The music is good, which helps make up for the slow parts. ;-)
Maybe it would have been different watching the series as it came out,
versus being able to pop 'em in one after the other, but it didn't
seem too slow to me. *shrug*
They're really running with the spread it over a couple shows
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Cameron Childress wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 4:08 PM, denstar wrote:
I like crossovers. Especially if the sibling shows are dead. :) A
little bit is ok.
I just don't want them to give up on the new enemies and fall back on
the old ones. One of the
The movie was awesome. SG1 was pretty awesome. SGA was good...not as good
as SG1, but still good. I am loving SGU. Did it start back up? I am so
lost without a DVR...I am living in a hotel for the next month and a 1\2, so
none of the luxuries of home. Luckily though I do have SyFy.
I just watched it for the first time yesterday on Netflix. It is decent but
kind of slow so far. I'll be interested to see where it goes.
-Original Message-
From: denstar [mailto:valliants...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2010 1:09 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Insane SGU (was
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Martin, Dustin W
dustin.mar...@kroger.com wrote:
I just watched it for the first time yesterday on Netflix. It is decent but
kind of slow so far. I'll be interested to see where it goes.
Don't count on it speeding up much till the last third of the season.
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
The movie was awesome. SG1 was pretty awesome. SGA was good...not as good
as SG1, but still good. I am loving SGU. Did it start back up? I am so
lost without a DVR...I am living in a hotel for the next
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 4:08 PM, denstar valliants...@gmail.com wrote:
I like crossovers. Especially if the sibling shows are dead. :) A
little bit is ok.
I just don't want them to give up on the new enemies and fall back on
the old ones. One of the things I liked about SG1 is that they
I agree with Cameron's initial assessment. It was slow and not all
that exciting. Relative to the other stargate shows (I watched 14
seasons of SG1 and SGA in about 2 years before watching the final
season of SG:Atlantis live).
It wasn't bad enough to quit on though because I found most of
Wait, what? They made another Stargate? *Makes a note to check all his normal
TV sites for episodes*
...
Then, if the stars are aligned right, Grahamnesty will lose during his next
...
Speaking of the stars, I found another space-ish show to watch.
I remembered somebody mentioning Stargate
The best thing that could happen to this country would be to abolish
political parties and PACs completely, and outlaw lobbyists entirely.
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Jerry Barnes critic...@gmail.com wrote:
The country should abolish straight ticket voting and listing party on the
The best thing that could happen to this country would be to abolish
political parties and PACs completely, and outlaw lobbyists entirely.
I'll agree on PACS and lobbyists.
Political parties are different. It would be unconstitutional to not allow
certain groups of people to meet and band
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 1:09 AM, denstar valliants...@gmail.com wrote:
Speaking of the stars, I found another space-ish show to watch.
I remembered somebody mentioning Stargate Universe, so said what the
hell, and fired it up.
Been enjoying it, too! Kinda got that Rama deal going for it.
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Cameron Childress wrote:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 1:09 AM, denstar wrote:
Speaking of the stars, I found another space-ish show to watch.
I remembered somebody mentioning Stargate Universe, so said what the
hell, and fired it up.
Been enjoying it, too!
I'm a little hesitant on PACS only for this reason, third parties, at
least in Virginia who have below a certain membership can only exist
as PAC's. Most state legislatures, knowing that third parties could
potentially draw voters away from the monopoly that Democans and the
Republocrats (after
Lobbyists, are the reason that public stockades should be reestablished.
No doubt. A good use for rotten vegetables and fruit.
J
-
Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms those entrusted with
power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny -
Thomas
Never watched any of the Stargate TV shows. I did enjoy the movie though.
J
-
Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms those entrusted with
power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny -
Thomas Jefferson on government
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
Never watched any of the Stargate TV shows. I did enjoy the movie though.
94 was a good year.
:Den
--
We are not very pleased when we are forced to accept a mathematical
truth by virtue of a complicated chain of formal conclusions and
The Democrats are just as guilty of 'if someone from the other side of the
aisle thought it up, its a bad idea' mindset. Fact of the matter is, more
often than not nether the Democratic stance, nor the Republican stance is
the 'best' solution to any problem. The 'best' solution would be 'in the
More piling on the
Onehttp://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/nilegardiner/100050412/the-stunning-decline-of-barack-obama-10-key-reasons-why-the-obama-presidency-is-in-meltdown/-
You can read about each number at the link.
The stunning decline of Barack Obama: 10 key reasons why the Obama
presidency
Trouble maker
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Jerry Barnes critic...@gmail.com wrote:
More piling on the
Onehttp://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/nilegardiner/100050412/the-stunning-decline-of-barack-obama-10-key-reasons-why-the-obama-presidency-is-in-meltdown/-
You can read about each number
I for one feel kind of bad for Obama. As an outsider it looks like he's
doing a great job handling monumentally big tasks.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Jerry Barnes critic...@gmail.com wrote:
More piling on the
One
Spin, distortion and nonsense. Not a single empirical statement on the
list, just someone's opinion.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Jerry Barnes critic...@gmail.com wrote:
More piling on the
One
Damn straight.
Looks like he is doing a great job in a horrid situation that the
Democrats inherited from the Republicans to me.
It baffles me how detractors expect to turn around or ignore the
effects of 8 years of someone's bad policies in a year or two
especially in this financial meltdown.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Vivec gel21...@gmail.com wrote:
Damn straight.
Looks like he is doing a great job in a horrid situation that the
Democrats inherited from the Republicans to me.
It baffles me how detractors expect to turn around or ignore the
effects of 8 years of someone's
Don't the Democrats have a majority in the Senate
AND the House?
Currently, yes, but that's not enough to ram policies through due to
things like the filibuster which requires a supermajority to get around.
Personally, I'm glad that no one party has too much power to impose their
will on us,
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Scott Stroz boyz...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't the Democrats have a majority in the Senate AND the House? If
the Democrats feel their policies are the end all, be all, why not
just ram the policies through?
The way the Senate is set up, you can't really just ram
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Justin Scott
jscott-li...@gravityfree.com wrote:
Don't the Democrats have a majority in the Senate
AND the House?
Currently, yes, but that's not enough to ram policies through due to
things like the filibuster which requires a supermajority to get around.
I'll speak directly to the one I've been following the most and that is 8:
US foreign policy is an embarrassing mess under the Obama administration
It is the opinion of some (many?) that Obama has alienated many of our
traditional allies (France, Britain, Israel, etc.) for no reason at
all.
Getting one or two RINO's to vote for you after you bribe them is not
bi-partisan.
Many votes they can't even bribe the democrats to stay on board.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.com wrote:
The way the Senate is set up, you can't really just ram your
How or when did Obama alienate Britain and France??
The Obama presidency completely reset international relations which
were at an all time low in the history of America under the bush
administration.
On 13 August 2010 14:42, Michael Dinowitz mdino...@houseoffusion.com wrote:
It is the opinion
I posted an article a while back about his alienating our allies in
general. I'll have to find it again. Till I do, a fast search gave me
this post with 10 points concerning Britian:
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/nilegardiner/100027838/barack-obama%E2%80%99s-top-10-insults-against-britain/
Spin, distortion and nonsense. Not a single empirical statement on the
list, just someone's opinion.
Well, it is an opinion piece.
J
-
Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms those entrusted with
power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny -
Thomas
How or when did Obama alienate Britain and France??
According to the author:
8. US foreign policy is an embarrassing mess under the Obama administration
It is hard to think of a single foreign policy success for the Obama
administration, but there have been plenty of missteps which have
Currently, yes, but that's not enough to ram policies through due to
things like the filibuster which requires a supermajority to get around.
Until Senator Kennedy died, the democrats had a filibuster proof majority.
J
-
Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms those entrusted
Trouble maker
Me?
J
-
Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms those entrusted with
power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny -
Thomas Jefferson on government
~|
Order the Adobe
Maybe the Dems don't want to use the Republican playbook?
On Aug 13, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
Currently, yes, but that's not enough to ram policies through due to
things like the filibuster which requires a supermajority to get around.
Until Senator Kennedy died, the
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Jerry Barnes critic...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently, yes, but that's not enough to ram policies through due to
things like the filibuster which requires a supermajority to get around.
Until Senator Kennedy died, the democrats had a filibuster proof majority.
Until Senator Kennedy died, the democrats had a
filibuster proof majority.
For a while, yes, but that is in the past now, thank goodness.
-Justin
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
Wasn't the first rule of the dem controlled congress that they didn't
need to include the minority in discussions?
That would make your comment correct :)
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox
zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe the Dems don't want to use the Republican
They can count on Brown half the time.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Justin Scott
jscott-li...@gravityfree.com wrote:
Until Senator Kennedy died, the democrats had a
filibuster proof majority.
For a while, yes, but that is in the past now, thank goodness.
-Justin
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Justin Scott
jscott-li...@gravityfree.com wrote:
Until Senator Kennedy died, the democrats had a
filibuster proof majority.
For a while, yes, but that is in the past now, thank goodness.
Doesn't seem to really matter, honestly. It isn't like they were able
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox
zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe the Dems don't want to use the Republican playbook?
Then they should quit complaining. As I said, grow a set or get the
fuck out, but quit the whining.
--
Scott Stroz
---
You can make
Then why present it as news or certainty?
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Jerry Barnes critic...@gmail.com wrote:
Spin, distortion and nonsense. Not a single empirical statement on the
list, just someone's opinion.
Well, it is an opinion piece.
J
They won't because Obama is too busy playing nice with the GOP and
conservative democrats are too busy on their knees under the desks of
corporate America.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 2:28 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re:
Bad feelings about how we are handling BP? We should be slamming the
asswipes against the wall instead of kissing their asses. Sorry if some
British pensioners lose out on their money, but that is what happens when
you privatize your retirement and invest it in a company that lacks any
moral
I think that was the Bush admin that was alienating France...remember the
freedom fries bullshit?
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com]
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 3:27 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: The stunning decline of Barack Obama: 10
Everything with Israel has gone right...it has shown them (Israel) for the
fascist assholes they really are.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Barnes [mailto:critic...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 3:58 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: The stunning decline of Barack Obama: 10
Not coming to the table does not equal not being included...
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 4:20 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: The stunning decline of Barack Obama: 10 key reasons why the
Obama presidency is in meltdown
I am all for them growing a pair and telling the republicans to either be
part of the solution or go fuck themselves.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 4:53 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: The stunning decline of Barack Obama:
So you're saying Bush was behind the freedom fries thing? Somehow I doubt it.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
I think that was the Bush admin that was alienating France...remember the
freedom fries bullshit?
As nothing Israel does is right in your eyes, it's not even worth
talking to you when it comes up in a topic.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
Everything with Israel has gone right...it has shown them (Israel) for the
fascist assholes they
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
I am all for them growing a pair and telling the republicans to either be
part of the solution or go fuck themselves.
That's how we got the health care mess that 58% of the public wants to
repeal and will be
I don't recall you complaining about it when the republicans were in power.
I guess it's only an issue when the dems are in power.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Munn [mailto:cfmuns...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 8:16 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: The stunning decline
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
I don't recall you complaining about it when the republicans were in power.
I guess it's only an issue when the dems are in power.
I thought you only started posting this year.
Obviously, the Republicans
Then why present it as news or certainty?
I don't know. Why?
I mean, I didn't. I just linked to the article and posted his ten reasons.
I thought others might find it interesting. In fact, I haven't stated any
opinions on this list, pro or con.
J
-
Experience hath shewn, that even under
Doesn't seem to really matter, honestly. It isn't like they were able to
wrangle 60 votes for a quick, non-negotiable party-line vote. Ever.
Thank God. An encouraging sign. Lock step voting by party (any party) by
representatives from such a large country with so many regional differences
Only if you count Bernie Sanders and Joe Lieberman, neither of whom are
Democrats.
I do.
Lieberman was a Democrat before he was sabotaged by other democrats and had
to go independent.
Republicans have a fairly coherent caucus. Snowe, Collins (and now Brown)
are the primary exceptions to that
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Barnes [mailto:critic...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 11:26 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: The stunning decline of Barack Obama: 10 key reasons why the
Obama presidency is in meltdown
Doesn't seem to really matter, honestly. It isn't like
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Jerry Barnes critic...@gmail.com wrote:
Only if you count Bernie Sanders and Joe Lieberman, neither of whom are
Democrats.
I do.
Lieberman was a Democrat before he was sabotaged by other democrats and had
to go independent.
Meh. If Lieberman is a Democrat
You appear not to be paying any attention to either of those people.
Whatever.
You may not recall this, but Grahamnesty voted for Kagan and Sotomayor.
Those in and of themselves are enough. He also voted for TARP. He is also
a proponent of cap and tax (though he did back down due to mounting
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
...
Then, if the stars are aligned right, Grahamnesty will lose during his next
...
Speaking of the stars, I found another space-ish show to watch.
I remembered somebody mentioning Stargate Universe, so said what the
hell, and fired it up.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
I am all for them growing a pair and telling the republicans to either be
part of the solution or go fuck themselves.
The Democrats are just as guilty of 'if someone from the other side of
the aisle thought
62 matches
Mail list logo
