I had to suffer listening to the person when he was running for
Maryland's Senate seat 7 years ago in '02. Some of the stuff he said
on the stump was right wing extreme even when compared to Barbera
Buchannan of Minnesota.
I really don't think the guy's insane. He's an extremist trying to
make a
Larry wrote:
I had to suffer listening to the person when he was running for
Maryland's Senate seat 7 years ago in '02.
too long. I saw him last year. his logic on things was like a
Pollock painting.
~|
Want to reach the
No, Keyes is bat-shit crazy.
I don't know if he is bat-shit crazy, but he is extremely conservative. He
makes most GOP members look like full-blown socialists.
he couldn't win against a democrat in Maryland who was incompetent to say
the least
That means nothing. I have seen plenty of
Let me put it this way about Keys in the Maryland election, he started
off at the bottom of the barrel and began digging deeper. He alienated
almost every group he would have needed to win. The seat could have
been his for the taking if he had been even a bit sensible.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at
Let me put it this way about Keys in the Maryland election, he started off
at the bottom of the barrel and began digging deeper. He alienated
almost every group he would have needed to win. The seat could have been his
for the taking if he had been even a bit sensible.
Ahhh. I don't follow
Scott wrote:
I never said that none of the birthers are racist, but I don't think
they all are.
See? You've finally come around to my position because that's exactly
what I said. I said it's a conspiracy of racists, reactionaries, and
wackos.
So neither of us thing they all are.
We agree!
No, you said that trying to 'de-legitimizing' the president was
racist. That we do not agree on.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Gruss Gott grussg...@gmail.com wrote:
Scott wrote:
I never said that none of the birthers are racist, but I don't think
they all are.
See? You've finally come
You are also making the assumption that ALL birthers are racist,
again, something we disagree on.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Gruss Gott grussg...@gmail.com wrote:
Scott wrote:
I never said that none of the birthers are racist, but I don't think
they all are.
See? You've finally come
Scott wrote:
You are also making the assumption that ALL birthers are racist,
again, something we disagree on.
Uh, no.
As I've written at least 5 times I think some are racists and the rest
are reactionaries and loons. Here's what I wrote at the top of this
thread:
It's an alliance
I wonder if
thishttp://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2009/02/obama-birth-cer.htmlbirther
is racist?
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
No, Keyes is bat-shit crazy.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Jerry Barnes critic...@gmail.com wrote:
I wonder if this
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2009/02/obama-birth-cer.html
birther
is racist?
~|
Want
just a complete loon. Seriously, he couldn't win against a democrat in
Maryland who was incompetent to say the least. Then the republicans
made him a parachute candidate against Obama where he was was
thoroughly trashed in the election. so I suspect that he's a bit
bitter over that defeat.
On
JJ wrote:
No, Keyes is bat-shit crazy.
Yeah, I saw him speak in Chicago and ... whoa. I truly believe he's insane.
Glen beck just plays an insane guy on TV but Keyes? He's the real
deal. actually insane.
~|
Want to
I think he might be. He really reminds me of the blind, black KKK dude
in the Chappelle Show skit except Keyes is more crazy.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Jerry Barnes critic...@gmail.com wrote:
I wonder if
Clayton Bigsby I believe.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.comwrote:
I think he might be. He really reminds me of the blind, black KKK dude
in the Chappelle Show skit except Keyes is more crazy.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Jerry Barnes
See, I would have had no issues if the argument against Rush owning a
team was 'well, he is a douche bag'
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.com wrote:
Limbaugh admitted to telling a black listener to Take that bone out
of your nose and call me back and saying
Funny, there goes the whole 'well the other guys do it' argument. I
love that one, really puts a smile on my face.
And in my own, admittedly limited, experience, I have found that black
people living in public housing want to kill white paramedics (and
that is based on more than just my
Lets see as a ESPN commentator Rush Limbaugh said that Philadelphia
Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb was overrated because the media
wanted to see a black quarterback do well.
Also to quote Limbaugh
Look it, let me put it to you this way. The NFL all too often looks
like a game between the
The comment about McNabb was more of a slam against the media than
McNabb, and far from a racial comment.
The only way I see the second comment would be racist is if you assume
only blacks are in gangs.
This comment was more directed at how the NFL runs its operation
rather than those who play
Scott without even trying there are quite a few of his racist quotes:
The NAACP should have riot rehearsal. They should get a liquor store
and practice robberies.
source: http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2549
Take that bone out of your nose and call me back(to an African
American female
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.com wrote:
Limbaugh admitted to telling a black listener to Take that bone out
of your nose and call me back
He said that 30 years ago as a music DJ and said often he feels really
bad for saying it.
and saying Have you ever
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com wrote:
Lets see as a ESPN commentator Rush Limbaugh said that Philadelphia
Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb was overrated because the media
wanted to see a black quarterback do well.
That's not racists. Or are white folk
thing is that he has said similar stuff more recently. Its a pattern
this person uses regularly, he goes right up to the legal edge of a
hate speech.
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com wrote:
Scott without even trying there are quite a few of his racist
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com wrote:
Scott without even trying there are quite a few of his racist quotes:
The NAACP should have riot rehearsal. They should get a liquor store
and practice robberies.
source: http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2549
I
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704322004574477021697942920.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_RIGHTTopCarousel
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com wrote:
Scott without even trying there are quite
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com wrote:
Scott without even trying there are quite a few of his racist quotes:
The NAACP should have riot rehearsal. They should get a liquor store
and practice robberies.
source: http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2549
I
If he's thought as Democrat Lite, I'd hate to see what the right wing would
be, Nazi regalia underneath Klan robes?
As someone else noted, the klan made famous for its brutality was
practically an extension of the Southern Democratic Party. Kind of like
Acorn and the Democratic party now.
As
Obama claimed he was born in two different hospitals, hard to take him
seriously.
I think it's pretty clear to see the Obama is a Kenyan robot programmed to
destroy the US.
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with
Scott wrote:
Based on your reasoning, Larry is racist because he tried/tries to
de-legitimize GW every chance he got.
So Larry made the claim that GW was not a US citizen?
Larry - did you claim that GW was not a US citizen? Did you ask for
GW to prove that he met the requirements to be US
NO I just go for stupidity, veniality and plain incompetance. not just
the shrubbery.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Scott Stroz boyz...@gmail.com wrote:
Based on your reasoning, Larry is racist because he tried/tries to
de-legitimize GW every chance he got. (Sorry, Larry, Gruss'
I'm simply not sure about that. It seems to me that the birther issues
are a veneer overlying the racism. I think that if Obama was white
but had the exact same background, the same accusations would not
exist. Its only because he is black that you're getting such hysterics
on the extreme right
That's my take on it too.
And it's what I think of when they are interviewed and say
they have to take back THEIR country.
Sad stuff.
2009/10/17 Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com:
I'm simply not sure about that. It seems to me that the birther issues
are a veneer overlying the racism. I
You have to be kidding. Senator McCain has one of the highest scores
from the Conservative Union - having voted over 98% on pro
conservative issues.
If he's thought as Democrat Lite, I'd hate to see what the right wing
would be, Nazi regalia underneath Klan robes?
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:19
I actually don't think it is racist, so much as not like meist
I think if he had a heavy Spanish accent, heck, a heavy French accent, the
same would hold true.
If he were a Morman, again, true.
If he were single, I think he would be having similar problems.
Or gay.
So on Obama's case, I
So, is it questioning anyone on whether they are a citizen that is
racist? Or is it only if you question the president? Or maybe only
this president?
Nice backpedal Gruss. You claimed they were racist because they are
trying to 'de-legitimize' the president. A very good argument can be
made that
Well, with Bush we questioned his legitimacy as a human, not as a citizen.
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Scott Stroz boyz...@gmail.com wrote:
So, is it questioning anyone on whether they are a citizen that is
racist? Or is it only if you question the president? Or maybe only
this
how is he hiding it? do you want him to hand it around so each one of these
nutjobs can feel the raised seal?
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Scott Stroz boyz...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't think of another Democrat, or Republican, who has gone to such
lengths to hide his birth certificate.
yeah. What he said.
It wasn't like Democrats in Congress were questioning McCain's
standing to be President and initiated a partisan attack on him. Quite
the contrary, they deemed the legal issue to be obscure and totally
useless and therefore put forth a resolution saying that they all
Scott wrote:
Nice backpedal Gruss.
Well here's my experience.
I just happen to have discussed this with, eh, maybe 30 of these
birther people, and to a person they get all worked up and eventually
they call Obama a monkey or a nigger or they say the blackhouse or say
that Michelle Obama is a
Wow...you talked to a whole 30 people. That is quite a sampling.
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Gruss Gott grussg...@gmail.com wrote:
Scott wrote:
Nice backpedal Gruss.
Well here's my experience.
I just happen to have discussed this with, eh, maybe 30 of these
birther people, and to a
Sadly, while I may try to see the best in people, I tend to see the
worst in people. Almost 20 years of slinging bodies around the streets
on NJ can do that to a fella.
I never said that none of the birthers are racist, but I don't think
they all are. I just find it funny that it seems OK for
Wrong party.
Nazi and Clansmen are Dems.
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com wrote:
You have to be kidding. Senator McCain has one of the highest scores
from the Conservative Union - having voted over 98% on pro
conservative issues.
If he's thought as
So what do you make of the folks that filed law suits against McCain?
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Jerry Johnson jmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I actually don't think it is racist, so much as not like meist
I think if he had a heavy Spanish accent, heck, a heavy French accent, the
same would
For eight years GG was screaming the only purpose of the media was to
challenge the president and the government.
Now, you're racist if you challenge anything Obama.
Convenient that black thing isn't it :)
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Scott Stroz boyz...@gmail.com wrote:
So, is it
You can't be that ignant to think people believe this rubbish?
Hmmm, then again I always used to say if you question a lefty long
enough you'll find anti-semitism.
Maybe you're right. I don't know any birthers so I can't do my own study :)
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Gruss Gott
Correction, I paint no more of a wide brush than Sam or others. That
said, one thing I wam willing to admit and unlike those others, I am
very willing to admit when I'm wrong, or when the data dictates other
than what I think.
In my own admittedly limited experience, I've found that when you
I challenge you to prove in any way Rush is racists.
The current NFL scam was a fraud pointing back to Obama administration.
What Rush said on ESPN years ago was not racist no matter how you try
to spin it.
I find that people throwing the racist label around are often the ones
that cross the
Limbaugh admitted to telling a black listener to Take that bone out
of your nose and call me back and saying Have you ever noticed how
all composite pictures of wanted criminals resemble Jesse Jackson?
as well as (more specific to the NFL) Look, let me put it to you this
way: the NFL all too
The money that was spent on that sign should have gone to NASA.
I'm deeply saddened.
--
Anyone who speaks in the name of others is always an imposter.
Emile M. Cioran
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:06 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
...
New 'brith certificate' billboard erected in Florida:
Denny wrote:
The money that was spent on that sign should have gone to NASA.
I'm deeply saddened.
That's the thing: somebody was actually stupid enough to spend money on this.
It's such an utterly brainless concept that it can only be racism.
I get racism - it's a eons old psychology
gg wrote:
So the only explanation that I can come up with for someone to spend
money on something like this is devolution.
They are not men. The are devo.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWmf7r_37e
~|
Want to reach the
But it's also logically ridiculous.
Screw you cracker!
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive:
Grant wrote:
But it's also logically ridiculous.
Screw you cracker!
Hey bro, I'm down with brown.
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
gg wrote:
They are not men. The are devo.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWmf7r_37eA
New rule: you're an idiot if you don't love these guys:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRENoPisFY
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion
Are you an idiot if you can't FIND those guys...?
The URL contained a malformed video ID
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Gruss Gott grussg...@gmail.com wrote:
New rule: you're an idiot if you don't love these guys:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRENoPisFY
It says you are a malformed video id.
0_0
2009/10/16 Gruss Gott grussg...@gmail.com:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRENoPisFY
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of
Please explain to me how its racist.
I will give you ridiculous, I will give you stupid. But I fail to see
how its racist.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Gruss Gott grussg...@gmail.com wrote:
Denny wrote:
The money that was spent on that sign should have gone to NASA.
I'm deeply
Wait..I get it..its racist because its abotu Obama.
I forgot that part of the 'change' we were promised was that you can
no longer question the president without being called a racist.
That there is some great 'change'
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Scott Stroz boyz...@gmail.com wrote:
it's irrational malice. Explain it some other way if you can.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Scott Stroz boyz...@gmail.com wrote:
Wait..I get it..its racist because its abotu Obama.
I forgot that part of the 'change' we were promised was that you can
no longer question the president
It *IS* change. Before (2000-2008) if you questioned the president you were
unpatriotic. Now it's racist. Next president will just label anyone that
questions him a pedophile.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Scott Stroz boyz...@gmail.com wrote:
Wait..I get it..its racist because its abotu
I will buy 'irrational malice'. But giving it a label of 'racism' is ludicrous.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
it's irrational malice. Explain it some other way if you can.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Scott Stroz boyz...@gmail.com wrote:
Wait..I
Good point Michael.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Michael Grant mgr...@modus.bz wrote:
It *IS* change. Before (2000-2008) if you questioned the president you were
unpatriotic. Now it's racist. Next president will just label anyone that
questions him a pedophile.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009
Vivvy wrote:
It says you are a malformed video id.
0_0
2009/10/16 Gruss Gott grussg...@gmail.com:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRENoPisFY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRENoPisFYk
forgot the k
~|
Want to reach the
Scott wrote:
I will buy 'irrational malice'. But giving it a label of 'racism' is
ludicrous.
It's an alliance between Tim McVeighs and David Dukes: reactionary
righties and racists.
And this isn't questioning the President's policies, it's an attempt
to outright de-legitimize him.
And
Racism is 'discriminatory or abusive behavior towards members of
another race '. I would not categorize the birthers behavior as
discriminatory nor abusive.
I'll buy your 'right wing conspiracy nut job' label, but, again, not racism.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Gruss Gott
Whether or not it is racism depends entirely on the motive of those
behind this movement. At least in part, these birthers are being
funded by white supremacist organizations - so in those cases, it
would indeed be racism.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Scott Stroz boyz...@gmail.com wrote:
Scott wrote:
Racism is 'discriminatory or abusive behavior towards members of
another race '. I would not categorize the birthers behavior as
discriminatory nor abusive.
Trying to de-legitimize a US president is a proxy for racism. Do you
really believe that if it was McCain - who was
Based on your reasoning, Larry is racist because he tried/tries to
de-legitimize GW every chance he got. (Sorry, Larry, Gruss'
definition, not mine)
If Obama as Republican we would not be talking about this either. I
find it interesting that with all the differences between McCain and
Obama, you
because the key point about GW is not that he is a white man. It's that he
is a STUPID white man.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Scott Stroz boyz...@gmail.com wrote:
Based on your reasoning, Larry is racist because he tried/tries to
de-legitimize GW every chance he got. (Sorry, Larry,
ok. You think it's irrational malice towards democrats? What? Just calling
something ludicous is not a refutation.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Scott Stroz boyz...@gmail.com wrote:
I will buy 'irrational malice'. But giving it a label of 'racism' is
ludicrous.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at
No, they key point about GW was that he is a stupid man.
The key point about Obama is not that he is a black man.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
because the key point about GW is not that he is a white man. It's that he
is a STUPID white man.
On Fri,
I think the obsession with his birth certificate is ludicrous. I
personally think it is more based on the fact that he is a Democrat
than the fact he is black.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
ok. You think it's irrational malice towards democrats? What? Just
Let me correct that...the point about GW was that he was a stupid Republican.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Scott Stroz boyz...@gmail.com wrote:
No, they key point about GW was that he is a stupid man.
The key point about Obama is not that he is a black man.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 7:51
well I can't think of another Democrat who's been asked for a birth
certificate, But I am sure you have some examples to back that up, right?
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Scott Stroz boyz...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the obsession with his birth certificate is ludicrous. I
personally
Another link for you:
Gary Kreep To File 9 New Birther Lawsuitshttp://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=3854
The site does not give many details.
Nice name.
By the way, on the racism charge: Some of the birthers are surely racists
but that doesn't make them all racist. I think most are just
Yeah, the real problem is always ideas.
Things like race or ethnicity or eye color... bwahahaha. Yeah, right.
Different... Same... Different... Same...
It's all a game.
--
Fame!
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
Another link for you:
Gary Kreep To File 9 New Birther
McCain had a congressional investigation. Are they racist against whites?
They are not de-legitimizing the president. He is by not providing
constitutionally required proof.
It would take one phone call to end it, instead he spent over $1
million to hide it.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 3:34 PM,
I thought you were out of politics?
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Maureen mamamaur...@gmail.com wrote:
Whether or not it is racism depends entirely on the motive of those
behind this movement. At least in part, these birthers are being
funded by white supremacist organizations - so in
I can't think of another Democrat, or Republican, who has gone to such
lengths to hide his birth certificate.
Following your, and Gruss', logic because some birthers are racist,
they must all be racist. Its a wonder you can hold that wide brush you
are painting with.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at
Out of curiosity, where do you see that John McCain had an
investigation by Congress? The Senate passed a non-binding resolution
(which has absolutely 0 credibility as far as Constitutional
requirements goes) but I've yet to see anything that says anyone in
the Senate did any investigation. They
I might also point out that that particular resolution was introduced
by Claire McCaskil (a Democrat) and was cosponsored by Hillary Clinton
and Barack Obama (who were both still competing for the Democratic
nomination in April 2008).
It wasn't like Democrats in Congress were questioning
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.com wrote:
I might also point out that that particular resolution was introduced
by Claire McCaskil (a Democrat) and was cosponsored by Hillary Clinton
and Barack Obama (who were both still competing for the Democratic
Thought everyone might get a kick out of these, regardless of whichever side
you fall.
New 'brith certificate' billboard erected in Florida:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.viewpageId=112765
An article from a Kenyan Newspaper from 2004 mentioning 0bamab being born in
Kenya:
No. You can be a british subject until you are blue in the face, but this
does not make you a british citizen nor does it give the british anything at
all to do with your citizenship.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
No Shit Sherlock :)
Obama himself claimed to
Being a british subject simply means that you are a citizen of a country
whose head of state is the queen of England. It does not give you British
citizenship nor does it give Britain any say in the citizenship matters of
your country since her status is purely ceremonial.
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Sam wrote:
There's going to be a time in your life when you can't defend Obama by
blaming Bush.
Actually I think that time passed.
I wasn't defending Obama, I was observing how much Bush 43 sucked.
His whole administration sucked donkey balls, truth be told.
Obama could speak when he was born?
He truly *IS* amazing
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
No Shit Sherlock :)
Obama himself claimed to be a British Subject when he was born, not a
British Citizen.
Being a British Subject his citizenship was governed by
Only one state out of 57 plus states certified Obama as president.
57 plus states?
*scratches head*
Christ Sam, you don't even know how many bloody states your country has?
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with
I got that from The One :)
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Michael Grant mgr...@modus.bz wrote:
Only one state out of 57 plus states certified Obama as president.
57 plus states?
*scratches head*
Christ Sam, you don't even know how many bloody states your country has?
There are those who say that even if Obama were to provide every last
record down to dry-cleaning receipts, no proof could satisfy birther
proponents. In Taitz's case, there's what she calls a two-prong test.
Bucking the common view that natural born citizen the constitutional
requirement for a
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Vivec gel21...@gmail.com wrote:
Bucking the common view that natural born citizen the constitutional
requirement for a U.S. president means, generally speaking, born on
American soil,
Of course, this is wrong too because natural born citizen means
born on
I was wondering when someone would be bringing up implicit social
cognition. It woudl be far better if the writer could have presented
some research on the attitudes of Birthers and their supporters.
That said there was an excellent article about Orly Taitz - one of the
shining lights of the
I don't know what Birthers are.. maybe I agree with them in large part.
Personally, I think just because you're born here shouldn't make you a
citizen. Specifically, if you're born in the United States to someone
who is not a legal resident, you should NOT be automatically granted
citizen. I
that's not the issue. the constitution quite clearly states
eligibility, native born - on US soil or of parents who are citizens.
End of story.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Rick Root rick.r...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know what Birthers are.. maybe I agree with them in large part.
Rick..
This is a pseudo-political topic
...
okies...it is a political topic :-)
About the eligibility of Obama to be a US President.
Birthers are a group of nutjobs who continue to say that Obama
is not a United States citizen despite evidence to the contrary.
They supported a US
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com wrote:
that's not the issue. the constitution quite clearly states
eligibility, native born - on US soil or of parents who are citizens.
End of story.
Not end of story.
The constitution can be amended, as it has been done
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Vivec gel21...@gmail.com wrote:
About the eligibility of Obama to be a US President.
Birthers are a group of nutjobs who continue to say that Obama
is not a United States citizen despite evidence to the contrary.
Yeah, see that's just silly.
rick
Still its irrelevant to the topic. Hijack another one, this is about
Birther loonies not immigration ... well you know...
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Rick Root rick.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com wrote:
that's not the issue.
I don't give a damn about the birth certificate. I would like to know why
none of these documents have been released.
Columbia University transcripts
Columbia thesis paper
Campaign donor analysis requested by major watchdog groups
Harvard University transcripts
Illinois State Senate records
Why do those need to be released?
Did George Bush, Ronald Reagan, or Bill Clinton release all those records?
2009/10/7 Jerry Barnes critic...@gmail.com
I don't give a damn about the birth certificate. I would like to know why
none of these documents have been released.
Columbia
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
