So is this no longer valid?
-Kevin
- Original Message -
From: Michael Dinowitz
To: CF-Community
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 11:38 AM
Subject: OT Posts
We've been getting a lot of tech posts here and they're kind of OT for
this
list. Unless your really bitching about a tech
Yeah...we want more sex, less tech.
:)
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 December 2003 17:39
To: CF-Community
Subject: OT Posts
We've been getting a lot of tech posts here and they're kind of OT for
this
list. Unless your really bitching about a
Oh no you don't oh honorable list master.
There is NO OT on this list! Remember, we had this discussion two years
ago! :D
/me looks up archives
Anything is fair game ... and if you tell me I can't ask my tech
questions here ... while ... I'll ... I'll just have to leave. :(
I hate
I'm not stopping anyone, just saying that the more tech talked here, the more
people will join for the tech and the more respectable the list will get.
Eventually it'll get to the point where a discussion on the gay marriage of Dean
and Clark to nail down the presidential bid will not be
I'm not sure that should ever be an acceptable discussion. Not that it
shouldn't happen, it just shouldn't be considered acceptable.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 1:05 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: OT Posts
I'm
I for one will welcome our new gay Democrat overlords.
-Kevin
- Original Message -
From: Nick McClure [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 12:12 PM
Subject: RE: OT Posts
I'm not sure that should ever be an acceptable discussion
PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: OT Posts
I'm not stopping anyone, just saying that the more tech talked here, the
more
people will join for the tech and the more respectable the list will get.
Eventually it'll get to the point where a discussion on the gay marriage of
Dean
and Clark
-
From: Nick McClure [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 12:12 PM
Subject: RE: OT Posts
I'm not sure that should ever be an acceptable discussion. Not that it
shouldn't happen, it just shouldn't be considered acceptable.
-Original Message
What about sex tech.
larry
At 12:49 PM 12/1/2003, you wrote:
Yeah...we want more sex, less tech.
:)
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 December 2003 17:39
To: CF-Community
Subject: OT Posts
We've been getting a lot of tech posts here and
Teledildonics?
- Jim
Larry C. Lyons wrote:
What about sex tech.
larry
At 12:49 PM 12/1/2003, you wrote:
Yeah...we want more sex, less tech.
:)
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 December 2003 17:39
To: CF-Community
Subject: OT Posts
We've
or sanctioned by these organizations. This e-mail is
unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.
-Original Message-
From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 1:23 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: OT Posts
I'm not sure that should ever be an acceptable
toys, toys, toys.
What about sex tech.
larry
At 12:49 PM 12/1/2003, you wrote:
Yeah...we want more sex, less tech.
:)
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 December 2003 17:39
To: CF-Community
Subject: OT Posts
We've been getting a
Gives a new meaning to the term reach out and tough someone.
Teledildonics?
- Jim
Larry C. Lyons wrote:
What about sex tech.
larry
At 12:49 PM 12/1/2003, you wrote:
Yeah...we want more sex, less tech.
:)
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 1:50 PM
Subject: RE: OT Posts
nazi
Timothy Heald
Web Portfolio Manager
Overseas Security Advisory Council
U.S. Department of State
571.345.2319
The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S.
Department of State or any affiliated
New custom tags that I wrote for cf-sex-tech-talk
cf_dildo
cf_plastic_doll
cf_horny_robot_midgets
- Matt Small
- Original Message -
From: Michael Dinowitz
To: CF-Community
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: OT Posts
toys, toys, toys.
What about sex tech.
larry
or sanctioned by these organizations. This e-mail is
unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:04 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: OT Posts
And Tim thereby fulfills the Online Mailing List
-Community
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: OT Posts
toys, toys, toys.
What about sex tech.
larry
At 12:49 PM 12/1/2003, you wrote:
Yeah...we want more sex, less tech.
:)
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 December 2003
if you were toexplain the details of that would you be talking about the
ins and outs of that technology?
larry
At 01:48 PM 12/1/2003, you wrote:
Teledildonics?
- Jim
Larry C. Lyons wrote:
What about sex tech.
larry
At 12:49 PM 12/1/2003, you wrote:
Yeah...we want more sex, less
These are actually wrappers that encapsulate the code for each of the tags.For example, CF_Dildo contains a large binary dildo written in PERL.
- Matt Small
- Original Message -
From: Marlon Moyer
To: CF-Community
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:12 PM
Subject: Re: OT Posts
those
To: CF-Community
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: OT Posts
toys, toys, toys.
What about sex tech.
larry
At 12:49 PM 12/1/2003, you wrote:
Yeah...we want more sex, less tech.
:)
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
.
- Jim
Matthew Small wrote:
New custom tags that I wrote for cf-sex-tech-talk
cf_dildo
cf_plastic_doll
cf_horny_robot_midgets
- Matt Small
- Original Message -
From: Michael Dinowitz
To: CF-Community
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: OT Posts
toys, toys, toys.
What
-talk
cf_dildo
cf_plastic_doll
cf_horny_robot_midgets
- Matt Small
- Original Message -
From: Michael Dinowitz
To: CF-Community
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: OT Posts
toys, toys, toys.
What about sex tech.
larry
At 12:49 PM 12/1/2003, you
No, just a general vibe.
- Jim
Larry C. Lyons wrote:
if you were toexplain the details of that would you be talking about the
ins and outs of that technology?
larry
At 01:48 PM 12/1/2003, you wrote:
Teledildonics?
- Jim
Larry C. Lyons wrote:
What about sex tech.
larry
At 12:49 PM
All right, you all have just invoked one of my favorite jokes.
Do you know what the real difference between people and computers is?
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
With computers, the software goes into the hardware :-()
Thank you, try the lasagna, I'll be here all week.
--
Ian Skinner
:-)
Matthew Small wrote:
New custom tags that I wrote for cf-sex-tech-talk
cf_dildo
cf_plastic_doll
cf_horny_robot_midgets
- Matt Small
- Original Message -
From: Michael Dinowitz
To: CF-Community
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: OT Posts
25 matches
Mail list logo
