Dan/Les thanks. I was aware of the other methods and was hoping I could have
conditional logic in one CSS file. IE really is a PITA!
-Original Message-
From: Les Mizzell [mailto:lesm...@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 10:59 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: CSS Conditionals
On 8/11/2011 10:15 AM, Che Vilnonis wrote:
>
> I know how to call/import different CSS files using statements like this:
>
Everything goes here
In my CSS
#myParaStyle { ... stuff for most }
#IEroot #myParaStyle { ...stuff just for IE }
I am aware of one technique that internet explorer employs in order to
achieve something like what you are looking for, but this doesn't help you
for other browsers.
You alsmost have to have some logic and then include different css files if
you really want something extravagant.
Check out this
Rick Root wrote:
> Anyone want to take a gander at this?
>
> http://www.opensourcecf.com/cfopenchat/layout.html
>
> In the above layout, I only want to hard code the width and height in
> the outermost div (the inside of that div will be code generated)
>
> This works great in Chrome and IE.. b
I recently installed the Amateras plug-in on the recommendation of someone
on the
list. (Jim?) It's doing a great job with CSS, JS, and JSP editing. I think
it handles XML, too,
but I don't do XML, so I'm not sure about that. I tried Aptana, too, but it
was wy to pushy.
I don't even know th
Web Tools Project?
Mark
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Jake Pilgrim wrote:
>
> Hi everyone, does anyone have any recommendations for a CSS editor for
> eclipse galileo? I used to use aptana, but it just does WAAAY more than i
> need it to, and it seems to get in the way of CFEclipse at times
Ah, I had forgotten about border="0" on the table tag. I was setting border
properties and such via css on the table cells but had forgotten about the
old school table html tag options. Show's how much table layout I'm doing
these days. Your suggestion seems to be solving my problem. And by solid
Solid background behind table headers?.must be the pm slump because I
can't think what you mean, but maybe the stuff below will help.
I am using border-collapse and setting borders on all my table cells, like
this:
I am setting font and background color in the class as you can see from my
I'm getting closer to what I want with a table layout. One thing I can't
seem to get so far is a solid background behind table headers.
border-collapse works in a browser but isn't supported by the cfdocument.
Setting border-spacing, padding and margin all to 0 doesn't seem to do it
either.
Any t
I should have mentioned that I had to put everything in tables for layout.
I also removed every non-basic CSS thing I had. I ended up with a print
version and a simle print style sheet and the web version with its own
nicer style sheet.
My client had what is basically an accounting spreadsheet t
Font sizes I specified in pt instead of em and I tried to do everything in
percentages with no px definitions under the theory that pdf is a vector
format. No love.
Thanks for all the ideas being tossed out though.
Judah
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Randi Knutson wrote:
>
> I use an alte
I use an alternate style sheet that sets fonts to a point size instead of
em and has a fixed width. Even then, I sometimes run into an odd scaling
down effect if there is too much data. Also, if you have images that you
are resizing for the web, make an alternate actual size image for the pdf.
The CSS file is definitely being included, so that's good. And I haven't
tried to do anything with images yet, thankfully. Perhaps I need to move to
a fixed-width layout using inches as units instead of percentages. Or maybe
tables. Blech.
Thanks for that link though, I haven't looked at that one
This is pretty old but it might be helpful.
http://www.coldfusionmuse.com/index.cfm/2006/2/16/cfdocument.performance
The main thing to realize is that converting HTML to PDF is really a trick -
going from a fluid medium to a very staticky and specific medium. Unless
your HTML is already pretty
Also, floats don't work correctly in cfdocument.
-Original Message-
From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 1:17 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: css and cfdocument...grrr
Ok, I know cfdocument is finicky about the html it tries to render into a
pdf. I h
> >I actually think you're not supposed to use quotes at all with CSS
> url paths
> >( can anyone confirm/deny? )
>
> Quotes are optional, and can be single or double if used.
>
> Without quotes, you need to escape parentheses, whitespace, commas,
> and quotes - using either backslashes or url
>I actually think you're not supposed to use quotes at all with CSS url paths
>( can anyone confirm/deny? )
Quotes are optional, and can be single or double if used.
Without quotes, you need to escape parentheses, whitespace, commas, and quotes
- using either backslashes or url encoding.
With
I actually think you're not supposed to use quotes at all with CSS url paths
( can anyone confirm/deny? )
So this would be what browsers would expect according to the CSS spec:
>
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Don L wrote:
>
> >see if that single quote in your bg image url is
>see if that single quote in your bg image url is playing tricks on you
>(unless it's a typo or bad copy/paste...)
>your first machine may be just serving cached pages and that's why you
>still see the bg rendered correctly on it: hard-refresh the page to
>check for sure (ctrl+shift+r in FF, or, i
see if that single quote in your bg image url is playing tricks on you
(unless it's a typo or bad copy/paste...)
your first machine may be just serving cached pages and that's why you
still see the bg rendered correctly on it: hard-refresh the page to
check for sure (ctrl+shift+r in FF, or, iirc,
You probably need to add Cache-Control and possibly Pragma headers fro
the cache to work.
mxAjax / CFAjax docs and other useful articles:
http://www.bifrost.com.au/blog/
2009/1/22 Wil Genovese :
> Well, I have to take that back. I was positive it was caching, but
> now I can't seem to make it
Well, I have to take that back. I was positive it was caching, but
now I can't seem to make it do so. But it still reads the style info
properly.
Using Firebug to view my NET activity show that the cfm style sheet is
reloaded every time even after turing on Coldfusion caching. I added
a
Adrian,
I had to test this since this is something I wanted to do for
generating style sheets from users preferences saved in a DB.
I can get the style sheet to cache using cfheader. I also used
cfcontent to set the text/css content type so as far as the browser
knows it has received nothi
Adrian,
Merging all CSS and JS into a single download is done all the time in
the ASP.NET world. I think this would be considered a best-practice
for Web-site programming. You should be able to keep the .css
extension on the original file and cfinclude it into the cfm file.
This is easier to pull o
The only main downside to this is that browsers may not cache the style
and|or script files as it would with normal file extensions increasing
bandwidth and load times for web pages. I believe this can be mitigated
with some proper headers added to these files with the
tags, but I have never
I haven't, but I've been thinking about this a lot lately. We just hired a
CSS firm that produced some nice looking results, but the underlying CSS is
hard to follow.
Have you started playing with any of these yet?
Personally I'd really like CSS that doesn't require a ton of classes and IDs
to me
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 9:44 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CSS Question
I don't blindly hate them, and I'm pretty sure that it's valid CSS.
I want a common set of selectors that will work predictably (and in the same
way) in every browser, that will cov
need to take the blame for lots of things,
> but not everything they do is wrong.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 8:57 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CSS Question
>
> as long as M$ is in the
and for public sites you're absolutely right. But
the application is for a College, the requirements state that it has to
work in both...I'm just glad they didn't include
Safari and IE7 for the Mac.
Claude Schneegans wrote:
> >>Or a browser that adheres to the standard?
>
> C'mon, we are in
---
From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 8:57 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CSS Question
as long as M$ is in the game that will *never* happen
Dave Francis wrote:
> Or a browser that adheres to the standard?
>
> -Original Message-
>
>>Or a browser that adheres to the standard?
C'mon, we are in a developer forum here, any developer should be concern
by the way their application behaves on the client side, and like it or not,
about 80% of client use Explorer.
~~~
>>I really really wish that someone would come up with a standard that
will work in every browser.
In my experience:
1. option tag cannot include any HTML child;
2. option style only support color, no background, no bold, italic or so.
as long as M$ is in the game that will *never* happen
Dave Francis wrote:
> Or a browser that adheres to the standard?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 9:44 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subj
Or a browser that adheres to the standard?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 9:44 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CSS Question
Updates:
I used a style attribute in the option tag
(background-image:(url=images/imagename
Updates:
I used a style attribute in the option tag
(background-image:(url=images/imagename)) it works in FF3 but does
absolutely nothing in IE7
I really really wish that someone would come up with a standard that
will work in every browser.
Scott Stewart wrote:
>
> get_category.hex_id>sele
>
>>
>> Sandra Clark
>> =
>> http://www.shayna.com
>> Training and Consulting in CSS and Accessibility
>> Team Fusebox
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
color
>> tags
>>
>>
>> Sandra Clark
>> =
>> http://www.shayna.com
>> Training and Consulting in CSS and Accessibility
>> Team Fusebox
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Scott Ste
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 12:53 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CSS Question
Hi Sandra,
First off, let me say that I absolutely accept you as the
authority on CSS, at least on this list. But... This seems to work (in
the drop-downs if no size specified), even on chrome
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 12:40 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CSS Question
You can't color individual option tags. You can however color
tags
Sandra Clark
=
http://www.shayna.com
Training and Consulting in CSS and Accessibility
Team Fusebox
-Ori
gt; Training and Consulting in CSS and Accessibility
> Team Fusebox
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 12:30 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CSS Question
>
> t
2008 12:30 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CSS Question
this colors the entire option tag
here's the rendered html with a div in place, still no love
#CC
#66CC66
sday, September 16, 2008 12:30 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CSS Question
>
> this colors the entire option tag
>
> here's the rendered html with a div in place, still no love
&
Ok, I get what you are trying to do now. You want a colored box beside
the hex value in the option tag.
Correct?
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 12:30 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CSS Question
this colors the
>
> get_category.hex_id>selected>
> #hex_id#
>
>
>
> any reason why the span tag shouldn't produce a small box colored with
> the dynamic hex value
Oh I read the other replies first before I noticed that it was inside an
option box... I've not done much with styling option elements, bu
I don't believe that option tags can contain children.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 11:30 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CSS Question
this colors the entire option tag
here's the rendered html with a di
If you can live without support for IE6, you can set the display for the
span to "inline-block" which (as best I can tell) makes it behave
the way an image behaves with regard to its "surface area". That will
let you give it a width without needing to float it left or the like.
--
s. isaac deal
this colors the entire option tag
here's the rendered html with a div in place, still no love
#CC
#66CC66
#CC6699
Put the style attribute in the tag and get rid of the .
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 12:07 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CSS Question
selected>
#hex_id#
any reason why the span tag shouldn't produce a small
Because a span is an inline element and cannot have a width applied to it.
If you want a block you're either going to have to put more non-breaking
spaces inside your span, use a div, or set display: block on your span.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
NC. 27616
(919) 874-6229 (home)
(703) 220-2835 (cell)
-Original Message-
From: Dominic Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 5:21 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CSS page calls and image calls from a CFC
>
> Why not? (asked looking for a legitimate reason, IE:
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Dominic Watson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Why not? (asked looking for a legitimate reason, IE: x or y won't work
> > properly if you do)
>
> There's no solid reason *not* to, that I'm aware of, other than design
> choice. I have built a display framework like
>
> Why not? (asked looking for a legitimate reason, IE: x or y won't work
> properly if you do)
There's no solid reason *not* to, that I'm aware of, other than design
choice. I have built a display framework like this in the past and after it
launched I found that there was no real reason *to* p
Images in a css file are relative to the css file itself, not the index file.
The link to the css file is relative to the url location of the page that
calls it.
William Seiter (mobile)
Have you ever read a book that changed your life?
go to: http://www.winninginthemargins.com
and use passcod
(703) 220-2835 (cell)
-Original Message-
From: Dominic Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 1:22 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CSS page calls and image calls from a CFC
>
> When I call the css template in the href of the link tag, is it relative
> t
> As an adjunct to Dom's suggestion, custom tags would be a good candidate for
> headers and footers if you are looking to control the data that is passed to
> and from them.
Also, something that I've run into is if I'm using AJAX to power the
contents of a CFDIV, I can have no other HTML gener
>As an adjunct to Dom's suggestion, custom tags would be a good candidate
for headers and footers if you are looking to control the data that is
passed to and from them.
Actually, you might want to take a look at Ray Camden's Blog.cfc. In the
tags folder there is a file called layout.cfm that can
It would be the same if you were using regular cfincludes. It is relative to
the page that processes the actual http request.
As an adjunct to Dom's suggestion, custom tags would be a good candidate for
headers and footers if you are looking to control the data that is passed to
and from them.
ht
HTML on a CFM.
--
Scott Stewart
ColdFusion Developer
SSTWebworks
4405 Oakshyre Way
Raleigh, NC. 27616
(919) 874-6229 (home)
(703) 220-2835 (cell)
-Original Message-
From: Dominic Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 1:22 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CSS page cal
>
> When I call the css template in the href of the link tag, is it relative
> to
> the location of index.cfm or layout.cfc?
The css path with be relative to the template that is being hit by the url
(index.cfm) as paths in the html are read and translated by the browser (?).
A side note: as a g
Glad to help!
Joel
>Thanks Joel,
>
>Your idea worked :)
>
>sas
>
>--
>Scott Stewart
>ColdFusion Developer
>
>SSTWebworks
>4405 Oakshyre Way
>Raleigh, NC. 27616
>(919) 874-6229 (home)
>(703) 220-2835 (cell)
>
>Scott--
>
>The problem is that you are absolutely positioning those three divs (they
-Talk
Subject: Re: CSS Question: Browser Sidebars
Scott--
The problem is that you are absolutely positioning those three divs (they
aren't rendering correctly in Firefox 2.5 or IE 7, btw). Take off the
absolute positioning, as well as "left" and "top" for each. Then, float
Scott--
The problem is that you are absolutely positioning those three divs (they
aren't rendering correctly in Firefox 2.5 or IE 7, btw). Take off the absolute
positioning, as well as "left" and "top" for each. Then, float each left and
use margins to space them out.
This will stop them fro
On 3/13/08, Adrian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This'll no doubt help
>
>
> http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q
> =taming+lists&spell=1
That's an interesting page but doesn't seem to address my issue of setting
width's on inline list elements.
I a
Yeah, IE and FF treat styles of the list elements completely different.
You might look at zero-ing your element margins (in all browsers) prior
to writing any CSS, to gain a somewhat consistent look and feel. Google
Eric Meyers on this topic...
Steve "Cutter" Blades
Adobe Certified Professional
This'll no doubt help
http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q
=taming+lists&spell=1
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Rick Root
Sent: 13 March 2008 13:38
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CSS help
Okay, I'm working on a pretty simple navigation element for this we
use to create a pdf to your size and specs.
Azadi Saryev
Sabai-dee.com
http://www.sabai-dee.com/
Andy wrote:
> OK. Not sure what happened. But now it is working in IE and FireFox,
> although FireFox displays the data differently. More playing I guess.
>
> Is there a way I can set headers
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 10:16 PM
To: 'cf-talk@houseoffusion.com'
Subject: RE: CSS Question
Jake,
Ok, I've been playing around for the last 2 hours and can't get it to work.
For example, in the following "header" both displays on the screen and
#Header {visibility: hidden;}
}
Test Document
Header
Testing
-Original Message-
From: Jake Churchill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 5:39 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CSS Question
media="print" in your link ta
Very cool.
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Jake Churchill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 5:39 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CSS Question
media="print" in your link tag where you import the stylesheet will
accomplish this.
media="screen&
media="print" in your link tag where you import the stylesheet will
accomplish this.
media="screen" will be screen specific and media="all" is for both. A lack
of this attribute will default to all.
There's more too it than that. Here's a good resource for you:
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/m
>They don't have a doctype on their site which is throwing it into quirks
>mode. You are using an xHTML 1.0 transitional which, at least on Firefox,
>is having the browser use standards rendering.
Thanks for lookin sandy. I'm talkin with their staff to see about getting a
doctype on there.
Wil
They don't have a doctype on their site which is throwing it into quirks
mode. You are using an xHTML 1.0 transitional which, at least on Firefox,
is having the browser use standards rendering.
Sandra Clark
=
http://www.shayna.com
Training and Consulting in CSS and Accessibility
Tea
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 5:02 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CSS Refresh Crash in Firefox??
I don't know why its crashing, but simplify your life Paul. Use inheritance
and the cascade to create a more efficient CSS. That way when you start
trying to figure out where the problems are, it will
CTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 3:36 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CSS Refresh Crash in Firefox??
Its basically one div pod that is crashing, as in the txt style doesn't
apply and the div ends up appearing 3 times and one of the 3 is out of
place. I didn't post the code origi
just some.
-Original Message-
From: Andy Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 5:23 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CSS Refresh Crash in Firefox??
Not sure if it's just the way it came through in email, but your classes are
setup incorrectly.
A class definition shoul
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 4:36 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CSS Refresh Crash in Firefox??
Its basically one div pod that is crashing, as in the txt style doesn't
apply and the div ends up appearing 3 times and one of the 3 is out of
place. I didn't post the code originally because I was
rolls over
the graphic or header the header (background-color) will change.
Thanks in advance for any input.
-Original Message-
From: Andy Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 4:22 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CSS Refresh Crash in Firefox??
Can you be a little m
Can you be a little more clear as to what you mean by "CSS crash"?
Are you saying that the CSS doesn't work? Doesn't load? Do you have a site
we could look at?
andy
-Original Message-
From: Paul Henderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 1:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Sub
sulting in CSS and Accessibility
Team Fusebox
-Original Message-
From: Victor Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 3:57 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CSS difference between IE and FF
Thank you both for your answers.
I kind of fix it. It had a div above my
Thank you both for your answers.
I kind of fix it. It had a div above my header. IE was displaying the header
nicely after the first one, but FF was overlapping it, even though I was
setting a 20px top margin.
I will have to read more on this to better understand it, but by taking the
first div o
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 2:44 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CSS difference between IE and FF
Victor,
You will also want to Google CSS Box Model. IE's poor, non-standards
based CSS implementation throws this off a great deal over
standards-compliant browsers.
Ste
Victor,
You will also want to Google CSS Box Model. IE's poor, non-standards
based CSS implementation throws this off a great deal over
standards-compliant browsers.
Steve "Cutter" Blades
Adobe Certified Professional
Advanced Macromedia ColdFusion MX 7 Developer
_
ht
Pixels aren't different between browsers, but each browser has a different
interpretation of how CSS should be rendered. Without seeing this code in
context, it's difficult to say exactly what it is, but it probably has
something to do with your margin settins. Try setting them to zero:
margin: 0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have two different pages:
>
> http://www.ocbin.org/index.cfm
>
> And
>
> http://www.ocbin.org/index.html
>
> They are EXACTLY the same (checked page source).
No they aren't. You are sending the CFML with a HTTP header that
indicates it is UTF-8 (which will overr
: Richard Colman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 9 July 2007 2:30 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: css not working in CF file
That worked!
However, I am at a loss to explain why the setting of 79% worked of in the
...html file but not in the .cfm file ... They are identical?
TNX again
That worked!
However, I am at a loss to explain why the setting of 79% worked of in the
..html file but not in the .cfm file ... They are identical?
TNX again.
-Original Message-
From: Bob Imperial [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 8:49 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re
Setting the #navBar{ margin: 0 0 0 79%; to 78% allows it room to display at
the top of that div, or at least it does locally ;)
Bob
> I have two different pages:
>
> http://www.ocbin.org/index.cfm
>
> And
>
> http://www.ocbin.org/index.html
>
> They are EXACTLY the same (checked page sour
Ditto , might even play around with navbar a bit
#navBar{
margin: 0 0 0 79%; <<<
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 11:21 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: css not working in CF file
>
It looks almost as if the width of the left side floated item is too wide to
accomodate the right. So it pushes it down below it. Just for the heckuvit,
shrink the width of the left side to see if it brings the right back up.
Will
~~
Josh,
You were right, it wasnt just the width though, it was the darn box model
error in IE with margins and padding, thanks for the help.
On 6/27/07, Dan Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Update
> The navigation issue has been fixed. For some reason putting the following
> structure all on 1 l
Update
The navigation issue has been fixed. For some reason putting the following
structure all on 1 line. I am not quite sure why that happens. Now I just
need to fix the menu and Im all good!
On 6/27/07, Dan Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Josh,
> I agree that thats why
Josh,
I agree that thats why it usually happens. This happend before the google
docs post went up. To check this issue I made the right menu 100px instead
of the 210px it is now and I still had the problem.
Also with the navigation I found something out. If I change the li a below
and take away th
> It looks great in FireFox and people have told me that in IE7 it looks ok
> as
> well. In IE6 however (i know..haha) the navigation menu and the right menu
> is all screwed up.
Dan, this happens when the main content area is too wide. Because it's all
css, it will either overlap columns or pu
Is a background color not good enough?
#bwAlphabet a:hover{
background: #000;
}
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 12:03 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SOT: css question
I have a weird CSS question.
I'm using Aptana CSS editor,...
Yeppers. Included the file between the style tags and away we went. Thanks
guys!
JH
>... I would expect it would need to be a cfinclude rather than a linkref.
>
>
>I agree. I do something similar on one of my sites. It works fine when I
>include the style content using a CF include inside the
> The browser has no idea CF is involved - it just cares about the final
> result. The webserver doesn't care about the context of the GET request,
> it
> processes them all by the the same rules.
OK, since the whole page is CF it's already getting parsed. I spaced it on
that one.
-- Josh
~
On 5/8/07, Josh Nathanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Calling test.cfm outputs "FOO" with a black, one pixel border around it,
> > in
> > both Firefox and IE7
>
> What happens if you put something dynamic in styletest.cfm, like
>
> ..foo {border:1px solid #mycolor#}
>
> when mycolor is defined
> Calling test.cfm outputs "FOO" with a black, one pixel border around it,
> in
> both Firefox and IE7
What happens if you put something dynamic in styletest.cfm, like
..foo {border:1px solid #mycolor#}
when mycolor is defined somewhere previously? I think that's what the OP is
trying to do.
On 5/8/07, Ian Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Whap happens when you call the CSS file directly in the URL (as if you
> were going to it as a page)?"
>
>
> This is a very important debugging step.
Speaking of debugging - if you have debugging enabled, that could be causing
issues.
Throw
>
> CFML can server up CSS content just as easily as it can serve up text or
> HTML or many other formats. You do have to tell it that it is server up
> CSS with the above mentioned tag. It can have some
> caching issues since the browser will not automatically reuse a dynamic
> CSS source unles
1 - 100 of 613 matches
Mail list logo
