how the song goes, Sesame street was by brothers generation not mine.
We're 10 years apart.
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 12:44 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Congrats To Bushies
We stayed in Shinjuku, but got arou
.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 12:27 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Congrats To Bushies
>
> > Ken wrote:
> > However, I am a Sushi snob (4 years in Japan might have so
: Friday, November 05, 2004 12:27 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Congrats To Bushies
> Ken wrote:
> However, I am a Sushi snob (4 years in Japan might have something to do with it)
I was just in Tokyo - it's great. Did you ever eat Sushi from those
places by that massive fish market?
> Ken wrote:
> However, I am a Sushi snob (4 years in Japan might have something to do with it)
I was just in Tokyo - it's great. Did you ever eat Sushi from those
places by that massive fish market? Sushi for breakfast is fine with
me!
~
> I imagine the sweet stuff is just added to the bag so that the corn and the sweet
> stuff are infused during the poping in the microwave. Just a guess. So it is
> really microwaved popcorn with an artificial kettlecorn taste. Again having never
> had real kettlecorn I may not be a good judg
the fake stuff sure seems good to me.
-Original Message-
From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 11:32 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Congrats To Bushies
Kettlecorn is popped in a kettle. Microwave kettlecorn
in a bag. How does the kettle come into
Kettlecorn is popped in a kettle. Microwave kettlecorn
in a bag. How does the kettle come into play?
--- Ken Ketsdever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Buy a bag and try it. Can't say I've ever had real
> kettlecorn, but that microwave stuff sure is good.
>
_
Ken Ketsdever wrote:
> Buy a bag and try it. Can't say I've ever had real kettlecorn, but that microwave
> stuff sure is good.
>
> However, I am a Sushi snob (4 years in Japan might have something to do with it) and
> will not eat the bait that many friends claim is good sushi only because they
had truly good sushi. So if you don't like the microwave stuff I understand.
-Original Message-
From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 9:46 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Congrats To Bushies
Can anyone explain microwave kettlecorn to me?
---
Can anyone explain microwave kettlecorn to me?
--- Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Mmmm...kettlecorn.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.
www.yahoo.com
~~
eman awards and two first place shooting
> competitions, I don't think I'd have a problem with that. I prefer kettlecorn
> please :)
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 1:20 PM
(smothers a smile and blinks innocently)
want me to go find one?
Dana
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 15:19:54 -0600, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The only non-lethal gun is one in the hands of the French Army.
>
> I double dog dare you to say that to a Legionnaire.
>
> /me starts the popco
PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Congrats To Bushies
> The only non-lethal gun is one in the hands of the French Army.
I double dog dare you to say that to a Legionnaire.
/me starts the popcorn.
-Kevin
~|
Special tha
> The only non-lethal gun is one in the hands of the French Army.
I double dog dare you to say that to a Legionnaire.
/me starts the popcorn.
-Kevin
~|
Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net
http:
I'm just being a wise-ass. But there are still small
farms in Queens.
-sm
--- Won Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sam Morris wrote:
> > Sorry you're right.
> > They are funded by the peopel that support your
> view
> > to make with my view look bad.
> >
> > I though country folk were always re
Naw, you haven't seen me shoot. I can't hit the broad side of a barn. From the inside!
Jerry Johnson
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/04/04 03:47PM >>>
The only non-lethal gun is one in the hands of the French Army.
~|
Special thanks
> Won Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Protect all the rights that we have in the Constitution.
Cheers. Actually I would be for gun control, but there are so many
out that now that I don't see how it could ever be workable.
My gun control, however, would put massively tight controls on guns -
ba
The only non-lethal gun is one in the hands of the French Army.
-Original Message-
From: Won Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 12:44 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Congrats To Bushies
Sam Morris wrote:
> Sorry you're right.
> They are funded by
Sam Morris wrote:
> Sorry you're right.
> They are funded by the peopel that support your view
> to make with my view look bad.
>
> I though country folk were always republican/guns and
> city folk were Democrat/ anti-gun.
>
> What do I know, I'm just a farm boy from NYC.
>
> -sm
Hmm...Trying t
Sorry you're right.
They are funded by the peopel that support your view
to make with my view look bad.
I though country folk were always republican/guns and
city folk were Democrat/ anti-gun.
What do I know, I'm just a farm boy from NYC.
-sm
--- Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sam
Nick wrote:
> You know, I don't make millions, and I got a pretty good tax cut, I sure
> don't want to give it back :)
You didn't get a tax cut, you got loan that you'll have to pay back
with interest because the money didn't come from a decrease in
spending; in fact spending was increased.
If yo
Gruss Gott wrote:
>>Sam wrote:
>>They are studies meant to attacking the right. They
>>are funded by the left to make the right look bad.
>>It's pretty obvious if you read their polls.
>
>
> I personally refute the idea that there's a "right" and "left".
>
> If you look at Mr. Bush's fiscal poli
> Sam wrote:
> They are studies meant to attacking the right. They
> are funded by the left to make the right look bad.
> It's pretty obvious if you read their polls.
I personally refute the idea that there's a "right" and "left".
If you look at Mr. Bush's fiscal policies, how is being the larges
woops :)
thought I was talking to Sam and was a bit brutal even at that. My apologies.
And I think you are right. It may boil down to directs vs perceived
indirect responsibilities.
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 12:47:44 -0600, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whoa whoa whoaI wasn't making MY argument
Whoa whoa whoaI wasn't making MY argument, I was pinpointing where I
thought YOUR argument for the delusion came into play.
I should of made that clear, sorry.
> yeah, I am in favor of individuals taking responsibility for their own
> actions, with no innocent populations getting killed inste
yeah, I am in favor of individuals taking responsibility for their own
actions, with no innocent populations getting killed instead :)
Sorry, some sarcasm crept in there. I think this is, yes, where you
and I diverge. So you think a statement by Saddam justifies our
actions? (I am taking your word
No, I'm saying they both are and I can recognise that
and should also.
Let me also clear something up, PIPA is not the
University of MD. It's a group that's based at the
University and is funded by left wing organizations.
-sm
--- dana tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok, so
>
> The Univer
This depends on where you draw the line for responsibility.
If you start tracing back from the 19 terrorists that day, for direct
responsibility, I think you end up back at Osama Bin Laden. Perhaps the line
of direct resonsibility ends there.
The current administration, however, and this "signifi
o: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Congrats To Bushies
We had a major terrorist attack and a small scale invasion of Afghanistan to
iradicate terrorists both which served as justified reasons for increased
spending. Bush then opted to spend unforseen billions of dollars and
thousands of lives unjustif
ok, so
The University of MD is biased
Sean Hannity is not???
Dana
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 10:12:36 -0800 (PST), Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Exactly.
> Sean Hannity does a man on the street segment each
> week where they ask people walking by who they
> support, who's the Vice-Presid
Exactly.
Sean Hannity does a man on the street segment each
week where they ask people walking by who they
support, who's the Vice-President and a few questions
like that. The folks that vote Republican almost
always get it right and the folks teat vote Democrat
almost always get it wrong.
I don't
u read their polls.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 9:56 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Congrats To Bushies
>
> Has anyone politically correct supported that
> nonsense?
> They are stu
look bad.
It's pretty obvious if you read their polls.
-Original Message-
From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 9:56 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Congrats To Bushies
Has anyone politically correct supported that
nonsense?
They are studie
ok so nobody on the right has studied the issue because by definition
if you think there is an issue you are not on the right? Is that what
you are saying?
And no, darlin, it isn't obvious. Not to me. Explain it to me.
Dana
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 09:56:27 -0800 (PST), Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Read carefully :)
(#replace(paragragh2, "delusional", "ignorant",
"all")#)
Its all good.
-Original Message-
From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 9:49 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Congrats To Bushies
Sorry I
This from someone who says that Bush didn't lie. Just said things that
were wrong. That might (almost) be acceptable if he thought he had
ever made a mistake. But ok, ok. I am starting to froth at the mouth,
let's go to the real issue.
I guess it all depends on your definition of reality. In mine
Has anyone politically correct supported that
nonsense?
They are studies meant to attacking the right. They
are funded by the left to make the right look bad.
Its pretty obvious if you read their polls.
--- dana tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're saying someone called you ignorant in a
Sorry I made a mistake. In this thread Jeffry Houser
called us ignorant Gross said it wasn't a bad thing
and Dana said we couldnt deal with reality.
Then you jumped in and agreed with Dana and I got the
wires crossed. Same theory applies, replace ignorant
with delusional
(#replace(paragragh2, "ig
> From: Adam Haskell
> Seriously now folks If I called the FBI telling them my
> neighbor ran a crack house and had a huge cache of weapons
> and explosives and plans to boom the local city hall then
> when the cops show up they find a 1/4 gram of pot, hunting
> riffle, and some m120's they'd p
You're saying someone called you ignorant in another thread? Who was that?
And yeah, I try to operate in reality. At times it seems to me that
you refuse to do so. For instance, your rejection of the pipa data.
Does it not occur to you that some people have a disinterested
interest in truth, rega
> Nick wrote:
> the people who came to the site first said they didn't care too much about high
> explosives, they could deal with those fairly easily.
They didn't care because they didn't have enough troops to care and as
to dealing with them later, yeah it was easier: just let them be
looted and
I was merging threads.
Deliberately wrong? I guess that's why we never agree,
you're in your world and I'm not :)
--- dana tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm. First of all, I believe that the word
> "ignorant" was introduced
> into this conversation by you. I don't think you are
> stupid
come right out and
all them ignorant. Maybe you should spend a little time with one. Or with someone who
is not goose stepping behind the bush bandwagon.
-Original Message-
From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 8:54 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject:
Hmm. First of all, I believe that the word "ignorant" was introduced
into this conversation by you. I don't think you are stupid :) just
wrong:) at times it seems deliberately so. But I do appreciate your
willingness to continue a discussion :D Perhaps just perhaps there is
hope.
Dana
On Thu, 4
Subject: RE: Congrats To Bushies
We had a major terrorist attack and a small scale invasion of Afghanistan to
iradicate terrorists both which served as justified reasons for increased
spending. Bush then opted to spend unforseen billions of dollars and
thousands of lives unjustifiably invading Iraq
You know, I don't make millions, and I got a pretty good tax cut, I sure
don't want to give it back :)
-Original Message-
From: Ken Ketsdever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 11:46 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Congrats To Bushies
Hey if they
PS. Mike D, Do you think you could write a module that would change all @ signs in our
posts to % or something like that? And perhaps also strip the dot whatever from
anything containing the @ symbol?
-Patrick
>-Original Message-
>From: dana tierney
>
>And they are expensive ($80-$90 US
well yes, I see your point.
>-Original Message-
>From: dana tierney
>
>And they are expensive ($80-$90 US) and often long-term.
>
>On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 09:11:24 -0500, Harkins, Patrick
wrote:
>> Probably due to the increased risk of suicide. They just
>passed a bill in Canada requiring al
You voted for both Bush 41 and 43 and Bob Dole? But
now your so against the Republican Party that you
state they can't deal with reality?
Maybe it's you that's changed and can't deal with
reality. You sound like a Jehovahs Witness that all
of the sudden realized everything about them is wrong
and
We had a major terrorist attack and a small scale invasion of Afghanistan to iradicate
terrorists both which served as justified reasons for increased spending. Bush then
opted to spend unforseen billions of dollars and thousands of lives unjustifiably
invading Iraq. That was a leadership deci
Hey if they want a tax break they should make millions. THen Bush will provide them
with plenty of tax breaks. :)
-Original Message-
From: Adam Haskell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 8:29 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Congrats To Bushies
Seriously now
oh, these aren't stupid people; that's the tragedy of it. Some of them
are people I respect! And yet they believe this stuff. I have been
thinking about this and am wondering if a bad on political advertising
on broadcast media might not be a bad thing after all.
Dana
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 09:20:48
And they are expensive ($80-$90 US) and often long-term.
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 09:11:24 -0500, Harkins, Patrick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Probably due to the increased risk of suicide. They just passed a bill in Canada
> requiring all SSRIs to have a warning on them about it.
> -Patrick
>
> >--
Yes, I read that poll. Carefully. Is it wrong? If so, how? Also please
explain how and when the University of Maryland became "the liberal
media." I have taken classes there, and last I saw it was a very
large college campus.
> The Liberal media is at it again. Did you read that
> poll? What a jo
> 1.) The looted weapons to-do: nobody I've talked to sees this as
> massive policy failure which it clearly is. If your primary job in an
> invasion is to secure weapons so that they don't fall into the hands
> of terrorists, wouldn't securing the *known* weapons caches be a key
> thing to do? W
Seriously now folks If I called the FBI telling them my neighbor ran a
crack house and had a huge cache of weapons and explosives and plans
to boom the local city hall then when the cops show up they find a 1/4
gram of pot, hunting riffle, and some m120's they'd probably arrest me
for insighting a
Sam wrote:
> How do you think I feel listening to your claims that
> the majority of the people are ignorant because they
> don't agree with you?
Ignorant isn't a bad thing - it means a lack of knowledge. The study
Sandy showed awhile ago proved that that is the case. It also is
consistent with
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Congrats To Bushies
--- dana tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a) I am not whining. It is a demonstrated fact that
> Bush supporters tend to misperceive reality.
> See the study Sandy posted a few days ago.
The Liberal media is at it again. Di
maybe, but last time I saw her she still looked hot! :)
>> I mean I would like to look like Sophia Loren,
>> but I don't :)
>
>Isn't she like 80 now?
>
>-sm
Outbound email scanned for viruses. (e232)
~|
Purchase from Hous
Probably due to the increased risk of suicide. They just passed a bill in Canada
requiring all SSRIs to have a warning on them about it.
-Patrick
>-Original Message-
>From: dana tierney
>welp, all I can say is don't run out and get a prescription for Prozac
>(unless of course you do it
I am too.
If like me you are pondering the implications of the continuing status quo, you might
want to read this book that I am reading by Gwynne Dyer called Future:Tense.
http://www.mcclelland.com/catalog/display.pperl?isbn=0771029780
-Patrick
>-Original Message-
>From: Jeffry Houser
Can't wait till that bill passes then this wil all be over b/c if you
say anything negative about the administration you'll get fined
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 22:58:48 -0700, Charlie Griefer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 21:55:12 -0800 (PST), Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 21:55:12 -0800 (PST), Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I mean I would like to look like Sophia Loren,
> > but I don't :)
>
> Isn't she like 80 now?
>
> -sm
she's still hot at 80 :)
--
Charlie Griefer
Marta was wa
--- dana tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a) I am not whining. It is a demonstrated fact that
> Bush supporters tend to misperceive reality.
> See the study Sandy posted a few days ago.
The Liberal media is at it again. Did you read that
poll? What a joke. Look at all the polls pipa.org di
How do you think I feel listening to your claims that
the majority of the people are ignorant because they
don't agree with you?
-sm
--- Jeffry Houser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I must be a democrat, because that's how I feel.
> I think that voting for
> another 4 years of Bush is proof o
welp, all I can say is don't run out and get a prescription for Prozac
(unless of course you do it in Canada)
http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/Insurance/Insureyourhealth/P41966.asp
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 09:18:55 -0500, Jeffry Houser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I must be a democrat, because tha
yes...
exactly
if it does i have a new titanium spork, and i am not afraid to use it
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 08:37:34 -0500, Jeffry Houser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you worried that the world as we know it is about to end? I am.
>
> At 08:04 AM 11/3/2004, you wrote:
> >Subject: Congrats T
I must be a democrat, because that's how I feel. I think that voting for
another 4 years of Bush is proof of how ignorant Americans really are.
At 09:04 AM 11/3/2004, you wrote:
>Subject: Congrats To Bushies
>From: "G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 07:33:09 -0600
>Thread:
>http:
Are you worried that the world as we know it is about to end? I am.
At 08:04 AM 11/3/2004, you wrote:
>Subject: Congrats To Bushies
>From: Paul Ihrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 07:14:15 -0500
>Thread:
>http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm/method=messages&threadid=147
let's hope he does :) And *read* any bills proposed by his
administration. As the man said, trust, but verify.
Dana
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 12:59:45 -0600, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Brian wrote:
> >I have seen some (imho) unrealistic fears that this loss somehow portends
> > the end o
> Brian wrote:
>I have seen some (imho) unrealistic fears that this loss somehow portends
> the end of our way of life as we know itbut otherwise most lefties i've
> seen have been gracious.
I agree, but Dana makes a good point that the win doesn't invalidate
the concerns. All it does is say
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 9:55 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Congrats To Bushies
Well, I have to admin that I was really scared about this election going
like it did last time with Bush stealing the election (in my opinion). But
now that a clear majority of the voters have elected
PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Congrats To Bushies
I haven't seen much whining by the losing side.
I have seen some (imho) unrealistic fears that this loss somehow portends
the end of our way of life as we know itbut otherwise most lefties i've
seen have been gracious.
>
> I
is bad
it may be considered better than an unknown.
-Original Message-
From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 9:34 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Congrats To Bushies
What does that mean?
58 million Americans are simply confused?
> the guy they
You know what Andy? This message is beneath you. Step back and read
what you just wrote. I respect you for your willingness to consider
other points of view, but apparently I am interfering with the victory
celebration?
a) I am not whining. It is a demonstrated fact that Bush supporters
tend to m
-Community
Subject: Re: Congrats To Bushies
Actually, I doubt it. If the election here was anything to go by, the
people were sent to the wrong precinct then given a provisional ballot
:D
Seriously, I am very glad that in any event it did not boil down to
New Mexico. There were some very telling
I haven't seen much whining by the losing side.
I have seen some (imho) unrealistic fears that this loss somehow portends
the end of our way of life as we know itbut otherwise most lefties i've
seen have been gracious.
>
> It was a hard-fought battle, but 1 side was the clear winner. The wh
Yes, a lot more.
Something about Bush appealed to 51% of registered voters in the United
States. That's not a fluke. That can't be "i'm right, 58 million people are
wrong".
I don't really know what your al-Qaeda statement means.as if Afghanistan
never happened.
> A lot of them, yes. They th
Dana.
What is your point? Since it is who they voted for, it is clearly who they
want. A want is a thought, versus a need.
Since he won the popular vote and the electoral vote, it is clearly a
majority, no matter how you count it. When you combine this with the
Congressional growth by the repub
A lot of them, yes. They think we are fighting al-Qaeda :) need I say more :)
Dana
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 11:33:53 -0600, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What does that mean?
>
> 58 million Americans are simply confused?
>
>
>
>
> > the guy they THOUGHT they wanted.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 3 Nov 200
; yeah, me too. This sucks. But there is squat I can do about it. The people,
> I guess have spoken.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Ihrig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 7:14 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Congrats To Bushies
What does that mean?
58 million Americans are simply confused?
> the guy they THOUGHT they wanted.
>
>
> On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 08:38:10 -0400, Angel Stewart
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, he won the electoral vote, AND the popular vote.
> > So this time I think you can safely say that the
the guy they THOUGHT they wanted.
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 08:38:10 -0400, Angel Stewart
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, he won the electoral vote, AND the popular vote.
> So this time I think you can safely say that the Majority of americans got the guy
> they wanted.
>
> -Gel
>
> -Original
Hey I got Election day off. :) State employees get Presidential Election
days off.
Pretty cool, schools are closed and everything.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Ketsdever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 11:28 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Congrats To
That's what absentee ballots are for
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 8:15 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Congrats To Bushies
> Brian wrote:
> yes yes yes, but all that stuff aside.all I want is a day off
Who is "we don't" ?
In the USA we keep hearing of 6-8 weeks of vaction time in European countries. Most
Americans start with two weeks vacation time.
So we get two or three extra holidays I'd prefer the extra 4 - 6 weeks of vacation
time. Besides I get 6 hoildays a year, New Years, Memorial
> Ken wrote:
> Maybe Kerry should have run on that as part of his platform
>
> National Security blah blahb blah
> Iraq blah blah blah
> Health Care blah blah blah
> and I will make election day a national holiday!!
I still don't think it'd beat, "them home-a-sexshuls ain't a gittin
hitched
> Brian wrote:
> yes yes yes, but all that stuff aside.all I want is a day off work.
Well, to be fair to the alternative argument, that's exactly the
problem they say. If we make election day a national holiday,
everyone will just go to Mexico rather than vote.
::Impersonates Homer::
Stupid
Sounds like you guys already have too many holidayswe don't.
I'd even be in favor of axing President's Day in Feb, and moving that
holiday to election day. At least the day off would be of some use then. I
mean, what is there to do in February?
> G,
> We have the most public holidays I thi
That one hour wouldn't have helped here.
The average commute to work for Americans now-a-days is 32 minutes each way. And we
have to vote where we live (not where we work).
My wait was 1 hour 45 minutes. Some people waited more that 9 hours to vote (although
many left before then)
Ah, to be a s
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 11:03 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Congrats To Bushies
Maybe Kerry should have run on that as part of his platform
National Security blah blahb blah
Iraq blah blah blah
Health Care blah blah blah
and I will make election day a nation
G,
We have the most public holidays I think of any country.
And even here, we don't have a day off for Elections.
Employers are simply mandated that they must provide at least one hour free for
employees to vote.
-Gel
-Original Message-
From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
yes yes yes, b
:12 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Congrats To Bushies
I disagree with all that other stuff..but as to your final pointwhy
isn't election day a national holiday? Seriously. Is there a valid reason I
don't know of
Is this an American thing? Do other countries have holiday
yes yes yes, but all that stuff aside.all I want is a day off work. If
voting is as important as everyone says it is, then election day should be a
holiday to facilitate the process.
> > Brian wrote:
> > I disagree with all that other stuff..but as to your final
pointwhy
> > isn't el
Ok Gruss, you're hired! :)
>-Original Message-
>From: Gruss Gott
>
>Overall it seems to me that if we're the greatest democracy then it
>should show. We should have the latest voter technology, national
>holidays (parties) for elections, federally funded elections, TV ads
>that must incl
> Brian wrote:
> I disagree with all that other stuff..but as to your final pointwhy
> isn't election day a national holiday? Seriously. Is there a valid reason I
> don't know of
>
> Is this an American thing? Do other countries have holidays on their
> election day?
Yes, but notice w
I disagree with all that other stuff..but as to your final pointwhy
isn't election day a national holiday? Seriously. Is there a valid reason I
don't know of
Is this an American thing? Do other countries have holidays on their
election day?
>
> I agree, the state of the election proce
Angel wrote:
> What I find puzzling, is after the last election and all the furor that was raised,
> how did so many absentee ballots manage to get
> mailed out late?
I agree, the state of the election process in America is horrible: old
heterogeneous technology, an electoral college system that
2004 6:48 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Congrats To Bushies
> I think there has always been fraud and there will always
> be fraud. But if you lose by 2 million votes I don't see
> that fraud really affected the outcome. If you are down
> by 140,000 votes in a state I doubt
> I think there has always been fraud and there will always
> be fraud. But if you lose by 2 million votes I don't see
> that fraud really affected the outcome. If you are down
> by 140,000 votes in a state I doubt that the small amount
> of potential fraud will make up the difference.
Whether i
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
