RE: VPS Accounts and CFMX 7

2005-04-23 Thread James Holmes
I agree that there should be a demand - CF in a shared environment is a risky proposition, even with sandboxing. Anyone with moderate security needs would have to consider a VPS solution. -Original Message- From: Jordan Michaels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, 23 April 2005 4:0

Re: CrystalTech Users Beware

2005-04-23 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Connie DeCinko wrote: > Right, but... What if you chose a common name and someone on the same > server does the same. Also, what if you need to test different versions of > the same application on the same server? Shouldn't sandboxing protect you > from that? Sandboxes in CF 5 used to have that

some IE 7 details released

2005-04-23 Thread Jochem van Dieten
http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2005/04/22/410963.aspx I am very excited about the CSS fixes. I just hope IE7 will be available for Win2K too. Jochem ~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking a

cfx_getimage

2005-04-23 Thread bob
I can't seem to get cfx_getimage to work if I am using a JDBC datasource. Does anyone know of another other custom tags that will let me display an image that is stored in a SQL Server database as type 'image'? I've found cfx_open image and cfx_image, but the documentation is extremely minimal (

CFFORM format="flash" Problems!

2005-04-23 Thread Paul Wilson
I was playing around with the tab navigator today. You need to give your tab formgroup an "id" attribute and you can then use myTabID.selectedIndex. The first tab has an index of 0. Try the Flex/Flash documentation. The tab component is based on a Flex. http://livedocs.macromedia.com/flex/15/a

login issues

2005-04-23 Thread sp
We run a paid subscription service for students to help them pass their state and national boards. We've found that some subscribers are passing around their login info and getting into our site for free. I've tried to do an IP comparison when two users login with the same login. This is not ide

Re: CFX_Zip and Empty Directories

2005-04-23 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
> >>it uses java. > and Java uses? To zip and unzip files? Java uses the operating system if that's what you're referring to - it doesn't need WinZip or PKZip that I'm aware of... ZIP is a format (open source? ... at least, I'm not aware anyone claims copyright on the format)... So java.uti

RE: cfx_getimage

2005-04-23 Thread James Holmes
In Oracle we just query a BLOB and write it to a temporary file for display with cfcontent - can you not do the same in SQL server? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, 23 April 2005 9:04 To: CF-Talk Subject: cfx_getimage I can't seem to g

Re: CFX_Zip and Empty Directories

2005-04-23 Thread Claude Schneegans
>>To zip and unzip files? Java uses the operating system if that's what >>you're referring to Exact; what I mean is that all those Zip facilities use about the same zip library of tools. If this library does not include empty directories in the zipped file, no matter you go through PKZip, winZ

RE: login issues

2005-04-23 Thread Michael T. Tangorre
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > We run a paid subscription service for students to help them > pass their state and national boards. We've found that some > subscribers are passing around their login info and getting > into our site for free. I've tried t

Re: CrystalTech Users Beware

2005-04-23 Thread Pete Ruckelshaus
Don't blame your bad coding practices on CrystalTech. Of course two different applications with the same name are likely to cause conflict on a server...any server...even one that you own and have total control over, if you name two applications the same thing you will run into this. Pete ~~

RE: CrystalTech Users Beware

2005-04-23 Thread Peter Farrell
Hashing your app name isn't going to protect you from others on a shared server from looking in on you: That code can be run by anyone on the server and you'll see the application name and the dump of ALL the sessions for that app.

RE: CrystalTech Users Beware

2005-04-23 Thread Dave Merrill
Interesting, wasn't aware of that. Is there any way to guard against that kind of exploit, other than encrypting everything in application and session scope, which would be very inefficient and annoying? Dave Merrill > Hashing your app name isn't going to protect you from others on a > shared s

Re: CrystalTech Users Beware

2005-04-23 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Dave Merrill wrote: > Interesting, wasn't aware of that. > > Is there any way to guard against that kind of exploit, other than > encrypting everything in application and session scope, which would be very > inefficient and annoying? Disabling createObject() and cfobject for Java objects in the

Re: CrystalTech Users Beware

2005-04-23 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Pete Ruckelshaus wrote: > Don't blame your bad coding practices on CrystalTech. Where am I using bad coding practices? Where do I blame them on CrystalTech? Jochem ~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer s

Re: CrystalTech Users Beware

2005-04-23 Thread Sean Corfield
On 4/23/05, Peter Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hashing your app name isn't going to protect you from others on a shared > server from looking in on you: > > > createObject("java","coldfusion.runtime.ApplicationScopeTracker")> But sandbox security can turn that off... -- Sean A Corfiel

RE: login issues

2005-04-23 Thread sp
I did in the past implement something like you said about putting a flag in the DB whenever a user logs in and not allowing further logins unless there is first a log off. The problems that came up was that quite a few people were on dial up and when they lost the connection and logged in again

RE: CrystalTech Users Beware

2005-04-23 Thread Jim Davis
> -Original Message- > From: Peter Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 12:33 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CrystalTech Users Beware > > Hashing your app name isn't going to protect you from others on a shared > server from looking in on you: It not hashing

RE: CrystalTech Users Beware

2005-04-23 Thread Jim Davis
Sorry - I didn't look at the attached code well enough (I just got up, yeah, I know it's one o'clock). ;^) You're right - if the server allows access to the core Java Components this will work. Jim Davis > -Original Message- > From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday,

RE: CrystalTech Users Beware

2005-04-23 Thread Jim Davis
> -Original Message- > From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 1:05 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: CrystalTech Users Beware > > Pete Ruckelshaus wrote: > > Don't blame your bad coding practices on CrystalTech. > > Where am I using bad coding pra

RE: login issues

2005-04-23 Thread Adrian Lynch
How about logging the user out before they login? It won't stop them sharing and using the system at different times, but if one is logged in and then suddenly gets logged out they make think twice about letting this other user use their login details. Ade -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

Re: CrystalTech Users Beware

2005-04-23 Thread Sean Corfield
On 4/23/05, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Using a hash of the directory ensures to a great degree of certainty that > the name won't be accidentally used again. Adding the salt attempts to > ensure that nobody could guess the name easily just by knowing your > application path. To be hon

RE: CrystalTech Users Beware

2005-04-23 Thread Jim Davis
> -Original Message- > From: Sean Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 1:34 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: CrystalTech Users Beware > > On 4/23/05, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Using a hash of the directory ensures to a great degree of certainty

Re: Application Scope (was: CrystalTech Users Beware)

2005-04-23 Thread Jared Rypka-Hauer - CMG, LLC
Thanks Bryan, that helps... not that it's really any of my business anyway. It's just that once in a while someone says something that makes me cringe... your post about application vars was one of them. There are so many misperceptions or even just situations where someone says things about "CF"

Re: Application Scope (was: CrystalTech Users Beware)

2005-04-23 Thread Bryan Stevenson
> Thanks Bryan, that helps... not that it's really any of my business > anyway. hehe...no worries..reminds me of another misconception I had based on something long ago. I think it was Barney B. that set me straight that CF is not case sensitive (like say Oracle). I had all these kinds of co

RE: CrystalTech Users Beware

2005-04-23 Thread Dave Watts
> > Hashing your app name isn't going to protect you from > > others on a shared server from looking in on you: > > > > > > > createObject("java","coldfusion.runtime.ApplicationScopeTracker")> > > But sandbox security can turn that off... Well, yes, assuming that CFML code is your only route

Re: CrystalTech Users Beware

2005-04-23 Thread Sean Corfield
On 4/23/05, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Exactly as I've said before. You should expect compromise when sharing - > it's just that simple. Yes. > Saying "get a dedicated server" is all well and good but a lot of people > don't have the money. So what can you do with your $20 a month?

RE: login issues

2005-04-23 Thread Connie DeCinko
How about checking for concurrent logins? Seems to me that more often than not, if people are sharing passwords at some point they will be logged on at the same time. Then disable that account for abuse. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC

RE: CrystalTech Users Beware

2005-04-23 Thread Connie DeCinko
No, even so, that is a major bug in ColdFusion and or sandboxing, or at least a problem with the configuration. This means that someone could maliciously decide to hijack my site just because they are on the same box and guessed my application name. Security should be #1 at any hosting price leve

RE: CrystalTech Users Beware

2005-04-23 Thread Jim Davis
> -Original Message- > From: Connie DeCinko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 2:12 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CrystalTech Users Beware > > No, even so, that is a major bug in ColdFusion and or sandboxing, or at > least a problem with the configuration. This m

RE: login issues

2005-04-23 Thread Jim Davis
> -Original Message- > From: Connie DeCinko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 2:08 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: login issues > > How about checking for concurrent logins? Seems to me that more often > than > not, if people are sharing passwords at some point th

? and #

2005-04-23 Thread Stephens, Larry V
I know it's been asked but I can't find it in the archives or stored on my machine. How do I use the syntax "http://somewhere.com/mydir/myfile.cfm?#SESSION.AddToken#"; and combine it with a page jump #pageLocation ? I've tried putting it different places in the URL and can't get it to work. Than

Re: CrystalTech Users Beware

2005-04-23 Thread Sean Corfield
On 4/23/05, Connie DeCinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, even so, that is a major bug in ColdFusion and or sandboxing, or at > least a problem with the configuration. No, it's a feature of the underlying Java servlet platform. Go read the docs about how the underlying context works and you'll s

Re: CrystalTech Users Beware

2005-04-23 Thread Cameron Childress
On 4/23/05, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Security" and "Cheap" just don't go together. That being said CrytalTech, > HostMySite and many other CF host still provide good (but nowhere near > perfect) security configurations on their shared servers. I think that the key phrase here is "Y

RE: ? and #

2005-04-23 Thread Dave Merrill
If I'm understanding your question, ## evaluates as #, and #pageLocation should be part of the url itself, not the query string. Is one of those what you're running into? So, I think this should work (can't test it right now): http://somewhere.com/mydir/myfile.cfm##pageLocation?#SESSION.AddToken#

Re: CrystalTech Users Beware

2005-04-23 Thread Brian Kotek
As someone who hosts with Crystaltech and has never had any problems, I think it's also important to point out that the problem being discussed here is not Crystaltech's "fault", this will affect every single person who uses a shared server, regardless of who hosts it. On 4/23/05, Cameron Childres

Re: CrystalTech Users Beware

2005-04-23 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Connie DeCinko wrote: > No, even so, that is a major bug in ColdFusion and or sandboxing, or at > least a problem with the configuration. This means that someone could > maliciously decide to hijack my site just because they are on the same box > and guessed my application name. It is documented

RE: CrystalTech Users Beware

2005-04-23 Thread Vince Bonfanti
It's not exactly true that "all sorts of code other than CF" have these sorts of problems in shared hosting environments. ASP.NET, for example, isolates every application from all the others just to avoid these problems. If you're running BlueDragon.NET, then your CFML inherits this application iso

RE: CrystalTech Users Beware

2005-04-23 Thread Jim Davis
> -Original Message- > From: Vince Bonfanti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 5:29 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CrystalTech Users Beware > > It's not exactly true that "all sorts of code other than CF" have these > sorts of problems in shared hosting environment

RE: login issues

2005-04-23 Thread dave
I dont know if I would use social security #, I mean mine is 555-12- or was it 123-45-6789 or maybe 999-99-, you can't really validate its "correctness" besides the syntax. Maybe use their cc # or checking account # as their username (securely of course) because they cant fake that and

RE: login issues

2005-04-23 Thread Michael T. Tangorre
> From: dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Maybe use their cc # or checking account # as their username > (securely of course) because they cant fake that and it's > highly doubtful they will pass that # around to their friends. You can fake it. I can generate you any valid credit card number yo

RE: login issues

2005-04-23 Thread dave
right, I shoulda added that, I was assuming the user had a previously bought access to the site via cc or checking account #, in which case that number would become their username. Or an addition way would to use a regular username and password and also store their signup IP and compare it at lo

RE: login issues

2005-04-23 Thread Michael T. Tangorre
> From: dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > right, I shoulda added that, I was assuming the user had a > previously bought access to the site via cc or checking > account #, in which case that number would become their > username. Or an addition way would to use a regular username > and password

RE: login issues

2005-04-23 Thread dave
lol, i know huh! Or you can just take the stand of just letting them share because those ppl probably woulnt pay anyways but someone they show might and then you at least get a sale that you wouldn't have before, may sound dumb but what can you do. From

RE: CrystalTech Users Beware

2005-04-23 Thread Dave Watts
> No, even so, that is a major bug in ColdFusion and or > sandboxing, or at least a problem with the configuration. > This means that someone could maliciously decide to hijack my > site just because they are on the same box and guessed my > application name. Security should be #1 at any host

Re: CrystalTech Users Beware

2005-04-23 Thread Cameron Childress
> On 4/23/05, Cameron Childress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think that the key phrase here is "You get what you pay for, On 4/23/05, Brian Kotek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As someone who hosts with Crystaltech and has never had any problems, > I think it's also important to point out that t

Re: CrystalTech Users Beware

2005-04-23 Thread Cameron Childress
I think that some people on the list are blowing this issue out of proportion as a "bug" when it's really just expected behavior (and always has been) for ColdFusion. However, I don't think it would be a bad idea for Macromedia to examine this and other security issues for adjustment in future ver

Re: CrystalTech Users Beware

2005-04-23 Thread dave
" However, I don't think it would be a bad idea for Macromedia to examine this and other security issues for adjustment in future versions of ColdFusion." Umm, I don't think Macromedia will be releasing anymore versions of ColdFusion Fr

Re: CrystalTech Users Beware

2005-04-23 Thread Cameron Childress
On 4/23/05, dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Umm, I don't think Macromedia will be releasing anymore versions of > ColdFusion Zzz -Cameron -- Cameron Childress Sumo Consulting Inc http://www.sumoc.com --- cell: 678.637.5072 aim: cameroncf email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

OT: need a little help with Apache please

2005-04-23 Thread Mike Kear
I'm needing a little help in understanding Apache's configuration please. I want to set up my various sites on my pcs as virtual hosts in apache, but not sure My directory structure is as follows: c:/sites c:/sites/intranet c:/sites/clientsite1 c:/sites/clientsite2 etc and I understood I co

Getting MS Exchange Mailbox Info??

2005-04-23 Thread Ramiro Estrada
Anyone been able to get mailbox info such as the size from an Exchange server using a CFSCRIPT or other way? -R ~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and docu

RE: low-end web hosting?

2005-04-23 Thread Don R Seibert
Try SeiberSpace Technologies, LLC low-end but lots of personal service. CF MX 6.1, MSSQL, MySQL, and Access. http://www.seiberspace.net -Original Message- From: E C list [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 11:53 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: low-end web hosting? I al

Good Log File Parser?

2005-04-23 Thread Britta Bennett
I run a pile of sites on subdirectories off a main site with a single IP. When the browser hits the main page of the IP it masks the url and then pulls the page in the subdirectory. www.thesite.com/dd/ (one domain) www.thesite.com/rw/ (another domain) etc. I need a cold fusion log file analyz

Re: OT: need a little help with Apache please

2005-04-23 Thread Chris Jensen
Hi, > but i'm not sure what i should put in my http.conf file. Your http.conf file looks good. Do you have a DNS or hosts file entry for clientsite1? I take it you're running your browser and apache on the same PC? In which case you should add the following line to the hosts file on the PC. 127

Re: OT: need a little help with Apache please

2005-04-23 Thread Mike Kear
Thanks Chris, I'd forgotten about the hosts file. But when I changed it, all those urls led to the same place - to the root c:\sites. Does that mean I have to change hosts to the following (in which case I'm wondering why bother - its as much work as typing the whole url as i've always had to do