Re: Faking Out IIS?

2003-07-20 Thread DDB Lists
Just want to throw this in: if you need even more flexibility you should look at http://www.isapirewrite.com/ the paying version let's you rewrite url's but even allows you to proxy request to another server depending on the url, so your request can arrive at your iis server, but may actually be

RE: Cons to Fusebox

2003-07-20 Thread Philip Arnold
Oh, in that case fusebox sucks. I'm not going to use it anymore! You're the smartest guy ever! Hey, you said I've never heard a developer who's actually architected and developed a project with FB say I wish I hadn't used FB I told you that I had a situation where I HAD said that I wished I

RE: Cons to Fusebox

2003-07-20 Thread GL
No dork, I was responding to your weird remark: What does that say about FuseBox? I don't understand nor do I wish to understand your goofy situation and why you have to work so hard to upload files. I think you may have made a logistical error or 2 designing this cluster-f*** of a site, but it

RE: Cons to Fusebox

2003-07-20 Thread Roger B.
I tried to build an app on FB2, then another client wanted a site with exactly the same technology - this meant duplicating the files over the ? 2 folders - whenever I did updates, I had to upload to 2 locations Philip, I'm no FB evangelist... people should use whatever works for them, IMO.

RE: Cons to Fusebox

2003-07-20 Thread Roger B.
This is almost rediculous. I've seen complete newbies with little or no CF experience pick up fusebox in a week. There's nothing ridiculous about the FB learning curve... FB makes instant sense to many people, and is completely impenetrable to many others. Anyone who has watched the various FB

RE: Cons to Fusebox

2003-07-20 Thread Matt Robertson
The anonymous GL said, No dork, I was responding to snip If you can't be a grownup here then get out. Around here that attitude just discounts your opinion as noise. Matt Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSB Designs, Inc. http://mysecretbase.com

RE: Cons to Fusebox

2003-07-20 Thread Michael Wilson
...and you further support their point that people who use Fusebox are idiots. You do nothing to further this thread with these comments and you do nothing to show that Fusebox is beneficial to developers. Michael Wilson -Original Message- From: GL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

SOAP CF

2003-07-20 Thread W Luke
Hi, I need to get a very basic app running by Thursday - just one which messages MSN/ICQ clients instead of email. I've found a Web Service which can help (free): http://www.bindingpoint.com/ws/imalert/imalert.asmx I've not done any SOAP before, and not much WSDL (although a little). Could

RE: SOAP CF

2003-07-20 Thread Jim Campbell
Are you using ColdFusion MX? If so, this code will do the job: cfinvoke webservice=http://www.bindingpoint.com/ws/imalert/imalert.asmx?wsdl; method=sendICQ returnvariable=theResult cfinvokeargument name=fromName value=Me cfinvokeargument name=toUserID value=You

RE: Cons to Fusebox

2003-07-20 Thread GL
It's not really a campaign to convert stubborn cowboy-coders to use Fusebox is it? I don't care if these guys are too smart to use fusebox. Those of us that efficiently produce reusable, maintainable code are just becomming more valued in the industry. Clients/Investors are quickly learning that

RE: Cons to Fusebox

2003-07-20 Thread Shawn Grover
Your statements assume the apps in multiple locations all belong to one client. If I had 3 clients who each required a shopping cart app (for instance), I doubt very much if they would want their system to be even partially located on server's outside their domains. In this case (which is common

RE: Cons to Fusebox

2003-07-20 Thread GL
Just to set the record straight since you weren't paying attention to the whole thread. I was using dork to describe the obvious latency in brain function on the part of the guy when he said: So, because you've been proven wrong, you come back with a smart-ass remark?. My smart-ass remark was

Re: OT: anyone take a MySQL training class from mysql.com?

2003-07-20 Thread S. Allen
dan martin wrote: I am considering taking the Using and Managing MySQL training class and was wondering if anyone here had any feedback on the class (from www.mysql.com) Anyone take any other training class on MySQL that they could recommend? I am interested in coming up to speed quickly

read-only SQL transactions

2003-07-20 Thread Jochem van Dieten
How do you start a read-only SQL transaction from CF MX? Jochem ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4

RE: read-only SQL transactions

2003-07-20 Thread Dave Watts
How do you start a read-only SQL transaction from CF MX? I don't think the CFTRANSACTION tag supports this. I suspect that you could just write your batch within CFQUERY tags and set it there. This is just a suspicion, though; I haven't tried it. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software

RE: read-only SQL transactions

2003-07-20 Thread Joe Eugene
What do you mean by a start read-only SQL transaction? Multiple select statements within a cfquery? Joe Eugene -Original Message- From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 4:41 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: read-only SQL transactions How do you

RE: Fire and forget a Stored Procedure

2003-07-20 Thread Gunther Ahamer
I am not 100% on this but I believe even if the user hits the stop button or disconnects the client some other way, CF will continue processing the page anyway. I dont think that IIS tells CF that the client has disconnected. Gunther -Original Message- From: DURETTE, STEVEN J (AIT)

Re: Fire and forget a Stored Procedure

2003-07-20 Thread Doug White
I don't think it will work - When the visitor closes the browser or moves on to somewhere else you will get an error like the following in your ColdFusion Server Log file: Error,1160,07/15/03,12:20:34,,Unable to write reply -- client browser stopped waiting for request.

CF5 with Apache 2.0.42 on Windows

2003-07-20 Thread Mike Alberts
Mike, I'm running Apache 2.044 on Windows 2000 without any issues. Using one of the drivers Dave mentioned. HTH Mike Alberts ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription:

Code Reuse

2003-07-20 Thread LI, Chunshen \(Don\)
Code Reuse -- How to make a reusable component to provide more value to customers? Hope the topic is not OT. I'm not sure if Dr. Carma McClure's claim that software reuse is the best answer to the decade-old software crisis is all that accurate. But I'm a firm believer in code reuse, probably

cfqueryparam and unicode and SQL Server

2003-07-20 Thread Matthew Walker
I'm inserting Unicode data (specifically Japanese characters) into a SQL Server table. This works fine if you use the N prefix, e.g. title = N'#arguments.title#', Anybody know how to write this using the cfqueryparam tag? I optimistically tried . . . title = Ncfqueryparam

Re: cfqueryparam and unicode and SQL Server

2003-07-20 Thread Paul Hastings
make sure you're using the JDBC driver, set the advanced option's use unicode.. on. then title = cfqueryparam value=#arguments.title# should work. all the other encoding stuff still applies. I'm inserting Unicode data (specifically Japanese characters) into a SQL Server table. This works fine

RE: cfqueryparam and unicode and SQL Server

2003-07-20 Thread Matthew Walker
Beautiful! Thanks! I figured you'd probably know the answer. ;-) -Original Message- From: Paul Hastings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 21 July 2003 4:03 p.m. To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: cfqueryparam and unicode and SQL Server make sure you're using the JDBC driver, set the

RE: Cons to Fusebox

2003-07-20 Thread Mosh Teitelbaum
Brian Kotek wrote: I mean, I could say the best methodology is the build the best application methodology. There are no repeatable steps to this methodology, no way to document it in a way that someone else can use. But when you use it and you do it right, whooeee the results are amazing!

RE: Fire and forget a Stored Procedure

2003-07-20 Thread Jim Davis
-Original Message- From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 8:10 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Fire and forget a Stored Procedure I don't think it will work - When the visitor closes the browser or moves on to somewhere else you will get an error

RE: Cons to Fusebox

2003-07-20 Thread Mosh Teitelbaum
Mosh Teitelbaum wrote: 4) Fusebox does have a learning curve (IMO, a pretty steep one if you want to truly and properly use all that FB offers) but once learned, you're in pretty good company (until the next release and then there usually seems to be another learning curve). GL drew