that too I was limiting myself to the practical aspects of the
question. So Bush is already out?
woohoo
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
> I was against the cost of the inauguration until last night I was
> realizing that all the Bushies had moved out of the Whitehouse
> Judah wrote:
> So let America have its party and then roll up its sleeves and get to work.
>
Cheers to you citizen!
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http:
I was against the cost of the inauguration until last night I was
realizing that all the Bushies had moved out of the Whitehouse and I
found myself cheering an end to an 8 year nightmare.
That's when I realized that several million people are going to head
to DC regardless of whether Obama wants t
I agree.
The inauguration may not be a good instance of that though, as it has
a fair amount of historic and psychological meaning. Quite apart from
the history that is being made is the fact that perception matters a
great deal in any push to get people buying again, and if we are too
poor to mar
> Stroz wrote:
> One thing that annoys me is that every time its pointed out that maybe Obama
> could have done something different, you know, that 'change' he keeps
> preaching,
You were making a good point until the "change" comment. That's one
of those stupid things to debate because it's subj
You have a valid point, I have not bitched about it on this list. I have
bitched about it, just not here.
I am not so opposed to the bailout as I am that there seem to be no strings
attached. Banks still gave millions in bonuses to the executive who put the
banks in the precarious position to be
my point is that I don't see you bitching about giving billions to
banks. I have not been paying attention to the inauguration but you
know what, I was in DC for Reagan's and you never saw so many hot and
cold running balls.
Furthermore, it's not just an extravagance. Consumer confidence needs
to
Now, that right there is funny...
>
>
> DON'T DO IT!!! Look what happenned to Clinton!
>
>
--
Scott Stroz
Some people are like slinkies...not really good for anything but they bring
a smile to your face when pushed down the stairs.
~~
> JJ wrote:
> I thought that cost extra?
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Erika L. Walker wrote:
>
>> Now boys ... do we need to tie all of you to a tree and cut a nice new
>> switch ? :)
>>
Oo! Oo! How much?
~|
Adobe® Col
I thought that cost extra?
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Erika L. Walker wrote:
> Now boys ... do we need to tie all of you to a tree and cut a nice new
> switch ? :)
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 2:47 PM, wrote:
>
> >
> > If you have a problem with that, too bad. Learn to deal with it.
>
> I assume that if President Obama told you that it will help solve global
> warming if you knelt down and hobbed his knob, you would knock over every
> other tree fucker to be first in line.
DON'T DO IT!!! Look what happenned to Clinton!
~~
Now boys ... do we need to tie all of you to a tree and cut a nice new
switch ? :)
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 2:47 PM, wrote:
>
> If you have a problem with that, too bad. Learn to deal with it.
>
>
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 softwar
Wait, let me get this straight...
You make assumptions about the author of a post based on nothing more than
your liberal bias and then have the fucking nerve to say 'If you have a
problem with it, too bad' when he calls you out on it?
Well, I am going make some assumptions based on the petulant
So... suggesting... no wait, flat out stating that I would actually be
pleased if people got hurt... that's not an insult? Sorry, no. You don't
get to hurl insults and insinuations and then act like the injured party
when your target fires back. Learn to deal with that.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at
I had for a while, then this set of posts pissed me off. I don't know who you
are, I use the web archive so I do not see the sender's email. The petulant
tone of the email sounded too much like aset of conservatives that are on this
site. So I responded in kind.
If you have a problem with it to
So, because its not billions of dollars its OK to piss it away? You should
get into politics, you'd fit right in with that attitude.
Finish up your Kool-Aid, the Prophet of Change is on his way.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Dana wrote:
> more people, higher security risks, it's four years
more people, higher security risks, it's four years later... that's off the
top of my head. I heard they are closing all of the bridges in DC. That's a
pretty extreme security measure and it will take a huge amont of manpower
just for that right right there.
::shrug:: I have not been paying attent
Charlie's posts are always must read.he crax me up.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Michael Grant [Modus IS]
wrote:
> > Didn't your last two posts contain the phrase "before i unsubscribe
> again"? Can't find the link?
>
> That's just plain clever, no matter who's side you're on with this o
> Didn't your last two posts contain the phrase "before i unsubscribe
again"? Can't find the link?
That's just plain clever, no matter who's side you're on with this one.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Larry Lyons wrote:
> >I call bullshit. and not the 5 yard variety. the 15 yard variety.
> >
> >If it was McCain or any other republican won the election you'd be up on
> >your high horse atop a soap box screaming about how it's the "same ol'
> same
> >ol'".
> >
>I call bullshit. and not the 5 yard variety. the 15 yard variety.
>
>If it was McCain or any other republican won the election you'd be up on
>your high horse atop a soap box screaming about how it's the "same ol' same
>ol'".
>
>--
>I have failed as much as I have succeeded. But I love my life.
> Sam wrote:
> it." - Rush
>
HA! Quoting comedians, that's funny.
Well here's what Kudlow thinks:
HE IS CHARMING, HE IS TERRIBLY SMART, BRIGHT, WELL-INFORMED, HE HAS A
GREAT SENSE OF HUMOR ...
INTERESTING THING. THIS IS JUST GENERALLY SPEAKING, HE IS SO
WELL-INFORMED, AND HE LOVES TO DEAL WIT
> ChuckG wrote:
> Didn't they already spend the money on the party? The big extravagant one
> in Chicago?
That was the Obama campaign's party that they invited people to. That
was nice of them.
This is America's party, the inauguration of the next leader of our country.
So let's party!
~~
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
> > ChuckG wrote:
> > If it was McCain or any other republican won the election
>
> Then you really don't know me, which is given your exposure to emails
> isn't surprising. But given I'm me, I can tell you exactly how I'd
> feel:
>
Of course.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
> 1.) I don't know what you're talking about, and
You never get it :P
> 3.) We've got a historic election during 2 wars and the greatest
> financial crisis in our history. A big ass ole fashioned American
> party for our new leader is DEFINITEL
> ChuckG wrote:
> If it was McCain or any other republican won the election
Then you really don't know me, which is given your exposure to emails
isn't surprising. But given I'm me, I can tell you exactly how I'd
feel:
(1.) There isn't a partisan issue here: it's an inauguration, not a
policy qu
It's been done for every Republican ever elected. It happens every
four years. Are you implying that Obama is somehow responsible for
the crowds and could control the number of the people who show up?
Should he go on television and tell everyone to stay home?
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Sc
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
> > Scott wrote:
> > All I am asking for is just a little bit of equality...now that would be
> a
> > nice change.
> >
>
> 1.) I don't know what you're talking about, and
>
> 2.) My 4th grade teacher taught me an important phase I haven't
> forge
> Scott wrote:
> All I am asking for is just a little bit of equality...now that would be a
> nice change.
>
1.) I don't know what you're talking about, and
2.) My 4th grade teacher taught me an important phase I haven't
forgetten, "kids need to learn life isn't fair".
There should be equality o
Imagine, if you will, how all the tree-huggers would react if all this was
being done for a republican...we would never hear the end of it.
All I am asking for is just a little bit of equality...now that would be a
nice change.
>
> It may have something to do with the minor matter of upwards of
>>> Hurricaines, floods and the inaugurationmakes sense to me...not
>>
>> After 8 years of Bush the federal government qualifies as a disaster
>> area and emergency management is needed.
>
>Given the subject of this thread and the facts as they have been
>presented, I don't think blaming Bush i
Do you think Bush is making nice in the hope that Obama will call of
the dogs so he doesn't have to spend the next four years in court?
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> You would also think that maybe they could hold on on redecorating the White
> House until things got a lit
You would also think that maybe they could hold on on redecorating the White
House until things got a little better as well.
To me the only thing that is really changing is the guy who sits in the big
office at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, everything else will stay the same.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 2:0
> Change is a train and trains require a lot of torque to get moving.
Yeah, but I don't think pushing backwards is going to further the cause
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
>> Hurricaines, floods and the inaugurationmakes sense to me...not
>
> After 8 years of Bush the federal government qualifies as a disaster
> area and emergency management is needed.
Given the subject of this thread and the facts as they have been
presented, I don't think blaming Bush is going
> cHat wrote:
> left and right, don't you think that the candidate for change would
> try to lower the cost of things, not triple them?
>
Change is a train and trains require a lot of torque to get moving.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8
> Scott wrote:
> Hurricaines, floods and the inaugurationmakes sense to me...not
>
After 8 years of Bush the federal government qualifies as a disaster
area and emergency management is needed.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software
Yes.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 2:04 PM, C. Hatton Humphrey wrote:
> > http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28650363/
> >
> > Hurricaines, floods and the inaugurationmakes sense to me...not
>
> More to the point, according to what I've seen and heard the cost is
> between $110 and $150 Million. The last
I see you're going to be a problem, watch it or you might lose your
internets rights.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:04 AM, C. Hatton Humphrey
wrote:
>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28650363/
>>
>> Hurricaines, floods and the inaugurationmakes sense to me...not
>
> More to the point, according to
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28650363/
>
> Hurricaines, floods and the inaugurationmakes sense to me...not
More to the point, according to what I've seen and heard the cost is
between $110 and $150 Million. The last inauguration cost $40M and
people were screaming from the rafters about how
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28650363/
Hurricaines, floods and the inaugurationmakes sense to me...not
--
Scott Stroz
Some people are like slinkies...not really good for anything but they bring
a smile to your face when pushed down the stairs.
~~
41 matches
Mail list logo
