Thanks, guys... :o)
Rick
<><
-Original Message-
From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 12:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: MM Rich Text Editor - WAS: RE: Macromedia Contribute
Multiple instances are almost as easy to set up as fo
com
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 6:09 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: MM Rich Text Editor - WAS: RE: Macromedia Contribute
The biggest question I would have in using it is how
to use it with multiple text fields to edit on
IL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 8:09 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: MM Rich Text Editor - WAS: RE: Macromedia Contribute
The biggest question I would have in using it is how
to use it with multiple text fields to edit on a single page.
e.g., if a client has an announcements page
page...one for each field?
Rick
<><
-Original Message-
From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 1:15 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: MM Rich Text Editor - WAS: RE: Macromedia Contribute
Nope. Its just a single-domain license. I have to say
EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 9:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: MM Rich Text Editor - WAS: RE: Macromedia Contribute
Looks good and easy to use.
Does $100 buy unlimited use of the product?
Rick
<><
-Original Message-
From: Tilbrook, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PR
- Original Message -
From: "Tilbrook, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 11:28 PM
Subject: RE: MM Rich Text Editor - WAS: RE: Macromedia Contribute
> ActivEdit from CFDEV (www.cfdev.com) is VERY go
Looks good and easy to use.
Does $100 buy unlimited use of the product?
Rick
<><
-Original Message-
From: Tilbrook, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 11:29 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: MM Rich Text Editor - WAS: RE: Macromedia Contribute
Activ
PROTECTED]
Telephone: (02) 6213 6731
Mobile: 0439 401 823
Facsimile: (02) 6213 7287
-Original Message-
From: Massimo, Tiziana e Federica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 12 December 2002 1:58 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: MM Rich Text Editor - WAS: RE: Macromedia Contribute
&quo
> > Yes, I had the same concerns and I came out with a custom solution:
> >
> > http://hh212167-174.chicagowebs.com/cfxhtml/
> >
> > I am still working on a few details, but you should get the picture
>
> Hi Massimo,
>
> That looks great. I was just plugging your DWMX extension version, we use
it a
"Kay Smoljak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
000901c2a16d$76f6ace0$0a00a8c0@blackhalo">news:000901c2a16d$76f6ace0$0a00a8c0@blackhalo...
> Take a look at Massimo's xhtmleditor -
>
http://www.macromedia.com/software/dreamweaver/special/extensions/#xhtml_edi
tor
>
> It doesn't have all the featu
Cantrell, Adam wrote:
> I'd like to see an editor that only defines classes in a div or a span, and
> which provides a default style sheet. The extent of the html would be very
> simple , , and XHTML compliant. One problem I see with this
> is pulling in word documents, or old HTML with tables an
Mike Chambers wrote:
> 1. you can change the color / skins for the component (either by
> adjusting the graphics (reskinning), or using styleProperties)
Thanks Mike - that's exactly what I wanted to know. Sounds great! At the moment we're
using Massimo's excellent xhtmleditor, but we have some
Massimo, Tiziana e Federica wrote:
> Yes, I had the same concerns and I came out with a custom solution:
>
> http://hh212167-174.chicagowebs.com/cfxhtml/
>
> I am still working on a few details, but you should get the picture
Hi Massimo,
That looks great. I was just plugging your DWMX extensio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 9:50 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: MM Rich Text Editor - WAS: RE: Macromedia Contribute
>
>
> Problem is pulling in either word or other text documents or older html
> documents from the database. There's no way a
r step, as from what I believe it's just an 'XML
standard that happens to have the syntax of html'.
Adam.
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 7:56 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: MM Rich Text
Adam.
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Pete Freitag [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 3:21 PM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: RE: MM Rich Text Editor - WAS: RE: Macromedia Contribute
> >
> >
> > Adam, in Acti
s more of a general complaint towards the common markup
woes that we still all have to deal with for some reason :)
Adam.
> -Original Message-
> From: Pete Freitag [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 3:21 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: MM Rich T
TED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 3:49 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: MM Rich Text Editor - WAS: RE: Macromedia Contribute
> Bleeaghhh... steaming pile of code turds.
Wow Krieg, thanks for the nice compliment. :)
---
Don Bellamy
SiteObjects, Inc.
http://www.siteobjects.com/
Tel (517) 324
r 10, 2002 1:33 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: MM Rich Text Editor - WAS: RE: Macromedia Contribute
I'd like to see an editor that only defines classes in a div or a span, and
which provides a default style sheet. The extent of the html would be very
simple , , and XHTML compliant. One problem
t;
> >You should look at soEditor also.
> >
> >http://www.siteobjects.com/pages/order.cfm?object=65&method=viewCart
> >
> >Tim
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Joshua Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 20
> I'd like to see an editor that only defines classes in a div or a span,
and
> which provides a default style sheet. The extent of the html would be very
> simple , , and XHTML compliant. One problem I see with
this
> is pulling in word documents, or old HTML with tables and invalid markup.
>
> I
That is a *nice* product
:)
-Original Message-
From: Kreig Zimmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 10:17 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: MM Rich Text Editor - WAS: RE: Macromedia Contribute
Bleeaghhh... steaming pile of code turds.
It's a case of &qu
]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 10:00 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: MM Rich Text Editor - WAS: RE: Macromedia Contribute
>
>
> I would think that given those abilities that integrating it into an
> intranet security context would provide functionality for permissions
;You should look at soEditor also.
>
>http://www.siteobjects.com/pages/order.cfm?object=65&method=viewCart
>
>Tim
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Joshua Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 11:00 AM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: MM Rich T
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 9:30 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Macromedia Contribute
>
>
> Samuel R. Neff wrote:
> > If that's what you want you can take a look at
> > MM's DRK2 which has a Rich Text Editor component for Flash.
> It can easily
> >
t; From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 9:32 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Macromedia Contribute
>
>
> There are built-in controls to limit users to a particular directory;
> disallow editing of scripts/includes/forms/ or even anything b
]
*
-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 11:32 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: MM Rich Text Editor - WAS: RE: Macromedia Contribute
I can't recommend anything. We have looked at everything and not found
one to our likely. We created a rich
r 10, 2002 11:22 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: MM Rich Text Editor - WAS: RE: Macromedia Contribute
>
> So what do you recommend Matt?
>
> Joshua Miller
> Head Programmer / IT Manager
> Garrison Enterprises Inc.
> www.garrisonenterp
]
*
-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 11:08 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: MM Rich Text Editor - WAS: RE: Macromedia Contribute
All of the Flash-based editors seem to suffer from the same problem;
they support a limited amount
dvise us by return e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
-Original Message-
From: Timothy Heald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 11:15 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: MM Rich Text Editor - WAS: RE:
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 10:32 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Macromedia Contribute
There are built-in controls to limit users to a particular directory;
disallow editing o
strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this e-mail in error please delete it immediately and
> advise us by return e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> *****
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From:
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 10:32 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Macromedia Contribute
There are built-in controls to limit users to a particular directory;
disallow editing of sc
erent permissions. Other than that, it's not really extensible for
permissions from what I can see.
-Kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Kay Smoljak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 8:30 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Macromedia Contribute
>
>
2002 9:30 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Macromedia Contribute
Samuel R. Neff wrote:
> If that's what you want you can take a look at
> MM's DRK2 which has a Rich Text Editor component for Flash. It can
easily
> be wrapped into a stand-alone widget for embedding in HTML and an
Samuel R. Neff wrote:
> If that's what you want you can take a look at
> MM's DRK2 which has a Rich Text Editor component for Flash. It can easily
> be wrapped into a stand-alone widget for embedding in HTML and an also be
> extended.
Does anyone have this, who would like to comment on how e
the
development/web community another choice.
Bruce
- Original Message -
From: "Samuel R. Neff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 7:07 AM
Subject: RE: Macromedia Contribute
> I really don't agr
I really don't agree that Contribute competes with CF developers, at least
not most of them. Contribute's main market is to replace the people that
use Dreamweaver templates to manage their sites.
A small shop with a web site or intranet with 2-5 content developers can
put up a pretty decent s
Is it not using anything else? Because we can FTP to the servers here and I even tried
setting my home directory as where to publish/view and it still gave an error. Yet it
worked instantly the first time on my personal server. I can "browse" the directory
structure down to where the web root is
Hmm...
True MM could have brought out a tool that generated CF pages where the
text or graphic placement could be edited in a template by the end
user...those pages would integrate with whatever custom code you as the
developer wrote, and would be something you rolled out with your
application.
A
I haven't used ActivEdit, but my understanding is it's just a WYSIWYG
textarea for editing HTML. If that's what you want you can take a look at
MM's DRK2 which has a Rich Text Editor component for Flash. It can easily
be wrapped into a stand-alone widget for embedding in HTML and an also be
e
At 03:27 PM 12/9/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>Another point in all of this, there is a lot more to a large web application
>than just the code. Networks, Routers, Firewalls, DB Servers, Environments,
>OS's etc etc. We offer very broad-based business solutions that cover all
>aspects of making web-base
ECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 3:02 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Macromedia Contribute
On 12/9/02, Matt Brown penned:
>Matt Brown here. I am the community manager for CT and Dreamweaver.
>
>I think you sum up the product really well in this paragraph. CT is
>designed to take aw
On 12/9/02, Matt Brown penned:
>Matt Brown here. I am the community manager for CT and Dreamweaver.
>
>I think you sum up the product really well in this paragraph. CT is
>designed to take away the simple and silly things that need changing, not
>the big updates and design changes. What our target
ceived this e-mail in error please delete it immediately and
advise us by return e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
-Original Message-
From: Pete Freitag [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002
er 09, 2002 3:48 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Macromedia Contribute
Depends on who we are talking about. Some business will be excited about
Contribute. Others will understand or find out the hard way that they
really need a CMS. Of course many are still finding out the hard way
that CMS is an
>Point is in some cases - this will free up some time and allow you to
>create more important changes. While allowing clients text only changes,
>most often than not - an enthusiastic client, whom sees delay changes =
>happy web surfers - they commit to larger and more frequent updates and
>therefo
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Macromedia Contribute
>
> Speaking of, does anyone know what it's using to connect to the server
(ie
> RPC)? I got it to try out and I managed to get it working fine to my
home
> server, but it does not work with any of the servers at work (a
Speaking of, does anyone know what it's using to connect to the server (ie RPC)? I got
it to try out and I managed to get it working fine to my home server, but it does not
work with any of the servers at work (all of which are Solaris). The only thing I can
think of is that it's using some daem
meet their future needs.
Matt Liotta
President & CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
888-408-0900 x901
> -Original Message-
> From: Joshua Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 3:11 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: R
ct API isn't implemented fully on Mac OSX browsers).
Applets do work quite well on Windows, and reasonably well on Linux however.
I can relate to Macromedia Contribute undercutting many of their customers,
I don't think its helping their popularity with the development community.
However custo
"
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 14:34:47 -0500
>
>
>
>
>
>Just got a snazzy tri-fold in the mail today about Macromedia
>
>Contribute
with outside applications
like Flash and Office.
Sam
At 02:34 PM 12/9/2002, you wrote:
>Just got a snazzy tri-fold in the mail today about Macromedia
>Contribute. It looks great, too bad it doesn't run on the web.
>
>Wouldn't it be nice to make Contribute a Java application tha
>then why do they need to pay you for a content management system?
Perhaps so he can continue to pay his kids tuition bill, the mortgage or
buy groceries? :)
Ken
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?fo
14:34:47 -0500
Just got a snazzy tri-fold in the mail today about Macromedia
Contribute. It looks great, too bad it doesn't run on the web.
Wouldn't it be nice to make Contribute a Java application that could be
integrated into an existing web-application to give this kind o
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
-Original Message-
From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 2:54 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Macromedia Contribute
Personally, my answer to that is an emph
oshua Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 14:34:47 -0500
>Just got a snazzy tri-fold in the mail today about Macromedia
>Contribute. It looks great, too bad it doesn't run on the web.
>
>Wouldn't it be nice to make Contr
Just got a snazzy tri-fold in the mail today about Macromedia
Contribute. It looks great, too bad it doesn't run on the web.
Wouldn't it be nice to make Contribute a Java application that could be
integrated into an existing web-application to give this kind of
power/control to us dev
Group -- Macromedia, Inc.
tel: (415) 252-2287 -- cell: (415) 717-8473
aim: seancorfield -- http://www.macromedia.com
An Architect's View -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
Introducing Macromedia Contribute. Web publishing for ev
eld -- http://www.macromedia.com
An Architect's View -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
Introducing Macromedia Contribute. Web publishing for everyone.
Learn more at http://www.macromedia.com/contribute
~|
Archives: http://
> Yeah - and another law is at work here. It's called
> Mark's PITA law (and it has nothing to do with animals).
> It's states:
> "...the smaller the fee the client is willing to pay, the
> bigger the PITA he or she will become"
> If you have trouble with my acronym, the first three words
> are "
esse Noller [mailto:jnoller@;macromedia.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:12 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: OT? Macromedia Contribute, is it Content
> Management or not?
>
>
> How is the creation of a new product "moving resources away"
> from ColdFusion?
>
>
to:jnoller@;macromedia.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:23 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: OT? Macromedia Contribute, is it Content Management or
not?
>
> /sigh
>
> I know Dave. I'm not claiming infinite resources. However, I don't
think
> that becomes a va
I want to run Macromedia.
That being said. I don't want to run Macromedia.
;)
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscri
age-
> From: Pete Ruckelshaus [mailto:cflist@;ruckelshaus.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:14 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: OT? Macromedia Contribute, is it Content
> Management or not?
>
>
> Heck, I think Contribute is a cool idea, my sister wants a
> s
I sure wish they'd fix some of the problems with existing products
before going in another direction.
Thanks,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwatts@;figleaf.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:23 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT? Macromedia Contribute, is it Co
-Original Message-
> From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwatts@;figleaf.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:23 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: OT? Macromedia Contribute, is it Content Management or not?
>
> > How is the creation of a new product "moving resources away"
> How is the creation of a new product "moving resources away"
> from ColdFusion?
If it's not, I'm glad to see that MM now has infinite resources. Woohoo!
Seriously, anything that MM does comes out of the same bucket o'resources,
so if you have a new product, that takes effort that you could spe
mber 12, 2002 3:12 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: OT? Macromedia Contribute, is it Content Management or
not?
>
> How is the creation of a new product "moving resources away" from
> ColdFusion?
>
>
> -jesse
>
>
> > -Original Message-
&g
How is the creation of a new product "moving resources away" from ColdFusion?
-jesse
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Liotta [mailto:mliotta@;r337.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:05 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: OT? Macromedia Contribute, is it
ginal Message -
From: "Judith Dinowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 2:00 PM
Subject: OT? Macromedia Contribute, is it Content Management or not?
> And how many have you seen succeed? ColdFusion started
h Dinowitz [mailto:jdinowit@;houseoffusion.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 2:01 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: OT? Macromedia Contribute, is it Content Management or not?
>
> And how many have you seen succeed? ColdFusion started as a 1.0. So
did
> Flash. This product may succeed a
And how many have you seen succeed? ColdFusion started as a 1.0. So did Flash. This
product may succeed as well.
What I'm trying to say is: It's fine to be cautious but why be so negative about it?
Let's give Contribute a chance, test it out on non-production servers, see how it
works. Maybe yo
Corfield -- Director, Architecture
Web Technology Group -- Macromedia, Inc.
tel: (415) 252-2287 -- cell: (415) 717-8473
aim: seancorfield -- http://www.macromedia.com
An Architect's View -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
Introducing Macromedia Contrib
I agree - all new clients for the past year are carefully accepted - but
funny thing is - that all this little piddly work that others ignore -
if handled right can be a profit point for someone else.
You just have to know how to deal with the PITA clients. When to ditch
them - when to price th
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:08 AM
Subject: RE: Contribute and Fusebox (WAS RE: OT? Macromedia
Contribute, is it Content Management or not?)
| Millions. And considering Dreamweaver is the best selling
web site
| de
Jay,
Yeah - and another law is at work here. It's called Mark's PITA law (and it
has nothing to do with animals). It's states:
"...the smaller the fee the client is willing to pay, the bigger the PITA he
or she will become"
If you have trouble with my acronym, the first three words are "Pain in
rocknaphobia Jones [ mailto:adrocknatalk@;hotmail.com
<mailto:adrocknatalk@;hotmail.com> ]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:39 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Contribute and Fusebox (WAS RE: OT? Macromedia Contribute,
is it Content Management or not?)
Well I'm curious about the
rom: Adrocknaphobia Jones [mailto:adrocknatalk@;hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:39 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Contribute and Fusebox (WAS RE: OT? Macromedia Contribute,
is it Content Management or not?)
Well I'm curious about the bottom line.
Is anyone planning on implementing Contribute in a
tson-Ravo, Neil (REC)
[mailto:Neil.Robertson-Ravo@;csd.reedexpo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:18 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Contribute and Fusebox (WAS RE: OT? Macromedia Contribute,
is it Content Management or not?)
I think there are going to be the pro camps and the con camps, I for one
xists. Not every MM product is for CF
developers.
-Kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (REC)
> [mailto:Neil.Robertson-Ravo@;csd.reedexpo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:18 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Contribute and Fusebox (WAS RE: OT? Ma
Great points, Sean.
In our shop, we have one person that does CF full time (me), one that does
it part time combined with design, one that just works on static sites, and
one student. We design/manage/support/build a couple of hundred websites. 72
of those are static and distributed (non-tech) sta
(WAS RE: OT? Macromedia Contribute,
is it Content Management or not?)
Millions. And considering Dreamweaver is the best selling web site
development app, it makes sense to have a lightweight, dumbed down content
editor for those Dreamweaver sites.
-Kevin
> -Original Message-
>
dexpo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:56 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Contribute and Fusebox (WAS RE: OT? Macromedia Contribute,
> is it Content Management or not?)
>
>
> and how many of those are around...? I mean true old fashioned
> pre db boom
> websites
-Original Message-
From: John Beynon [mailto:John.Beynon@;era.co.uk]
Sent: 12 November 2002 10:03
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Contribute and Fusebox (WAS RE: OT? Macromedia Contribute,
is it Content Management or not?)
Small businesses, one man shops etc - not everyone is going to shell out for
DWMX
[mailto:John.Beynon@;era.co.uk]
Sent: 12 November 2002 10:03
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Contribute and Fusebox (WAS RE: OT? Macromedia Contribute,
is it Content Management or not?)
Small businesses, one man shops etc - not everyone is going to shell out for
DWMX. We all know DW is way better than FrontPage
-
> From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (REC)
> [mailto:Neil.Robertson-Ravo@;csd.reedexpo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:56 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Contribute and Fusebox (WAS RE: OT? Macromedia
> Contribute, is it Content Management or not?)
>
>
> and
e rut' - there's a massive market out there of homeusers.
-Original Message-
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (REC)
[mailto:Neil.Robertson-Ravo@;csd.reedexpo.com]
Sent: 12 November 2002 09:56
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Contribute and Fusebox (WAS RE: OT? Macromedia Contribute, is
it Conten
and Fusebox (WAS RE: OT? Macromedia Contribute,
is it Content Management or not?)
What do you expect for $99? It's not meant for editing web applications,
simply for editing websites!
jb
-Original Message-
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (REC)
[mailto:Neil.Robertson-Ravo@;csd.reedexp
(WAS RE: OT? Macromedia Contribute, is
it Content Management or not?)
yep, it hasnt not been thought through.,..if you have any kind of page which
is not, lets say, normal..it will freak la sheek.
-Original Message-
From: David Notik [mailto:dave@;digital202.com]
Sent: 11 November 2002
and how many 1.0 have we seen get canned..?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jdinowit@;houseoffusion.com]
Sent: 12 November 2002 03:42
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT? Macromedia Contribute, is it Content Management or not?
Keep in mind, this is a 1.0 release right now
? Macromedia Contribute, is
it Content Management or not?)
Hmmm, it doesn't look like it works too well with Fusebox. It loaded
the first page, index.cfm, and then loaded all linked pages and graphics
(which is *everything*, since it all goes through index.cfm
Fusebox-style). Then it wouldn
:56
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT? Macromedia Contribute, is it Content Management or not?
that is incorrect.
from:
http://www.macromedia.com/software/contribute/productinfo/faq/#1_7
-
Does Contribute work with dynamic web pages?
Macromedia Contribute can edit static HTML on any web page
> Topic: Macromedia Contribute
> http://www.macromedia.com/desdev/contribute/
>
> Poking around the site, it sure as heck looks like some sort
> of content management system, but MACR seems to go to great
> pains to NOT us the "Content Management" moniker. The
&g
LOL - That is hilarious and I really should have put a disclaimer in
there regarding that.!
I may with your permission possibly post this with any inquries
regarding this software <*grin>
All kidding aside though - I would think others out there will inform
clients of the do's and don'ts and poten
Keep in mind, this is a 1.0 release right now. (And it's not even released yet --
It's a pre-release.) I think that the idea has a lot of merit, and I'd like to see it
work and make things easier for Web publishing in general.
I will be testing this out and using it on a smaller website. I'll b
MAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 8:53 PM
Subject: Re: OT? Macromedia Contribute, is it Content
Management or not?
| Monday, November 11, 2002, 6:07:47 PM, Jason Miller wrote:
|
| > Personally - if this is really what it is - Finally a
light means to
| > edit simple stuff that a
Monday, November 11, 2002, 6:07:47 PM, Jason Miller wrote:
> Personally - if this is really what it is - Finally a light means to
> edit simple stuff that a developer or a serious designer get's tired of
> editing - like "Today's Specials" - it will be great.
And so begins the next round between
On Monday, Nov 11, 2002, at 12:44 US/Pacific, Sandy Clark wrote:
> My initial feel from looking at the stuff is this is going to be mostly
> meant for smaller sites that use Dreamweaver MX to setup the template
> editing areas with defined static areas for Contribute users to modify
> and hands off
"Jason Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:3DD04653.3090507@;etcnj.com...
> There are quite a few hurdles I am curious about - like if the specials
> have dynamic links or pages written in coldfusion how it handles it or
> rather - does not interfere with it - I will be ecstatic to ha
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
