>You're framing a question that doesn't need to be asked. The real
>question any company asks is where can deliver the most return to
>shareholders? And if the greatest revenue opportunity is in China,
>and if having a headquarters there gets that money, then yes.
Again we're not talking about
> Sam wrote:
> 1- Hongkong != Beijing
> 2- one Office != moving entire company
>
You're framing a question that doesn't need to be asked. The real
question any company asks is where can deliver the most return to
shareholders? And if the greatest revenue opportunity is in China,
and if having a
Can you stay focused?
Why are you talking about Reagan? Chinese capitalism started before Reagan went
there. But you just don't want to talk about Barry do you?
Do you think Beijing is a far superior place to start a business than anyplace
in the US because of the infrastructure? Maybe United Hea
1- Hongkong != Beijing
2- one Office != moving entire company
You're evading the point again.
As a large company would you rather set up your headquarters in Beijing because
the infrastructure is far better
than anyplace in the US?
> Here are some people working with $130 billion of those "dup
China has created a very clever compromise where people have a decent
amount of personal freedom- as long as they don't criticize the
government, engage in "non-sanctioned" religious activities, or
protest in public.
People protest all the time in China, but they get locked up for
making trouble-
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is known is that Regan's
> show-them-capitalism-and-they-will-change policy has failed.
>
The only thing capitalism guarantees is that you will maximize your
profitabilityit in no way guarantees democracy or freedom
> Sam wrote:
> Yes they have a booming economy and we buy their goods. That doesn't make
> them a shining example for the world. Anyone who thinks they are has been
> duped.
By the Republicans? Because wasn't the big plan with China started by
Regan? That by introducing capitalism the Chinese
> Sam wrote:
> Anyone who thinks they are has been duped.
>
Here are some people working with $130 billion of those "dupes" money:
---
The 1,200-attorney Weil, Gotshal & Manges law firm, whose private
I think you're confusing exploiting communist slave labor with a nation of
freedom and laws by and for the people.
While the Chinese are spending billions on railroads and highways they also
don't care much about environmental impact or safety.
Most highways are too expensive due to all the toll
Ok, well I think most economic analysts would disagree.
China's infrastructure has been expanding and developing at a rate that far
exceeds what the United States, and most of the 'Developed' countries in the
world.
The China Market is *the* next market for US goods and services, and there
are man
Huh?
That was a direct answer.
Would you prefer?
Definitely WRONG!
>Nice way to dodge the question.
>
>2008/8/27 sam morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>>
>> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2008/08/21/cnchina121.xml
>>
>> Not where I want to set up shop
>>
Nice way to dodge the question.
2008/8/27 sam morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2008/08/21/cnchina121.xml
>
> Not where I want to set up shop
>
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 softwar
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2008/08/21/cnchina121.xml
Not where I want to set up shop
>"Their ports, their train systems, their airports are vastly the superior to
>us now, which means if you are a corporation deciding where to do business,
>you're starting to think, 'B
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Their ports, their train systems, their airports are vastly the superior
> to
> us now, which means if you are a corporation deciding where to do business,
> you're starting to think, 'Beijing looks like a pretty good option.'"
>
"Their ports, their train systems, their airports are vastly the superior to
us now, which means if you are a corporation deciding where to do business,
you're starting to think, 'Beijing looks like a pretty good option.'"
-BHOjr"
Duped?
Respond to that statement. Is he right or wrong?
2008/8/27
That's why Jr. is going to lose. He keeps dwelling on the America sux message.
It doesn't and if he can tell us what he'll do besides make other countries
like us I'll listen.
What does he say?
1) Close the borders to trade to bring more jobs back to the US.
I thought you where into globalization
http://www.wallbuilders.com/LIBissuesArticles.asp?id=133#FN45
The passage of the 14th Amendment, much like the 13th Amendment, was also along
partisan lines. In the House, it passed 138 to 36. Of the 134 Republicans in
the House, 128 (96%) voted to provide civil rights to former slaves; of the 3
> too truestill, a minority may be too much to swallow by itself as
> evidenced by my mother-in-laws recent doctor visit. While in the
> waiting room, there were some old farts talking about the upcoming
> election. One said, "I've been a democrat for 47 years, but I'm not
> gonna vot
> Erika wrote:
> Wow. That is sad ... sounds like the area I'm currently living in ...
>
[DRAMA TO FOLLOW]
That why I feel like yet again America stands at the crossroads of
human progress and can choose to be a leader or to die. I am certain
that 500 years from now this election will be a turni
rreal that someone born before the Japanese
attack on Pearl Harbor is running for President.
-Original Message-
From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 12:12 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Hillary's speech
If she had given speeches like that on th
Wow. That is sad ... sounds like the area I'm currently living in ...
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> too truestill, a minority may be too much to swallow by itself as
> evidenced by my mother-in-laws recent doctor visit. While in the
> waiti
That's wrong. Bedford Forrest was not among the 6 men who founded the
klan. It was already established before he became aware of it. The
political party and masonic affliation of the founding members is
unknown. The only known affliation is that they were former
Confederate soldiers.
On Wed,
ok i find the add for The Little Mermaid halarious at the bottom of the page...
think it has a double meaning?
Twilight
Heroes
The Little Mermaid - Ariel's Beginning
Dexter - The Complete Second Season
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 so
At least they're not voting for charisma.
It's Obama Biden not Osama bin laden :)
>there are people who wont vote for him because his NAME sounds too
>much like OSAMA's
>
>yeah. we are in a world where people THAT stupid exist.
~
You're right, my bad. It wasn't the Democrat party it was the democrats in the
party.
Glad I cleared that up.
>Wrong. Sometimes the lies are so egregious that I know you're just trolling.
>
>
>> Well it is the party that created the KKK.
really?
http://www.freemasonrywatch.org/kkk.html
h
ok they didnt coin it... but a GRAND LEADER and his boys surely did make it up.
tw
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Maureen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also wrong.
>
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
> Wrong. Sometimes the lies are so egregious that I know you're just trolling.
>> Well it is the party that created the KKK.
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~
>I don't think the Democratic party spun off the KKK, but rather it was
>a result of the Civil War. Essentially it was, and is, a modern
>American insurgency pretty similar to Iraq.
Based on and made up of angry Democrats
>Another interesting point is that shows the evolution of the parties.
>
>
Also wrong.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the masons created the kkk
>
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:38 PM, sam morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Well it is the party that created the KKK.
Wrong. Sometimes the lies are so egregious that I know you're just trolling.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 9:38 AM, sam morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well it is the party that created the KKK.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8
i just dont think so...
i think the country is just truly sick of the shit
and want change for the sake of change... i really do.
-- tony
Better than a thousand hollow words, is one word that brings peace.
-- siddhartha gautama
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Maureen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
If she had given speeches like that on the campaign trail indeed of
resorting to a bunch of negative sound bites, perhaps he would have.
Or perhaps she would be the one picking a VP.
I don't know about anyone walking away with the election. I suspect
it will be very close, and the repugs will tak
-Original Message-
>> From: Erika L. Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 9:19 AM
>> To: CF-Community
>> Subject: Re: Hillary's speech
>>
>>
>> All I could think was "Why didn't Obama pick Hillary as VP
the masons created the kkk
-- tony
Better than a thousand hollow words, is one word that brings peace.
-- siddhartha gautama
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:38 PM, sam morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well it is the party that created the KKK.
>
>
>>too truestill, a minority may be too much
> Sam wrote:
> Well it is the party that created the KKK.
>
I don't think the Democratic party spun off the KKK, but rather it was
a result of the Civil War. Essentially it was, and is, a modern
American insurgency pretty similar to Iraq.
Another interesting point is that shows the evolution of
Well it is the party that created the KKK.
>too truestill, a minority may be too much to swallow by itself as
>evidenced by my mother-in-laws recent doctor visit. While in the
>waiting room, there were some old farts talking about the upcoming
>election. One said, "I've been a democr
August 27, 2008 9:19 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Hillary's speech
>
>
> All I could think was "Why didn't Obama pick Hillary as VP "
>
> Seems to me the Dems could of walked away with the election.
>
> On Wed
. Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 9:19 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Hillary's speech
All I could think was "Why didn't Obama pick Hillary as VP "
Seems to me the Dems could of walked away with the election.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008
> gMoney wrote:
> I would have reconsidered my Obama vote if he had selected HillaryI
> doubt I would have been alone. I probably wouldn't have changed my mind, but
> I would have given it serious thought.
>
> There is risk and reward in selecting anyone.
>
Same here. And as great as Hillary
I would have reconsidered my Obama vote if he had selected HillaryI
doubt I would have been alone. I probably wouldn't have changed my mind, but
I would have given it serious thought.
There is risk and reward in selecting anyone.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTEC
All I could think was "Why didn't Obama pick Hillary as VP "
Seems to me the Dems could of walked away with the election.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, what did you think?
>
>
~
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is the part she cites:
>
>
> Most of all, I ran to stand up for all those who have been invisible
> to their government for eight long years. Those are the reasons I ran
> for president, and those are the reaso
So, what did you think?
My wife is a Hillary supporter and had already told me that she would
be voting for McCain after Obama's nomination. The speech came on
last night. My wife told me she was going to our room to watch
something on Tivo since she didn't want to listen to Hillary talk
43 matches
Mail list logo
