We've been pretty happy with dotProject (http://www.dotproject.net/)
While not written in CF, it is pretty flexible and you can customize
the PHP code to do whatever you need.
Matt
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 18:15:45 +
Subje
Marco Antonio C. Santos wrote:
> How can I do MySQL works fine with this simple query:
>
> SELECT DISTINCT User_ID,(SELECT Count(User_ID) FROM users p1 WHERE
> p1.User_ID = users.User_ID) AS CountID
> FROM users
SELECT User_ID, count(User_ID)
FROM users
GROUP BY User_ID
Jochem
[Todays Threads]
> TRANSFORM
> sum (dp.cantidad) as totalt
> select sum (dp.cantidad) as total, dp.idproducto as codigo
> from pedidos p, detallesdepedido dp
> where p.idpedido=dp.idpedido
> and p.mesenvio = 7
> group by dp.idproducto
> PIVOT
> p.diaenvio
> In CFMX i can make a query like this, if i can how i
"and cfml list loop is even more efficient than array..."
WOW!... There must be something really wrong with the CFMX Implementation of
Arrays.
That is completely backwards to Java Implementation. Bruce Eckel's (Thinking
in Java)
compares the Collection Classes and i believe mentions...
There is N
http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/
A few of the new ColdFusion "Blackstone" release features are discussed in some detail.
Enjoy!
Damon Cooper
Dir of Eng, ColdFusion
Macromedia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settin
First off it's only sometimes the case that a CFML list loop is more
efficient than an array. In most of the cases that it is the hit comes in
the form of converting/creating the array. This seems natural: it should
take less time to assign a string value than to create an array. So while
using
> "and cfml list loop is even more efficient than array..."
> WOW!... There must be something really wrong with the CFMX
> Implementation of
> Arrays.
> That is completely backwards to Java Implementation. Bruce
> Eckel's (Thinking
> in Java)
> compares the Collection Classes and i believe mention
> Lastly it may also be that you're right. CF Arrays aren't
> Java Arrays.
> They're counted from 1, not zero. They're passed by value
> not by reference
> (which I wish would change). I'm not sure what's under
> the covers to do
> this "conversion". I assume, at least for looping, that
> it's
I agree completely - the argument is always that you can't change something
so fundamental because you don't know how people've used it.
I applaud, mostly, MM's desire to remain as backwards compatible as
possible. Sometimes it's just awkward tho'. ;^)
Jim Davis
If they changed the behavior of
On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 10:59:25 -0400, Joe Eugene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "and cfml list loop is even more efficient than array..."
>
> WOW!... There must be something really wrong with the CFMX Implementation of
> Arrays.
> That is completely backwards to Java Implementation. Bruce Eckel's (Thin
It is well known that IE is broken. MS made it gues the content
of the response based on the first X bytes instead of following
RFC 2616 19.5.1.
Do you have a URL so we can observe the FireFox behaviour?
Jochem
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Set
Damon
Thanks for the post
Some very nice, and much anticipated capabilities.
One thing that is of particular interest (to me) is in the next to last
paragraph:
Java Application Deployment
With ColdFusion MX, you can already deploy ColdFusion as a Java
archive (EAR or WAR file) and then
> I agree completely - the argument is always that you can't
> change something
> so fundamental because you don't know how people've used
> it.
> I applaud, mostly, MM's desire to remain as backwards
> compatible as
> possible. Sometimes it's just awkward tho'. ;^)
Yea... I often wish they wer
Can't resist getting in on this.
On Aug 7, 2004, at 11:05 AM, S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
> > I agree completely - the argument is always that you can't
> > change something
> > so fundamental because you don't know how people've used
> > it.
>
> > I applaud, mostly, MM's desire to remain as backw
Good points. It would be very cool to see this in a future release;
maybe NewAtlanta will offer it first, putting the pressure on MM. :-)
Michael T. Tangorre
> One way this has been done, historically, with other products, is to
> support both new implementations and prior implementations with
All great questions...what's on the Macromedia ColdFusion website is all we can talk about publicly so far.
Licensing, editioning, pricing and packaging details haven't yet been announced.
>Damon
>
>Thanks for the post
>
>Some very nice, and much anticipated capabilities.
>
>One thing that is o
Ok!
Is there a separate wishlist for Blackstone, if so where?
Dick
On Aug 7, 2004, at 11:59 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> All great questions...what's on the Macromedia ColdFusion website is
> all we can talk about publicly so far.
>
> Licensing, editioning, pricing and
We don't have a Blackstone-specific wishlist setup, but we do review submissions to the regular wishlist here:
http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/
>Ok!
>
>Is there a separate wishlist for Blackstone, if so where?
>
>Dick
>
>On Aug 7, 2004, at 11:59 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[EMAIL PRO
Big question...
I've been writing a lot in cfscript lately. Seems easier a lot of the time, especially when writing long logic blocks and it can be a lot easier to read. Is MM going to do away with cfscript or should I write more in CFML.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fas
Hey Steve,
At first glance, you need to partition off the seperate conditional
queries in your clause.
This should help:
SELECT *
FROM tblLawyers
WHERE 0=0
AND LName LIKE '%#FORM.LName#%'
AND (
County1 LIKE '%#FORM.County#%'
OR County2 LIKE '%#FORM.County#%'
This has got to be possible. Seems like I remember the question being asked before but can't seem to word it right in the archives to get any results. Anyone know a link or a solution?
I am using sessions to log people in and keep them logged in. There must be a way to count active sessions right?
On Sat, 07 Aug 2004 17:44:54 -0400, Peter Farrell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Big question...
> I've been writing a lot in cfscript lately. Seems easier a lot of the time, especially when writing long logic blocks and it can be a lot easier to read. Is MM going to do away with cfscript or should
I'm not sure why you'd ask the question. What have you heard to make you
worry?
CFSCRIPT appeared in CF 4.x - it's "newer" than CFML and a core part of the
language. They really couldn't get rid of it at all easily.
That being said the other side of the coin is also true: it doesn't appear
as i
On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 18:15:08 -0400, Ewok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This has got to be possible. Seems like I remember the question being asked before but can't seem to word it right in the archives to get any results. Anyone know a link or a solution?
>
> I am using sessions to log people in and
Joe,
That was just the ticket! Thanks!!
It is by design that they are limited to 4.
Thanks again.
_
From: Joe Rinehart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2004 3:07 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Pulling results from 1 Text field and 2 Select Lists
Hey Steve,
At first
I second a vote for dotProject. I tried out dozens of open source project management apps awhile ago and this was the one that I thought was the best all around package. Looks nice, runs well and easy to use.
Cheers,
Mike
>We've been pretty happy with dotProject (http://www.dotproject.net/)
>Whi
I'm outputting a file to Excel like this:
SELECT * FROM CAT_ORD
--->
DATE
NAME
...more columns
#HN_DATE#
#HN_Name#
...more columns
Is working sorta OK. Got a question
1. One field comes in as a list. I'd like all the values in that list to
end up in one
Doesn't look like this came through the first time... if its double posted you can hang me by my ... ummm...parts
This has got to be possible. Seems like I remember the question being asked before but can't seem to word it right in the archives to get any results. Anyone know a link or a solution?
Looks promising, I'll give it a whirl. Thanks for the link
- Original Message -
From: Dave Carabetta
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2004 6:21 PM
Subject: Re: Count logged in user sessions
On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 18:15:08 -0400, Ewok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This has
In a way, that is odd:
1) cfscript resembles is based on _javascript_
2) so is Flash ActionScript
3) both cfml and ActionScript interface _javascript_ contained in html
You would think it would benefit developers using MM products to have a
common scripting language.
It has always bothered me t
You can execute scripts most scripting languages (Perl, PHP, Python,
Ruby, Tcl, OASscript, etc.) from the command line with something like:
#!/usr/bin/php
/*
Some PHP script
*/
function SomePHPFunction($someVar)
{
$myVar=$someVar + $someVar;
return $myVar;
}
*
*
*
This can be qu
In the pre-mx work you could do this by passing the template to the CF
Executable (something like "cfserver.exe /myTemplate.cfm", but I forget the
exact syntax). And you're right - it was very useful. ;^)
In the MX world things aren't that simple. You can't just call a template
from the command
Is there a way to determine the setting of the Insert key and toggle it to either off or on -- on entry to a form -- I assume it is done with _javascript_ -- need the script.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
This is just a test, please don't respond
Jason
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
> Sooner or later, backwards compatibility inhibits
> progress. Macromedia
> will need to address the BC issue or others will
> NewAtlanta has an
> advantage, here because they do not (necessarily) need to
> worry about
> protecting an install base of older versions.
> One way this has been done
> This is just a test, please don't respond
> Jason
Okay I won't... D'oh!
s. isaac dealey 954.927.5117
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?s
LOL! I was just checking to see if this mail list server was going to have
an issue with my Lotus Notes account.
Thanks for the reply
Jason
S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/07/2004 20:42:15:
> > This is just a test, please don't respond
>
> > Jason
>
> Okay I won't... D'oh!
>
You're welcome. D'oh!
> LOL! I was just checking to see if this mail list server
> was going to have
> an issue with my Lotus Notes account.
> Thanks for the reply
> Jason
> S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/07/2004
> 20:42:15:
>> > This is just a test, please don't respond
>>
>>
> I'm just demonstrating that often when people say "this is faster
> than that" it's not the primitive thing they're talking about their
> implementation of it: even in simple testing code can often be
> optimized.
More importantly, though, most of the "which is faster" stuff is
practically us
> Is there a way to determine the setting of the Insert key
> and toggle it to either off or on -- on entry to a form --
> I assume it is done with _javascript_ -- need the script.
No there's not. At least none that I'm aware of, and given the state
of browser "security" nowadays, I wouldn't expec
> In a way, that is odd:
>
> 1) cfscript resembles is based on _javascript_
> 2) so is Flash ActionScript
> 3) both cfml and ActionScript interface _javascript_ contained in html
>
> You would think it would benefit developers using MM products to
> have a common scripting language.
>
> It has alw
> I've been writing a lot in cfscript lately. Seems easier a lot of the
> time, especially when writing long logic blocks and it can be a lot
> easier to read. Is MM going to do away with cfscript or should I write
> more in CFML.
I wouldn't worry about CFSCRIPT going away - the CF development tea
I only meant that they added a new feature by including it within tags
-- that are, essentially, compiler directives.
Dick
On Aug 7, 2004, at 5:40 PM, S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
> > On reflection, though this is exactly the way that they
> > added scripting with ...
>
> Say what? cfscript has no
> Sooner or later, backwards compatibility inhibits progress.
> Macromedia will need to address the BC issue or others will
Unfortunately, we all have different definitions of progress. Most of the
things that people have mentioned in this thread - NULL values, strong
typing, etc - are things th
> That being said the other side of the coin is also true:
> it doesn't appear
> as if they're particularly anxious to add to CFSCRIPT,
> either. ;^)
Well yea, they created CFFUNCTION to be an end-run around the need to
support more featurees in cfscript... I understand why they took that
approac
Bummer :-)
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
Well if you included in a template executed on a CF3
server, the page would produce an error, so I guess I'm still unsure
how that equates to ... or your saying that
their addition of cfscript in version 4 was exactly that sort of
phenomenon... :-/ ... I'm confused.
> I only meant that they adde
Guess the follow-up question is how to clear spaces behind cursor when entering data into a field -- a script to remove trailing spaces as the user types.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
>> Sooner or later, backwards compatibility inhibits
>> progress.
>> Macromedia will need to address the BC issue or others
>> will
> Unfortunately, we all have different definitions of
> progress. Most of the
> things that people have mentioned in this thread - NULL
> values, strong
> typing, etc
> Bummer :-)
Yea, sorry. :)
s. isaac dealey 954.927.5117
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=45569&DE=1
http://www.fusiontap.com
[To
> Guess the follow-up question is how to clear spaces behind
> cursor when entering data into a field -- a script to
> remove trailing spaces as the user types.
I don't believe there's a DOM standard way to do this (at least that I
know of)... IE has an onKeyUp attribute, which would be a nice
add
I haven't been clear... sorry, my bad!
To me, backward compatibility means a new version runs prior version
code just like the prior version -- not that the new version additions
will run on a prior version.
I meant that new version of CF could accept prior version syntax,
assumptions. etc, by
> To me, backward compatibility means a new version runs prior version
> code just like the prior version -- not that the new version additions
> will run on a prior version.
>
> I meant that new version of CF could accept prior version syntax,
> assumptions. etc, by enclosing the target code wi
Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.
At minimum I can do a trim of the field contents on screen display and then use the kind of script you suggest to omit trailing spaces.
Alternatively, I could just increase the max length of the field to double the number of allowable characters and
In many cases I have a master form/page with a dozen or so fields.
On the master form/page I also have one or more buttons that call sub-forms/pages for purposes of maintaining multiple records associated with the master form/record (in a one to many relationship).
The question I have is "What i
Aw c'mon Dave -- be reasonable, application.cfm & onRequestEnd.cf,
Even I can understand that.
Dick
On Aug 7, 2004, at 7:29 PM, Dave Watts wrote:
> > To me, backward compatibility means a new version runs prior version
> > code just like the prior version -- not that the new version
> additio
Question, for the "Sourceless Deployment", is it possible to have "mixed mode", that is, say, 99% code are compiled while leaving one or two templates like application.cfm source code editable? TIA.
> http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/
>
> A few of the new ColdFusion "Blackstone" rel
O... good point.
Would save a lot of 1-time configuration coding to define datasources,
etc. -- very important!
Dick
On Aug 7, 2004, at 8:01 PM, Chunshen Li (Don) wrote:
> Question, for the "Sourceless Deployment", is it possible to have
> "mixed mode", that is, say, 99% code are compiled
I guess that's up to you. I just did a form with MANY steps, after I validated each step and made sure all values entered were ok, I dumped the entire form results into a session structure (Thanks to a tip from a fellow cftalker it was extremely simple)
as for keeping the data in the f
The value of dtgVar is 21 instead of 021, 021 is correct. I have workaround to circumvent the problem though.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
>>The value of dtgVar is 21 instead of 021
This is another "advantage" of lousely typed language.
CF is worse than lousely typed: it is "let me guess the type" :-(
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm
Thanks Jim
That gets me pointed in the right direction
... little browsers... on the desktop... little browsers, made of
ticky-tacky...
(paraphrasing an old Malvina Reynolds song)
I was trying to figure out what the webserver (apache) connector was
doing.
But these little browsers are OK --
Very nice -- Thanks
Hope to get some more inputs -- this ole brain needs all the help it can get and then some :-))
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
"Sourceless Deployment" sounds like "deployment without source" which
by definition would not leave Application.cfm editable...
On Sat, 07 Aug 2004 23:01:11 -0400, Chunshen (Don) Li
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Question, for the "Sourceless Deployment", is it possible to have "mixed mode", that is
Sorry it was eating at me that I couldnt remember the name of the "fellow cftalker" who showed me this nice little trick it was Michael Tangorre
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/messages.cfm/threadid=33884&forumid=4
- Original Message -
From: Arden Weiss
To: CF-Talk
Sent
On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 20:11:08 -0400, Jim Davis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the MX world things aren't that simple. You can't just call a template
> from the command line like you used to. However you can still call CF
> Templates via the web server (as always) - and there's a few tools that let
Ahh ok...if I hard code the file it just plays instead of downloading (IE only)..is there a way around this? or does this come under the same issue (and yes I have tried both "inline" and "attachment") and both don't work...
No there is no URL cause it would breach the privacy, so sorry..
>It is
On Aug 7, 2004, at 9:17 PM, Sean Corfield wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 20:11:08 -0400, Jim Davis
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In the MX world things aren't that simple. You can't just call a
> template
> > from the command line like you used to. However you can still call
> CF
> > Templ
This kind of deployment is common in the J2EE world - there's rarely any
source.
In most applications many of the things that you'd normally find in
Application.cfm are kept in property files (usually XML) - that way changes
can be made to application without recompiling.
It does take a little ef
I've had conversations about this kind of stuff with Mike Nimer in the past.
It's one of those things that people either really want or just see no need
for at all.
One thing I would REALLY LOVE is the ability to call CF from Windows
Scripting Host. I hope somebody smarter than I will take the in
I dunno - that seems right to me. The Val() function returns the value, not
the "digits" - I would expect it to only return significant digits. After
all the value of "021" is "21" just as the value of "021" is
"21".
Jim Davis
From: Claude Schneegans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
71 matches
Mail list logo
