On 5/19/07, Eric Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually...it is parsed by the server and compiled into Java which produces
the HTML and JavaScript which is in turn parsed by the browser :-D
CFMX 6.0 used to translate the CFML to Java and then compile the Java
to bytecode which runs on the
On 5/19/07, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm does BD parse/translate to a proprietry language before it goes to MSIL
and on to the CLR? Wouldn't the .NET version simple be J#?
BlueDragon was originally written in Java and used the J# path to get
the core engine compiled
On 5/17/07, James Wolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I cant speak about Frameworks in general, but I can tell you to avoid FuseBox
like the plague.
Oh dear... there's always one, isn't there?
If all you ever coded in was fusebox, then maybe its an OK framework to work
with.
I didn't much care
On 5/18/07, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will Scorpio fix the problem which CF7 has when trying to swap out shipped
components which updates one? In particular iText, JavaMail, Axis.
Since Scorpio is covered by NDA, no one can answer this (except Adobe
staff, I guess).
On 5/18/07, C. Hatton Humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So after the nucluear meltdown of my life yesterday I was told that we
are going to purchase CFMX 7 assuming that we will get the upgrades to
8 when the time comes around.
Question is this - where would you recommend purchasing from?
On 5/18/07, Tom Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 18 May 2007, Bobby Hartsfield wrote:
I'm sure he's looking for a better price Tom...
Well, there's Smith then.
which won't run any framework-based code :)
Right now I can't even get settings to 'stick' in the Smith admin -
and
On 5/18/07, Ali Majdzadeh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have no OO background. Till now I just used coldfusion tags to make my
projects. It was easy and with a little help from Dreamweaver it was the
easiest programming experience I ever had.
Then Fusebox is probably the best match for you and,
On 5/16/07, DURETTE, STEVEN J (ATTASIAIT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All, I have a semi-urgent need to learn Fusebox and FLiP. Can't get the
funding (at the moment) for going to a training class, so what is the
best book for learning it quickly?
Jeff Peters just released Fusebox 5 FLiP:
On 5/17/07, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it a different code base?
Same code base (the first major release to not be a rewrite).
Do you/they as developers see it as a minor
point update or a major?
Well, that's the debate right now - and why we are running a poll
On 5/14/07, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is exactly how I envisage us using it I think. With the getOrmService
is thus via ModelGlue.getOrmService()? That is in the app.framework scope
yeah?
Inside a controller, yes, you can call getOrmService().
You still using
On 5/14/07, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It also seems you can't scaffold when you are using packages (unless the
package needs to named the same as the original object)?
Can't say as I noticed that when I was using MG:U + Transfer but bear
in mind the package names affect
On 5/15/07, Christopher Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good Lord Mike, why on earth did you agree to this kind of arrangement
in the first place!? :o)
I agree. I would never have accepted such a strange gig - the client's
out of their mind! :)
In short, I think it's your client who's being
On 5/14/07, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lol, I am sure Mr Corfield will be right in... But what you have noted so
far makes perfect sense.
Who? Me?
Once you have it wired up, you can use scaffolding or MG's generic DB
messages or just go ahead and access Transfer
On 5/11/07, Andrew Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really wish there was more tips on CFCUnit and how to write tests,
I keep poking Paul about it but now that I'm no longer his manager I
don't have quite as much sway :)
Sean, so going bug to my bug that I ticketed. Could you look at the
On 5/11/07, Andrew Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As Sean said
Heh, fresh from a couple of legal audits of my team's code base
(before I left Adobe a month ago). It was partly that process that
brought sufficient pressure to bear on Joe to get the MG:U license
changed - and on Paul to get
On 5/11/07, Andrew Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Sean,
I was having a bad day that day... And for the life of me should have know
that... Really I should..
NP.
Btw I also have designed a similar CFCUnitView, but didn't realise that
CFEclipse was doing it either. My attempt was to
On 5/12/07, Rick Root [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If Model Glue was originally under the Lesser GPL... future version
would be considered derivative works, would they not?
The author(s) can choose change the license. If you created a
derivative work from the old codebase, it would be covered by
On 5/12/07, Andrew Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So with Apache 2.0, you need to apply the license to every file?
Yes. Every file must contain the standard ASL license text:
!---
Copyright (c) , The Names Of The Authors Or Company
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
On 5/11/07, Peterson, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know very little about licensing of lesser GPL, Apache, etc. If I
develop a site using the latest MG:Unity, Transfer, and Coldspring, are
there any hiccups in their current license that would prohibit me from
a) leasing the end result
On 5/11/07, Jaime Metcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3. Use cfunit's AssertOutputs function (or steal or write your own for
cfcunit) to run the form processing module, capture its output and run a set
of assertions agains the output.
With cfcUnit, you can either use cfhttp to run the page or
On 5/9/07, Brad Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forta was at the Kansas City user group last night and I would just like
to say I am so happy to hear that CFCs (and XML documents) will
serialize properly in CF 8 and replicate between shared sessions!
Why are so many people so excited about this?
On 5/5/07, Eric J. Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not to add to the hornet's nestwell, okay maybe, but back to the
issues we deal with in perceptions with CF. This time not price, just a
pure lack of focus on what the CF platform can do from a review of a
site that moved from a mixed
On 5/8/07, Casey Dougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We log the request as we're talking with them. We have a task management
system that's really tricked out.
OK. You had me worried for a while :)
Thanx for explaining how you actually work because I didn't get any of
that from your original
On 5/7/07, Andrew Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing I like about it is the fact from a TDD point of view, no other CF
tool besides Flex builder (aka eclipse anyway) supports Test Driven
Development with full SVN integration, and tools that support jira, Bugzilla
etc with Tasks that can
On 5/7/07, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, well still pittance I suppose considering the amount of time (and JD)
Mark spends on the project in his own time.
Certainly no one should underestimate the time Mark spends on this project!
His work on the new frameworks
On 5/7/07, Mike Chabot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How show I rewrite this code now that App B was changed from using
Application.cfm to using Application.cfc?
Just run a cfapplication tag and the necessary methods / includes.
Application.cfc is meant to represent a best practice approach where
On 5/7/07, Robert Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was pretty disappointed with ftp on eclipse for quite some time.
For the last 6 months I would do a search for plugins figuring I
would find a decent solution because the one that comes with eclipse
is terrible.
Yeah, core FTP support for
On 5/7/07, Andrew Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Serioulsy you have no idea how common that is, I guess my attempted humour
was way off. I had already read the other posts, and they had said enough
and I had no more really to add. But I was serious about blogging the
downsides to it. I thought
On 5/7/07, Casey Dougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How long would that take to commit these
edits using SVN?
Right-click, Team Commit add (an optional) comment explaining what
the change does / fixes and click OK.
I can't imagine working on code without SVN.
Can they be done with the client
On 5/3/07, Peterson, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May I ask how you maintain session state?
Session variables. And session affinity on the load balancer.
Are you using the built in cluster
capability in Coldfusion, or a hardware device?
Hardware. No JRun load balancing, no session
On 5/3/07, Peterson, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I currently have my Cisco CSS set to use the users IP address to keep
their session 'sticky' to a given server, which works for most of my
cases (AOL is busted).
Configure it to use a (transient) cookie instead.
That's how adobe.com
On 5/3/07, Jeff Small [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think a Frameworks Overview needs to be added to the Max conference this
year. Not a debate. Not a discussion or a Birds of a Feather... but a
nice, healthy overview of the frameworks available to ColdFusion
programmers, and their strengths and
On 4/28/07, Dwayne Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1). What framework best manages variable scoping (what should go into the
application scope, what should go into request scope etc)
Most of the frameworks place no restrictions on this sort of thing -
that decision is down to the developer.
On 4/30/07, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No specific named methodology. Frameworks? Model-Glue, Fusebox,
ColdSpring, Transfer.
Interesting. Not Mach-II anymore?
No. I blogged quite a while back about my switch from Mach II to
Model-Glue. That was when I was working on
On 4/30/07, Peterson, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Relating to Frameworks, is there a certain one that scales better
between 2 or more servers, or do they all scale the same as long as you
setup client vars to be in a DB and shared? Does any framework
specifically store internal variables
On 4/30/07, Dwayne Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More specifically, what types of application parameters should be set up at
application initiation.
That's a very open-ended question with no black and white answer.
I put pretty much any per-application config in application scope in
one way
On 5/2/07, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So preference aside, this effectively tells me, from you as a top notch OO
developer, is that Model-Glue is better than Mach-II...
I don't think you should draw that conclusion. I could give a long
explanation of why I prefer
On 5/2/07, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So can and will ColdSpring, Transfer and Mach-II play nice?
Mach II has a ColdSpring plugin. You can use either of Reactor or
Transfer (or objectBreeze or whatever) with Mach II / ColdSpring. I'd
say they already play nice.
--
Sean A
On 5/2/07, Barney Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would pick Fusebox w/ ColdSpring by default. But if the application
processing required a significant number of dynamic state changes at
the controller level, I'd probably go with Model-Glue w/ ColdSpring.
FB's execution path is static, so
On 5/2/07, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, let's hear the explanation of why and your experiences, I think this
should be in the public domain by whatever means. (blogged, list/off-list)
Sure, here's excerpts of a long email exchange I had with someone
about choosing
On 4/28/07, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just what frameworks/methologies are people using, if any?
No specific named methodology. Frameworks? Model-Glue, Fusebox,
ColdSpring, Transfer.
from research it seems
people fleet between them etc which seems futile.
I think a
On 4/24/07, Steve LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For some reason, I thought if would be more complicated. I guess I was
comparing what RSS does.
Even RSS - Really Simple Syndication - is just another data source
that ColdFusion would query (although in that case it would fetch the
RSS feed
On 4/18/07, James Blaha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ColdFusion SMS Text Message to Cell?
Built into CFMX 7 Enterprise via the SMS Event Gateway. You just need
an SMSC account to connect into the cell providers' network.
I don't know if Mike Kear's system works on this (I hope so - CFMX SMS
support
On 4/14/07, Andrew Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thats what I mean, best practice says use cfqueryparam, and every document
you read regardless of cfmx 5.0, 6.0, 7.0 says when writing to a variable
you will have a race condition.
No. It is *not* the case that you will have a race condition.
On 4/15/07, Mike Kear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cfset OkToGo = false /
cfloop list = #UserPermissions# index=i
cfset OkToGo = listfind(Permissionsrequired, #i#) /
/cfloop
cfif OkToGo is false
cflocation addtoken=no url=/index.cfm /
cfabort
/cfif
This all seems a
On 4/15/07, Andrew Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cfset application.flag = true /
no on its own that can not cause a race condition, but if somewhere else
there is a read on that variable somewhere then that will cause a race
condition.
Wrong.
Code can read that variable to its heart's
On 4/15/07, Jaime Metcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While we've got the attention of all these big brains, can we just agree
that Jason's problem has nothing to do with locking or lack thereof?
Correct. Despite Andrew Scott's repeated long posts about race
conditions, that has nothing whatsoever
On 4/12/07, Dwayne Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use a modified fusebox framework (all request go through index.cfm) will
google analytics still work?
Yes, GA can figure this out. We use GA on the Fusebox site - which is,
of course, a Fusebox application - and it works really well.
You can
On 4/5/07, Tom Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've not bought 'real' boxed software for years.
Software comes in boxes? :)
I think the last software I bought that wasn't just a download was
Visio Professional 5.0, based on the almost complete lack of boxes in
my office. Hmm, Visio 5.0...
On 4/1/07, John Beynon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just make sure you reference your swf relative to the root index.cfm -
if your use httpwatch (http://www.httpwatch.com/) to show you what is
being loaded and you'll see the problem immediately,
Yeah, it's almost certainly a path issue - Fusebox
On 4/1/07, Damien McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another way to consider this, is an ORM with intelligent defaults. Fusebox 6
looks to be going in this route, that certain configuration items have
defaults suitable for most basic usage, allowing you to limit the amount of
hardcoding
On 4/1/07, Doug Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually it is HOF version of night of the comet...part duex
Night of the Comet just came out on DVD so my wife was finally able to
sit me down and make me watch it for the first time. Very, very funny
movie!
Daddy would've gotten us Uzis!
And,
This is basically asking people to work for free, with only a chance of the
possibility of winning the contest. It's called Spec Work and it's a bad
practice.
Actually, it's a community open source project and everyone involved
contributes their time, ideas and code (and in this case graphic
I'm simply saying that this contest devalues the overall work product
because it expects that people would be willing to work towards a prize that
they might not win.
Hmm, and yet when companies put out for bids on design work, the applicants
will have to offer up designs for free in an attempt
Since most of you disagree with me (and that's totally fine), at what point
do YOU think it's a bad idea?
I think it's a bad idea when the prize is commercial work (in other words,
companies asking for commercial design bids on spec is not great business for
anyone). If people are bidding on a
I agree with you. In a contest, there is always something to win, but
when the only winner is the one who set up the contest, it is not a
contest, it's a rip-off ;-)
And if the winner is an entire community of developers...?
Sean
I have nothing against Fusebox at all. I think I've made that pretty clear.
I have respect for their product, even if I don't personally use it.
Product?? Product???!?!? Is that how you see the community-created frameworks
and tools or was that perhaps just a bad choice of words?
Your first
This is what they say. IMHO they don't give a dam the community, they
just do it for glory,
for the sensation of belonging to some group of nerds, or whatever.
Ah, Claude, you've figured out the cunning conspiracy... we don't give a dam
(sic) about you, it's true :)
systems
to support Flex applications) but also Model-Glue: Unity (for administrative
consoles) and a mix of Reactor and Transfer (for persistence).
And of course we're relying very heavily on cfcUnit for all our unit testing!
Sean Corfield
(these days a very occasional contributor to cf-talk due
I actually think you and I are in agreement on many points here.
Very likely :)
I didn't exactly drop MG because of these optional components. I did drop
Reactor because of some of the things I mentioned below...
OK, thanx for the clarification.
The decision to include Reactor caused me to
On 2/11/06, Aaron Rouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if it might mean we will eventually see them replace DW with
something built on Eclipse, at least for CFM dev work.
FWIW, I use DW for all my visual layout work (CF or HTML) and Eclipse
(with CFEclipse) for all of my non-visual
Good point! I'll ask someone to update it...
On 2/12/06, Aaron Rouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did not even bother to navigate that far into the site when on the home
page I saw a reference to CFUnited a year ago then when I went to the
downloads page I saw the last stable build was from last
On 2/11/06, John McKown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is mention on that site that MM is backing them now, but the
updates look stale on the
site, and once again there is the issue of momentum.
A new, unified site will be rolled out soon. We have most of the
infrastructure in place on a new
On 2/11/06, Aaron Rouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not just post that paragraph on the current CFEclipse site. I went to
it early when I read Johns post and it does look kind of stale when you
see last dates from back in the middle of 05
http://cfeclipse.org/go/project/roadmap
--
Sean A
On 2/9/06, John C. Bland II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Flex 2 + Flex Builder 2.0...$999.99
I'd probably phrase that as two items:
Flex Builder 2.0 ... $1,000 (I have no idea how much less)
Flex Framework / SDK .. Free (compiler and libraries)
The
On 2/9/06, John McKown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The videos are neat on the labs site, and it really does look powerful,
but until they release pricing information (did I miss it somewhere?)
I'm curious as to what more we can do to get the message across here?
I was talking with Ben about this
On 2/9/06, John C. Bland II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Put a (suggested or in stone) pricing page on Labs so folks looking to
download can check it out.
The pricing information is already on labs:
http://labs.macromedia.com/technologies/flexbuilder2/ - Product Details:
How much will Flex
On 2/9/06, Aaron Rouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only reason I knew much of anything about Flex 2 was because of emails on
this list in recent weeks about it. I do not read blogs much any more so
maybe that is why I have been in the dark on Flex 2.
Interesting. Yes, the blogs have been on fire
On 1/27/06, Oleg Gunkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I make a function with unlimited number of parameters, and how do I
access these parameters?
cffunction name=foo
cfset var i = 0
cfset var n = arraylen(arguments)
cfloop from=1 to=#n# index=i
cfoutputp#arguments[i]#/p/cfoutput
On 1/27/06, Peter Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find
Dreamweaver to be a little buggy if/when the FTP connection runs slowly
Which version of Dreamweaver? FTP support was overhauled for DW8 and
now runs in the background so it doesn't even stop you working on
files while FTP operations
Why not just tail the log as stuff is written to it?
tail -f cfserver.log
On 1/25/06, Barney Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another option would be to use `tee` to send everything both places.
I believe this is the syntax you'd want, but don't quote me on that.
eval $CFSTART 21 | tee -a
On 1/25/06, Barney Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What if you need 11 lines? Or 50? Easier to scroll back a terminal
window
tail -f shows *all* continuous output, just as if you had it printing
to the console anyway. You can scroll back in Terminal as much as you
need.
If the file doesn't
On 1/17/06, Jordan Michaels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3. Is ServletExec comparable to enterprise J2EE servers?
As far as I know, yes. ServletExec is one of NewAtlanta's flagship
products - I'd imagine it'd be roughly comparable to most J2EE servers
available.
ServetExec supports JSP and the
On 1/15/06, Casey Dougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to find something with some real nitty gritty, down and dirty
examples of how to use CFC's. Just one solid example that shows how a
CFC can be used with display, update, delete add functionality. It
Well, the generally accepted best
On 1/16/06, Ian Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, why is it bad form? Assuming you are not mixing your layers, why is it
bad to create a view CFC that does nothing but display? What is it about
using a CFC for the display that would break a MVC model?
If you use a plain ol' CFML page
On 1/15/06, Michel Deloux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm an intermediate CF developer looking for(late 'cause CF 5
version) CFC books to learn how to work with components.
There are no good books for learning CFCs (Hal's book is very
out-of-date because of changes in components since it was
On 1/15/06, Phillip Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just downloaded the trial version of 7 but for the life of me cant find
how to start the server. I'm sorry if this is discussed before but I dont
have time to search the archives
Have you read the installation documentation?
How far have
A good proportion of my cf-talk list mail is now being flagged as spam
/ junk by Gmail. It started on Jan 11 or Jan 12.
Michael, did you make any changes then or is this just Gmail
tightening it's filters?
--
Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/
Got frameworks?
If you're not annoying
On 1/2/06, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Consider categorizing the solutions by CF version
as well as difficulty, e.g. easy, intermediate, difficult.
And perhaps categorizing by framework use as well since that will be a
useful yardstick for many developers.
Fusebox, Mach II,
If you have a multi-step form process that you would normally need to
spread across multiple HTML or would otherwise be extremly long and
complex, then Flash forms are a great option. The immediate feedback /
validation and the all-in-one-screen aspects provide a better user
experience.
If you
On 12/27/05, Samantha Brinkley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CFFUNCTION NAME=getSubCategories
CFARGUMENT NAME=CatID TYPE=numeric
CFQUERY NAME=getSubCategories DATASOURCE=#APPLICATION.Datasource#
You are overwriting the function with the result of the query (since
they have the same name).
If
On 12/26/05, Ben Nadel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe I cannot quite imagine how your DB is designed... but I am not sure
how it is possible for all of those to return 6 if you AND'ing the TypeIDFK=
parts. I am assuming this is an integer field in the DB table - how can they
ever equal two
On 12/26/05, John Wilker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(TypeIDFK = 1 AND Type IN (3,4)) (returns 6,12,15,16,17,77)
(TypeIDFK = 2 AND Type IN (1,5)) (returns 2,3,5,6,9,12,15,20,22)
(TypeIDFK = 3 AND Type IN (3,4)) (returns 6,33,66)
(TypeIDFK = 4 AND Type IN (1,4)) (returns 2,4,6,14,19,20,23,27)
On 12/22/05, Justin Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to switch to Dreamweaver 8, from HS 5.5, and I've got 2
monitors. I had Homesite opening multiple instances so I can have one on
each screen. How do I do this same thing with Dreamweaver 8?
Why would you want multiple instances of
On 12/20/05, jonese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just tried to drop [EMAIL PROTECTED] an email with some questions but it
bounced.
I'll let Christian Cantrell know (see his blog for his new email address).
--
Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/
Got frameworks?
If you're not annoying
On 12/19/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have finished putting together a new component that performs ping,
traceroute, dig and whois lookups. If anybody is in need of a coldfusion
looking glass script:
Looks very useful but just to clarify, it's Windows-only right?
--
Sean
On 12/19/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't tested the cfc on linux os yet, but it should work. It's either
cfexecute or the java runtime object we use in the methods.
OK, I modified it to work with OS X:
http://corfield.org/articles/lg.cfc.zip
--
Sean A Corfield --
On 12/19/05, dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That link gives an error Sean
Thanx. I foolishly assumed that a file called lg.cfc.zip would be
downloadble but the lg.cfc part is being caught by the CF connector it
seems...
OK, I modified it to work with OS X:
http://corfield.org/articles/lg.zip
On 12/16/05, Phill B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know there is Mach II and Model-Glue out there but are there any
other MVC style methodologies available for CF?
MVCF (?) from Benoit Hedard probably also fits the bill (and that's
more of a methodology than a framework - which is what Mach II and
On 12/14/05, Chris Velevitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm curious as to why you don't like custom tags?
There's a couple of situations where I find them natural but mostly
I lean toward CFCs and UDFs because that's what's in my programming
background. Custom tags are just a bit weird to me...
On 12/12/05, Chris Velevitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, you can:-
cfexit method=loop
Ah... Ugh! I'll add that to my list of why I don't like custom tags ;)
can be a custom tag. And so when CF parses such code, there is an
general rule that says, opening and
On 12/13/05, Ryan Guill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there then a way to read the license/EULA that I 'read' when I installed?
http://www.macromedia.com/software/eula/tools/
Section 4 covers upgrades.
--
Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/
Got frameworks?
If you're not annoying somebody,
On 12/13/05, Sean Corfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.macromedia.com/software/eula/tools/
List of all EULAs:
http://www.macromedia.com/software/eula/
--
Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/
Got frameworks?
If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive.
-- Margaret Atwood
On 12/13/05, Dawson, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At a recent Adobe User Group, the Adobe guy said Dec 31, 2005 is the
deadline for something related to upgrading to Studio 8. I don't
remember the details, since I already have 8, but I'm pretty sure it was
related to upgrading for a very
On 12/13/05, Chris Velevitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree, so why doesn't cf support this natively? One should be able to say:-
cftransaction retrycount=5
!-- my transaction, however complex, goes here --
/cftransaction
It sounds like a good enhancement request to
On 12/12/05, Chris Velevitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I use paired custom tags (see below), I get errors saying I need a
closing cftry or cfcatch tags.
Your tags don't match (i.e., they are not correctly nested). You
cannot split a try/catch across multiple tag executions like that.
--
On 12/12/05, Chris Velevitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/13/05, Sean Corfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your tags don't match (i.e., they are not correctly nested). You
cannot split a try/catch across multiple tag executions like that.
Yes, but how do I extend the cftransaction to do what
On 12/11/05, Snake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing that has always been lacking for CF is a decent forums product,
especially a free one.
Ray Camden's Galleon forums?
--
Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/
Got frameworks?
If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive.
--
On 12/10/05, Mike Chabot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a list of well-known Web sites that are powered by
ColdFusion and would like to know if anyone knows where I could find
such a list. The Macromedia.com showcase section is inadequate.
http://forta.com/cf/using/
--
Sean A
On 12/10/05, blists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a working web service that is deployed on CFMX 6.1. Our Dev Server
has CFMX 7.0 and the client that interacts with the webservice now returns an
error. Nothing has been changed. I compared the two WSDL files and they have
quote a few
501 - 600 of 1357 matches
Mail list logo
