I'm thinking about clustering I read some of the articles on this
(bpurcells, and others, etc) and I'm still a bit confused about which is
the best way for Entry Level / simple clustering.
Right now I have 1 CFMX6.1 Pro license and a single IIS box, sharing
MSSQL2K with CF over 2 1Ghz
Katz, Dov B (IT) wrote:
I'm thinking about clustering I read some of the articles on this
(bpurcells, and others, etc) and I'm still a bit confused about which is
the best way for Entry Level / simple clustering.
Right now I have 1 CFMX6.1 Pro license and a single IIS box, sharing
:13 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: time to cluster, I thinkL
Katz, Dov B (IT) wrote:
I'm thinking about clustering I read some of the articles on this
(bpurcells, and others, etc) and I'm still a bit confused about which
is the best way for Entry Level / simple clustering.
Right now I
I'm going to be blasted for this, but clustering is the last resort, not
first.
1. Do you have seperate boxes for DB and webserver? (no)
2. Are they maxed in ram? (probably)
3. Are they peaked? (?)
4. Is your network set up tight? (no as it's one server)
Just moving the SQL to a new box will
IMHO I think the first step, assuming you only have a budget for 1
extra machine, would be to move your MSSQL installation onto a separate
box to free up some more resources for CF. This'll save you a bit too
as you should have most of the software licenses you need too.
After you've done that
Katz, Dov B (IT) wrote:
Sorry for not making clearer My problem now is heavy load
Moving the database to a separate box from the application /
webserver would be the first step.
general risk of availability by having a SPoF.
It is better to have a SPoF with 99.8% uptime then 2 systems
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 09:26:18 -0500, Michael Dinowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to be blasted for this, but clustering is the last resort, not
first.
I would be surprised if anyone blasts you.
1. Do you have seperate boxes for DB and webserver? (no)
This would be the first thing I'd
Why do you want to cluster? If it is for reliability, then that is ok.
But if you need speed, you may be best off just putting the IIS/CF on one
computer and the MSSQL2K on the other computer, since you already have one
license of each. The computers are cheaper than the licenses. If you do
in planning ahead some.
John Burns
Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
AI-ES Aeronautics, Web Developer
-Original Message-
From: Sean Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 11:03 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: time to cluster, I thinkL
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004
Message-
From: Burns, John D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 11:22 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: time to cluster, I thinkL
Continuing down this line of questioning, what kind of numbers are you
all experiencing when you're having to split to separate servers, go
Burns, John D wrote:
Continuing down this line of questioning, what kind of numbers are you
all experiencing when you're having to split to separate servers, go to
multiple machines, etc?
It isn't so much about having to split, but wanting to split. I
don't want to run a database server on
clustering if it
doesn't help.
On a side note...
I noticed you have google adwords. Has it been worth the real estate?
Emmet
-Original Message-
From: Katz, Dov B (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 11:33 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: time to cluster, I thinkL
-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 11:42 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: time to cluster, I thinkL
Burns, John D wrote:
Continuing down this line of questioning, what kind of numbers are you
all experiencing when you're having to split
With a lot of traffic (At least for my website), it practically pays for
dedicated hosting.
-Original Message-
From: Emmet McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 12:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: time to cluster, I thinkL
We have a cluster setup for one
With a lot of traffic (At least for my website), it practically pays for
dedicated hosting.
On a side note...
I noticed you have google adwords. Has it been worth the real
estate?
Emmet
NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and
Subject: RE: time to cluster, I thinkL
With a lot of traffic (At least for my website), it practically pays for
dedicated hosting.
-Original Message-
From: Emmet McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 12:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: time to cluster, I thinkL
We
and was hesitant to give advertising space up for something
like that.
e
-Original Message-
From: Katz, Dov B (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 12:18 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: time to cluster, I thinkL
With a lot of traffic (At least for my website
and was hesitant to give advertising space up for something
like that.
e
-Original Message-
From: Katz, Dov B (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 12:18 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: time to cluster, I thinkL
With a lot of traffic (At least for my website
-Original Message-
From: Burns, John D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 11:22 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: time to cluster, I thinkL
Continuing down this line of questioning, what kind of numbers are you
all experiencing when you're having to split
19 matches
Mail list logo
