Jeff,
If you want to see more examples of how you might write unit tests for CF,
you should take a look at the tests that accompany a few of the frameworks.
You can find a battery of unit tests in the cfcUnit, ColdSpring, Transfer,
and Tartan frameworks. I know that these aren't tutorials, but *re
Change "setup" to "setUp"
On 12/12/06, Dan Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am running some test cases using cfcUnit, My question is when i ran this
> test the first time i forgot to pass the datasource to my init method. I
> have since
> added it but it still does not see it in the setup? I
Jeff,
At this point there really isn't a *mock object* solution, per se for CF
developers in the form of any particular framework developed to create
Mocks. Really, the simplest way at this point is to create them by hand.
Also, are you sure you want mock objects that will fully behave like Reacto
You might not be aware of this, but Sean has been out of the country and
away from computers since Nov 17, and just got back to work yesterday. He
has a bit of catching up to do, so chill out.
On 11/30/06, Teddy Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Adam,
> I appreciate your desire to be audible an
The site works now. Don't know why it was causing errors earlier.
On 10/19/06, Dan O'Keefe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just so happens I was doing some searching on CFOOP today and I can get to
> the site with this URL
>
> http://www.tartanframework.org/tartan/?
>
> Dan
>
> On 10/19/06, Nick To
If you do not specify the output attribute, it will behave like a normal
block of cf code that is not between tags and generate all sorts
of white space. If you specify output="true", the cffunction tags will act
just like tags and evaluate any text that is between #s. If you
specify output="fals
Jeff,
cfcUnit and CFUnit are a bit different in how assertions are made. In CFUnit
(like JUnit) there is a single function name "asserEquals". JUnit can take
advantage of method overloading, so a single method name with different
argument types will work. CFUnit takes the same approach and only ha
My experience is that the number of queued events allowed at a time is
limited. I don't know what the limit is, but I do know that when the
directory watcher created several hundred events, it stopped queueing them
after a certain threshold was met. I never figured it out since all I had to
do was
Sean, I certainly hope you include the testing tools in coldfusion as well
when you say they are hard to use. I agree that there is a lot of code that
is written to put together automated tests, but the long-term benefit tends
to be worth it if the tests are maintained along with the code they veri
en you need to lock the writes to the instance data of
> the CFC.
>
> On 9/2/05, Paul Kenney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is not always the case. Sometimes CFCs are placed in the
> application
> > scope with state that changes all the time. The CFC could
This is not always the case. Sometimes CFCs are placed in the application
scope with state that changes all the time. The CFC could be a very busy
manager, and not just a stateless utility or something. It might be in the
application scope because you only want one, and no more.
On 9/2/05, Bria
All instances of a particular CFCs share a single object for each of their
methods. So, a CFC is essintially an object with references to *singleton*
method objects. Very efficient use of memory.
On 7/24/05, Barney Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> CFCs are definitely heavier than POJOs,
7/12/05, Bryan Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: "Paul Kenney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk"
> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 1:10 PM
> Subject: Re: Web service caling local CFC
>
>
> > Yeah, you have to add a virtual
Yeah, you have to add a virtual directory in the jrun-web.xml file under
{webroot}/WEB-INF
On 7/12/05, Bryan Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hey Brian,
> >
> > Maybe try adding a ColdFusion mapping called "appCFCs" to wherever the
> > appCFCs directory is - I've had issues with CFC r
This global setting is something you could also override for all gateway
CFCs in a directory using the tag in an Application.cfc or
Application.cfm file.
On 4/13/05, Sean Corfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 4/12/05, dcooper @ macromedia. com dcooper @ macromedia. com
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED
I would like to meet Jared myself, so its in my best interests to help him
out. Can't think of a better way.
On Apr 4, 2005 1:51 PM, Will The Game <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> As you know, Jared R-H posts quite a bit here. He's helped me out a ton,
> and probably has helped many
No, you can't do that at CrystalTech... they make heavy use of
security sandboxing.
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 12:18:31 +1000, Ryan Sabir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not sure about CrystalTech's security on shared servers.. but last
> time I was on a shared server, using CFDIRECTORY I able to merrily
>
Microsoft's taking over Macromedai!? Oh no, not again! I don't how
many times I can take it!
In all seriousness, I think this discussion should either end or go
over to cf-community.
--
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://
But when will it come out?
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 19:36:06 -, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shadowing is your friend. Also the next version of VSS will be far improved
> with regards to Web Development.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: jonese
> To: CF-Talk
> Sent
Out of curiosity, what is the objective your code aims for?
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:48:12 -0800, Barney Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Take a look at the Tartan framework. It looks really confusing
> initially, but it takes care of inter-object relationship problems
> with a remarkable deg
Just like Application.cfm
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 22:44:17 -0800, Sean Corfield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 23:42:38 -0500, Michael Dinowitz
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Will application.cfc be executed whenever CF fails to find the
> > > messages_4_38946.cfm page?
> > Theo
I don't know if this is simply a case of "failure under load", but a
combination of issues. Besides Michael, how many sites do you have
running on the House of Fusion server? I'm guessing that it isn't
anything like the number of sites a shared hosting environment has...
like somewhere between 60 a
Or no other hosting company has enough customer that make it so
public... even Macromedia has run into this problem on their site. You
have to assume that they will get it worked out. Maybe most other
companies don't enable J2EE sessions (among other things)... something
to consider.
On Mon, 14
The issue with dynamic paths is that you can't do any type-checking at
all in the , , and tags. For me,
this is too important since it saves a lot of time debugging. It also
makes the structure of component files clearer since I am always
having to use it. It may seem like more work, but it pays
A single mapping should be a one time thing, so it *shouldn't* be a
big deal for them.
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:19:28 -0500, Jeff Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just create the mapping on both your local and live sites. Use
> > hardcoded fully qualified paths if you can... try to avoid dynami
Just create the mapping on both your local and live sites. Use
hardcoded fully qualified paths if you can... try to avoid dynamic
path names when refering to the names of CFCs. It makes things easier
to understand when you look at it later, and if you have to change the
names at some point the "se
exception and using
another tag with a session timeout of "0 seconds"
seems good enough. Maybe not... I really don't know :)
--
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pjk.us
~|
Logware (w
Well, for Application.cfc, here is my solution:
Sorry, but there seems to have been an error:
Anyone have any idea how this same fix can be modified for use in
Application.cfc?
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:20:06 -0700, Connie DeCinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So far, this seems to be working for me. Have not seen an error... Yet.
>
>
> applicationtimeout="#createtimespan(1
Heard of cfcUnit? Check it out: http://www.cfcunit.org
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 18:37:13 -0500, DURETTE, STEVEN J (AIT)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been reading a lot of articles lately about automated testing and
> I'm hoping a few of you can answer some questions.
>
> Are there a
Really, I don't think that cfparam is as useful inside CFC methods as
it is inside CFM files.I have mostly used to "declare"
attributes to a custom tag or input values to an included file. It
makes sure that required variables exist, and for those that aren't
required it can set default value
This one is really easy...
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 15:01:56 -0600, Andy Ousterhout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How would I retrieve the hint from a CFC:
>
> hint="An actor is someone who interacts with the system either directly with
> it or indirectly through an other Actor or output from t
This one is really easy...
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 15:01:56 -0600, Andy Ousterhout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How would I retrieve the hint from a CFC:
>
> hint="An actor is someone who interacts with the system either directly with
> it or indirectly through an other Actor or output from t
That is correct. CFUnit was written by Christian Cantrell and I wrote
cfcUnit.
Qasim Rasheed wrote:
>CFCUnit.org and CFUnit in DRK are essentially two different products. AFAIK
>
>
>
>On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:48:38 -0400, Joe Rinehart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Not sure, but you can get C
Well, it does do the same thing. The only difference is that you use
instead of using the JDBC API directly. In fact, if you use
, the database turns your query is turned into a
prepared statement the first time it is called and sends back a handle
to the JDBC driver. For all subsequent calls to
f you wish..
-Paul Kenney
Matt Liotta wrote:
>I suggest hosting the code at OpenXCF (sf.net/projects/openxcf), which
>already has all the infrastructure and several contributors.
>
>-Matt
>
>
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL P
Matt, don't you realize that the event gateway IS external Java
invocation of CFCs? I remember you complaining about not being able
to to this without really digging really deep and that it really
wasn't recommened due to its fragile and tricky nature. Isn't nice
that MM has provided a public, doc
Fair enough.
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:04:44 -0400, Matt Liotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Matt, I might be wrong here, but I don't think it's Macromedia's intention
> > to make it COMPULSORY for you to use the new feature.
> >
> I don't think anyone even implied that.
>
> > I think you could ta
Matt, what exactly is your point... besides that the Event Gateway
isn't that great of an idea? Are you just trying to be contrary?
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 10:58:42 -0400, Samuel R. Neff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If what you need to do is integrate with SMS, IM, Sockets, or any of the
> built-in g
I would suggest that you look at the code that drives the MachII
framework. It might give you some ideas on how CFCs can be used and
what they are capable of doing. On that note (beware: shameless plug),
you could also check out cfcUnit at SourceForge
(http://sourceforge.com/projects/openxcf)
The first thing I ask when someone poses a question like this is, "How
often does this run?" If it is a batch process that runs once a day
during non-peak times, it does not matter how efficient it is. It
just has to get done in a timely manner. Too many people will toil
over finding the most el
You could always transfer the data between the two systems via wddx.
When PHP wants the session data, it could make an HTTP request to a
.cfm server for a serialized version of the session. If CF wants to
see the session data used by PHP, it could also make an HTTP request
to a .php file for a se
By "MVC" do you mean "Model View Controller"?
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:22:54 -0700, Paul Kenney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, they are. Thanks for tip, i was looking under "Jokes" ;)
>
> There ya go! Glad to be of service. :)
>
>
> Yes, they are. Thanks for tip, i was looking under "Jokes" ;)
There ya go! Glad to be of service. :)
--
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
; you will
> > find a few conflicting
> > development design patterns. Yes, there is are a TON of other research
> > papers out there
> > but nothing really that you could use to model Large Applications.
> >
> > Joe
> >
> > - Original M
Joe,
First, you aren't going to find anything that shows you how to do any
of these things using MVC. The reason for this is that these types of
solutions general are the realm of the model. It seems that you are
incorrectly using the term MVC and I would recommend that you go and
brush up on th
In general, I don't know if conferences are really where you will find
in-depth information on these topic. This is mainly because they are
not simple and do not fit within the short format of individual
sessions. If you really want to know about these things, first do
your homework and read a fe
Also, you might want to change your returntype to the name of this
component since that's what its returning and not a struct.
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:02:06 -0400, Cutter (CF-Talk)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, I have the CFC of which I am trying to start on some webservices
> stuff. Here is a b
First, set output to "false" on your init() function. Next, add the
"required" attribute to the argument in your init() function and set
it to "true".
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:02:06 -0400, Cutter (CF-Talk)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, I have the CFC of which I am trying to start on some webserv
Oh, and who calls them?
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:32:15 -0400, Peter Farrell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> well, no other methods
>
>
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
So, the only method that Display_Tables() calls is
"Get_Phone_Messages". What methods do you have then that are
dynamically called with positional arguments?
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:32:15 -0400, Peter Farrell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> well, no other methods
>
>
[Todays Threads]
[This Messa
> Member of Team Macromedia
> Macromedia Certified Master Instructor
> http://www.cfstandards.org
>
>
>
>
> Paul Kenney wrote:
>
> > It was mostly a 3-day commercial last year. However, I've heard that
> > MM got so much flack for last year's MAX, that
Ok, so what other methods does Display_Tables() call?
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 12:00:54 -0400, Peter Farrell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, Get_Phone_Messages() does not call any other method/functions.
>
>
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[
Ok, I'm taking this step by step, So bear with me...
Display_Tables() is a public method that has two arguments: method and values.
"method" is a string,
"values" is a string.
Display_Tables() then calls the method specified by the "method"
argument and passes the string specified in "
Ok, Get_Phone_Messages() takes a single argument. Are there other
dynamically called methods that take multiple arguments?
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 17:56:01 -0400, Peter Farrell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Despite all my attempts, I cannot for the life of me figure this one out.
>
> I h
Can you show an example of this? I don't think I'm following.
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 19:24:48 -0400, Peter Farrell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was wanting to do it in cfscript as well - however I cannot figure that one out.
>
> The reason why I wanted to do it by position, is that the methods I'
Why? You need to explain a little more then.
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:50:17 -0400, Peter Farrell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Paul -
>
> I thought of that - should of mentioned that.
>
> Anyway of passing in the variables by position?
>
> callmefunction(1, 3, 4)
>
>
>
[Todays Threads]
This will do the trick:
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 17:56:01 -0400, Peter Farrell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Despite all my attempts, I cannot for the life of me figure this one out.
>
> I have a CFC method (Display_Table in the application.MessagesCFC) that displays a table of error mes
Is this perhaps something that could be generalized for public consumption?
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 20:55:39 -0700, Dick Applebaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim
>
> How did you do that?
>
> You got 233 lines past Michael's 100-line filter.
>
> Now as to the content.
>
> I read through it and y
Does the remote server have any scripting/CGI abilites or is it
running something like PERL, ASP, JSP, CF? If so, you could simply
have the remote server check for you. All you would have to do is
tell it which files to check in a list. Does the remote server have
FTP access? If so, you could
ting wants its captive audience to experience for three
days.
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:14:36 -0400, Joe Eugene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am thinking MAX 2004 might just be more of Trade show for Macromedia
> Products.
--
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Todays Threads]
[This Me
Something else to consider is the idea of the code/language itself as
a tool--not to write code, but to get the job done. If you look at it
this way, using CFML and a simple (non-integrated) editor could be
seen as comprable to using ASP.NET and VS.NET.
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 14:56:37 -0500, G <[EMA
But Sean, we're not computer people... we're CFers!
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 21:59:25 -0700, Sean Corfield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But the error message infers that the login is not being accepted.
>
>
> *implies*
>
> You might *infer* from the error message that the login is not being accept
Go to http://www.macromedia.com/go/usergroups
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 13:52:26 -0400, Adrocknaphobia
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sure MM has one, but I know every issue of CFDJ has a nice little
> map with all of them listed. Not sure how up-to-date that is though.
>
> -Adam
>
>
> - Origina
Ok, I've updated the installation... go check it out at http://www.cfcunit.org
--
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
now when a new version of the zip
flle is available.
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:25:43 -0700, Paul Kenney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yeah, that's me. Go check out www.cfcunit.org. I've got a blog going
> at www.pjk.us/blog and sean corfield's blog. I'm writing
Yeah, that's me. Go check out www.cfcunit.org. I've got a blog going
at www.pjk.us/blog and sean corfield's blog. I'm writing about it and
Sean has posted some comments.
On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 15:16:00 +1000, Chris Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> What does everyone here use for their
It depends though. If the test is simple enough, it shouldn't be too
big a deal. It just makes sure that they understand basic syntax and
concepts. I have to agree though, that actual conversation will
uncover a lot more about what an interviewee actually knows as long as
the interviewer fully un
Perfectly legal. Go for it.
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:19:19 -0400, Ben Densmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If I create an instance of a cfc using createObject() can I use an application variable in the path that points to the cfc or does the path have to be hard coded?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
Why not?
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:24:30 -0700, Dick Applebaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 28, 2004, at 5:16 PM, Matt Woodward wrote:
>
> > >So, CF programs can be run without a browser.
> > >
> > >Now, if you don't need a browser, why do you need a web server?
> > >
> > >Dick
> >
> >
You won't need a browser, except to manage the CF server--but you
might still want to keep writing web apps in CF as well. So don't
count the browser out yet!
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:43:34 -0700, Dick Applebaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 28, 2004, at 9:14 AM, Samuel R. Neff wrote:
>
>
Agreed.
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:16:18 -0400, Rick Root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Paul Kenney wrote:
> >
> > This is not currently possible with CFMX 6.1. It basically removes
> > the requirement of a web server to use ColdFusion.
>
> I didn't say th
Its not listening on different ports.
It is actually listening for event announcements from a custom telnet
gateway Java component. The gateway interacts with the OS and calls
the appropriate CFC when it needs to. So actually, the gateway
listens for telnet connections and passes the requests
notifications, telnet...
You implement a thin gateway interface in Java and it will interact with
CFCs that you write to handle certain events. Its kind of like Flash
Remoting in that way.
It's way cool!
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
916-212-4359
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexand
That would be rich!
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
916-212-4359
> -Original Message-
> From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 7:56 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: CFML Visual Studio Plugin
>
>
> Anyone kn
Reed,
Yeah, actually that sounds like a valid reason. You will also find
that it is part of their sandboxed security model. You can only
connect to your own database that is associated with your own account.
The flip side to that is that other sites hosted by CT cannot access
your database. I
A very compelling demo!
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 18:47:40 -0400, Michael T. Tangorre
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sometimes, the paid versions aren't worth the money
> http://www.countersinkdg.com/demo/admin/login.cfm?url="">
> dg.com/demo/admin/index.cfm?
>
>
> > Nothing at all against Ray's
OK, and...?
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
916-212-4359
> -Original Message-
> From: Seamus Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 10:55 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: list problem
>
>
> Hi
>
> I have a list I'm trying to r
Exactly!
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
916-212-4359
> -Original Message-
> From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 8:24 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: RDS support (was Re: CFEclipse release - beta
>
>
> Inte
Just think of those poor developers that are forced to work off of shared
hosting accounts with no WebDav, a single FTP account, an Access database
and no RDS access. Oh, the humanity! They could all be saved!
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
916-212-4359
> -Original Message-
> From
access to
the CFC browser--since it uses the much protected RDS password. Wouldn't it
just be helpful if the IDE took care of all this for you, and did it well?
Come on Matt, wouldn't it?
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
916-212-4359
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Liott
OK, but consolidated into one single service available on the server.
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
916-212-4359
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 6:22 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: RDS support (wa
How about these things:
1. User-level authentication/authorization
2. Database info
3. Component info
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
916-212-4359
> -Original Message-
> From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 9:45 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> S
mings. How about a web-service interface using CFCs instead?
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
916-212-4359
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 5:53 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: RDS support (was Re: CFEc
ol, but it is a published one--albiet internally.
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
916-212-4359
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 2:38 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RDS support (was Re: CFEclipse release - beta
>
CF's been able to do this at least since CF4.5, since Allaire did this very
thing for Spectra.
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
916-212-4359
> -Original Message-
> From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 2:58 PM
> To: CF-Talk
&g
Tony,
I have a custom tag that I wrote to display exception information and it
catches some of the random error that happen when just cfdumping a cfcatch
variable. Call it like:
I put it below.
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
916-212-4359
---START CODE---
Len(toString(ArrayLen
Oh yeah, I glanced at that thread quickly but didn't really read it... I
guess I'll do that now. Nevermind my recommendation. Just do what they
said ;)
Thanks.
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
916-212-4359
> -Original Message-
> From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL P
You can, however, the "isEmail" udf within the component method
and it is only visible within that method.
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
916-212-4359
> -Original Message-
> From: Burns, John D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 7:32 AM
> To:
? Are you concerned that there will be overlap
among instances of the task? If this is the case, then using CFLOCK might
make sense.
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
916-212-4359
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 200
I just restart IIS.
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
916-212-4359
> -Original Message-
> From: Casey C Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 1:51 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: World Wide Web Publishing Service
>
>
> I installed my Macromedia C
Expecially if that's a $100 hammer.
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
916-212-4359
> -Original Message-
> From: Nathan C. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 7:24 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: "FREE" BD vs. "" CF
bucks. You pay them money so that
you can pay them more money.
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
916-212-4359
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 5:48 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: "FREE" BD vs. &qu
Microsoft also has their product, Live Meeting. Please don't hurt me!
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
916-212-4359
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 1:31 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: OT-Webe
And don't use "variables" as the name of your top level struct variable.
Use a name that isn't already used by CF, like "local" or something similar.
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
916-212-4359
> -Original Message-
> From: Semrau Steven Ctr SAF
Not only does it have a lot of money, but it doesn't have as many nuns as it
would like. Can we say "Supply and Demand"?
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
916-212-4359
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 20
What if the money went back to the User Group for fun events or paid
speakers?
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
916-212-4359
> -Original Message-
> From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 11:24 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CFMX f
In general, boolean expressions should return boolean values
(yes,no,true,false). This is a bug.
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
916-212-4359
> -Original Message-
> From: Samuel R. Neff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 1:20 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subje
If www.bart.gov is redirecting you, do you have the "redirect" attribute for
set to "true"?
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
916-212-4359
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 11:39 AM
> To: CF-Ta
OS
issue and not a DW issue--at least as far as the registry goes. A better
solution might be to NOT store site settings in the registry, but as text
files within the user's profile directory (C:\Documents and Settings).
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
916-212-4359
> -Original
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
