prevent fraud
> and such.
>
> DRE
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 10:07 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Important threads
>
>
> Actually, since some people's description of a problem
be prety cool. Would be interesting to come up with ways to prevent fraud
and such.
DRE
-Original Message-
From: Jim Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 10:07 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Important threads
Actually, since some people's descripti
Forgoing the complexity (since I'm not writing it!) I would rather see the
ability to vote on a messages than threads (or have them separate, with the
individual message votes contributing in part to the thread score).
A message could be rated, I think, on two aspects: "general applicability"
woul
Maybe a Wish list/bug report section as well. Should make an easy
reference if someone is trying to find out about a feature or error.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 2:03 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Important threads
I'm going to have to copy some of those. Well placed. :)
> The CSS list I'm on has an accompanying wiki. They also have clearly
posted
> ground rules.
> http://www.css-discuss.org/policies.html
>
> -Kevin
>
>
>
>
>
> > On this list there are threads that are important in the realm of CF or
> > gen
nt: Friday, March 26, 2004 1:49 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Important threads
>
>
> On this list there are threads that are important in the realm of CF or
> general. On the tech lists, the importance is based on the simple
> question
> of usefulness. If it's a simpl
The CSS list I'm on has an accompanying wiki. They also have clearly posted
ground rules.
http://www.css-discuss.org/policies.html
-Kevin
> On this list there are threads that are important in the realm of CF or
> general. On the tech lists, the importance is based on the simple question
> of u
Right. Think of how many times "I forgot my CF admin password..what do I
do?" gets asked.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 1:49 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Important threads
On this list there are thread
On this list there are threads that are important in the realm of CF or
general. On the tech lists, the importance is based on the simple question
of usefulness. If it's a simple question but one that everyone asks, then
its important.
> I'm not sure that any thread is really more important than a
I'm not sure that any thread is really more important than another on this particular list. Maybe on this list have it go by popularity, then recency? Just a thought.
With the more technical forums, again how do you determine importance. I've asked some comparatively dumb-a$$ questions, but to me
Actually, since some people's description of a problem might be a little
different (although, how many ways you can say "Hey, did anyone hear
about Microsoft buying Macromedia?") - that "Recently Answered" would be
most useful if it had a link to the discussion as well.
- Jim
Ben Doom wrote:
> I think I would like the democracy of everybody being able to vote on the
importance of a thread, but maybe some voters' opinions have more weight
then others.
This is why I'm leaning towards the volunteer model for thread information.
> Something I've always felt should be on lists like this is
nt: Friday, March 26, 2004 12:25 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Important threads
Trollbait would be limited to this list while a previously answered link
would be useful in general. I think that means we need some volunteers
to
rate the posts and list previous answers and the like.
> &q
Trollbait would be limited to this list while a previously answered link
would be useful in general. I think that means we need some volunteers to
rate the posts and list previous answers and the like.
> "Trollbait" and "Learn to Google"
>
> :-)
>
> Seriously, a "recently answered, check archives"
I think I would like the democracy of everybody being able to vote on the importance of a thread, but maybe some voters' opinions have more weight then others.
Something I've always felt should be on lists like this is the ability to actually move threads to more appropriate locations. Is it to
"Trollbait" and "Learn to Google"
:-)
Seriously, a "recently answered, check archives" kind of thing would
probably be good as well.
--BenD
Michael Dinowitz wrote:
> Now that I've got some (forced) free time, I'm going to do a few things:
> 1. finish up all the things on the subscription UI
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
