? Yeah. Angry? Definitely. They probably had no
> idea of the long term consequences of the action.
If they had no idea of the long term co
"Prop 13 turned the voters into the 'cronies' - sticking it to others.
Congrats Californians who voted for Prop 13, you are not just as corrupt as
the people you despised!"
I don't see that you can call the people who voted for this 30 years ago
corrupt. Shortsighted? Yeah. Angry? Definitely
I'm terrible at regular expressions. I need what I think is an easy one. I
have a field that is decimal(10,2). I have already verified that the value
is of the correct precision. I now need to ensure that the actual value
submitted is a whole number...aka the two digits to the right of the decimal
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
> Therein lies the problem. What's fair? Isn't that how Prop 13 got
> started? Tax assessors where giving their cronies bonus rates while
> sticking it to others. People got fed up and, voila, Prop 13.
So if you can't beat em, join em? Pr
"I just find it interesting that both sides of the debate accuse each other
of the same thing through the same thought process."
Ding, ding, ding! We have a winner.
"That said, you're wrong. There is ample data supporting anthropogenic
climate change. And every month the data keeps piling up
"I am in favor of everyone paying their fair share."
Therein lies the problem. What's fair? Isn't that how Prop 13 got
started? Tax assessors where giving their cronies bonus rates while
sticking it to others. People got fed up and, voila, Prop 13.
"...but I have come to the conclusion th
Actually, he was a writer.
Next.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Kris Sisk wrote:
>
>>I missed the part where someone, anyone said he was wrong.
>
> As I've told you before, open a history book. There are only a few people who
> DON'T say he was wrong, and those are all politicians.
>
> Now I
>I missed the part where someone, anyone said he was wrong.
As I've told you before, open a history book. There are only a few people who
DON'T say he was wrong, and those are all politicians.
Now I realize you think some politicians can be believed but the truth is that
they lie for a living
I missed the part where someone, anyone said he was wrong.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> No I think that his being thoroughly wrong discredits him. But hey
> coming from someone who thinks that Beck and limpblob are legitimate
> sources I'm not surprised.
>
~~~
No I think that his being thoroughly wrong discredits him. But hey
coming from someone who thinks that Beck and limpblob are legitimate
sources I'm not surprised.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> It's just funny as hell that:
>
> 1) you keep forgetting about him, even in the same
It's just funny as hell that:
1) you keep forgetting about him, even in the same post one time
2) you think being dead disqualifies you as a source
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> just because the person is dead does not make the idea any more stupid.
>
> On Mon, May
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:00 PM, denstar wrote:
>> Ah so you think the whole surveillance idea thing is new, started with Bush.
>
> No. What happened under his leadership was especially bad though.
And now it's worse because of what he started? Which he didn't start.
He just made it evil so n
Rather any less stupid.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> just because the person is dead does not make the idea any more stupid.
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Sam wrote:
>>
>> Remember...
>> we were talking about the dead guy...
>> not so long ago...
>>
>> On Mon
just because the person is dead does not make the idea any more stupid.
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Remember...
> we were talking about the dead guy...
> not so long ago...
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Larry C. Lyons
> wrote:
>>
>> you forgot your sarcasm tags.
>>
90 matches
Mail list logo
