But finally - that the consequences of throwing out ALL the science and
ignoring it are so dire that we HAVE to consider action now, even if part
or all of the science is proven wrong later.
Which science? On the side of the cult of man made global warming or
against?
Anyway, if any figure
like the way you phrase that. Actually are you qualified to comment
even? You refer AGW to a cult. So is a general consensus of the
scientific community considered a cult now?
What about the current consensus on Gravity, is that a cult?
What about General Relativity? Do we have a cult here?
like the way you phrase that. Actually are you qualified to comment even?
You refer AGW to a cult. So is a general consensus of the scientific
community considered a cult now?
I've referred to it as a cult for years and, as has been presented
repeatedly, there is not a consensus. Far from it.
No consensus. Then how many qualified PhD level scientists who
specialize in the field are calling AGW fraudulent etc. Even that big
list that has been cited time and time again has fewer than 100 PhD
level scientists are on it. And most of those who are do not
specialize in climate research.
No consensus. Then how many qualified PhD level scientists who specialize
in the field are calling AGW fraudulent etc. Even that big list that has
been cited time and time again has fewer than 100 PhD level scientists are
on it. And most of those who are do not specialize in climate research.
Ok... a medical doctor has an underlying degree in science, but I am
certainly not going to go to my physician for advice on climatology...
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Barnes [mailto:critic...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 9:20 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Forget
I am still stuck on how limits on greenhouse gases would harm the
environment. Amazing the things that people think up.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
Ok... a medical doctor has an underlying degree in science, but I am
certainly not
Yeah...I am with you on that Dana.
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 11:04 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Forget global warming - it's Cycle 25 we need to worry about
(and if NASA scientists are right the Thames will be
and Plan 9...
Beware Agenda 21
--
will
If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable.
- Carrie Fisher
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Jerry Barnes critic...@gmail.com wrote:
So we should be pumping even MORE greenhouse gasses into the
atmosphere to counter the coming mini ice age?
Nope. Just keep an open mind and don't accept GW as an established fact.
It is a theory and the science is
exactly
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Cameron Childress camer...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Jerry Barnes critic...@gmail.com
wrote:
So we should be pumping even MORE greenhouse gasses into the
atmosphere to counter the coming mini ice age?
Nope. Just keep
Like a broken record.
Nobody is saying throw out all the science. They're just saying it is
not settled.
.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Cameron Childress camer...@gmail.com wrote:
- But finally - that the consequences of throwing out ALL the science
and ignoring it are so dire that we
Actually - you just agreed (in part) with my statements.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
Like a broken record.
Nobody is saying throw out all the science. They're just saying it is
not settled.
..
Yeah minus the dire and action now stuff.
.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Cameron Childress camer...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually - you just agreed (in part) with my statements.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
And are you an expert in determining the scientific consensus or again
are you just parroting the party line?
What do you want for your settled science? Which btw is only a term
used by extremists who keep moving the goal posts each time more data
is shown to support AGW.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah minus the dire and action now stuff.
Then we understand each other on this matter perfectly.
-Cameron
...
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
So we should be pumping even MORE greenhouse gasses into the
atmosphere to counter
the coming mini ice age?
Nope. Just keep an open mind and don't accept GW as an established fact.
It is a theory and the science is NOT in.
Question the motives of those on both sides of the issue.
J
-
Just a reminder about a post I wrote a year ago. If the dailymail says it,
double check with a reputable newspaper.
Can you point out some reputable papers? I can't seem to find any. I find
some that claim to be reputable.
J
-
Protection of the environment has become the principal tool for
Beware Agenda 21
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Jerry Barnes critic...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a reminder about a post I wrote a year ago. If the dailymail says it,
double check with a reputable newspaper.
Can you point out some reputable papers? I can't seem to find any. I find
some
Let me guess...a study funded by the oil industry?
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Barnes [mailto:critic...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 9:51 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Forget global warming - it's Cycle 25 we need to worry about (and
if NASA scientists are right the
Forget global warming - it's Cycle 25 we need to worry about (and if NASA
scientists are right the Thames will be freezing over again)
The supposed ‘consensus’ on man-made global warming is facing an
inconvenient challenge after the release of new temperature data showing
the planet has not
So we should be pumping even MORE greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere to
counter the coming mini ice age?
On 29 January 2012 23:51, Jerry Barnes critic...@gmail.com wrote:
Forget global warming - it's Cycle 25 we need to worry about (and if NASA
scientists are right the Thames will be
Just a reminder about a post I wrote a year ago. If the dailymail says
it, double check with a reputable newspaper.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/thread.cfm/threadid:31391
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Jerry Barnes critic...@gmail.com wrote:
Forget global warming -
And here those silly glaciers are caving off chunks the size of connecticut!
They've even let themselves melt so much that the northwest passage is open for
the first time since ... Ever.
Glaciers never consider the real data.
On Jan 29, 2012, at 7:51 PM, Jerry Barnes critic...@gmail.com
24 matches
Mail list logo
