"I'm Rick Perry, Mofo!"
http://www.ksat.com/news/4638422/detail.html
--- On Wednesday, June 22, 2005 1:17 PM, Marlon Moyer scribed: ---
>
> Rick Perry isn't right leaning enough for the Republicans. Afterall,
> he started out as a Democrat. Plus, he's crossing some of the
> Republicans down her
It's funny, because McCain and Perry are probably two Republicans I
wouldn't mind seeing in the oval office.
On 6/22/05, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, he has the same problem as McCain- can't make the right wing happy. And
> I don't really see the Republicans picking another Texa
Yeah, he has the same problem as McCain- can't make the right wing happy. And I
don't really see the Republicans picking another Texan for '08. Still, there
just are not a whole lot of legitimate looking contenders at this point.
>Rick Perry isn't right leaning enough for the Republicans. Afte
Oh sh!t, everybody step back for the lightning!
:-P
On 6/22/05, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree!
>
> On 6/22/05, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> > Given the way this country subsidizes gas prices, it probably would be
> > best if gas were allowed to climb to what it is in the rest of the
> >
> Larry wrote:
> Given the way this country subsidizes gas prices, it probably would be
> best if gas were allowed to climb to what it is in the rest of the
> world.
>
But those prices are taxes not market forces.
~|
Find out ho
> Sam wrote:
> I forgot, you're always right and everyone else is a mindless clone.
>
Just don't let it happen again.
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble
Ticket application
http://www.houseoffus
I agree!
On 6/22/05, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> Given the way this country subsidizes gas prices, it probably would be
> best if gas were allowed to climb to what it is in the rest of the
> world.
>
> larry
~|
Discover CFTicket -
Given the way this country subsidizes gas prices, it probably would be
best if gas were allowed to climb to what it is in the rest of the
world.
larry
On 6/22/05, Adam Haskell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Matt this thread has completely wasted my afternoon :) keep up
> the fight...oh and R
Thanks Matt this thread has completely wasted my afternoon :) keep up
the fight...oh and Rising gas prices are needed in america we pay a
rediculously low ammount for fuel...I'm glad its up I hope it goes
higher.
Adam H
On 6/22/05, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I forgot, you're always right an
I forgot, you're always right and everyone else is a mindless clone.
On 6/22/05, Gruss Gott wrote:
> > Sam wrote:
> > I think they need 60 Republicans for that.
> >
>
> They need 60 clones for that. Just Republicans won't do it - Sen
> Voinovich proved that.
> Sam wrote:
> I think they need 60 Republicans for that.
>
They need 60 clones for that. Just Republicans won't do it - Sen
Voinovich proved that.
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficien
I think they need 60 Republicans for that.
On 6/22/05, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> The Republicans OWN the Congress and presidency! They shouldn't need
> the Dems for *anything*. The fact that the President can't get a UN
> ambassador appointed shows how foolish his decisions are.
>
> Sam wrote:
> Or a President that has tough choices, like imigration and Social
> Security. Also remember when Clinton was Pres the Republicans worked
> with him even before they won control. The Dems on the other hand
> refuse to cross part lines even as a minority.
>
The Republicans OWN the Co
Or a President that has tough choices, like imigration and Social
Security. Also remember when Clinton was Pres the Republicans worked
with him even before they won control. The Dems on the other hand
refuse to cross part lines even as a minority.
On 6/22/05, Gruss Gott wrote:
> > Brian wrote:
>
Because the Dems brought out 12% more voters using Soros and Moore
while Bush increased his voters 20% and won more Governors, Senators
and Congressman.
In other words the Dems pulled out all the stops to replace Bush and
not only did he win but his but most Dems lost including Daschle.
On 6/22/0
> Brian wrote:
> But relatively speaking, that's higher than a lot of presidents. 60% is a
> high turnout for a US presidential election.
>
Polls go up and down, but what they reflect in this case is a mediocre
to poor President.
Which is why prominent conservatives from the Reagan-Bush era have
Or if a French-like loser doesn't win and hand your country over to the UN.
On 6/22/05, G wrote:
> You only "win", as a voter in an election, if your candidate successfully
> carries out the mandate you intended with your votes.
~~
> Sam wrote:
> I don't think you're following along :)
>
I'm following, I was just commenting on the use of "we're" in your
reply as if you have anything to do with Mr. Bush or his allies. If
you think you do then Mr. Bush simply duped you into voting for him.
It's kind of like a robbery victim
When less than a third of the population supports the person by voting
for him, how is that a mandate. Over 60 or 70% is a mandate, 30.6% is
a tepid approval by a minority. American Idol got a better response
than that.
larry
On 6/22/05, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But relatively speaking, tha
But relatively speaking, that's higher than a lot of presidents. 60% is a
high turnout for a US presidential election.
>I found it very ironic that he was claiming a mandate, when his vote
> was barely 51%. Given that only 60% of the eligible population voted,
> he had a mandate of around 30%.
>
I found it very ironic that he was claiming a mandate, when his vote
was barely 51%. Given that only 60% of the eligible population voted,
he had a mandate of around 30%.
larry
On 6/22/05, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bush won with over 50% of the popular vote. His current approval rating is
>
Bush won with over 50% of the popular vote. His current approval rating is
well below 50%. I wonder if there are currently some Bush voters debating
whether they actually "won" or not.
You only "win", as a voter in an election, if your candidate successfully
carries out the mandate you intended
I don't think you're following along :)
Larry was talking about "rabid pro shrub types", which I think he
means anyone that voted against Kerry.
Anyway, people that keep voting Republican and getting the candidate
they selected are winners as opposed to those whose candidates lose.
This in no way
> Sam wrote:
> As long as you keep thinking we're idiots we'll keep winning.
Remember the old saying, "if you have to ask you can't afford it?"
That's kind of like Feynman's quote about quantum physics: "If you say
you understand quantum mechanics, you don't."
Which is like my quote about polit
Of course given that the republican congress at the time prevented
the president to intervene had nothing to do with it.
Unlike the current Iraq conflict where the same party controlled the
executive and legislative branches.
Now its Iraq, the Dar Fur region, western Africa, Haiti, just to name
Not mean enough.
On 6/22/05, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a riddle for you :)
> If the Dems are so smart why do they keep losing?
~|
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place
for d
Rick Perry isn't right leaning enough for the Republicans. Afterall,
he started out as a Democrat. Plus, he's crossing some of the
Republicans down here in Texas.
On 6/22/05, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frist would be a disaster as a candidate. One thing the article by Brooks
> hig
Original Message-
From: Robert Munn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 01:09 pm
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: W usurps the throne
Importance: Low
Frist would be a disaster as a candidate. One thing the article by Brooks
highlights is that Senators have a very bad tra
I don't see the shift to the right. Many on the right thing W is too
Liberal, not defending the borders and excessive spending.
The Red States Right Wing is more of a "Don't force Gay culture on me
with" revolt rather than a true Right-wing movement. The Gay movement
was too aggressive too quickly
Frist would be a disaster as a candidate. One thing the article by Brooks
highlights is that Senators have a very bad track record of late when running
for President. So who to call on?
No one in the House has the standing, IMO, to make a serious run. Republican
Governors? Arnold can't run. Je
He's considered too Liberal. He openly supports partial birth
abortion, which is a big negative for the right wing. He also indorsed
Cuomo over Pataki and has close ties to Liberals. He's also not a good
public speaker, too ruff around the edges. His true quality is he
takes no shit and gets things
Part of it is due to Dem ineptness, but i also think there has been a
genuine shift to the right among the US population in recent years. Put the
two together, and you've got a GOP stronghold.
I wouldn't strut around too much thoughDem's won't remain in disarray
for long, and shifts in any
Here's a riddle for you :)
If the Dems are so smart why do they keep losing? The Presidency,
Congress Senate and Governors.
As long as you keep thinking we're idiots we'll keep winning.
Hehehehe Some people just can't learn :)
At the rate the Dems are going they won't be a major party in 2012 and
i
> what was his aids name that 'killed' himself?
Vince Foster
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~|
Protect Your PC from viruses, hackers, spam and
and the kids in mena.
Somalia
Kosovo
what was his aids name that 'killed' himself?
Loathe
C. Hatton Humphrey wrote:
>>Remember when Clinton lied no one died.
>
>
> Except for those poor folks in the asprin factory.
>
> Hatton
>
>
~~
> SStewart wrote:
> And Frist is way more conservative so I'm sure he'll get the nod from the
> Rich, White
> "Christian Right" .
>
Mr. Frist shouldn't and hopefully will never get the nomination.
Nobody has said it better than David Brooks:
June 19, 2005
What Makes Bill Frist Run?
By DAVID B
eney
> McCain vs Cheney
> Clinton/McCain vs ?
>
>
> Matthew Small
> Web Developer
> American City Business Journals
> 704-973-1045
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 20
He still has to get through the nomination process. That's where the
party faithful rule. Typically what happens is that (depending on the
party) the more sucessful primary candidates are more
reactionary/radical than the mainstream. This reflects who votes in
the primaries. The typical voter in th
Perhaps, but then it that all rides on how the public perceives him.
Guiliani might not get the repub nomination for the reasons you stated. But
the average american isn't going to bristle at these "improprieties" quite
as much, and he remains an extremely popular (sympathetic?) figure from Sept
McCain has already stated that what happened to him in South Caroline
in 2000 will not happen again. So if Frist wants to follow the same
route mapped out for Bush by Reid and the Christian Coalition, he will
be making a very big mistake.
larry
On 6/22/05, SStewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An
I'm not sure of that. Guiliani has too much baggage for the republican
right wing christian fundimentalists - in his last 2 years as mayor of
NYC he went through a very messy divorce while living with his now
current wife. There are also some accusations of some quite shady
deals he was involved in
Fax: (703) 834-5527
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 11:28 am
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: W usurps the throne
Importance: Low
Unfortunately its the special interest groups that are pouring money
into the parties. Eliminate
Has Guiliani decided not to run?
He'd probably have the best chance at keeping the GOP in the white house,
though I truly believe our next prez is a democrat.
> Unfortunately its the special interest groups that are pouring money
> into the parties. Eliminate the need to cater to the SIG's for
>
> 704-973-1045
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 11:09 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: W usurps the throne
>
> How about McCain/Clinton vs Cheney/Ashcroft.
&g
Stewart,
> Web Application Developer
>
> Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. (ECS)
> 14026 Thunderbolt Place, Suite 300
> Chantilly, VA 20151
> Phone: (703) 995-1737
> Fax: (703) 834-5527
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Small [mailto:[E
Much less than the estimated 15,000 civilians in Iraq so far.
On 6/22/05, C. Hatton Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Remember when Clinton lied no one died.
>
> Except for those poor folks in the asprin factory.
>
> Hatton
>
>
~~
Cheney/Ashcroft would have us in WWIII within two years of the election. And
the initiation of public works program to build Arab-American "re-education
camps"
Scott A. Stewart,
Web Application Developer
Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. (ECS)
14026 Thunderbolt Place, Suite 300
Chantilly,
n Developer
Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. (ECS)
14026 Thunderbolt Place, Suite 300
Chantilly, VA 20151
Phone: (703) 995-1737
Fax: (703) 834-5527
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 11:03 am
To: CF-Community
Subject
n Developer
Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. (ECS)
14026 Thunderbolt Place, Suite 300
Chantilly, VA 20151
Phone: (703) 995-1737
Fax: (703) 834-5527
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 11:03 am
To: CF-Community
Subject
gt;
>
> -Original Message-
> From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 10:57 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: W usurps the throne
>
> W's a pretty good politician, but he'd be absolutely no match for the
grand
> champion of polit
n Developer
Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. (ECS)
14026 Thunderbolt Place, Suite 300
Chantilly, VA 20151
Phone: (703) 995-1737
Fax: (703) 834-5527
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 11:03 am
To: CF-Community
Subject
Original Message-
> From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 10:57 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: W usurps the throne
>
> W's a pretty good politician, but he'd be absolutely no match for the grand
> champion of politics a
Matthew Small wrote:
>
> So, who agrees with me that we should completely eliminate the Constitution
> and appoint W as the new King of the World Empire?
Why would you want to eliminate it when you can just ignore it?
Jochem
~|
> Remember when Clinton lied no one died.
Except for those poor folks in the asprin factory.
Hatton
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble
Ticket application
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/vi
> >> So, who agrees with me that we should completely eliminate the
> > Constitution
> >> and appoint W as the new King of the World Empire?
> >>
"A girl of ancient name will marry a man of noble birth and together they
will rule our world... and their son will rule the universe."
So... the only
Along with the rabid anti-bush zombies, i'd say a nice large percentage of
the population is ahead of the game in the
labotomy department.
Bush, more than any other figure I've seen in my (relatively short)
lifetime, has the ability to invoke such passion in people as to have it
overshadow thei
?
Matthew Small
Web Developer
American City Business Journals
704-973-1045
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 10:57 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: W usurps the throne
W's a pretty good politician, but he
all
> Web Developer
> American City Business Journals
> 704-973-1045
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 10:49 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: W usurps the thron
I think it would require mass lobotomies. Mind you given how some
rabid pro shrub types act, they're already ahead of the game, with
complete brain removals.
larry
On 6/22/05, Matthew Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's really slow today.
>
>
>
> So, who agrees with me that we should compl
> Matthew Small
> Web Developer
> American City Business Journals
> 704-973-1045
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 10:49 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: W usur
, June 22, 2005 10:49 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: W usurps the throne
Absofuckinlutely! Booyah!
Along those lines I fully support the bill introduced in the House to
revoke the 22nd Amendment.
On 6/22/05, Matthew Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's really slow today.
>
Im kinda looking forward to the mark of the beast (616)
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49
Message: http://www.house
Absofuckinlutely! Booyah!
Along those lines I fully support the bill introduced in the House to
revoke the 22nd Amendment.
On 6/22/05, Matthew Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's really slow today.
>
>
>
> So, who agrees with me that we should completely eliminate the Constitution
> and a
Maybe I missed the press release.
Matthew Small
Web Developer
American City Business Journals
704-973-1045
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Dawson, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 10:45 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: W usurps the throne
Do you mean that hasn't already happened?
M!ke
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 9:44 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: W usurps the throne
It's really slow today.
So, who agrees with me that we should completely
It's really slow today.
So, who agrees with me that we should completely eliminate the Constitution
and appoint W as the new King of the World Empire?
Matthew Small
Web Developer
American City Business Journals
704-973-1045
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~
66 matches
Mail list logo
