On 9/13/06, Brad Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Man, I wish I had requirements that good BEFORE the project started at
> my job. Our motto here is "You get to work on it, we'll go find out what
> they want." :)
Preach on, brother!
The ironic part is that we've been more successful at lau
On 9/13/06, Mike Kear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The ideal thing would have been to take this big file and break it
> into smaller bits - cfcs or includes or custom tags, however that
> wasnt an option apparently.
Yeah, I like the small bits part, and personally, I roll without
comments 'caus
Make sure you restart CF server after adding class paths and I would assume
adding classes to existing paths...
Eric
-Original Message-
From: loathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 11 September 2006 16:50
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Java/CF Question
Helps a bunch thanks.
Now I ha
I just had my install hell night and one whole day later hell.
My issue was CF forgot to install the windows service I have grown to love
and the docs to jrunsvc.exe were
as cryptic as per normal.
Cryptic
jrunsvc -install [jrun instance name] [service name] [display name]
[description]
Decrypted
Yeah... it's for CF7 in the multi-server configuration.
--
Jeff
Original Message
> From: "Andy Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 2:17 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 3:50 PM
> To: C
This is not spaghetti code, this vintage code ;-)
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm
(Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Thanks.
>>I actually believe this is a carry over from ColdFusion v1.x
Confirmed.
And I also remember that by that times, one could not reuse the same
query name twice
in the same template! A new query with the same name wouldn't overwrite
the previous one.
So can you imagine having a query in a loop,
Scottish/Italian eh...I bet the dinner table debates can get pretty heated ;-)
my wife is Scottish/Irish (not always a calm combination...hehe)
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
phone: 250.480.0642
fax: 250.480.1264
cell: 250.920.
Lol, the wonders of a Scottish/Italian name :-)
"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is
confidential and may also be pr
>I just saw a code sample, and verified it on the livedocs, basically:
>
>
>
>Since when did cfquery have a sql attribute, and is this deprecated or
>what?
Sure enough, I just found these docs on CF 1:
http://docs.varda.nl/coldfusion/ch7b.htm#_Toc328065209
DBQUERY
Attribute Explanation
NA
> If the process/docs are good enough an army of developers
> should be able to work together no worries.
Development, like anything else, is subject to the law of diminishing
returns. It is simply impossible for process and documentation to scale
infinitely.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
h
Where would that be? I don't see it in my local copy (CFMX). Is that an MX 7
path?
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Garza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 3:50 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: re: http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusi
>Hey all,
>
>I just saw a code sample, and verified it on the livedocs, basically:
>
>
>
>Since when did cfquery have a sql attribute, and is this deprecated or
>what?
>Maybe i'm just dense, but I've never seen it before.
I actually believe this is a carry over from ColdFusion v1.x, which used the
You'd still have to architect and completely document your project.
Your documentation must be extremely detailed, and then someone else
simply types up what your documentation specifies.
If I remember right, the developers have to "prove" their level of
proficiency with CF and with fusedoc and yo
If the process/docs are good enough an army of
developers should be able to work together no worries.
Man, I wish I had requirements that good BEFORE the project started at
my job. Our motto here is "You get to work on it, we'll go find out what
they want." :)
~Brad
~~~
err...Neil...not Rob (damn that last name first in your name..hehe)
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
phone: 250.480.0642
fax: 250.480.1264
cell: 250.920.8830
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.electricedgesystems.com
- Original Me
> It is not a problem if they all follow a defined standard etc.
>
> What is your limit? If the process/docs are good enough an army of
> developers should be able to work together no worries.
Yep and a spec that perfect occurs how often in real life?? and everyone will
of
course iterpret it the
It is not a problem if they all follow a defined standard etc.
What is your limit? If the process/docs are good enough an army of
developers should be able to work together no worries.
"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Ki
powell wrote:
> No file appears in the specified directory, and nothing
> is in the ATTACHMENTFILES column of the query.
> server="#url.servername#" username="#url.POPusername#" password="#url.
> POPpassword#">
>
> Ideas, anyone?
Try a \ after your attachmentpath. If that doesn't help, use a p
You can have some fun looking for hidden functionality in CF by browsing the
tag defs found in
{jrun.installdir}\servers\cfusion\cfusion-ear\cfusion-war\WEB-INF\cftags\META-INF\taglib.cftld
Lists out all of the known tags and available attributes for each...
Might be surprised... anyone? (c
I'll ask Nic about that, Sean.
~Simon
Simon Horwith
CIO, AboutWeb - http://www.aboutweb.com
Editor-in-Chief, ColdFusion Developers Journal
Adobe Community Expert
Adobe Certified Master Instructor
Blog - http://www.horwith.com
Sean Corfield wrote:
>> I actually think you and I are in agreement
According to CfQuickDocs, that is not currently an attribute:
http://www.techfeed.net/cfQuickDocs/?getDoc=cfquery
I wonder what would be the point of that? It'd sure make it harder to read
your SQL and you couldn't use cfqueryparam.
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Strutz [mailto:[EMAIL
I have never seen that before. Crazy!
-b
...
Ben Nadel
www.bennadel.com
Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer
Need Help?
www.bennadel.com/ask-ben/
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Strutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 4:27 PM
To: CF
Hey all,
I just saw a code sample, and verified it on the livedocs, basically:
Since when did cfquery have a sql attribute, and is this deprecated or what?
Maybe i'm just dense, but I've never seen it before.
--
nathan strutz
http://www.dopefly.com/
~
Well worth it. But I personally am hoping to get the next version at a great
discount due to all my free marketing for ImageCR... joke... but not
really... seriously... kind of ;-)
..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth
You guys should really take a second look at CP+. I like it for all the
same reasons that you guys like Webmin, only CP+ is much more polished
then Webmin. In fact, I believe that CP+ was originally based off webmin
code. There are a few places where you can definitely see the
resemblance between W
I believe SecretAgents is run by Steve Nelson of Fusebox fame. If he's
the person behind it, I wouldn't heistate to work with him at all.
Rey...
Doug Boude (rhymes with 'loud') wrote:
> I was wondering if anybody has firsthand (secondhand will also be accepted)
> knowledge of whether or not it
The ideal thing would have been to take this big file and break it
into smaller bits - cfcs or includes or custom tags, however that
wasnt an option apparently.
Since the actual work was only a 5 minute job but it took most of the
day to do, his decision not to have comments anywhere was an expens
Plus cf comments are not shown to the browser and therefore are not part of
the final html and therefore don't affect the final filesize.
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 3:52 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Line C
>I actually think you and I are in agreement on many points here.
Very likely :)
>I didn't exactly drop MG because of these optional components. I did drop
>Reactor because of some of the things I mentioned below...
OK, thanx for the clarification.
>The decision to include Reactor caused me to
This is probably NOT it, but I did have a semi-related error (if I
remember right),
that had to do with the case of the CFIDE directory. Some links pointed to
CFIDE and others pointed to cfide. Something like that. I highly doubt that
your problem was my problem, because Windows isn't case sensi
I think in a file with 7800 lines, an extra 100 lines worth of comments
aren't going to amount to much additional file size.
Silly project managers.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Kear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 2:42 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Line Cou
Oh I agree, I an not dissing the comments, just our client wants an
actual line count of code.
>From a developer stand point, comments are greatly appreciated
especially in a team environment.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Kear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 200
You can add UTF-7 support to CFMX (6.1 or 7) with this package - it
works dandy:
http://www.freeutils.net/source/jcharset/
There's a discussion of the issue in the Adobe cf forums, which I
recommend checking out for discussion on where to put the class file in
various CF versions and installation
+1 for webmin.
Great tool. It allows you to control multiple servers via one control panel
as well, which is kool. You can also find plugins for it to do just about any
type of management you'd need.
Installation is super simple, and I'd actually recommend you download the
latest, even if the l
I had a nightmare assignment once to fix two lines of code in a file
that had 7800 lines. There were nested tables, inside nested loops,
multiple CFiFs, lots of "cfif clientID=x and version=y"
And not one comment anywhere. The project manager had the view that
comments only make the file size b
I'm stuck trying to make this happen. I've used CFPOP a thousand times, but
never before on Exchange mailboxes. I can get the message headers information
with no problems (so that means that I have the correct servername, username
and password), but when I go to pull the attachment on a messag
Problem is there are many developers that work with the code.
-Original Message-
From: Peterson, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 3:15 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Line Counter (without Comments)
N, just roll without comments. I mean cmon, you wro
True, True...I've used their CFX_JPG tag for years...however, ImageCR
is relatively expensive...
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Bobby Hartsfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 2:32 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Image resizing
The quality (and overall function
N, just roll without comments. I mean cmon, you wrote the code, you
should remember what it does!
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Claude Schneegans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 2:56 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Line Counter (without Comments)
>>what
We have been using cfx_pop3 standard for a while, and I think we're having
issues with stability. The reason we went away from using the built in
CFPOP is because it didn't support UTF7 at least in MX 6.1. Has this
changed in 7? We are basically checking a mailbox for mail bounces, so
anything s
Sean,
I actually think you and I are in agreement on many points here.
> I think it's a bit short-sighted to drop MG just because it has added some
optional components you don't like...
I didn't exactly drop MG because of these optional components. I did drop
Reactor because of some of the thing
>>what if you wanted
to obtain the lines of actual code rather than code and comments?
Then it would be time to use CF_REextract and parse files! ;-)
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm
(Please send
Hey Doug,
I seem to recall a rather heated debate (on cf-talk) about whether or not it
was
a good idea to have an army of developers develop an app.
Personally I think it's a horrible idea because IMHO too many hands in the
cookie jar makes for a big mess...inconsistent coding...lack of knowle
>>The quality (and overall functionality) of ImageCR from Efflare.com has
still not been matched as far as I'm concerned.
Confirmed.
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm
(Please send any spam to this
Does that mean you will never use visual studio too?
John McKown
> -Original Message-
> From: Cutter (CFRelated) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 10:01 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Holy crap I like CFEclipse!
>
> Rick,
>
> Personal opinion here, but I can
ahh, there's the rub! I just use cfexecute with command line switches
in CF. It's not the best solution. But, with tags that leverage the
java image component, I was experience resizing lasting up to 2
minutes and dark results. With ImageMagick, that same file is resized
in less than 2 seconds a
I was wondering if anybody has firsthand (secondhand will also be accepted)
knowledge of whether or not it would be a recommended path to entrust
SecretAgents.com with a large project? Their concept sounds great, just
wondered if anyone had any actual real world experience executing that concept
Piggy-backing this off the existing thread:
The one script that was shared was great, just one exception, what if
you wanted
to obtain the lines of actual code rather than code and comments?
The script will count each line.
TIA!
~~
Yeah, he's not too good with math. ;-P
..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
-Original Message-
From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 2:49 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Lines of code counter
ROFL! I think he wa
The quality (and overall functionality) of ImageCR from Efflare.com has
still not been matched as far as I'm concerned.
..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
-Original Message-
From: Jake Churchill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 12,
I had a look at the ImageMagick site, but didn't see anything about how
to use it with CF or what version of CF is required as a minimum.
Know of any resources online about that?
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Zaphod Beeblebrox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 200
> 3) The 'specific tag' option does more than finding by tag
> name ?
Uh, yeah.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized
instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta,
Chicago, Baltimore, Northern
Another reason to use the variables scope outside of a method like init()
would be when you extend a CFC from another CFC.
The variables defined in the variables scope will act like a psuedo
constructor if you are not calling that CFC via a cfinvoke, cfobject ...etc.
It provides a little flexibil
Also, be cognitive that ColdFusion converts the words "yes" and "no" into
boolean equivalent 1 and 0.
For code legibility and maintainability, I would agree with Sean C. on this
point of not using implicit boolean conversion.
logically will mean true for any returned records
or false for 0 recor
The only thing I acn suggest is checking the neo configuration files to see
if there is a way to superceed the steps.
Teddy
On 9/13/06, Ken Ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That has been my experience every other time too. This is the first time
> I've ever had any issue with installation
>I know you can use MG without Reactor, but that
>doesn't seem to be the focus of it
I think it's a bit short-sighted to drop MG just because it has added some
optional components you don't like...
If you don't have Reactor installed, MG starts up without it and scaffolding
and GDMs (Generic Da
Rick's image.cfc is awesome
Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
> I had trouble resizing large images to smaller ones. They would come
> out about 20 shades darker with the tmt_img tag. Of course, I didn't
> have a better java solution, so I opted for installing ImageMagick on
> the server.
>
>
> On 9/13/0
We're still mostly windows at work except for the mail server. At home I
run Redhat Fedora Core 4 (or 5 I forget) with X-Windows and Vmware server
(Free) with Exchange running in the VM. It's more or less stable, but I've
had a few issues which required me to do ctrl-alt-backspace to kill X and
g
To sound off here,
All of the points above are very valid. I've used Mach-II pretty heavily now
for a while and MG:U to varying degrees and I really see where the frameworks
add value. All three Front Controller frameworks ( Model Glue, MachII and
Fusebox) are quite solid and are worth learni
To sound off here,
All of the points above are very valid. I've used Mach-II pretty heavily now
for a while and MG:U to varying degrees and I really see where the frameworks
add value. All three Front Controller frameworks ( Model Glue, MachII and
Fusebox) are quite solid and are worth learni
>>any positive integer evaluates as true in a Boolean expression.
To be more exact: "any *non zero* integer evaluates as true in a Boolean
expression.
although recordcount here cannot be negative.
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox
>>it just seems wrong to me to be evaluating a number as boolean.
In some languages as C for instance, booleans are just numbers,
so there is nothing wrong there.
However, in CF which is a typeless language, I found some instances,
especially with query results, where it is better to be more spe
>Is it a good practice though? I know alot of people do it, but it just
>seems
>wrong to me to be evaluating a number as boolean.
Personally, I like to write code that's as specific as possible. Only if a
variable is to hold a true Boolean value, do I use the syntax.
So, I write the statement as
i've been told (by someone much smarter than me) -not- to use implicit
boolean conversion.
yes, in CF will work (where 0 evaluates to
false and any other number evaluates to true)...but what you really
mean is:
you're looking to see if the recordcount is greater than a specific number.
now, t
Isn't it any non-zero integer? Not just positive ones?
On 9/13/06, Ian Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It is NOT the same as saying, "as long as there is *one* record returned,
> true".
>
> Right?
>
> Correct, any positive integer evaluates as true in a Boolean expression.
>
>
>
>
Is it a good practice though? I know alot of people do it, but it just seems
wrong to me to be evaluating a number as boolean.
Greg
On 9/13/06, Claude Schneegans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>It is NOT the same as saying, "as long as there is *one* record
> returned, true".
>
> Right, and it i
As far as I know I'm still on the list as well
Haven't gotten a message in about forever.
Yves
On 9/13/06, Munson, Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I used to be on it (still am, at least I didn't unsubscribe), but no
> messages have come through for months, maybe even a year. I was curi
Thanks so much for your reply, Jim!
FYI - this was my final solution. Not entirely sure where I initially missed
the boat, but 2 formfields and including the xml version tag within the
cfhttpparam name / value pair explicity vs. as part of the xml string seemed to
do it.
https://secure.interne
I tunnel my VNC/X-Windows thru SSH only one port thru the firewall and it is
already a needed port! X is installed but system boots to runlevel 3 as I
find command line much faster. As for hardening your box the object is to
not let them get in in the first place X-windows is the least of your
wor
This link works for me: http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/
Oops, you meant the list. I haven't seen that.
Michael probably spammed it so everyone would just switch to Fusion
Authority Quarterly.
(couldn't help it)...
On 9/13/06, Dave Carabetta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/13/06, Michael Dinowi
I had trouble resizing large images to smaller ones. They would come
out about 20 shades darker with the tmt_img tag. Of course, I didn't
have a better java solution, so I opted for installing ImageMagick on
the server.
On 9/13/06, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >imageCFC (I forget wh
On 9/13/06, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh sorry, the LIST. My fault for not reading properly.
>
Woops, me too!
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion i
Yup - because 0 is false, but all other (positive?) numbers are true
Jeff Small wrote:
>
>
>
> is basically the same as saying, "as long as there's at least one
> record returned, true". This returns true and steps into the CFIF if the
> recordcount is 1, 2, 300...
>
> It is NOT the same
>>It is NOT the same as saying, "as long as there is *one* record
returned, true".
Right, and it is also the same as saying "as long as there is *at least
one* record returned, true".
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/
>> -Original Message-
>
>You would definitely add another cfhttpparam - each param equates to a
>single form field (POST parameter).
>
>Also in this case you can drop the "cfoutput" tags - CFOUTPUT is limited
>strictly to outputting CFML expressions outside of other tags - never within
>the
ooops...me too :\
On 9/13/06, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh sorry, the LIST. My fault for not reading properly.
>
> On 9/14/06, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The site came up for me:
> >
> > http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/
> >
> > On 9/14/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PR
is basically the same as saying, "as long as there's at least one record
returned, true". This returns true and steps into the CFIF if the recordcount
is 1, 2, 300...
It is NOT the same as saying, "as long as there is *one* record returned, true".
Right?
--
Jeff Small
LHWH Advertising
M
I used to be on it (still am, at least I didn't unsubscribe), but no
messages have come through for months, maybe even a year. I was curious
one day and sent a message to the list address, and I got a delivery
failure of some sort.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[
It is NOT the same as saying, "as long as there is *one* record returned, true".
Right?
Correct, any positive integer evaluates as true in a Boolean expression.
--
Ian Skinner
Web Programmer
BloodSource
www.BloodSource.org
Sacramento, CA
-
| 1 | |
- Binary Soduk
They probably forgot to renew the domain name. But good news, the JDJ
domain has been renewed for the next 150 years.
On 9/13/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was just asked if the CFDJ list was still around. I checked out their
> site and no dice. Anyone (Simon) have a clue
Oh sorry, the LIST. My fault for not reading properly.
On 9/14/06, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The site came up for me:
>
> http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/
>
> On 9/14/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was just asked if the CFDJ list was still around. I checked out
Not sure, but I know it was becoming subject to very low traffic and Spam
(something you do sterling job of keeping out!)
"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
Registered in England, Num
On 9/13/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was just asked if the CFDJ list was still around. I checked out their site
> and no dice. Anyone (Simon) have a clue about its status?
>
Not sure what URL you're trying, but this works fine for me (including
the links to each article):
The site came up for me:
http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/
On 9/14/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was just asked if the CFDJ list was still around. I checked out their site
> and no dice. Anyone (Simon) have a clue about its status?
>
> Michael Dinowitz
> President: House of Fu
The variables scope, when used within a CFC, is a protected private
scope (only accessible from within the CFC). Within the head of your
object (after the cfcomponent tag, but prior to any functions) you may
have a block like this:
variables.instance = structnew();
variables.instance.firstname
http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/ ?
On 9/13/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was just asked if the CFDJ list was still around. I checked out their site
> and no dice. Anyone (Simon) have a clue about its status?
>
> Michael Dinowitz
> President: House of Fusion
> http://www.ho
I was just asked if the CFDJ list was still around. I checked out their site
and no dice. Anyone (Simon) have a clue about its status?
Michael Dinowitz
President: House of Fusion
http://www.houseoffusion.com
Publisher: Fusion Authority
http://www.fusionauthority.com
Adobe Community Expert
yeah, i opted for another php SOAP library (nuSOAP), and with a bit of tweaking
i've got it working.
thanks for all the help
> I just run this example this morning and I received and array [empty]
> result.
>
> http://www.ryanmitchell.co.
> uk/rtCMS.php?wsdl")>
>
>
>
> uk\\www\\")>
>
>
>
Executables are usually not a problem... although if they are around and
they have security holes...
In general, unless you're using linux as a desktop, I've never found a need
for X-Windows. Most programs need to be installed from the command line
anyway.
Servers run a lot more stable and fas
>imageCFC (I forget who did it, maybe rick?)
>Imagemagick from alagad.com
>
>Russ
>-Original Message-
>From: Jake Churchill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: 12 September 2006 22:44
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: Image resizing
>
>I know I've seen this topic posted before but I need some input. I
To add my 2c,
Denny, Reactor isn't really a framework. It is a way to automate the
persistence of objects. In OO programming, you often create DAOs and Gateways
(data access objects and table data gateways) to abstract your database access
code for single records and recordsets. Firstly, I have
To add my 2c,
Denny, Reactor isn't really a framework. It is a way to automate the
persistence of objects. In OO programming, you often create DAOs and Gateways
(data access objects and table data gateways) to abstract your database access
code for single records and recordsets. Firstly, I have
> Yes, they can, using the js file provided with urchin (and
> probably google analytics). Urchin has js that forces a
> download of a gif to which it appends the screen resolution
> among other things.
Hahah splitting hairs here but that is just Javascript trickery using a
gif file that wi
Yes, they can, using the js file provided with urchin (and probably google
analytics). Urchin has js that forces a download of a gif to which it
appends the screen resolution among other things.
Russ
> -Original Message-
> From: COLLIE David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday,
For the webserver to capture it, I think it would have to be sent with
an HTTP request (e.g. as a CGI variable) which I don't think it is.
We caputre this information via JavaScript by setting the JS variables
screen.width and screen.height into a hidden form variable and then
processing it on the
> Sorry for the off topic, but I cant find an answer so far.
>
> Can Apache's log files pick up the users screen resolution?
> Can any web servers's log files?
>
> Or is this something you need to add yourself to track?
No, it's client side information.
You could code some javascript that fir
I guess it depends on your situation. This is not a definitive list, but
these are the things I found were completely or somewhat broken with
1.5:
- ldap over ssl
- web services
- verity admin
To us that loss of functionality was better than Coldfusion randomly
crashing with the 1.4 jvm. (docu
Good points and nice doc by Ray. I didn't know about the variables scope
being available to the whole cfc.
Thanks
Victor
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion infor
This just came up on something for me this morning and I read that by
doing this, it allows your .init() function to access the variables.
Ryan, Terrence wrote:
> Typically if you are doing manipulation of the value, you don't want to alter
> the input value, but rather a copy of it.
>
>
> Vs
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
