On Wednesday 07 Apr 2004 17:06 pm, Bryan Stevenson wrote:
cfheader statusCode = 302 statusText = Document Moved.
Just those two one the page ? No fusebox or anything ?
Not that I know of Dave...where do you suggest I look? on the client? with
the ISP hosting this co-located server? somewhere
-
Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
Founder Director
www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Chiverton
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: CF MX/Linux/Apache/Cookie madness
On Wednesday 07
Yes we do.We stick the query in the cookie and then have to
use the code below becauase we can't use CFLOCATION after
setting a cookie:
!--- Send user to the next page in the registration process ---
cfheader name=location value=public.cfm?pg=reg_2
cfheader statusCode = 302 statusText =
-
From: Dave Watts
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 10:08 AM
Subject: RE: CF MX/Linux/Apache/Cookie madness
Yes we do.We stick the query in the cookie and then have to
use the code below becauase we can't use CFLOCATION after
setting a cookie:
!--- Send user to the next page
Solution : Dont use ODBC Driver with MS-SQL Server.
Options
1. Checkout the Microsoft JDBC Driver for MS-SQL (Better Performance)
Or
2. You can use the CFMX JDBC Driver
HTH
Joe Eugene
-Original Message-
From: Chad Nikirk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 8:44 PM
To:
Do you have virus scanning software on that server and active during
install? I've had installs barf on me because of that.
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 15:25, Andrew Scott wrote:
Hoping that someone might be able to shed some light on a problem I am
having, have installed coldfusion a number of times
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 24 February 2004 10:31 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF MX 6.1 install problem with installanywhere
Do you have virus scanning software on that server and active during
install? I've had installs barf on me because of that.
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 15:25, Andrew Scott wrote
, 24 February 2004 10:31 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF MX 6.1 install problem with installanywhere
Do you have virus scanning software on that server and active during
install? I've had installs barf on me because of that.
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 15:25, Andrew Scott wrote:
Hoping
Street
South Melbourne, Victoria, 3205
Phone: 03 9686 0485-Fax: 03 9699 7976
_
From: Rob Rohan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 24 February 2004 10:42 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF MX 6.1 install problem with installanywhere
You can try this to get a clue (from zerog.com):
Debugging
Cfgraph was deprecated in favor of cfchart in MX
_
From: Nick Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 5:30 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CF MX CFGRAPH
Developed some graphing (Line graphs) on CF 5.0 and it worked.When I
uploaded to a ColdFusion MX server, at
Sandy,
Thanks for the info and CFCHART has some improved features, but how do you
label the X-Axis of a line chart?
I am using both CFCHART and CFCHARTSERIES and tried CFCHARTDATA, but
CFCHARTDATA creates errors
The best I can tell is that the itemColumn attribute of CFCHART would be
the
Sure, no problem.
Stephen E. Schuster
PeopleSoft Administrator
2000 Ashland Drive
Ashland, KY 41101
Office Phone 606.920.7447
Cell Phone 606.831.4590
_
From: Andrew Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 6:45 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF MX 6.1 and com objects
: RE: CF MX 6.1 and com objects
You probably do indeed have it working but not natively. .NET is the
replacement for COM. COM has a different internal architecture from .NET and
thus they are not compatibility natively. That is why you have to use the
RCW which translates specific calls from managed
Stephen E. Schuster
PeopleSoft Administrator
2000 Ashland Drive
Ashland, KY 41101
Office Phone 606.920.7447
Cell Phone 606.831.4590
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 7:49 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF MX 6.1 and com objects
, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 8:53 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF MX 6.1 and com objects
You probably do indeed have it working but not natively. .NET is the
replacement for COM. COM has a different internal architecture from .NET and
thus
Bank Street
South Melbourne, Victoria, 3205
Phone: 03 9686 0485-Fax: 03 9699 7976
_
From: Schuster, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 7 January 2004 12:53 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF MX 6.1 and com objects
You probably do indeed have it working but not natively. .NET
Sorry I should have also said that this is the error that I am getting as
well
The cause of this exception was that:
coldfusion.runtime.com.ComObjectInstantiationException: An exception
occurred when instantiating a Com object..
Regards
Andrew Scott
Technical Consultant
NuSphere Pty Ltd
Can't give you a complete answer but a part of one.
It has something to do with interfaces.CFMX requires the IDispatch
interface and something I read in a forum from a tech support person is that
.NET components don't expose this by default.The .NET docs indicate that
.NET COM wrappers are in
Are you trying to use a COM wrapper for a .NET object? If so, I would
recommend skipping the pain that is the Java-COM bridge and instead use
Black Knight
(http://montarasoftware.com/go/9d58a59e-df02-1157-affb-e87c411e1c8f).
Matt Liotta
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.MontaraSoftware.com
On
: 03 9699 7976
_
From: Samuel R. Neff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 6 January 2004 10:42 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF MX 6.1 and com objects
Can't give you a complete answer but a part of one.
It has something to do with interfaces.CFMX requires the IDispatch
interface
January 2004 10:51 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF MX 6.1 and com objects
Are you trying to use a COM wrapper for a .NET object? If so, I would
recommend skipping the pain that is the Java-COM bridge and instead use
Black Knight
(http://montarasoftware.com/go/9d58a59e-df02-1157-affb-e87c411e1c8f
, January 05, 2004 7:04 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF MX 6.1 and com objects
Matt,
How the hell do you think you know what I am doing...
Were did I say I was creating a wrapper, I am developing a
com object nothing more nothing less. The object has business
logic that will be widley used
.Net does support com, I have it working here now. Secondly I am creating
code that can be used by Windows Applications as well as ASP applications
and coldfusion applications that will share common business logic.
Blacknight does not support what I am trying to achive, so I am correct when
I say
Try turning on trusted cache in your cfmx admin. For me, that makes the
biggest difference in performance since the files live on a mapped drive,
which is slow.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Everland III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 10:06 AM
To: CF-Talk
Silly thought, but if you use CFCs extensively AND have the debugging
service enabled (even if you're not displaying the information) then you can
see a HUGE performance drop due to all the method calls being logged by the
debugger.
I've got one process that ran 122 seconds with debugging on,
cfloop list=#variables.my_table_fields# index=x
CFSET structDelete(form,#x#)
cfparam name=form.#x# default=#qSelProgTable[#x#]#
/cfloop
I don't believe you can use StructDelete() on scopes. I would rewrite
the code as follows.
cfloop
, November 10, 2003 1:49 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF MX 6.1 Migration issue
cfloop list=#variables.my_table_fields# index=x
CFSET structDelete(form,#x#)
cfparam name=form.#x# default=#qSelProgTable[#x#]#
/cfloop
I don't believe you can use StructDelete() on scopes. I
The code works, but since variables changed over to structures in CF MX I am
get the error with cfinsert and cfupdate.
Thanks,
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: chris kief [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 5:00 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF MX 6.1 Migration
I don't believe you can use StructDelete() on scopes.
Within CFMX, you can use StructDelete, or any other structure function, on
almost any scope, as they are all exposed as writeable structures.
Although, you may not be able to set values in the form
scope either as some scopes have become
People,
thanks a lot to you for opinions about MX book!
Alex Timchur
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4
Unsubscribe:
We are kinda biased to Ben Forta et al's books - they've sold truckloads -
but many other fine authors are out there too. I'm looking for a 6.1 looking
title myself.
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4
We are kinda biased to Ben Forta et al's books - they've sold truckloads -
but many other fine authors are out there too. I'm looking for a 6.1
looking
title myself.
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coldfusion2/
Massimo Foti
Certified Dreamweaver MX Developer
uncle bens
advanced macromedia cfmx app dev. is always a nice read!
tony weeg
sr. web applications architect
navtrak, inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.navtrak.net
office 410.548.2337
fax 410.860.2337
-Original Message-
From: Alexandr Timchur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September
Rob Brooks-Bilson has a book published by O'Reilley which has content for 6.1 release
of CFMX. It is called Programming ColdFusion MX, 2nd Edition and you can find
details here in our blog.
http://www.webapper.net/index.cfm?fuseaction=Fuseblog.ShowCommentsArticleID=20030818084646
Hth
Kind
Alex:
You're going to get a slew of different answers here, so by the time
everybody chimes in, just about every mx book will have been mentioned :)
but i'll throw in a ringing endorsement for the MX Bible by Churvis,
Churvis, Arehart, and Helms.
charlie
- Original Message -
From:
I have been very pleased with Mastering ColdFusion MX' by 'Danesh, Camden,
Bainum and Rish' published by Sybex.
It's a mighty heavy book to lug around... but for a 'keep it nearby complete
reference', it can't be beat.
The examples are clear and simple... and the book is very well edited.
--
Buy them all, you know you want to.
Really though, we bought several that on the face would cover the same
material. But when you actually peruse them, they each have different
strengths. But I agree that many of them cover material that is often
unneeded.
To the authors:
I'd love separate,
.
Hal Helms
See halhelms.com for classes in...
Java for ColdFusion Programmers
Fusebox 4
Mach-II
OO Applications with CFCs
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 3:28 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF MX *right* book.
Buy them all, you
If one can develop a well-focused book I would be more than willing to
donate some money to help the author self-publish.
-Original Message-
From: Hal Helms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 5:11 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF MX *right* book.
Thanks
, September 12, 2003 3:28 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF MX *right* book.
Buy them all, you know you want to.
Really though, we bought several that on the face would cover the same
material. But when you actually peruse them, they each have different
strengths. But I agree that many of them cover
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 5:11 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF MX *right* book.
Thanks for the kind words. I agree with you about having small,
well-focused books but the big publishers (and a depressingly large
number of developers) seem to judge books on a dollar per pound
Not technical enough for me.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 5:17 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF MX *right* book.
The Reality books fall into this category - FlashMX integration, J2EE
integration, etc.
- Jim
Bryan F
-
From: Hal Helms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 5:10 PM
Subject: RE: CF MX *right* book.
Thanks for the kind words. I agree with you about having small,
well-focused books but the big publishers (and a depressingly large
number of developers
We just switched to MX and can not get the scheduler to work.
We have an SSL site. We can not allow basic authentication on
the main site so we made another site just for the schedule
jobs. We made it basic auth. We can get the pages to run in
the borwser but get the following in the cf
Are you able to resolve the URL in a browser on the server console? If not,
the machine might not be resolving DNS queries correctly.
If you mean by clicking on the Run Schedule Task button on the schedule tasks
screen, we did try this. That is how we are getting the error.
Since you've
Are you able to resolve the URL in a browser on the server
console? If not, the machine might not be resolving DNS queries
correctly.
If you mean by clicking on the Run Schedule Task button on the
schedule tasks screen, we did try this. That is how we are getting
the error.
No, I
Thanks Benoit!
That took care of it. I figured that since a few people said that they had
similar issues that I should make sure everyone knew what fixed it for me.
Thanks again.
Buddy
-Original Message-
From: CF-Talk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 3:01 AM
To:
I had a similar error last week.
When using date comparison with QoQ with MX, you need to use cfqueryparam
value=#someDate# cfsqltype=CF_SQL_DATE.
Benoit Hediard
www.benorama.com
-Message d'origine-
De : Buddy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mercredi 18 juin 2003 02:08
À :
I'd guess it was the where section. Try commenting out and see if it works.
Is TDate a datetime column? Try getting rid of the dateFormat() functions.
IMO these are presentation functions that should only ever be used when you
want to display your data in a human-friendly form.
TDATE
Hey Buddy,
I don't have an answer for you, but I've had (and alot of others apparently)
issues with QofQs and MX. It tends to whine about datatypes when there is
nothing to whine about. Seacrh the list archives on MX and QofQs as some
folks have previously posted workarounds. Ultimately I had
Emily, we are trying to do something similar at present (not specifically
webmail) not quite there yet. We did not write the bean and we are having
to use CF50 so our experience may not help you but I will let you know if we
succeed and how.
Kind Regards - Mike Brunt
Webapper Services LLC
Web
Well, thank you both for responding. In a word that SUCKS big time.
Sometimes I have to ask where is Macromedia brain at?
David
- Original Message -
From: Jochem van Dieten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: CF MX
David Brown wrote:
Well, thank you both for responding. In a word that SUCKS big time.
Sometimes I have to ask where is Macromedia brain at?
Tossing out RDS security (or maybe just RDS completely), but providing a
free developers edition instead seems a reasonable solution to me.
Jochem
On Thursday 13 Feb 2003 14:18 pm, David Brown wrote:
Well, thank you both for responding. In a word that SUCKS big time.
Sometimes I have to ask where is Macromedia brain at?
This is why M don't suggest you enable RDS in production.
--
Tom C
The Good Lord is subtle, but never malicious
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 9:19 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF MX Enterprise Security
Well, thank you both for responding. In a word that SUCKS big time.
Sometimes I have to ask where is Macromedia brain at?
David
- Original Message -
From: Jochem van Dieten [EMAIL
Well, thank you both for responding. In a word that
SUCKS big time. Sometimes I have to ask where is
Macromedia brain at?
I think it's worth remembering that Macromedia, like any other company, has
finite resources available. Previous versions of CF used SiteMinder, a
third-party product
Could someone tell me how to limit what drives and folders in DW MX or Home
Site connecting to a CF MX Enterprise server. I have enabled sandbox
security, but it does not seem to limit what drives a user see when login in
via RDS. I don't see a way to assign security based on username.
David
, February 11, 2003 1:22 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF MX Enterprise Security
Could someone tell me how to limit what drives and folders in DW MX or
Home Site connecting to a CF MX Enterprise server. I have enabled
sandbox security, but it does not seem to limit what drives a user see
when login
David Brown wrote:
Could someone tell me how to limit what drives and folders in DW MX or Home
Site connecting to a CF MX Enterprise server. I have enabled sandbox
security, but it does not seem to limit what drives a user see when login in
via RDS. I don't see a way to assign security
You might want to look at iMS-SE. iMS-SE is a high-performance mail sending engine
for ColdFusion that has several
advanced features and does not require the use of an external email server.
Regards,
--
Howie Hamlin - inFusion Project Manager
On-Line Data Solutions, Inc. - www.CoolFusion.com
templatesbrbr
48 : input type=submit value=Install Nowbrbr
49 : /cfform
-Original Message-
From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2003 11:36 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF MX Mail
You might want to look at iMS-SE. iMS-SE is a high-performance mail sending
engine
The FusionMail installer relies on CFREGISTRY - do you have that disabled?
Regards,
Howie
- Original Message -
From: Tilbrook; Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 9:11 PM
Subject: RE: CF MX Mail
I noticed fusion mail doesn't work
James Alexander wrote:
I'm getting ready to upgrade a test machine from RC1 to RC2 and was
curious if anyone know of the issue between CFMX and RC1 was resolved
to
that I might finally be able to get MX on a 2K3 server.
I've had CFMX running on RC1 for over 6 months now... You just have to
Doh, I'd looked everyone for a work-around months ago and wasn't able to
find one. Do you know which key specifically that I need to edit?
- James
-Original Message-
From: Kay Smoljak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 6:30 PM
To: CF-Talk
James Alexander wrote:
Great! Thanks!
- James
-Original Message-
From: Kay Smoljak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 6:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: James Alexander
James Alexander wrote:
Doh, I'd looked everyone for a work-around months ago and wasn't able
to
find one. Do you
James Alexander wrote:
Doh, I'd looked everyone for a work-around months ago and wasn't able
to
find one. Do you know which key specifically that I need to edit?
OK, found the page: http://phydiux.com/cfmx_and_IIS6/
HTH,
Kay.
I use CFMX and fusebox without any problems. Everything IS Attribute
Scoped. No special config needed.
Brook
At 03:53 PM 1/13/2003 -0800, you wrote:
What a headache! One of my clients recently upgraded to CF MX from CF
5.0. Here is a problem that we had, I was wondering if anyone else has
seen
Yeah, worked fine on the dev box, was not sure what was happening
Robert Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Famous for nothing!
http://www.tinetics.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 5:52 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF
What does the COM object due? Perhaps there is a Java alternative that
would work much better in CFMX.
Make sure you've installed UR2.
At 06:10 PM 1/8/2003, you wrote:
I am having trouble getting this object to work via cold fusion. Works
fine in asp.
In ASP file
'Create ID3Edit object set
David,
I had the same problems when I upgraded to MX. I was using CFXid3 or
something like that, and it was using a COM object. The object for one
reason or the other wouldn't always load, and when it did, it wasn't
reliable. Sometimes locking up my treads.
So I moved everything over to a java
David,
One big question -- CFMX or CF5 (or 4.5)?
CFMX uses the jIntegra Java-COM bridge which is doesn't like poorly written
COM objects (objects that work just fine in ASP). And it doesn't like some
perfectly fine COM objects :) Tough job running COM under Java.
If you're using ColdFusion 5,
: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 11:16 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF MX cfobject
David,
One big question -- CFMX or CF5 (or 4.5)?
CFMX uses the jIntegra Java-COM bridge which is doesn't like poorly
written
COM objects (objects that work just fine in ASP). And it doesn't like
some
perfectly fine COM
You could use the Java Native Interface and create some wrapper classes that
you could instantiate in CFMX.
- Original Message -
From: David D Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 9:50 PM
Subject: RE: CF MX cfobject
Thanks, I am running
you can leave them on just fine, you must
only make sure to shut down the cf application
service.
tony
-Original Message-
From: Matthew P. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:21 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: cf mx install
Should you shut down the ms-sql
I did an add/remove programs on cfmx after shutting down the three mx
services. Clean boot and then install.
Thanks for the help,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 9:30 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cf mx install
you
very good.
later. tw
-Original Message-
From: Matthew P. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:40 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cf mx install
I did an add/remove programs on cfmx after shutting down the three mx
services. Clean boot and then install
DDE wrote:
Looks like the usage of Lower() function in a query of query does not
work as in standard SQL.
Simple example: if you have a table containing names ( first_name
middle_name and last_name) the following query of query :
cfquery name=myquery dbtype=query
select * from
I believe qoq has a very limited set of functions available. To get around
that, I set the original query to also retrieve the name in lower case and
in my qoq, search on the lower case set field.
e.g
cfquery name=qry1 datasource=bar
Select firstname, lower(firstname) as lower_first from
Hi Jochem,
It is exactly what I meant, the Lower() causes the problem.
In my case, it's not easy to add an intermediate QoQ since my QoQ is
generated dynamically on a lot of criteria entered in a form by a user.
I guess I'll have to use Oracle vues instead of QoQ in the mean time ..
by the
;cfex.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 5:45 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF MX Query of Query Lower() Function
I believe qoq has a very limited set of functions available. To get around
that, I set the original query to also retrieve the name in lower case and
in my qoq, search on the lower case
D. Delcomminette wrote:
by the way what does the mean time exactly means ??
It is a typo, it is supposed to be meantime :) Which in this case is
the time between submitting the bug to Macromedia, for which I posted
the link, and the time Macromedia fixes it.
Jochem
PROTECTED]
WWW : www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus
Yahoo IM : morpheus
My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is. - Yoda
-Original Message-
From: D. Delcomminette [mailto:dde;ingecom.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 9:10 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF MX Query of Query Lower
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF MX Query of Query Lower() Function
D. Delcomminette wrote:
by the way what does the mean time exactly means ??
It is a typo, it is supposed to be meantime :) Which in this case is
the time between submitting the bug to Macromedia, for which I posted
the link
Raymond Camden wrote:
CFMX Query of Query has an lcase function. You could use this to do a
non-case sensitive type search. This function did not exist in CF5
QofQ however.
LCase() throws an syntax error and is not in the docs [1], whereas
Lower() is and only throws a null exception when it
CFMX Query of Query has an lcase function. You could use
this to do a
non-case sensitive type search. This function did not exist in CF5
QofQ however.
LCase() throws an syntax error and is not in the docs [1], whereas
Lower() is and only throws a null exception when it gets to
Raymond Camden wrote:
It's what I get for posting before coffee. Yes, Lower() is right, not
Lcase. So the issue is that it's not handling a null value in the
column?
Yes. But I presume Dominique has already filled out the bug form.
Jochem
Yes I did,
Dominique
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:jochemd;oli.tudelft.nl]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 8:12 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF MX Query of Query Lower() Function
Raymond Camden wrote:
It's what I get for posting before coffee. Yes, Lower
Jochem van Dieten wrote:
[..]
Code to wrap lines using a loop and Insert() was significantly slower on
CF MX as CF 5. Complete thread can be found in the archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=messagesthreadid=14563forumid=4
[..]
The numbers:
CF 5
Community driven bug-hunt:
http://www.cfbughunt.org/
~Todd
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Smith, Matthew P -CONT(DYN) wrote:
Is there a somewhere that I can find the following:
1.Known bugs/limitations with CF MX
2.Known issues with CF5 apps sent over to a MX server.
Boss wants to know
you might want to look at this.
http://livedocs.macromedia.com/cfmxdocs/Migrating_ColdFusion_5_Applications/
contents.htm
- Original Message -
From: Smith, Matthew P -CONT(DYN) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 10:48 AM
Subject: CF MX
Hmmm, can't get that page to come up
~~
Stephenie Hamilton
Macromedia Certified ColdFusion Professional
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 10:53 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF MX bugs/transition problems info
ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is. - Yoda
-Original Message-
From: Stephenie Hamilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 11:38 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF MX bugs/transition problems info
Hmmm, can't get that page to come up
~~
Stephenie
for Hire
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo IM : cfjedimaster
My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is. - Yoda
-Original Message-
From: Stephenie Hamilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 11:38 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF MX bugs/transition
Community driven bug-hunt:
http://www.cfbughunt.org/
Doesn't seem to work. Anyone else?
__
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more
resources for the community.
Yeah, it's sporadic at best for some odd reason. Keep checking it.
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Everett, Al wrote:
Community driven bug-hunt:
http://www.cfbughunt.org/
Doesn't seem to work. Anyone else?
--
Todd Rafferty ([EMAIL
CF 5MX JRE 1.3MX JRE 1.4
9 KB405060
24 KB 240 3300 7000
84 KB 670013174000
ah that would explain my sucky numbers for cfmx. ah, let them eat i18n
cake ;-)
---
Outgoing mail is certified
Joe Eugene wrote:
I noticed on my Dev box... when you open server docs...
http://127.0.0.1/cfdocs/dochome.htm
Does this have anything to do with the JRE... Docs say
Note: The search dialog works with the J2SE 1.4.0 JRE, J2SE 1.3.1_02 JRE,
and J2SE1.3.1_03 JRE, and with the corresponding SDKs
mark brinkworth wrote:
Was the page encoding the same for both? I would suspect that putting
cfprocessingdirective pageencoding = UTF-8
on the CFMX page would speed it up.
Makes a difference of maybe a few percent (in the wrong way actually),
while we're talking a performance
Paul Hastings wrote:
just to toss in another monkey wrench, might useful to note JRE version (i'm
using 1.4 for its improved i18n stuff) if any patches were applied to
either version.
Was running:
JVM Details
Java Version 1.3.1_03
Java VendorSun
On my dev server, it takes 1232 ms for a 29k file.
My devserver is CFMX / WinNT/ 800 Cellaron w/ 128 megs
At 09:16 PM 30/07/02 +0200, you wrote:
Could somebody who has CF MX on the same machine as some older version
of CF test the script below for me? I find the results a bit disturbing
at
101 - 200 of 400 matches
Mail list logo
