ted a solution that will allow ColdFusion 9, 10, 11 to
> > generate a PDF that is fully section 508 compliant? Including tagging...
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > Scott Stewart
> >
> > --
> > --
> > Scott Stewart
> > Adobe Certified Instruc
will allow ColdFusion 9, 10, 11 to
> generate a PDF that is fully section 508 compliant? Including tagging...
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Scott Stewart
>
> --
> --
> Scott Stewart
> Adobe Certified Instructor, ColdFusion 8 & 9
> Adobe Certified Expert, ColdFusion 8 &
Has anyone implemented a solution that will allow ColdFusion 9, 10, 11 to
generate a PDF that is fully section 508 compliant? Including tagging...
Thanks in advance
Scott Stewart
--
--
Scott Stewart
Adobe Certified Instructor, ColdFusion 8 & 9
Adobe Certified Expert, ColdFusion 8 &
erald Guido [mailto:gerald.gu...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 1:22 PM
> To: cf-talk
> Subject: (sot) CF and Section 508 compliance & a 508 compliant date/time
> picker
>
>
> We just picked up a site that needs to be 508 compliant. I am getting a
> crash c
accessibility.
Judah
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Sandra Clark wrote:
>
> Regarding ARIA.
>
> Aria is not compatible with Section 508 as it stands now. If you are trying
> to comply with Section 508, ARIA will not help.
>
> Having said that, Section 508 is in a refresh,
Regarding ARIA.
Aria is not compatible with Section 508 as it stands now. If you are trying
to comply with Section 508, ARIA will not help.
Having said that, Section 508 is in a refresh, but has not yet been
finalized by the Access Board. The Section 508 refresh does in fact address
Aria by
was no way to tab out of it.
>
>
> Sandra Clark
> =
> http://www.shayna.com
> Training and Consulting in CSS and Accessibility
> Team Fusebox
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gerald Guido [mailto:gerald.gu...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, February
-talk
Subject: (sot) CF and Section 508 compliance & a 508 compliant date/time
picker
We just picked up a site that needs to be 508 compliant. I am getting a
crash course right now. I (or any of us really) never made a site/app that
needed to be 508 compliant.
My only concern is the use of
> If we have time we will roll our own, prolly using spry as long as it
> doesn't conflict with the Dynarch widget like said it could/would.
You can work around that by disabling Spry's date hints for
date-validated text fields.
--
s. isaac dealey ^ new epoch
isn't it time for a change?
>> I'm curious, what are the current torch and pitchfork arguments against
using CFFORM?
No reason for me to bring it up other than to avoid having the post
derailed. I have seen it brought up a few times tends though not as bad as
evaluate(). I have been using CF form for years with out a proble
an adjunct, but not the
> primary and/or only means to entering the date/time, then I will be fine?
> That is the part I am not clear on.
Yep, as far as I know that's an accurate interpretation. Section 508
isn't a full moratorium on JavaScript -- it just means that you have to
>>Any date-picker should be fine, provided that the widget is used to
populate a text field that can also be manually entered.
Thanx Ike,
So if I understand correctly, if I have a date/time widgets that can can be
used as (or considered to be) a convenience or an adjunct, but not the
primary and/
Gerald,
There are web developers and programmers who make it part of their life work
to make sure everything that is created by them is Section 508 compatible.
Frankly, it is the right thing to do.
Being under 'crunch', I feel for you. Unless you are editing a site that
was already
> Also.. Does anyone know of any 508 compliant date/time pickers? Those
> are going to be the only JS widgets that may be an issue.
Any date-picker should be fine, provided that the widget is used to
populate a text field that can also be manually entered. I integrated
the Dynarch widget into the
Gerald Guido wrote:
> using CFForm will be an issue. Yes I know... we shouldn't use CFForm etc..
> but it is uber-crunch time and that is what our code generator spits out.
I'm curious, what are the current torch and pitchfork arguments against
using CFFORM? In the past it was terrible and I st
We just picked up a site that needs to be 508 compliant. I am getting a
crash course right now. I (or any of us really) never made a site/app that
needed to be 508 compliant.
My only concern is the use of JS. It is basically a data entry and reporting
app and there is going to be a TON of form f
>A client is asking us about having their website coded for the disabled.
> I'm assuming he's talking about Section 508 compliance. Can anyone point
> me
> in the right direction for this?
Yes Section 508 is accessibility in the USin Canada it's a different set
o
Just an FYI,
Section 508 is the government's requirements for the departments of the
executive branch and those receiving grant monies (or other monies) from the
executive branch and using that money to put something up on the web.
Current cases in the courts (including the agreement be
equirements. And with any
website that needs to comply with section 508 or 2000/78/EC that
includes standard compliance. We wouldn't want to break the law,
would we?
Jochem
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusi
> Bobby was replaced with WebXACT which has a real comprehensive set of
> tests too.
Oops, sorry about that, actual URL for WebXACT is:
http://webxact.watchfire.com
Mary Jo Sminkey
http://www.cfwebstore.com
CFWebstore, ColdFusion E-commerce
~~
>The Web Developer Toolbar in FF has a vaalidate 508 tool on it, not
>sure how accurate it is, but it comes up with some sensible
>suggestions.
Yes, that's the CynthiaSays Tool, similar to the old Bobby validator. If you
don't use FF and the WD toolbar (why not?!) it can be found directly at:
ht
The Web Developer Toolbar in FF has a vaalidate 508 tool on it, not
sure how accurate it is, but it comes up with some sensible
suggestions.
On 6/21/05, S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Isaac. width: 1500 is a fixed size. trying using ems and
> > changing the text size in the brows
> Isaac. width: 1500 is a fixed size. trying using ems and
> changing the text size in the browser. Rachel (my css
> purist fiance) gave me a lecture on it, growing a checkbox
> to the entire size of the browser. The same code in mozilla
> just enlarged the box model around the checkbox but the
> c
Jochem: I think the website is to blame for both parts. All sites
should be cross-browser compliant. All I was saying is from a 508
standpoint it is a poor example, the fundamental objective of 508 is
to provide the same access to information, regardless of disability...
and regardless of thier bro
> Interesting. Unfortunately Mozilla is lacking in other
> areas for 508
> that I've tested. Like the inability to enlarge radio
> buttons and
> checkboxes. It will enlarge the text on a form, but leave
> checkboxes
> and radio buttons tiny, only enlarging the box around
> them.
Afaik MSIE doesn't
Adrocknaphobia wrote:
>> From: Adrocknaphobia
>>>
>>> Kinda ironic, but it should be noted that section508.gov isn't a very
>>> good example of 508 compliancy itself. The biggest glaring mistake is
>>> using an external mechanism outside the browser to adjust the text
>>> size.
> Interesting. Unfo
ancis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ctrl-mousewheel works in FF :P
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Adrocknaphobia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 2:03 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Section 508 Compliance
>
>
> Kinda ironic, b
Ctrl-mousewheel works in FF :P
-Original Message-
From: Adrocknaphobia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 2:03 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Section 508 Compliance
Kinda ironic, but it should be noted that section508.gov isn't a very
good example of 508 compl
The 508 check within Dreamweaver is quite good, and will cover most
corporate needs.
-Adam
On 6/20/05, John Dowdell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Russ wrote:
> > A client is asking us about having their website coded for the disabled.
> > I'm assuming he's talki
Russ wrote:
> A client is asking us about having their website coded for the disabled.
> I'm assuming he's talking about Section 508 compliance. Can anyone point me
> in the right direction for this?
and for information on using Macromedia tools to better support
those r
r the disabled.
> > I'm assuming he's talking about Section 508 compliance. Can anyone point me
> > in the right direction for this?
> >
> >
> >
> > Russ
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
~
>http://www.section508.gov/
>
>On 6/20/05, Russ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
Also, since the Bobby compliance checker is no longer free, take a look at the
CSE HTML Validator (http://www.htmlvalidator.com). It does a nice job of
checking your generated HTML for 508 compliance.
--
Michael Wolfe
>A client is asking us about having their website coded for the disabled.
>I'm assuming he's talking about Section 508 compliance. Can anyone point me
>in the right direction for this?
Be sure to also check out Sandra Clark's site, she has lots of information on
acce
http://www.section508.gov/
On 6/20/05, Russ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A client is asking us about having their website coded for the disabled.
> I'm assuming he's talking about Section 508 compliance. Can anyone point me
> in the right direction
A client is asking us about having their website coded for the disabled.
I'm assuming he's talking about Section 508 compliance. Can anyone point me
in the right direction for this?
Russ
~|
Logware (www.logware.
Macromedia's reply
“Try your apps with JAWS 4.5. You can download the installer at:
http://www.freedomscientific.com/fs_downloads/DL_JAWS45.asp
Since we launched CFMX7, issues with JAWS 5 and 6 have been fixed in JAWS 6.1.
We have not tested the Flash Forms in this release yet, but the results s
ColdFusion MX 7 Flash Forms, unfortunately, don't seem to be ready for
government use.
A better attention getter than the earlier post's first line.
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficie
Sandy,
As promised, here's our latest posting. For others with this problem, the
information from
http://www.macromedia.com/cfusion/knowledgebase/index.cfm?id=fcd4391e&pss=rs
was a nice try but did not work. As Sandy mentioned in a offline email, "The
problem with the MACR solution is that it r
t: CFForm, Section 508, JAWS and Window-Eyes problem
Below are 2 basic cfform examples; test_a1.cfm and test_a2.cfm (test_a2.cfm
is only provided as a submission point). Several efforts have failed in
getting the JAWS and Window-Eyes programs to read the test_a1.cfm which uses
the format="flash&q
Below are 2 basic cfform examples; test_a1.cfm and test_a2.cfm (test_a2.cfm is
only provided as a submission point). Several efforts have failed in getting
the JAWS and Window-Eyes programs to read the test_a1.cfm which uses the
format=flash attribute.
Has anyone else run into this? Is there a
sorry. it wouldn't be the first
time. ;^)
Jim Davis
_
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 3:14 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Section 508
Jim Davis said:
> I think you're missing the point a little, Jochem (it's not
Jim Davis said:
> I think you're missing the point a little, Jochem (it's not often
> that you do tho', so we'll give you credit. ;^) ) In fact I think
> we're arguing the same thing.
>
> We're not arguing against the tools (CSS).
The original comment reads:
"(d) Documents shall be organized so
s stemming from that.
You seem to be under the impression that he's arguing that it "can't be done
write" when I think he's arguing that "it's often done wrong".
Jim Davis
_
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursda
> > > > It's worth noting that pages that depend on CSS positioning
> > > > often aren't readable without the style sheet.
> > >
> > > But is that because it is impossible to use both CSS
> > > positioning and make them readable without the style sheet,
> > > or because the developer has a prio
You're preaching to the already converted. :-)
I was just asking about an implementation detail.
-Kevin
- Original Message -
From: "Sandy Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 10:31 AM
S
ary 15, 2004 11:17 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Section 508
Excellent points.
What's your take on a skipnav link vs placing the navigation in a div lower
in the code and using positioning to place it at the top for display?
For people considering doing a skipnav, we use an include that we call
ot;CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 9:43 AM
Subject: RE: Section 508
> Actually that is not true, Wired hides some content via styles that only
> comes out when you are not using styles.
>
> // Pulled from Wired's site with styles turned off.
>
Actually a better example of what you are trying to say is ESPN's site.
They don't offer skip links, their top navigation is still graphical.
However this is a development or management issue. If you compare the
differences between wired and espn, you can see the difference easily.
Part of the
-Talk
Subject: Re: Section 508
Jeremy Brodie wrote:
>
> I'll explain by example.
>
> For example the wired.com front page only uses stylesheets for mark-up and
positioning, using just DIV, P, SPAN and Header tags attached to IDs. (This
page uses best practices from accessablity p
phone or other device) could go
directly to the important stuff, skipping the ads.
Section 508 paragraph (o) A method shall be provided that permits users to
skip repetitive navigation links.
Wired goes one better and allows the user to skip to the content that is
important to them.
_
Jeremy Brodie wrote:
>
> I'll explain by example.
>
> For example the wired.com front page only uses stylesheets for mark-up and positioning, using just DIV, P, SPAN and Header tags attached to IDs. (This page uses best practices from accessablity point of view according to the W3). If one were t
Source.org
Sacramento, CA
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 6:39 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Section 508
Jeremy Brodie wrote:
>
> b) Design using styles without tables. One of the latest trends (especally if one r
Jeremy Brodie wrote:
>
> b) Design using styles without tables. One of the latest trends (especally if one reads Zeldman) is using CSS without tables. From a W3 acessablity point of view, this would be the proper way of creating accessability web sites. The DIV, P, and Hx tags would be overridden
Dave Watts wrote:
>>> It's worth noting that pages that depend on CSS positioning often
>>> aren't readable without the style sheet.
>>
>> But is that because it is impossible to use both CSS positioning and
>> make them readable without the style sheet, or because the developer
>> has a prioritie
pping words come to mind), that mixed content with presentation
and those aren't readable I agree.
_
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 10:21 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Section 508
> A page can be styled in CSS using positioning, etc.
> > It's worth noting that pages that depend on CSS positioning often
> > aren't readable without the style sheet.
>
> But is that because it is impossible to use both CSS positioning and
> make them readable without the style sheet, or because the developer
> has a priorities issue? If you believ
Dave Watts said:
>
> It's worth noting that pages that depend on CSS positioning often
> aren't readable without the style sheet.
But is that because it is impossible to use both CSS positioning and
make them readable without the style sheet, or because the developer
has a priorities issue? If you
Actually that's what I meant. should have read "unreadable" - which is,
itself, an awful say to say it.
Jeeze I'm tired. ;^)
Jim Davis
_
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 10:21 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Section 50
Haggerty, Mike wrote:
> There are a number of new developers where I work who have no clue as to
> what Section 508 is or what they need to be compliant. I have been
> spending time with each one individually, giving them examples,
> providing links, etc. but the message does no
> A page can be styled in CSS using positioning, etc. and still be
> completely readable when style sheets are turned off.
It's worth noting that pages that depend on CSS positioning often aren't
readable without the style sheet.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
phone:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 8:30 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Section 508
That paragraph actually means that you can't write content to a document via
something like _javascript_ and CSS (ie DHTML).
for instance, if you were using DHTML to open a layer in which
turned off.
_
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 6:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Section 508
Jeremy Brodie wrote:
>
> (d) Documents shall be organized so they are readable without requiring an
associated style sheet.
>
> Comme
thout your style sheet then its unlikely to
be legible with an accessibility sheet either.
At least that's the way I took the recommendation.
Jim Davis
_
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 6:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Sectio
Jeremy Brodie wrote:
>
> (d) Documents shall be organized so they are readable without requiring an associated style sheet.
>
> Comment: The W3 tells us to use stylesheets for asseability purposes! This item takes web design a step backwards instead of forwards.
Why would it take design a step
G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 2:41 PM
Subject: Re: Section 508
> It's interesting that someone mentioned "nothing in 508 requires support
for keyboard navigation".
>
> I was discussing 508 with
January 14, 2004 2:59 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Section 508
The irony is strong in this one.
Two things to note:
1. It's caused by the unnecessary "overflow: auto" on the body in their CSS.
2. Even though it may cause an accessibility problem, it's not technically
broken
, January 14, 2004 2:14 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Section 508
There are a number of new developers where I work who have no clue as to
what Section 508 is or what they need to be compliant. I have been
spending time with each one individually, giving them examples,
providing links, etc. but the message
Gov't site: http://www.section508.gov/
Test a page:
http://bobby.watchfire.com/bobby/html/en/index.jsp
-Original Message-
From: Paul Vernon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 3:14 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Section 508
Seriously, I'm subscribed
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 2:07 PM
Subject: RE: Section 508
> 2. Even though it may cause an accessibility problem, it's not technically
> broken by 508 guidelines. Nothing in 508 requires support for keyboard
> navigation.
Wow, that is poor! My step-
This is really cool. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Philip Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 1:22 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Section 508
> There are a number of new developers where I work who have no
> clue as to what Section 508
Seriously, I'm subscribed to quite a few lists and this is the first time
I've seen a reference to it using 'Section 508' rather than just being
referred to as something like 'the new accessibility laws'.
Paul
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription
> > I'm originally from the UK and I knew what 508 was... And I knew
> > before I had to deal with a US based client
>
> Just for the record, not being aware of the actual name of
> the legislation doesn't mean you dont know it's there!!
But there's enough talk on the lists and the Internet about
The mouse is a waste of time for
her, it is there only for other people to use when they need to work on her
PC.
The fact that there is no mandatory requirement in Section 508 for keyboard
navigation seems somewhat flawed for legislature that is designed for
accessibility purposes does it not?
keyboard
navigation.
-Kevin
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Vernon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 1:39 PM
Subject: RE: Section 508
> Being from the UK, I had no idea what Section 508 stood for so a q
> I'm originally from the UK and I knew what 508 was... And I knew before
> I had to deal with a US based client
Just for the record, not being aware of the actual name of the legislation
doesn't mean you dont know it's there!!
Paul
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Un
> Being from the UK, I had no idea what Section 508 stood for
> so a quick google took me to the Section508.gov site so now I know
I'm originally from the UK and I knew what 508 was... And I knew before
I had to deal with a US based client
> http://www.section508.gov/index.
Being from the UK, I had no idea what Section 508 stood for so a quick
google took me to the Section508.gov site so now I know
Now I like to scoll down pages using the keyboard either with the up/down
arrows or the page up/down keys Is it just me or do they not work on
this site
http://www.access-board.gov/sec508/guide/1194.22.htm
-Kevin
- Original Message -
From: "Haggerty, Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 1:13 PM
Subject: Section 508
> There are a number of new
> There are a number of new developers where I work who have no
> clue as to what Section 508 is or what they need to be
> compliant. I have been spending time with each one
> individually, giving them examples, providing links, etc. but
> the message does not seem to be getting thr
There are a number of new developers where I work who have no clue as to
what Section 508 is or what they need to be compliant. I have been
spending time with each one individually, giving them examples,
providing links, etc. but the message does not seem to be getting
through.
There was a link
Come to an intensive class on CFMX, Section 508 or Fusebox.
* Learn the tricks and tips on upgrading to CFMX
* Learn how to avoid Section 508 problems
* Learn advanced Fusebox coding techniques from Hal Helms
We will explain the details to let you improve your productivity
the next day! Class
e is truly compliant).
-Original Message-
From: Trusz, Andrew [mailto:Andrew.Trusz@;ssa.gov]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 8:58 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT: Section 508 Compliancy
Your examples suggest that the problem isn't with Lynx but with screen
readers. Lynx cleanly separates f
ce, Jochem seems right. Lynx delivers content. So, Jaws
over Lynx?
>Speech ready Lynx?
>
>drew
>-Original Message-
>From: Sandy Clark [mailto:slLists@;shayna.com]
>Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 2:52 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: RE: OT: Section 508 Compliancy
>
&
ovember 07, 2002 2:52 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT: Section 508 Compliancy
Not necessarily the specific portions. It might even comply legally,
but that doesn't meant that it would be easily readable in a screen
reader such as JAWS or Simply Web.
To give an example, use three programs.
All of these are great!
Thanks a lot :-)
-Original Message-
From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:sean@;corfield.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 1:00 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT: Section 508 Compliancy
On Thursday, Nov 7, 2002, at 06:11 US/Pacific, Jochem van Dieten wrote:
> Carli
1:11 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT: Section 508 Compliancy
Kevin Graeme wrote:
> Sorry Jochem, but that just means it works in Lynx not that it meets
> all the 508 criteria.
Which parts of 1194.22 wouldn't it comp
On Thursday, Nov 7, 2002, at 06:11 US/Pacific, Jochem van Dieten wrote:
> Carlisle, Eric wrote:
>> Is there any official certification for section 508 compliancy?
> Rule of the thumb:
> if it looks decent in Lynx and is valid HTML, it is compliant.
If only it were that simple! :)
Kevin Graeme wrote:
> Sorry Jochem, but that just means it works in Lynx not that it meets
> all the 508 criteria.
Which parts of 1194.22 wouldn't it comply with then?
Jochem
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/
Sorry Jochem, but that just means it works in Lynx not that it meets all the
508 criteria.
-Kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:jochemd@;oli.tudelft.nl]
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 8:11 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: OT: Section
ov/sec508/guide/1194.22.htm
They also have a FAQ that answers your question:
ii. Does the Federal government have a 'logo program' indicating which
products meet 508 standards?
No. The Federal government does not currently have a section 508 logo (such
as the Energy Star) that attaches
Carlisle, Eric wrote:
> Is there any official certification for section 508 compliancy?
>
> I've been looking around and have found 3rd party consultants that
> will make your site compliant.
>
> The only "badge" I've seen on Web sites is the "W3C WG
he federal government 508 site about
this or not.
www.section508.gov
- Original Message -
From: "Carlisle, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 8:37 AM
Subject: OT: Section 508 Compliancy
> Is
Is there any official certification for section 508 compliancy?
I've been looking around and have found 3rd party consultants that will make
your site compliant.
The only "badge" I've seen on Web sites is the "W3C WGAC" label... which is
and isn't the sam
urday service between the morning
>and afternoon sessions of our seminar.
>
> This all-day seminar *replaces* our regular June FREE third
> Saturday afternoon meeting.
>
> MAKING WEB SITES ACCESSIBLE
> Implementing Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act
> Sp
Bonnie,
With regards to applets (CF generated or otherwise), Section 508 says that
you should provide an alternative means to that information (like through a
text-based page or long descriptions). Simply put, you can have applets, but
they cannot be the only means to that information and/or
u any
answers I get (from the list or elsewhere).
Thanks,
Bonnie E. Betts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.interacttechs.com
- Original Message -
From: "Bonnie Betts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 11:47 PM
Subject:
Thanks Jeanne;
I've been working with Section 508 a little, but I'm looking for specifics
on CF tags like CFGrid mostly. It's an applet and I don't know if the
screen readers can read that applet. So I guess my question is, are CF
tags Section 508 compliant? Wh
I don't know what a VBA site is but 'skip repetitve navigation links' was
handled by USPS by putting a transparent link at the top of the navbar named
"Skip Navigation Bar" with a target to the cell with the content of that
page. That way when clicked, the screen reader would skip the navigation
-Talk
Subject: RE: ADA Section 508 Accessibility and CF tags
Whats a 'VBA' site ?
And also - "A method shall be provided that permits users to skip repetitive
navigation links". What is that driving at, exactly ?
~~
Structure
Whats a 'VBA' site ?
And also - "A method shall be provided that permits users to skip repetitive
navigation links". What is that driving at, exactly ?
~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthor
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
