t; > Lemme guessearly reports are that no oil is leaking?
> >
> > Then a week from now, we'll get a report saying SOME oil MIGHT be
> leaking.
> >
> > Then a few days later.10 trillion gallons of oil a day are spewing
> out
> > of the earth like an
Were you a journalism major?
haha
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 1:14 PM, GMoney wrote:
>
> Lemme guessearly reports are that no oil is leaking?
>
> Then a week from now, we'll get a report saying SOME oil MIGHT be leaking.
>
> Then a few days later.10 trillion g
Lemme guessearly reports are that no oil is leaking?
Then a week from now, we'll get a report saying SOME oil MIGHT be leaking.
Then a few days later.10 trillion gallons of oil a day are spewing out
of the earth like an eternal ebony money shot from hell.
*sigh*
On Fri, Nov 16,
http://abcn.ws/T6vhPz
An oil and gas rig off the coast of Louisiana was hit by an explosion and
fire this morning, leaving crew members missing.
The U.S. Coast Guard confirmed that a Black Elk Energy Co. oil and natural
gas platform had some sort of explosion occur in the gulf, sending plumes
ahh
bwhahahaha
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:18 PM, William Bowen wrote:
>
> well... not anymore...
>
> > "swan doctor"
> >
> > The guy ONLY works on swans???
>
>
> --
> will
>
> "If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
> and that would just be unacceptable."
> - Carrie Fisher
>
>
well... not anymore...
> "swan doctor"
>
> The guy ONLY works on swans???
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anth
"swan doctor"
The guy ONLY works on swans???
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> I am not endorsing or denigrating this theory. I do find it interesting
> and entertaining so I thought I'd send it out for others to read.
>
>
> THE M
I am not endorsing or denigrating this theory. I do find it interesting
and entertaining so I thought I'd send it out for others to read.
THE MYSTERIOUS DEATHS OF NINE GULF OIL SPILL WHISTLEBLOWERS (
http://www.setyoufreenews.com/2012/05/04/the-mysterious-deaths-of-nine-gulf-oil-
ans forced it into the bill.
>>
>> What I don't know is why Canada would care if we have a pipeline or
>> not. We would still buy oil from them it would just take us longer to
>> deliver and use it.
>>
>
> Economics. Without the pipeline, they might make significantly
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> I know it means jobs in the US and cheaper fuel cost eventually and
> the Republicans forced it into the bill.
>
> What I don't know is why Canada would care if we have a pipeline or
> not. We would still buy oil from the
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Medic wrote:
> You might need more than 32, but I bet if you sent all of your boyscouts
> and gave them stuff just out of your local gun shop you could probably
> overrun our forces. It wouldn't be the battle with the military that caused
> you trouble though, it
You might need more than 32, but I bet if you sent all of your boyscouts
and gave them stuff just out of your local gun shop you could probably
overrun our forces. It wouldn't be the battle with the military that caused
you trouble though, it would be the resistance. Canadians are not a people
tha
you know everyone thinks that, except like the taliban they're found
out to their regret.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
>> your choice.
>
>
> Oh man, you really don't want ME to choose. I totally want to s
> How else do you explain such a large percantage of the
> population living within 50 miles of the US border?
When you live in the USA's hat, it's warmest near the band?
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~~
I don't know about that. Canada has been prepping for an invasion for
years. How else do you explain such a large percantage of the
population living within 50 miles of the US border?
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Larry C. Lyons w
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> your choice.
Oh man, you really don't want ME to choose. I totally want to see 32 boy
scouts storm Canada and win.
-Cameron
...
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthol
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> lets see energy stops, invasion starts, energy infrastructure
> destroyed. US is 3 to 10 years without half its normally available
> energy. Rest of the world starts boycotting the US, the economy tanks
> to below 2008 and great depression
for all. No
interuption. US gets the oil, China doesn't. US is a bit richer for
the jobs and cheaper energy.
your choice.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
>> I'll let you figure out wh
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> I'll let you figure out what happens next.
We invade Canada using a troop of 32 Boy Scouts?
Merry Christmas! :)
-Cameron
...
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Antholog
n the US and cheaper fuel cost eventually and
>> >> the Republicans forced it into the bill.
>> >>
>> >> What I don't know is why Canada would care if we have a pipeline or
>> >> not. We would still buy
tually and
> >> the Republicans forced it into the bill.
> >>
> >> What I don't know is why Canada would care if we have a pipeline or
> >> not. We would still buy oil from them it would just take us longer to
> >> d
m wrote:
>
>> I know it means jobs in the US and cheaper fuel cost eventually and
>> the Republicans forced it into the bill.
>>
>> What I don't know is why Canada would care if we have a pipeline or
>> not. We would still buy oil from them it would just take
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Sam wrote:
> I know it means jobs in the US and cheaper fuel cost eventually and
> the Republicans forced it into the bill.
>
> What I don't know is why Canada would care if we have a pipeline or
> not. We would still buy oil from them i
I know it means jobs in the US and cheaper fuel cost eventually and
the Republicans forced it into the bill.
What I don't know is why Canada would care if we have a pipeline or
not. We would still buy oil from them it would just take us longer to
deliver and use it.
.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011
gt; case of do what I say not as I do. There is a long history of the US
>> meddling in internal affairs of both Canada and Mexico as well as
>> other countries in the Americas. Harper was just stating the case.
>> Canada can sell the oil far more pr
There is a long history of the US
> meddling in internal affairs of both Canada and Mexico as well as
> other countries in the Americas. Harper was just stating the case.
> Canada can sell the oil far more profitably to China than the US. If
> the US doesn'
Fine Sam, then when is the US going to stop doing that? Or is it a
case of do what I say not as I do. There is a long history of the US
meddling in internal affairs of both Canada and Mexico as well as
other countries in the Americas. Harper was just stating the case.
Canada can sell the oil far
ROFLMAO
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Milo Johnson [mailto:jmi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 9:05 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Canada says it will sell oil to the Chinese if Keystone XL is
not built
No. That's just shrinkage from the cold. honest.
O
No. That's just shrinkage from the cold. honest.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> The US has tried that for over 200 years. And mostly have been suffering
> from "ED" from the start.
>
> On Tuesday, December 20, 2011, Eric Roberts <
> ow...@threeravensconsulting.com>
>
sday, December 20, 2011 9:43 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Canada says it will sell oil to the Chinese if Keystone XL is not
> built
>
>
> Essentially Harper is telling the US screw you:
>
>
http://edmonton.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20111219/stephen-harper-yea
Fuck canada...
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 9:43 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Canada says it will sell oil to the Chinese if Keystone XL is not
built
Essentially Harper is telling the US screw you:
http
Currently the extraction methods use a lot of water and does produce a
fair amount of green house gases. That's where the real issue comes
in. And it needs to be solved and soon. Oil companies are now starting
to look at the oil shale deposits in the US. The methods to extract
oil from th
This would only effect new shipments of oil, I believe, since the
pipeline isn't built yet. If Canada is threatening to change their
current arrangements then that would obviously have a much bigger
impact.
Looks like Canada is still our number one supplier of oil but we
produce over hal
I think its a pretty big deal as, IIRC, we get most of our oil from
Canada. I imagine it will affect gas prices here.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Given that the Republicans in Congress are intent of forcing a 60 day
> decision on the pipeline and the
go on our merry way as we currently are. Perhaps not
ideal but also not a huge giant deal either.
Judah
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> Me, I'm just recognizing the reality. Harper said they will sell to
> the Chinese if the US doesn't get off its coll
There is no way to mitigate that.
We need to find sustainable sources of energy other than Oil, that's the
only way.
Fusion. We need Fusion. 0_0
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/
Telling a country how they should vote is playing politics.
.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> more like being pissed off at the politics. Besides China is willing
> to pay more.
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Sam wrote:
>>
>> Sounds like blackmail.
>>
~~
Me, I'm just recognizing the reality. Harper said they will sell to
the Chinese if the US doesn't get off its collective rear end. The oil
will be sold, it just depends on who is the buyer. If the Chinese then
it will go through the TransCanada pipeline to BC and then to China.
I'
> Sounds like blackmail.
> >
> > .
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Larry C. Lyons
> wrote:
> >>
> >> The current plans have it going over the Ogallala Aquifer. TransCan
> >> has already said that they'd reroute the pipeline as needed to a
t going over the Ogallala Aquifer. TransCan
>> has already said that they'd reroute the pipeline as needed to avoid
>> it. That said, Canada would probably make a lot more selling the oil
>> to China than the US. A lot of people I know back in Canada are now
>> saying s
Sounds like blackmail.
.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> The current plans have it going over the Ogallala Aquifer. TransCan
> has already said that they'd reroute the pipeline as needed to avoid
> it. That said, Canada would probably make a lot mor
The current plans have it going over the Ogallala Aquifer. TransCan
has already said that they'd reroute the pipeline as needed to avoid
it. That said, Canada would probably make a lot more selling the oil
to China than the US. A lot of people I know back in Canada are now
saying saying le
...and the US is more environmentally careful/friendly than Canada? Seems
the holdup is environmental studies that need to be completed for the
pipeline which from the article appears to stretch from Canada to the US
Gulf of Mexico?
I didn't realize Canada was so environmentally careless.
-Came
Essentially Harper is telling the US screw you:
http://edmonton.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20111219/stephen-harper-year-end-interview-111219/20111219/?hub=EdmontonHome
--
Larry C. Lyons
web: http://www.lyonsmorris.com/lyons
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/larryclyons
There is a cult
Oil tumbles below $80 amid US recession fears
Excerpt:
PARIS - Oil prices tumbled to their lowest in almost a year Tuesday in
Europe amid a global sell-off of equities and commodities triggered by
investor fears the U.S. will soon fall into recession.
Benchmark oil for September delivery was
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Chief Economist from the Internation Energy Agency says that he now
> thinks that we hit peak crude oil production in 2006. Previously he
> had said the he expected the world to increase oil production up
> through at leas
Chief Economist from the Internation Energy Agency says that he now
thinks that we hit peak crude oil production in 2006. Previously he
had said the he expected the world to increase oil production up
through at least 2030, so this is quite the change of pace for him.
Sounds like a pretty clear
I think that Haliburton must be working overtime. Where is Cheney these days?
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Isn't that #3? Makes you wonder how often this happened when we weren't
> paying attention to oil wells?
>
> -Original Message---
Isn't that #3? Makes you wonder how often this happened when we weren't
paying attention to oil wells?
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 2:12 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Another Oil Rig in the Gulf
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11014645
Explosion on Mariner Energy oil rig in Gulf of Mexico
An explosion has torn through an offshore oil platform in the Gulf of
Mexico, west of the site of the blast in April that caused a huge oil
spill.
The blast, which threw 13 people into the
g 4, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Medic wrote:
> >
> > My thoughts are that the explosion should have automatically activated a
> > series of fail-safes that closed the well. The amount of oil that should
> be
> > acceptable to spill should be the amount in the pipe from the base o
Why isn't anyone bitching
about that?
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> My thoughts are that the explosion should have automatically activated a
> series of fail-safes that closed the well. The amount of oil that should be
> acceptable to spill should be the amoun
My thoughts are that the explosion should have automatically activated a
series of fail-safes that closed the well. The amount of oil that should be
acceptable to spill should be the amount in the pipe from the base of the
well to rig. Failing the automatic measure there should be a manual series
So now that things (maybe) are finally getting patched up permanently in the
Gulf..what do you guys think?
I think all of the criticism leveled at BP about ignoring safety concerns
prior to the accident...and all of the calls for a comprehensive review of
safety regulations before allowing de
But he's different than all the othersor so I have been told -
over and over and over agiain
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> he is, in fact, a politician
>
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Sisk, Kris wrote:
>>
>> Are you saying that Obama can't make a decision witho
he is, in fact, a politician
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Sisk, Kris wrote:
>
> Are you saying that Obama can't make a decision without political
> motivation?
>
> /me runs away
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
h
Are you saying that Obama can't make a decision without political
motivation?
/me runs away
-Original Message-
From: Robert Munn [mailto:cfmuns...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 4:13 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Stunning photo series on the gulf/oil spill
The que
Knowing something of politicians and the Coast Guard, I'd guess a bit of both.
Coast Guard wants to keep people safe, politicians want to control the story.
Judah
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> The question is who made this decision and why. Was it made by the
> command
The question is who made this decision and why. Was it made by the
command structure in the Coast Guard, or by the White House? That is,
was it a decision, however over-zealous, based on legitimate concerns
of security, or based on political considerations?
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Jerry B
Won't someone think of the sun bathers!
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 1:27 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> The only thing that this proves beyond a doubtis that Obama doesn't care
> about white people.
>
> *slinks away smiling*
~|
Order th
ther than less. Investigation and
> documentation is a very good thing.
>
> On the other hand, I think that the Coast Guard was also trying to
> keep not only safety but also liability in mind with the buffers. How
> many of those photos showed beaches where parents were letting their
buffers. How
many of those photos showed beaches where parents were letting their
kids play in the oil soaked water? I guess I'll give credit to the one
lady who was wearing a respirator while sunbathing, but jeez, the
combination of crude oil and chemical dispersant doesn't make for a
ve
Another implied issue was the booms. The restriction is based on the booms,
which could be placed anywhere, even areas not directly effected by the
spill or areas actively being cleaned.
It's definitely a fine line. As stated, you don't want people in the way.
You don't want everything hidden f
On 7/7/2010 12:34 PM, G Money wrote:
> I guess I don't have a problem with reasonable restrictions that keep people
> out of the way of the cleaners...but reporting is a protected right and
> needs to be allowed to go on.
For sure, absolutely. Restrain the impulses of reporters from being
idi
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "Anyone who doesn't appreciate the breadth of this tragedy is an idiot."
>
> I would guess, and I am not sure about this, that Anderson would say that
> you can't appreciate the breadth of the tragedy unless it is reported. He
> would pro
And these two reporters
> say
> > everyone they have talked to, from BP to the Coast Guard, to Health and
> > Human Services in Washington has been giving them the runaround.
> >
> > Were not talking about a CIA station here. Were talking about a medical
> >
the runaround.
>
> Were not talking about a CIA station here. Were talking about a medical
> trailer that falls under the authority of, guess who, Thad Allen, the same
> Thad Allen who promised transparency all those weeks ago.
>
> We are not the enemy here.
>
>
> The timin
rency all those weeks ago.
We are not the enemy here.
The timing of the so-called blackout works well for anyone wanting to hide
the effects of the spill. According to MSNBC, millions of birds are about
fly into the oil spill area due to their migration patterns.
J
-
"The Government should
My 11 year-old son asked yesterday if the oil spill will sto s from
being able to swim when we go to Ocean City,MD in September. We told
him 'no' - now, I am not sure.
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
>
> http://www.katu.com/news/photos/95866
http://www.katu.com/news/photos/95866799.html
Wow.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusi
no sense.
>
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>>
>> Venezuela has seized control of 11 oil rigs owned by Helmerich.
>>
>> The oil wells have been idle for a while. Helmerich turned them off because
>> the PDVSA (the state ran oil company
Lol...they really did get that soccer bug in you, huh Scott? hehehhe
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 9:20 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Venezuela govt to nationalize 11 US-owned oil rigs
Wow...I had to read the 'su
Venezuela is one of those subjects you can count on the US media
distorting the facts on. There's almost certainly another side to this
we're not being told.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adob
Wow...I had to read the 'subject' 4 times because my mind kept reading
'Venezuela' as 'vuvuzela' - As you can probably imagine, the rest of
the subject made no sense.
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> Venezuela has seized control of 11
Venezuela has seized control of 11 oil rigs owned by Helmerich.
The oil wells have been idle for a while. Helmerich turned them off because
the PDVSA (the state ran oil company) has not paid $43 million dollars for
work that Helmerich says it was owed.
Venezuela countered that it should not
David Brooks on the mess that is the cleanup effort:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/18/opinion/18brooks.html?hp
On Tuesday, The Times ran a front-page article on the chaotic efforts
to clean up the oil washing around the Gulf of Mexico. Campbell
Robertson reported on an incident in which boats
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Sisk, Kris wrote:
>
> Honestly how difficult would it have been to tell the crews to bring their
> life vests and fire extinguishers if they were in that big a hurry to get the
> boats out on the water?
>
The story did not say whether there were vests and fire
: cf-community
Subject: Re: obama losing the war on the oil spill
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> The President can't win this war of words with Jindal because he will
> be painted as the villain no matter what he does. Jindal is more
> concerned about making
le/animals/environment
are definitely being hurt by the oil. So you risk potential damage to
mitigate definite damage- that's the sort of executive decision bold
leaders make in times of crisis
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion
7, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> I've seen a couple of stories today that highlight a problem that goes
> straight back to the President - bureaucracy causing delays in
> fighting the oil spill. Obama needs to instruct everyone at every
> level of the federal governme
I've seen a couple of stories today that highlight a problem that goes
straight back to the President - bureaucracy causing delays in
fighting the oil spill. Obama needs to instruct everyone at every
level of the federal government to cut through the red tape and get
things done. And here w
> Officials in Escambia County are preparing for oil
> from the massive spill in the Gulf to begin hitting
> Florida's pristine white beaches.
It's a sad day indeed. I live in Sarasota, several hundred miles down the
Florida coast (about 50 miles south of Tampa). We have
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> http://www.justnews.com/news/23762158/detail.html
>
> Officials in Escambia County are preparing for oil from the massive
> spill in the Gulf to begin hitting Florida's pristine white beaches.
> They said late Tuesday an o
nal Message-
> From: Vivec [mailto:gel21...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 10:33 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Florida can say goodbye to tourism for a while- Oil to hit white
> beaches Wednesday
>
>
> http://www.justnews.com/news/23762158/detail.html
>
> O
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 6:09 AM, Scott Stewart wrote:
>
> Yeah... I really hope BP get's taken to task for this.. the American people
> shouldn't have to foot a dime.. including restitution to the fishermen and
> anyone who's livelihood is effected by this...
>
> If BP goes out of business because
---
From: Vivec [mailto:gel21...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 10:33 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Florida can say goodbye to tourism for a while- Oil to hit white
beaches Wednesday
http://www.justnews.com/news/23762158/detail.html
Officials in Escambia County are preparing for oil from the m
http://www.justnews.com/news/23762158/detail.html
Officials in Escambia County are preparing for oil from the massive
spill in the Gulf to begin hitting Florida's pristine white beaches.
They said late Tuesday an oil sheen was seen about 9.5 miles off
Pensacola Beach, and are now prepari
Yep...look at Palestine...
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 2:16 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Oil and War
Well, its not really democracy if we don't like the person the people
choose, right? :D
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 1:47 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Oil and War
A show on the Economic realities that are behind the wars in the world.
It goes over the UK, US and other countries in their actions within
countries of the world including Egypt, Iraq, Iran etc.
http
Well, its not really democracy if we don't like the person the people
choose, right? :D
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
>
> I think his point was the Democracy part. Which we helped remove.
>
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Scott Stewart
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Iran was secula
I think his point was the Democracy part. Which we helped remove.
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Scott Stewart wrote:
>
> Iran was secular until the deposition of the Shah of Iran in the
> 1970's (early 1980's)
> The Ayatollah's have brought Sharia law and oppression ever since
>
> On Mon, May
Iran was secular until the deposition of the Shah of Iran in the
1970's (early 1980's)
The Ayatollah's have brought Sharia law and oppression ever since
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> A show on the Economic realities that are behind the wars in the world.
>
> It goes over the
A show on the Economic realities that are behind the wars in the world.
It goes over the UK, US and other countries in their actions within
countries of the world including Egypt, Iraq, Iran etc.
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/32.html
Was anyone aware that Iran was a Secular Democracy up unti
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> Reminds me of back when I was living in BC and mushroom season. At the
> time picking Psilocybin wasn't illegal, but possession was.We used to
> drive to the edge of town and watch all these overweight cops and RCMP
> trying to chase all th
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Dana wrote:
>
> who are you and what have you done with Sam?
>
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Sam wrote:
>>
> It was the GOP wasn't it?
No silly, it was Obama.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusi
who are you and what have you done with Sam?
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> You think there might have been a little corruption involved in
> getting that safety inspection pass? See making contributions to the
> GOP helps you by pass lot's of rules. It was the GOP wasn't it?
It wasn't speed typing?
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> *Petroleum
>
> See Sam, we are all prone to brain farts from time to time.
>
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-
Gulf shrimp taste like shit anyways :)
Cheney gave them a pass last year? Man I thought he retired.
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> It was Cheney that said that companies in the gulf didn't need the acoustic
> sensors that would have prevented this disaster since they w
No...they bought Amoco and was BP Amoco for a few years before going back to
just BP
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 2:19 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Oil from Gulf enters Loop to Florida and miami coast!
Didn't BP c
Imported? hehehe
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 2:19 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Oil from Gulf enters Loop to Florida and miami coast!
didn't know they had that sort of cactus in the Negev.
On Thu, May 20,
1 - 100 of 766 matches
Mail list logo
