On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Greg Morphis wrote:
>
> I don't think knowing the charge or mass of a distant particle will allow us
> to travel across time and space ;)
> I like the idea of warping space around a ship though.. contracting space in
> front and expanding it behind the ship could ma
I don't think knowing the charge or mass of a distant particle will allow us
to travel across time and space ;)
I like the idea of warping space around a ship though.. contracting space in
front and expanding it behind the ship could make the ship travel at
incredible speeds.. but even that has is
travel without moving.
needs to be one of mind.
consciousness, not physical body.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://ww
I'm pretty sure that Quantum Mechanics states that if we "will it"
hard enough (Ender's Game: Xenocide), we can do improbable things.
Perhaps even really really improbable things, like flip a spaceship
across the mind-paralyzing distances between the furthest stars.
Case in point:
The principle
Can't travel at the speed of light thanks to e=mc2. Because at the speed of
light your mass would be infinite.
But there's nothing saying you can't travel at 99.99% of it.
Also space can expand faster than the speed of light. Making something like
a warp bubble possible.
sent from my Droid ph
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Casey Dougall wrote:
...
>
> Propulsion isn't the way, wormholes are ;-)
>
> You can't physically travel at the speed of light, by the time you hit light
> speed you would be flatter then a pancake.
>
Wormholes sure seem to be in lately.
I was watching the new "Ra
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> They just had an article on yahoo news about how scientists just discovered
> a bacterium that uses both phosphorus and arsenic in it's dna and can
> survive in environments previously though inhospitable t
They just had an article on yahoo news about how scientists just discovered
a bacterium that uses both phosphorus and arsenic in it's dna and can
survive in environments previously though inhospitable to life.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20101202/sc_nm/us_arsenic_bacteria
-Original Message---
Hey, we were talking about roads on another thread...
Oh, wait. Not interstate.
Never mind, carry on.
Is an inner state like Kentucky or South Dakota?
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Vivec wrote:
> ...If you create...an inner state that functions
~
0_0
you don't know what
we.can.do.
If you create two states, an inner state that functions at our own time and
an outer one that seeks to travel at light speed
then those within the inner state would feel nothing.
*twilight zone theme*
On 2 December 2010 11:05, Casey Dougall wrote:
>
> Propul
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> I wonder when resources will be put towards finding new means of propulsion
> and other accomplishments that would make finding life on these planets
> worthwhile to begin with.
>
> I'd like to see 1 Trillion spent on R&D instead of on the militar
I wonder when resources will be put towards finding new means of propulsion
and other accomplishments that would make finding life on these planets
worthwhile to begin with.
I'd like to see 1 Trillion spent on R&D instead of on the military, for
example.
On 2 December 2010 03:36, denstar wrote:
Yeah, when I read the story, they basically said that the rest of the
world is not asking for more oil, and the demand from China and India
are already taxing their production capabilities.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,356238,00.html
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/16/bush.saudi.arab
i have been reading speculation that the saudis can't actually increase
output, as one of their biggest fields is in decline. further speculation
suggests that the saudis are being very coy about it because they fear a
public admission that this field is in decline would lead to mass panic in
the f
> Sgt Sorge wrote:
> increase until fuel started to rise. So how is this going to fix that?
Well Bush's plan there is to take the trip he's on to Saudi Arabia and
ask his ole Saudi oil buddies kick up production ... the problem is
The Saudis told Bush to fuck off. Essentially kicking him in
Well, I could talk specifically about our program for updating the outdated
data acceptance system for receiving and processing producer insurance data.
The USDA approved a major update and expansion of their current systems
because it was failing to meet the growing needs of the reinsurance proces
Can you elaborate on what these processes are?
>I don't think this bill has much affect on rising food prices at all...as
>you said, I think that is all fuel related. This bill funds processes that
>had essentially grinded to a halt because budgeted money had run out.
>Getting those processes movi
Um, if you are being paid not to produce anything, then how do you
factor into the equation? This is the question I have been trying to get
answered. The government is telling some farmers not to grow anything
because we have too much of whatever it is they were growing, and
getting paid for th
Well, in your scenario Bruce, now we have thousands fewer
producers.which results in how many millions fewer bushels of corn or
wheat or soybeans in the supply market? What's THAT going to do to prices?
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Bruce Sorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right, but why p
I don't get how on one hand people are complaining that all the
farmers growing Corn for Ethanol are causing shortages or
supply/demand price problems - then on the other hand we are still
paying farmers NOT to farm?!?!? WTF?
I mean I honestly don't know what was in the Farm Bill, but if the US
G
Right, but why pay people to do nothing? If you are not making money
with your farm, do something else. I know it is probably not as easy as
it sounds, but seriously, looking back at the beginning of subsidies, it
was broke from the beginning. How about fixing what is broke rather then
throwing
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Bruce Sorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Saying that this
> bill is due to rising grocery prices is to me not entirely true.
Well, it's probably not true that this bill will help with the rising
prices, Bruce, but that doesn't mean that it's passing wasn't partly
I agree that prices were not stable until fuel started to rise, but the
recent spike in prices is related to rising fuel costs, as are the
prices for just about everything else since it cannot get from the
manufacturer to the consumer without being trucked in. Saying that this
bill is due to ri
So you agreed with George Bush's contention that this bill was too helpful
for the so called "rich farmers" ??
You are probably rightbut let me ask you...all of the necessary
processes and people (like me) who's funding had run out and couldn't
continue without a farm budget.what about the
I don't think this bill has much affect on rising food prices at all...as
you said, I think that is all fuel related. This bill funds processes that
had essentially grinded to a halt because budgeted money had run out.
Getting those processes moving again was the result of this bill that
concerned
Given how much pork is laden into the farm bill it probably was better for it
to be vetoed. Just look at the hundreds of millions going to agriculture
corporations, you'd be disgusted. Its a darned pity that congress did not
exercise fiscal restrain in this case. I have no problem with family fa
You sure you've been buying the groceries? ;) And have you actually been
keeping track of the actual amount you pay on regular items?
I regularly check the price of the items we buy all the time, and have kept
a book of prices from all the grocery stores in the area (Tightwad Gazette
style), and
Well, I know that for over 140 years the idea of farm subsidies was
brought up on occasion and was subsequently shot down, mainly because
Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution provides no role for the
federal government in regulating American farmers, and this worked well
until about the 193
> You are not answering the question. How does paying farmers not to work
> help the general public? How is this going to stem the rising cost of
> groceries?
Do you know why the Federal Government pays farmers to let fields go fallow?
The history I mean?
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it
You are not answering the question. How does paying farmers not to work
help the general public? How is this going to stem the rising cost of
groceries?
G Money wrote:
> This bill funds necessary development across a broad spectrum of food
> producing organizations. This includes the ESSENTIAL b
This bill funds necessary development across a broad spectrum of food
producing organizations. This includes the ESSENTIAL business systems that
support agricultural producers and the insurance policies that protect their
business.
It also funds the continued work of the people who maintain and up
I don't see how this ties into the rising grocery costs. I have been
buying groceries for many years now and I did not notice any dramatic
increase until fuel started to rise. So how is this going to fix that?
This is also going to ensure that farmers are going to be paid *not* to
grow food for
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Bruce Sorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So political posturing on both sides excites you? That's all this is
> about is making sure they are elected this year. Nothing else.
>
>
So what. IMO, they did the RIGHT THING. Sometimes, doing the right thing
can be to
So political posturing on both sides excites you? That's all this is
about is making sure they are elected this year. Nothing else.
G Money wrote:
> So finally rising food prices and political pressure has convinced enough
> Republican reps. to vote for the Farm Bill, with a veto-proof margin!
>
> Zapper wrote:
> I always wonder how different people are in real life as opposed to
> the way they're portrayed on TV. What does your friend say about
> her? :)
>
Very nice, very no nonsense. However I heard that she was very ...
"distracting" even when conservative, so many of the dudes put
yeah, the showtime "After dark" show is really, really boring. I
prefer the packaged version given on CBS or the spoilers web site
where they don't strip all the juicy bits out to make it TV compliant.
On Apr 11, 2008, at 11:10 AM, Jacob wrote:
> I was channel surfing and came across this s
I was channel surfing and came across this show on Showtime about a week
ago.
Two minutes into the show I said "Well, I am sure it gets better than this."
After another eight minutes, I turned the show off and went outside to watch
the grass grow...
I wrote to Showtime requesting compensation for
I always wonder how different people are in real life as opposed to
the way they're portrayed on TV. What does your friend say about
her? :)
On Apr 11, 2008, at 10:39 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>> Zapper wrote:
>> So if you don't watch Big Brother, the subject line won't make sense
>> to you..
> Zapper wrote:
> So if you don't watch Big Brother, the subject line won't make sense
> to you.but if you do watch it, this means Natalie is on her way
> out! Woo hoo! Can't stand her.
>
Amanda worked for the same company I do in a group with a good friend of mine.
~~~
KDE?!?! You heathen!
LOL - I used to go KDE, but I tried and like Gnome. I'm using Amarok,
which is a KDE app tho... not sure how much they cross, but they do.
That's an interesting history. Don't remember much, but I think it's
basically NetBeans vs. Eclipse (one was closed (GNOME?) and then
A flavor of Linux. Currently, it's generally regarded as one of, if not
the, friendliest.
The default window manager is Gnome, but I prefer KDE, so I installed
Kubuntu, which is basically Ubuntu with KDE instead of Gnome. YMMV.
--BenD
Tony wrote:
> what is ubuntu?
>
> tw
>
> On 12/17/07, Din
I've not tried reading/writing NTFS drives via Linux, although at this
late date, I'd imagine it's pretty stable. I recently saw an app for
mounting Linux drives in XP, but I didn't look to see what formats are
supported (though I expect ext3, the Ubuntu default, is). I can
probably find it i
what is ubuntu?
tw
On 12/17/07, Dinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2007 11:11 AM, Casey Dougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 12/17/07, Ben Doom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Eclipse runs much faster under Linux in my limited experience.
> >
> > How is Linux with reading
On Dec 17, 2007 11:11 AM, Casey Dougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/17/07, Ben Doom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Eclipse runs much faster under Linux in my limited experience.
>
> How is Linux with reading off of NTFS formated partitions? What's my best
> route here for getting the mos
On 12/17/07, Ben Doom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Eclipse runs much faster under Linux in my limited experience.
No worries on performance here. My system's Got The Juice! I score 4.5 in
the vista experience scale. Probably means I'll score 11 out of 10 on Linux.
:-)
I'm thinking this we
Casey Dougall wrote:
> Outside of this, I've switched to eclipse so that wouldn't be much of an
> issue. Guess i would need to boot into windows to test sites from time to
> time on Safari.
Eclipse runs much faster under Linux in my limited experience.
I could be wrong, but I think that the versi
On 12/17/07, Ben Doom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't do graphics, so I don't use Gimp. I hear it's almost as good as
> Photoshop, but couldn't tell you from personal experience.
>
> Other than that, what keeps you from using Linux all the time?
>
> --BenD
"FinalScratch" I use this for m
I don't do graphics, so I don't use Gimp. I hear it's almost as good as
Photoshop, but couldn't tell you from personal experience.
Other than that, what keeps you from using Linux all the time?
--BenD
Casey Dougall wrote:
> On 12/17/07, Ben Doom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Kubuntu (I'm a KDE
I've got 1 gig on the mythtv frontend/backend. I've got 3 gig on my
desktop system that I'm going to push the backend to. I'll only give
it 512Mb or so though.
On 12/17/07, Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How much RAM you have in that thing?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Zaphod
How much RAM you have in that thing?
- Original Message -
From: "Zaphod Beeblebrox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community"
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2007 4:29 PM
Subject: Woohoo!
>I finally got MythTV up and running nicely on media pc. It's funny
> since I had tried all the myth-dist
I don't stroke the other one slowly :)
You could start with the vmware player or even server. Both are free
to download and use. Next, to make things really easy, you could
download a virtual appliance from the same web site that has ubuntu
already installed and ready to roll. That would be the
*Um, is that his chin?*
I have Windows XP running on an older Thinkpad T-42 laptop.
Where would I start to look at installing Ubuntu in a vm on my
machine? I am intrigued by trying it out, but don't have a box I can
put it on full-time. If I could cheat, and use this machine, that
would be very c
I'm in the process of making an Ubuntu vm that I'll transfer to my
Win32 desktop tonight. I'm going to try to run the myth backend on it
in a vm session. I use my desktop less and less nowadays since it's
in an office all by itself and it only runs windows :)
Now that I think about it, I don't r
On 12/17/07, Ben Doom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Kubuntu (I'm a KDE fan of old) is running on my (previously) Vista laptop.
>
> --BenD
I'm so close to doing this you don't even know...
Burned Kbuntu to disk the other day. Need to make some room for it but I
first need to figure out what to
Kubuntu (I'm a KDE fan of old) is running on my (previously) Vista laptop.
--BenD
Dinner wrote:
> Ubuntu has done nothing but impress me.
>
> I'll take it, over Vista, Hands Down, No Question. Destroys!
>
> --
> Love, love, loveit.
>
> On Dec 16, 2007 2:29 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTEC
Ubuntu has done nothing but impress me.
I'll take it, over Vista, Hands Down, No Question. Destroys!
--
Love, love, loveit.
On Dec 16, 2007 2:29 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I finally got MythTV up and running nicely on media pc. It's funny
~~
Was there some kind of hoops sports contest on last night or somethin? =)
Seriously, though, could basketball be suffering any more ratings-wise these
days? I mean, it's not as bad as the NHL, but...
On 6/15/07, Chris Montgomery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How 'bout them Spurs!
>
> --
> Best
Maidenhead! Lovely!!
Just thought of another really cool place to go - but you really need to
rent a car. NEW FOREST!
You can drive thru the park, see ponies crossing the road, stop in one of
the country pubs for a bite. Very beautiful little side trip.
:)
~
; Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 11:15 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Woohoo!
>
> Too bad his job is in london ...
>
> On 5/9/07, Paul Ihrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > lake districk or scotland.. feck england
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Woohoo!
Too bad his job is in london ...
On 5/9/07, Paul Ihrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> lake districk or scotland.. feck england
>
>
~|
ColdFusion MX7 and Flex 2
Build sales &
Glastonbury is well worth a visit for anyone with a bit of Hippie in them :)
Stonehenge is worth a visit, but Avebury is much more interesting and
impressive - http://www.avebury-web.co.uk/, it's easy to do both as they
are relatively close together.
On 09/05/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Too bad his job is in london ...
On 5/9/07, Paul Ihrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> lake districk or scotland.. feck england
>
>
~|
Deploy Web Applications Quickly across the enterprise with ColdFusion MX7 &
Flex 2
Free Trial
well ya ... given enough time either of these would be good. Give
Glasgow a miss though. Try Edinburgh...
On 5/9/07, Paul Ihrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> lake districk or scotland.. feck england
>
>
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFu
lake districk or scotland.. feck england
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
The most significant release in over 10 years. Upgrade & see new features.
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJR
Archive:
http://www.houseo
they are only about 30 miles apart. By the way, Glastonbury (where
Stonehenge is) is also where King Arthur is thought to have lived
On 5/9/07, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How 'bout both. Bath was amazing. So very hard to think that the
> town was sitting on top of the old
You're still close enough to it to be awed. Least in my opinion. One must
have the imagination going though - to think about how they got them there
in the first place and all the stuff they'd seen over the years...
On 5/9/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I heard it was closed to the public,
When I was there 2 years ago, they had a rope around it about 15~20
feet out. You could walk all around it, but could not go in the
middle of it. Think about how silly I felt...you know..with my
sacrificial knife and all.
On 5/9/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I heard it was closed to the
I heard it was closed to the public, you have to look from behind a fence.
On 5/9/07, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I vote for both as well. First, gotta love Stonehendge. Even if it's a big
> pile of rocks, it's simply surreal to stand close to them. Bath is
> fantastically beautif
I vote for both as well. First, gotta love Stonehendge. Even if it's a big
pile of rocks, it's simply surreal to stand close to them. Bath is
fantastically beautiful. Cute little par 3 course built right into the
hillside by the famous Royal Crescent. Nearby Bristol is very nice as well.
On 5/9/07
How 'bout both. Bath was amazing. So very hard to think that the
town was sitting on top of the old one. Come to think of it...I think
we did both Stonehenge and Bath in one day.
On 5/9/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bath is a nice town. But Stonehenge is very close and very famous...
>
Bath is a nice town. But Stonehenge is very close and very famous...
And who would not want to see King Arthur Country?
On 5/9/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hear nobody from the UK goes to Stonehenge. Too boring.
> Go to Bath.
>
> On 5/8/07, Dana Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
I hear nobody from the UK goes to Stonehenge. Too boring.
Go to Bath.
On 5/8/07, Dana Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And yes, if it is at all possible, get out of London while you are there. I
> recommend Glastonbury and Stonehenge for a day trip.
>
~~
+a million
On 5/9/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally I like the Canary Wharf area to stay. Right across the
> river there's a Hilton which is pretty nice and have an actual 18th
> century ship that's a restaurant. Then you can take a ferry across to
> Canary Wharf.
>
>
~~~
> Zapman wrote:
> Just make sure not to get a car in London, only outside.
The red bus is pretty sweet: you can buy a day ticket and then just
jump on and off at will. It's an easy and relaxing way to see all the
downtown sights.
If you sit upstairs, though, be prepared for a big surprise the ne
Yes. If you are faint hearted and don't have the guts or the pocket book,
stay out of the center of London. Yes, they have a Congestion Charge for
driving thru London. But it's not as big of an area as one thinks. It's not
the entire London proper. Just the main areas in the middle.
On 5/9/07, Zap
Just make sure not to get a car in London, only outside. It was hard
enough to drive with a navigator in the passenger seat. I can't
imagine how hard it would have been to drive without one.
On 5/9/07, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nah. Rent a car. It's a laugh to drive on the lef
yeah but don't they have some sort of user fee for driving in Central
London these days? Renting a car would be good for getting out to
Glastonbury though...I also thought of the Tower of London... which is
also probably not for a two year old.
On 5/9/07, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nah. Rent a car. It's a laugh to drive on the left and you are on your own
schedule and can go see the lovely country side where the buses and trains
won't take you. Especially to little tiny two pub towns. Just for a day.
Won't cost a fortune - well, the dollar against the pound sucks at the
momen
Central London -- Go see Big Ben. Buckingham Palace has a lovely little park
(St. James)just outside its gates. Go see Speaker's Corner in Hyde Park. If you
have time, Kew Gardens and Richmond Park in the West end are are both
beautiful.
There are more palaces than you can shake a stick at. I
slap one of the guys in the beaver hats.
but to be honest, get out side of london.
there are 1001 castles and estates you can check out on the cheap.
get a rental & drive a bit.
we used to live 40 South of london in weeting, in between Feltwell
mildenhall & lakeheath.
just drive and find the atmo
> -Original Message-
> From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 3:40 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: WooHoo Free Dougnuts
>
> I betcha doug's pretty proud of his nuts.
I also think he'd also probably appreciate a li
I betcha doug's pretty proud of his nuts.
On 6/2/05, Ben Doom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, but who wants Dougnuts?
>
> --Ben
>
> Marlon Moyer wrote:
> > Tomorrow is Doughnut Day and Krispy Kreme is celebrating by giving
> > away doughnuts
> >
> > http://krispykreme.com/
> >
> >
>
>
>
Yeah, but who wants Dougnuts?
--Ben
Marlon Moyer wrote:
> Tomorrow is Doughnut Day and Krispy Kreme is celebrating by giving
> away doughnuts
>
> http://krispykreme.com/
>
>
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company
That could be a positive...or maybe a negative if you're measuring
your waistline.
On 6/2/05, Deanna Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh sure. We don't have any Krispy Kremes around here.
>
> On 6/2/05, Marlon Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Tomorrow is Doughnut Day and Krispy Krem
Oh sure. We don't have any Krispy Kremes around here.
On 6/2/05, Marlon Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tomorrow is Doughnut Day and Krispy Kreme is celebrating by giving
> away doughnuts
>
> http://krispykreme.com/
>
>
> --
> Marlon
>
> "Only a Sith thinks in absolutes!"
>
>
~~~
Congrats Matt... that's wonderful!
Boo-ho I am so jealous. I want a loft, though.
Ijust have some old college credit card and phone bills and medical
bills to get off my record before I can seriously consider it.
I also have a hard time saving money with all the books out there to
buy. B
lol, i can imagine it! :-) ...the minivan can hold more passengers though,
right?
>-Original Message-
>From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: March 14, 2003 10:08 AM
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: RE: Woohoo
>
>
>Other than it being a complete nerdcar
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: March 14, 2003 9:48 AM
> >To: CF-Community
> >Subject: RE: Woohoo
> >
> >
> >The antithesis of a sexy vehicle is what I drive, a Saturn
> >station wagon.
> >I've nickname
LOL - that might work for me too! :-)
Patrick
>-Original Message-
>From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: March 14, 2003 9:48 AM
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: RE: Woohoo
>
>
>The antithesis of a sexy vehicle is what I drive, a Saturn
>station wag
The antithesis of a sexy vehicle is what I drive, a Saturn station wagon.
I've nicknamed it the nerdcar. At least I don't have to worry about it
being stolen.
larry
At 09:23 AM 3/14/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>LOL ... I have to get one of those too! The antithesis of sexy vehicle! :-)
> >-Origi
LOL ... I have to get one of those too! The antithesis of sexy vehicle! :-)
>-Original Message-
>From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Congrats, welcome to the wonderful world of home ownership,
>taxes and other
>fun middleclass stuff. So when are you getting your required minv
Congrats! Sorry for the delayed response but I was away sick yesterday, so
I'm exercising my right to be behind the times! :-) Patrick
P.S. I bought a house too and am moving at the end of the month! :-)
>-Original Message-
>From: Matthew Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: March 13, 2
LOL, I had the same initial thought.
~~
Stephenie Hamilton
Macromedia Certified ColdFusion Professional
CFXHosting
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 1:58 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Woohoo
Scary. I read this
Scary. I read this message immediately after Ben Doom's lyric posts to Beth.
It took a moment to realize the topic had changed.
Maybe I shouldn't read this list with a fever?
Jerry Johnson
<<< [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/13 12:02p >>>
small is good. less to clean.
congratulations
- Original
m: "FlashGuy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 12:35 PM
> Subject: Re: Woohoo
>
>
> Congats!
>
> I thought my first house was small - it was 2800 sq ft.
>
> Enjoy!
>
> On Th
prick with the big house!!
LOL J/k
thats a big ass first house man kudas!
- Original Message -
From: "FlashGuy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: Woohoo
Congats!
I thought m
Congats!
I thought my first house was small - it was 2800 sq ft.
Enjoy!
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 09:32:08 -0800, Ben Braver wrote:
> Hurray for Matthew !!
>
> Gee, I thought our first house was small - it was 1050 sq ft :-)
> Enjoy !!
>
> -Ben
>
>
> At 09:51 AM 3/13/03 -0500, you wrote:
> >Hi y'
Hurray for Matthew !!
Gee, I thought our first house was small - it was 1050 sq ft :-)
Enjoy !!
-Ben
At 09:51 AM 3/13/03 -0500, you wrote:
>Hi y'all,
> I just thought I'd share with you the fact that I just bought my
>first house yesterday. A tiny house (800 sqft) with a nice yard - 4
>b
yet to take the leap and buy a house...heck you should've
> seen me
> shaking when I bought a new truck in Jan.
> away)>
I am with you stephenie. A house is too big of a committment for me. We rent.
~|
Archives: http://ww
small is good. less to clean.
congratulations
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, March 13, 2003 5:51 am
Subject: Woohoo
> Hi y'all,
> I just thought I'd share with you the fact that I just bought my
> first house yesterday. A tiny hous
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
