> "I dabbled in witchcraft..."
Seemed innocent enough from the tone of the video clip. My fiancée was part
of a "coven" in high school and they would "cast spells" and the like, but
it was a phase that she grew out of just like the "goths" in high school
today. From the video it seemed more lik
"Does it scare you that she won a majority?"
No. It seems to scare the left and establishment Republicans though.
Many people don't seem to get the picture. Her nomination is not a ringing
endorsement of her religion or her potential. No one thinks she is going to
be the next Ronald Reagan or
"I dabbled in witchcraft..."
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20016907-503544.html
This is going to be one entertaining campaign. I wonder how long she'll have
support of the party before they decide to leave the sinking ship.
On Sep 17, 2010, at 1:28 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> I
: Does it scare you that she won a majority? o'donnell says earth
made in 6 days.
We'll never know what she was talking about because she never finished
her comments.
You do realize not everyone believes evolution as fact, being
skeptical about scientific theory is the reason we hav
Lol..valid reference though
-Original Message-
From: Medic [mailto:hofme...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 3:04 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Does it scare you that she won a majority? o'donnell says earth
made in 6 days.
>
> So was Hitler...
27 posts. You
Like that has changed in 15 years...its still the same book and it's still
the same lack of any credible evidence.
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 3:16 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Does it scare you that she won a maj
Kirk or God? hehehehe
-Original Message-
From: G Money [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 4:03 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Does it scare you that she won a majority? o'donnell says earth
made in 6 days.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Medic
Fundamentalist fanatics tend not to change much...
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 4:23 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Does it scare you that she won a majority? o'donnell says earth
made in 6 days.
She was a speaking
Actually Justin, that should read what they "shouldn't be doing with certain
body parts" hehehehe
-Original Message-
From: Justin Scott [mailto:jscott-li...@gravityfree.com]
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 4:56 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: RE: Does it scare you that she
She's passionate and SHOULD BE committed ;-)
-Original Message-
From: G Money [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 2:12 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Does it scare you that she won a majority? o'donnell says earth
made in 6 days.
On Fri, Sep 17,
It did but she took it all down after the election.
Does the waybackmachine go back just a little or do we need a weebackmachine?
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Justin Scott
wrote:
>
>> She was a speaking as a religious activist back then, not
>> as a politician. I don't even know what she s
> She was a speaking as a religious activist back then, not
> as a politician. I don't even know what she stands for
> now because her statements from 1996 seems to be the only
> thing people here care about.
As I mentioned, her campaign website is scant on information so it's hard to
say. We c
Stopped smoking pot years ago, so no worries Sam. But I can usually
help a brother out if you're in need.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> I got lots. You can swing by here if you need a nug.
>
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Sam wrote:
>
>>
>> I don't have any weed so you'r
careful you don't want a stampede up your way...
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> I got lots. You can swing by here if you need a nug.
>
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Sam wrote:
>
>>
>> I don't have any weed so you're on your own.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 4:24 PM,
I got lots. You can swing by here if you need a nug.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> I don't have any weed so you're on your own.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Judah McAuley
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Justin Scott
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>> You could
I don't have any weed so you're on your own.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Justin Scott
> wrote:
>>
>>> You could choose to skip the thread if you don't like it.
>>
>> Far from it, I find the discussion interesting but I do wish peop
Well if you start happy hour early so can I.
mmm frosty cold.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> Cute bit of editing, I take it you've been taking lessons from Briebart?
>
> So give some actual instances instead of rhetoric. You know actual proof.
>
> On Fri, Sep 17, 20
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Justin Scott
wrote:
>
>> You could choose to skip the thread if you don't like it.
>
> Far from it, I find the discussion interesting but I do wish people would
> stick to arguing the merits of their position rather than resorting to
> personal attacks. I was jus
She was a speaking as a religious activist back then, not as a politician.
I don't even know what she stands for now because her statements from
1996 seems to be the only thing people here care about.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Justin Scott
wrote:
>
>> You could choose to skip the thread
Cute bit of editing, I take it you've been taking lessons from Briebart?
So give some actual instances instead of rhetoric. You know actual proof.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Did you just contradict yourself?
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>>
>
> You could choose to skip the thread if you don't like it.
Far from it, I find the discussion interesting but I do wish people would
stick to arguing the merits of their position rather than resorting to
personal attacks. I was just having some fun with Godwin's Law in this
case.
In relation t
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 4:01 PM, G Money wrote:
>> We've covered it here hundreds of times. Evolution exists but she's
>> likely talking about evolution as creation.
>>
>
> Actually, she was contrasting evolution and creation. So no dice.
Um, she was comparing the evidence of both.
> I love re
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> unlike Kirk Cameron... who's just amazing.
>
Kirk Cameron's dreaminess is proof that there is a God, and he loves us.
--
No matter how close to yours another's steps have grown
In the end there is one dance you'll do alone
~~
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> We've covered it here hundreds of times. Evolution exists but she's
> likely talking about evolution as creation.
>
Actually, she was contrasting evolution and creation. So no dice.
Everything is so black and white to you.
>
Not really. I'm an
unlike Kirk Cameron... who's just amazing.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Medic wrote:
> It's a pretty safe assumption that if she feels she has proof of
> creation... she's an idiot.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology
It's a pretty safe assumption that if she feels she has proof of creation...
she's an idiot.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> We'll never know what she was talking about because she never finished
> her comments.
>
> You do realize not everyone believes evolution as fact, being
>
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Sam wrote:
...
> Everything is so black and white to you.
Heh. Coming from an "at any cost" kind of guy, that's funny. :)
You know, Sam, I think you are right. I think this chick is teh *awesome*!!!
More power to you Sam, more power to you.
The Republicans d
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:34 PM, G Money wrote:
>> You do realize not everyone believes evolution as fact, being
>> skeptical about scientific theory is the reason we have theories.
>
>
> Yes, I call them "people of faith", and America is full of them. Yepfull
> of them.
We've covered it her
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> We'll never know what she was talking about because she never finished
> her comments.
>
Rght...she never offered us this "evidence". That would have been good.
I wonder if a banana would have been involvedhee hee.
> You do realize not e
You could choose to skip the thread if you don't like it.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Justin Scott
wrote:
>
>> 27 posts. You might have Eric beat.
>
> It was a tossup between Hitler and Satan, but in great Internet tradition I
> chose to invoke Hitler in the hopes that it would bring the t
We'll never know what she was talking about because she never finished
her comments.
You do realize not everyone believes evolution as fact, being
skeptical about scientific theory is the reason we have theories. Now
I don't know what proof she thinks there is but I'd like to hear it
before calli
> 27 posts. You might have Eric beat.
It was a tossup between Hitler and Satan, but in great Internet tradition I
chose to invoke Hitler in the hopes that it would bring the thread to a
close more quickly, hehe.
-Justin
~|
O
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:15 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> I've never understood why being "passionate" was such a good thing...?
> Generally, people who are "passionate" over an idea are combative,
> obstinate, overly emotional and more likely to ignore evidence that
> contradicts their position.
If y
.On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Have you heard her evidence? Do you even know what she was talking
> about almost 15 years ago?
>
Does she have evidence that the creation story from Genesis is accurate?
Moreover, does her evidence outweighs that for evolution?
Sam, are these t
Yeah I read it.
He could be wrong. He's been wrong before.
I don't know how what he says backs your claim that she's an idiot.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> This is what one of your heroes says about Ms. O'Donnell:
>
> Faulty fairy dust
> Krauthammer: The endorse
Did you just contradict yourself?
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> I have yet to hear any member of the administration get as loony as
...
> Moreover these are not exceptions they seem to be the rule.
~~
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> >
> > So was Hitler...
>
>
> 27 posts. You might have Eric beat.
>
I've never understood why being "passionate" was such a good thing...?
Generally, people who are "passionate" over an idea are combative,
obstinate, overly emotional and more lik
Have you heard her evidence? Do you even know what she was talking
about almost 15 years ago?
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:11 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> Only an idiot thinks there is as much evidence for the creation story from
> Genesis as there is for evolution.
>
> Idiot.
>
~
>
> So was Hitler...
27 posts. You might have Eric beat.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www.hous
> I don't see her as an idiot. I think she's
> passionate and committed. That's a great quality.
So was Hitler... ignoring what they're passionate and committed to is well,
ignorance.
-Justin
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion A
I have yet to hear any member of the administration get as loony as
Angle or O'Donnell, or more than a few of the others that the
teabagging party has endorsed.
Moreover these are not exceptions they seem to be the rule.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> We have two whack jobs in
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> I don't see her as an idiot. I think she's passionate and committed.
> That's a great quality.
>
Only an idiot thinks there is as much evidence for the creation story from
Genesis as there is for evolution.
Idiot.
--
No matter how close to you
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:27 AM, G Money wrote:
>
>
> Isn't that how the partisan political game is played? Find an idiot across
> the aisle and try to convince people he/she represents all of them???
No, that's only how the left does it. Otherwise all Dems would be KKK
members or had $100K in
We have two whack jobs in the White House. That doesn't mean I should
brand all Democrats as loons.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> Its all a part of the public record. Would it have made it any
> different if I went directly to the sources? She's a whack job par
> e
This is what one of your heroes says about Ms. O'Donnell:
Faulty fairy dust
Krauthammer: The endorsement of O'Donnell by DeMint and Palin was
reckless and irresponsible.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/16/AR2010091604899.html?hpid=opinionsbox1
The Buckley rule
By Ch
Its all a part of the public record. Would it have made it any
different if I went directly to the sources? She's a whack job par
excellence.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> I heard on NPR yesterday that the DNC TPM said to attack O'Donnell as
> the face of the Tea Party and use
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> I heard on NPR yesterday that the DNC TPM said to attack O'Donnell as
> the face of the Tea Party and use her to weaken the GOP.
>
> Keep up the good work LL and MM
>
Isn't that how the partisan political game is played? Find an idiot across
the
I heard on NPR yesterday that the DNC TPM said to attack O'Donnell as
the face of the Tea Party and use her to weaken the GOP.
Keep up the good work LL and MM
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> OK how's this for mockery. Actually its a direct quote from Faux News
> hht
OK how's this for mockery. Actually its a direct quote from Faux News
hhttp://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,311946,00.html
O'REILLY: Everybody knows that scientists have enough knowledge to
clone a human being if they wanted to.
O'DONNELL: Right.
O'REILLY: But they're not, at least not that we k
I like it.
You mock my God so I mock yours.
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox
wrote:
>
> How about this nugget from Sharron Angle:
>
> "And these programs that you mentioned -- that Obama has going with Reid and
> Pelosi pushing them forward -- are all entitlement programs bui
How about this nugget from Sharron Angle:
"And these programs that you mentioned -- that Obama has going with Reid and
Pelosi pushing them forward -- are all entitlement programs built to make
government our God. And thats really whats happening in this country is a
violation of the First Co
All this time I thought you lived with Gel. So you don't hate all
Americans, just the ones around you? Or is it religious folks in
general? If I were as bitter as you I would move to San Franfreako,
you'd love it there.
Just saying...
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox
wrote:
>
I was thinking of the new Delaware Repugnicant nominee O'Donnel.
Texas is a lost cause already.
On other news Alice has some new screenshots and a trailer:
Alice: Madness Returns is scheduled for a 2011 Q4 release date for the
PC, 360 and PS3.
http://kotaku.com/5638204/yup-alice-is-definitely-
actually Larry, he's not all that ignorant. It does suck that I live in Texas.
If I didn't have so many family ties here, I'd leave in a heartbeat. It would
be nice to be around a general population that had a little more on the ball.
On Sep 15, 2010, at 8:19 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
>
As scary:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzHcqcXo_NA&feature=player_embedded
> http://blogs.alternet.
org/speakeasy/2010/09>
/15/gop-nominee-christine-odonnell-god-created-the-earth-in-six-days/
>
> "More good news for Democrats and the people who make their campaign
> ads: In 1996, GOP Senate
sucks that you pride yourself in ignorance.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Sucks that you live in Delaware and Texas.
>
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox
> wrote:
>>
>> I don't think I can trust someone who doesn't realize what evidence is
>> though. There
Sucks that you live in Delaware and Texas.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox
wrote:
>
> I don't think I can trust someone who doesn't realize what evidence is
> though. There is no evidence that a god created the Earth in six days, there
> is only faith.
~~~
I don't think I can trust someone who doesn't realize what evidence is though.
There is no evidence that a god created the Earth in six days, there is only
faith.
On Sep 15, 2010, at 5:40 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Vivec wrote:
>>
>> http://blogs.alternet
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2010/09/15/gop-nominee-christine-odonnell-god-created-the-earth-in-six-days/
If belief in Christian theology were a disqualification from office,
we could barely elect anyone. More pragmatically, I don't agree
The Delaware race was a closed primary. No independents or democratic
party members allowed.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> Are you sure about that?
>
> How did she win the majority pick for her own party in the first place?
>
> On 15 September 2010 14:03, Larry C. Lyons wrot
Delaware has significantly more Democrats than Republicans, with a
registered voter advantage of 100,000 out of 620,000 voters overall in
the state. Consequently, the pool of people picking the Republican
candidate was pretty small overall and more influenced by small
changes in electoral behavior
Are you sure about that?
How did she win the majority pick for her own party in the first place?
On 15 September 2010 14:03, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> I have to say Ms O'Donnel thank you for helping to ensure that the
> Democratic Party retains not only this seat but the Senate.
~~
Then there's her famous anti-masturbation video, and heer use of
palinisms, "Unfactual". Then there's her confusion about how many
counties she won when she ran against Biden (She says 2, the record
shows 0). Then there's the accusations of misappropriating campaign
funds, lack of fiscal responsib
Nope. I'm glad she'll help repeal Obamacare and vote against cap-n-trade.
Oh wait, they don't need her, the dems already started repealing it.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2010/09/15/gop-nominee-christine-odonnell-god-created-the-earth-i
"CHRISTINE O'DONNELL: Now, he said that it's based on fact. I just want to
point out a couple things. First of all, they use carbon dating, as an
example, to prove that something was millions of years old. Well, we have
the eruption of Mt. Saint Helens and the carbon dating test that they used
the
65 matches
Mail list logo
