[freenet-chat] Re: [freenet-devl] Uprizer Decloaks

2001-10-17 Thread David McNab
From: "Acrimon Beet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Nor would I be bothered if it were called "Muhammed spinning around in > Jesus's bum hole with a crucifix in each hand" > > That may not be so good for marketing though. Not good for lifespan either, if Salman Rushdie is anything to go by. ___

Re: [freenet-chat] Slashdot needs Freenet category with Hops

2001-10-17 Thread David McNab
From: "Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:25 AM Subject: Re: [freenet-chat] Slashdot needs Freenet category with Hops > Would it be possible to add FreeNet into something like Squid so that any > web browser inside a LAN that is already set to

[freenet-chat] Slashdot needs Freenet category with Hops

2001-10-17 Thread David McNab
I look forward to the day when I visit slashdot and see a story on Freenet, with the 'hops' logo at the top right of the story - ie freenet having its own category on /. ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/

[freenet-chat] fcptools/FreeWeb bug fix

2001-10-11 Thread David McNab
Apologies for earlier bug where fcpputsite and freeweb were crashing. Trivial - caused by malformed _fcpLog() call - now fixed. Windows binaries at http://freeweb.sf.net/bin/windows Source in CVS David ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http:/

Re: [freenet-chat] Any non-Java FreeNet?

2001-10-11 Thread David McNab
At one time there was a C library called libFreenet, that used the FNP protocol directly and therefore didn't require you to run an actual java freenet node. That was developed by Steve Hazel at www.thalassocracy.org AFAIK, it only supported freenet 0.3 protocol, and hasn't been updated for Freene

[freenet-chat] New FreeWeb now released

2001-10-11 Thread David McNab
Hi all, Especially, hi to Freenet users enslaved within Windoze. After much drama with fcptools, I've finally turned some attention to FreeWeb. It's a relief to (at last) release a new version of FreeWeb, compatible with Freenet 0.4 In fact, from now on, FreeWeb will no longer support freenet

[freenet-chat] Re: License of ezFCPlib

2001-10-10 Thread David McNab
. David - Original Message - From: "Jay Oliveri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "David McNab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 6:30 PM Subject: Re: License of ezFCPlib > On Wednesday 10 October 2001 03:04 am, [EMAIL

Re: [freenet-chat] how to move lots of files online?

2001-10-10 Thread David McNab
One major problem is the current limitation in freenet 0.4 which, while it consolidates its data store into a single file, can only work with one such file. Most operating systems and java interpreters can only support 2GB files. This results in a severe restriction which IMO *must* be overcome

[freenet-chat] is 0.4 dead?

2001-10-09 Thread David McNab
Hi, I can't seem to retrieve anything on 0.4 today. Not even the ever-reliable Snarfoo, GJ or CofE. Is anyone else having any luck with 0.4? David ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat

[freenet-chat] Re: License of ezFCPlib

2001-10-09 Thread David McNab
Hi Karl, Thanks for your email > if you turn ezFCPlib > into GPL every program that is linked against it > has to be released under GPL, too. (thinking of > programs that are closed source at the moment) > LGPL does avoid that problem. Problem? What problem? ezFCPlib was created initially as pa

[freenet-chat] Galeon!! - Windows Installer

2001-10-06 Thread David McNab
Galeon, if you're the guy who sent the windows freenet installer to CofE, could you please email me or email this group as soon as you can.   Your installer is excellent - it's the best Windows one yet - but it's of no use to us and cannot be released, without full source code.   Can you ple

[freenet-chat] Thoughts on Copyright (was: [p2p-legal] FW: Webnoize News Update - 10.03.01 - FastTrack Suit)

2001-10-05 Thread David McNab
From: "Patrick Oscar Boykin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >I think there is obviously a difference non-commercial p2p copying, >and a commercial entity springing up to profit off of it. Big difference. A big part of my inspiration for investing my time and money on the Freenet project is a personal visio

Re: [freenet-chat] FCPtools now with AutoSplit support

2001-10-04 Thread David McNab
From: "Ian Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Any progress on the new FreeWeb built around "fcpputsite"? That would be a > real boost to the number of Freesites on 0.4. That's less of a feature issue and more of an internal maintenance issue. I say this because FreeWeb automatically inherits the ne

Re: [freenet-chat] Freenet Community Meeting

2001-10-04 Thread David McNab
From: "Ian Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > At the O'Reilly P2P Conference in Washington DC. It will be free, and > all are welcome. Is a cyber-cam link out of the question? Failing that, would it be possible to video the proceedings, edit it down to highlights and stick some MPEGs/DivXs on a we

Re: [freenet-chat] FCPtools now with AutoSplit support

2001-10-04 Thread David McNab
Oh, I forgot to mention - once all this autosplit stuff fully stabilises, fcpputsplit will be deleted, since it will no longer been needed.   - Original Message - From: David McNab To: Freenet Chat ; Freenet Development Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 1:11 AM

[freenet-chat] FCPtools now with AutoSplit support

2001-10-04 Thread David McNab
Hi all,   I've checked into CVS a new version of the fcptools (freenet CVS, in Contrib/fcptools), which now supports auto-splitting of all inserted files.   Since auto-split is implemented completely in the ezFCPlib library layer, all client software which uses fcpPutKeyFromFile() will inher

[freenet-chat] New Zealand Open Source campaign

2001-10-02 Thread David McNab
Hi,   Am I the only Freenet user in New Zealand? Hope not.   If there's anyone else, either native Kiwis or permanent NZ residents, you might like to visit www.openz.org and sign your name to a petition which calls on New Zealand government to pass laws requiring Open Source Software to be s

[freenet-chat] NodeConfig - critical update

2001-09-30 Thread David McNab
Hi all   NodeConfig, the windows gui node config utility, has had a critical update.   From now on, any parameters which are not (yet) understood by the configurator, will be lumped together and written out unchanged to the end of the freenet.ini file.   This allows new parameters to be added

[freenet-chat] NOTICE - FCPtools moved to Freenet CVS

2001-09-28 Thread David McNab
Hi all,   I've moved all the key FCPtools code out of FreeWeb CVS and into the freenet project's official CVS, under /Contrib/fcptools.   You can access via cvs/ssh, or browse the tree at http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/freenet/Contrib/fcptools   I've relinquished ownership of

[freenet-chat] Bandwidth throttles killed my server

2001-09-27 Thread David McNab
After faultless uptimes, with 0.3 and 0.4 nodes running at full throttle for days on end, I decided to conserve some bandwidth, and set 0.3 to 1000 bytes/sec, and 0.4 to 5000 bytes/sec.   Result? Perfect. Both nodes obeyed their throttle settings nicely.   But on starting the night's round o

[freenet-chat] 0.4.3 installer feedback

2001-09-26 Thread David McNab
Hi,   I just downloaded the 0.4.3 windows installer from CofE's 0.4 site.   Feedback:   1) The 'configure' entry on the menu does nothing. Why not use the new windows NodeConfig.exe utility/   2) I notice that fcpproxy gets launched on node startup, and terminated on node shutdown - and that

[freenet-chat] NodeConfig update

2001-09-26 Thread David McNab
Just a quick note to say that the windows node config utility has been slightly updated - the spinner controls now work, and have built-in 'smarts' - eg bandwidthLimit and inputBandwidthLimit/outputBandwidthLimit work in mutual exclusion.   http://freeweb.sf.net/nodeconfig   David  

[freenet-chat] Kickass Client Apps Needed (was: Windows installer and Sun JRE)

2001-09-25 Thread David McNab
From: "Scott G. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> What??!??! >> User-friendliness is "not really appropriate for our goals of freedom of >> information" ??!? >Of course user friendliness is. Being exactly like >Joe-Poorly-Designed-Filesharing-Network isn't. Point taken. Sorry for the misunderstand

[freenet-chat] Release - 0.4/0.5 GUI config utility

2001-09-25 Thread David McNab
Hi all,   After a couple of totally boring coding sessions, I've come up with a full GUI-based node configuration utility for 0.4/0/5 freenet nodes (Windows 9x/ME/NT/2k/XP only sorry).   It's a beta release, but perfectly functional. I've just gotta implement the spinners and do a couple of

[freenet-chat] Freenet windows executable

2001-09-23 Thread David McNab
Hi,   Just a quick one to say that I've revived the Freenet EXE file, built from recent CVS, and shall update it regularly.   http://freeweb.sourceforge.net/bin/windows/freenet.exe   Running the exe file is equivalent to: c:\jdk1.3.1_1\jre\bin\java.exe -classpath "c:\program files\freenet.jar

[freenet-chat] Please re-send mail

2001-09-13 Thread David McNab
Anyone who has sent me any mail, to this message's return address, or to [EMAIL PROTECTED] over the last week, could you please re-send it. As part of the move of weaning myself off windows, I inadvertantly deleted all email received over the last 7 days. Thanks David

[freenet-chat] Fwproxy, FCPtools - major update

2001-08-04 Thread David McNab
Hi, After much slaving, fwproxy is now working well on 0.4 freenet. Memory leaks are now gone (nobody has detected any at this time). Also, the old FreeWeb functionality has been revived, so you can use fwproxy as your browser proxy. Web-blocking is turned on and off with the URL http://free/bl

Re: [freenet-chat] talked to ESR

2001-08-03 Thread David McNab
Often, when people 'troll' these lists, everyone else ends up putting the troller on their email kill lists. So over time, the troller gets the feeling that people aren't even receiving his emails, whieh they won't be. I've never done this, but I am pretty close to doing it with josh David

Re: [freenet-chat] Re: p2p = child-endangerment

2001-07-31 Thread David McNab
From: "Greg Wooledge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Because porn promotes sexual desire. >And why is that bad? >> Kids have more than enough of >> that without us giving them pornography. >Kids have no sexual desire to speak of. I must tender a correction to that. Pre-pubescent children are immensely

Re: [freenet-chat] Re: p2p = child-endangerment

2001-07-31 Thread David McNab
From: "Daniel Åborg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Your ideas are obviously aimed at ruining the foundations of our > society... Quite often, old buildings are not viable for renovation, since they have decayed to the very root. In such cases, the Architect must tear down the whole building and start af

[freenet-chat] Need YOUR Ideas

2001-07-30 Thread David McNab
Hi all, I need *your* ideas! I've just read through a government discussion paper at http://www.med.govt.nz/buslt/int_prop/digital/index.html which will be used as a basis for updating New Zealand's Copyright Act for the digital age. On first reading, it appears that the NZ Ministry of Economic

[freenet-chat] CVS correction (was: New 0.4 Freesite Insertion Tool)

2001-07-26 Thread David McNab
Address for anon cvs access for the FCPtools is: :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/freeweb then you need to check out the module 'freeweb-src' Apologies for earlier incorrect CVS address. Cheers David - Original Message ----- From: "David McNab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED

[freenet-chat] Apology (was: New 0.4 Freesite Insertion Tool)

2001-07-26 Thread David McNab
API for C clients (0.3,0.4) Any bugs or problems - just contact me. David - Original Message ----- From: "David McNab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "FreeWeb Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 2

[freenet-chat] New 0.4 Freesite Insertion Tool

2001-07-26 Thread David McNab
Hi all, Just announcing a new freenet client - 'fcpputsite'. Works on 0.4 freenet only. Compiles and runs on native linux, native windows, or windows/cygwin. Inserts a freesite into the 0.4 freenet. Simple, console-based, and straight to the point. No hype, no GUI, no fuss. Only 86kB (compared

[freenet-chat] Forth (was: Re: [freenet-devl] Integration test: volunteer needed)

2001-07-25 Thread David McNab
From: "Travis Bemann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >By the way, add Forth to that list (it is sad that Forth isn't used as >much as it should these days; Forth is a very simple but powerful >and fast ... You're a man of good taste, Travis. Forth used to be an old hacking favourite of mine in the early

Re: [Freenet-chat] Newsletter di Patnet

2001-07-24 Thread David McNab
Title: NewsLetter di Patnet I've put up an English babelfish translation of this page at http://heretic108.cjb.net/ip-italian-en.html   I don't know why, but a copy of the italian page was also sent to my personal email address.   David    

[freenet-chat] FreeWeb 0.1.4

2001-07-23 Thread David McNab
Hi all, Hi all, After some successful testing, I'm pleased to announce the release of FreeWeb 0.1.4 alpha Changes? Mainly, the addition of freenet 0.4 compatibility, plus much general code cleanup. By default, FreeWeb will work in freenet 0.3 mode, meaning that it inserts the old-style metada

[freenet-chat] 0.4 fcptools now available as tarbal

2001-07-22 Thread David McNab
For those of you who prefer shrink-wrapped packages over messing with cvs, the FCPTOOLS for freenet 0.4/0.3 are now available as a tarball. Please bookmark the URL http://freeweb.sourceforge.net/fcptools.tar.gz Also, there's a link to that tarball from the FreeWeb main site, http://freeweb.source

[freenet-chat] quick laugh on 0.4

2001-07-22 Thread David McNab
for a break from 0.4 stresses, feast your eyes on: CHK@YSvD83WdDtYWq4XnsNnDjEP6unAPAwI,PzdT0KwtLh57CcoJQnsmdQ Thanks Mr Bad for the inspiration. ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat

Re: [freenet-chat] more MSK delimiter proposals

2001-07-19 Thread David McNab
> What´s ht://dig doing wrong? The question is whether it's actually wrong or not. ht://dig has code which deliberately turns '//' to '/', arguing that certain websites are improperly structured. So naturally, in http://harpoonsearch.cjb.net , a Freenet search engine, I've commented out such code

Re: [freenet-chat] Please archive 0.3 content

2001-07-18 Thread David McNab
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > As an addendum, if 0.4 can speak to an 0.3 node, could people just > > keep up the 0.3 nodes for queries until they get cached by 0.4? > > > > > > > "David McNab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >

[freenet-chat] New 0.4-compatible client progs

2001-07-18 Thread David McNab
Hi folks, To assist with 0.4 testing, I've released some FCP-based clients that are now working with 0.4 metadata 0) FreeWeb - pre-release version 0.1.4 - supports freenet 0.4 and freenet 0.3 metadata, available from http://freeweb.sf.net/index1.html It works on Linux via Wine, if you tweak your

Re: [freenet-chat] more MSK delimiter proposals

2001-07-18 Thread David McNab
> 6) '!/' - example SSK@blah/name!/index.html Could be a winner :) I'll support it parallel to '//' in FwProxy (which I expect to start testing on 0.4 in the next day or two), and see how the misbehaving 3rd party progs (such as ht://dig and Offline Explorer) behave, and report findings back to

[freenet-chat] FreeWeb now working with 0.4 freenet

2001-07-18 Thread David McNab
Hi all, FreeWeb now works with Freenet 0.4 I've put up a pre-release test version of FreeWeb 0.1.4 on the site - http://freeweb.sf.net/index1.html To enable freenet 0.4 compatibility, you must be running a freenet 0.4 node. Also, you'll need to open the options window, change the FCP port to 8

Re: [freenet-chat] more MSK delimiter proposals

2001-07-18 Thread David McNab
> 6) '!/' - example SSK@blah/name!/index.html Could be a winner :) I'll support it parallel to '//' in FwProxy (which I expect to start testing on 0.4 in the next day or two). With this, it'll be interesting to see how the misbehaving 3rd party progs (such as ht://dig and Offline Explorer) beh

[freenet-chat] 0.4 FCP clients - FwProxy, fcpget, ezFCPlib

2001-07-18 Thread David McNab
Hi folks, To assist with 0.4 testing, I've released a couple of FCP tools that are now working with 0.4 metadata 1) fcpget - a simple command-line key retrieval prog 2) FwProxy - like FProxy, but working with 0.4. By default, FwProxy listens on port , and talks to a node on localhost:8481,

[freenet-chat] 0.4 FCP clients - FwProxy, fcpget, ezFCPlib

2001-07-18 Thread David McNab
Hi folks, To assist with 0.4 testing, I've released a couple of FCP tools that are now working with 0.4 metadata 1) fcpget - a simple command-line key retrieval prog 2) FwProxy - like FProxy, but working with 0.4. By default, FwProxy listens on port , and talks to a node on localhost:8481,

[freenet-chat] more MSK delimiter proposals

2001-07-16 Thread David McNab
More proposed MSK delimiters, from recent IRC discussion 1) '?' - example SSK@blah/name?index.html (requires banning the use of fproxy reserved words like 'htl', 'force', 'key' etc in SSK identifiers) 2) '}' - example SSK@blah/name}index.html 3) '/?' - example SSK@blah/name/?index.html (I lik

Re: [freenet-chat] MSKs "//" breaks lots of software

2001-07-16 Thread David McNab
> I am very much in favor of David's proposal - just drop one of the two > slashes and everything's nice and fluffy. You can still visibly partition > your subspace key without using slashes: As the proposer, I have to recant on the single-slash option. This is because there will be keys URIs in

[freenet-chat] Please archive 0.3 content

2001-07-16 Thread David McNab
With freenet 0.3 soon to cease, and freenet 0.4 coming in like a Concorde, we urgently need to archive as much of the 0.3 freenet content as possible, especially all those loose CHKs and KSKs. Don't delay - grab 'em or lose 'em. Because they ain't gonna be around much longer. This doesn't apply

[freenet-chat] Large Datastore - fatal problem

2001-07-16 Thread David McNab
For the last few days I've been complaining about the slowness of freenet. In that time I noticed Freenet slowing from a walk to a crawl through to total dead stop. Like, total dead stop - 1 hour or more to get CofE, if I could get it at all. No hope with Snarfoo or the others. I've noticed befo

Re: [freenet-chat] MSKs "//" breaks lots of software

2001-07-15 Thread David McNab
The problem could be solved **SO** simply. Let's assign two meanings to the single slash. 1) After 'SSK@blah', the '/' means 'a ssk subspace identifier follows, terminated by another slash or by end of uri' 2) Anywhere else, the '/' means 'msk' - telling the requesting client to look up the mat

Re: [freenet-chat] MSKs "//" breaks wget et al.

2001-07-15 Thread David McNab
> "//" is the prettiest, cleanest identifier for > denoting cdoc msk handling that I have seen. Again, '//' breaks a lot of third-party http software. Some software chokes when it sees '//'. Other software edits it to '/' which results in automatic 404s from fproxy. The most acceptable solution

Re: [freenet-chat] Suggestion... large files in freenet.

2001-07-15 Thread David McNab
Freenet's problems seem size-independent - Original Message - From: "Michael D. Carey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Freenet Tech" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Freenet Devl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Freenet Chat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 19:29 Subject: [freenet-chat] Suggestion...

[freenet-chat] Paranoia

2001-07-12 Thread David McNab
Is Freenet getting DoS'ed??? ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat

[freenet-chat] Nightmares

2001-07-12 Thread David McNab
Given the recent quietness of this group, I thought I'd spark things by quoting a recent statistic I heard on ABC news (USA). According to a recent health survey, Republican voters are more than three times more likely to suffer nightmares than Democrat voters. David _

[freenet-chat] Freenet Tsunami

2001-07-11 Thread David McNab
Freenet's recent 'tsunami' of the last 24-36 hours seems to have lifted. (Ok then, who's been inserting gigs of data at high htls?) ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat

[freenet-chat] ZDNet listing

2001-07-11 Thread David McNab
I just got a regular promo email from ZDNet, this one featuring file-sharing. Amongst Gnutella, Limewire and the others, Freenet was listed. Current Freenet version was showing as 0.1b ?!!!??! Time for an update perhaps? ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [freenet-chat] Harpoon needs *your* freesite addresses

2001-07-04 Thread David McNab
Sorry! - we should have mentioned before - please protect your anonymity if you are using the email option when submitting your sites to Harpoon If submitting your site via the email link, *please* make sure you have an anonymous email facility. If you don't have one, www.hushmail.com is pretty g

[freenet-chat] FreeWeb - URGENT bug fix release

2001-07-03 Thread David McNab
Hi all, I've just released FreeWeb 0.1.3.4, which fixes a critical bug which was introduced in 0.1.3.3 In 0.1.3.3, whenever a full re-insertion of a site was requested, FreeWeb would wipe out and replace the SSK keypair, thus invalidating anyone else's links to this site. Totally unacceptable, a

[freenet-chat] Quick Question

2001-07-02 Thread David McNab
When I successfully request a file from Freenet, does fred necessarily cache that file on my node (file count and size permitting)? If not, what's the basic algorithm by which a decision on this is made? Cheers David ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PRO

[freenet-chat] Attn all FreeWeb users

2001-07-02 Thread David McNab
Hi, I've finally got around to setting up the FreeWeb mailing list. Many of you will have already received confirmation request emails, from me having signed you up to the list manually. If so, please follow the instructions in that email. If not, and if you want to be kept informed about FreeW

Re: [freenet-chat] Harpoon Search - user notes

2001-07-01 Thread David McNab
aboration. > > So... what I would like to know: Where do you want to take this project? Was > this just a quick shot at hacking htdig to adapt it to Freenet? Or is it the > beginning of something bigger? > > Do you plan to add in-Freenet searching? > > And what about all the o

[freenet-chat] Harpoon Search - user notes

2001-07-01 Thread David McNab
works for you does not imply the existence of the page on the Harpoon server. 12. The search database is constructed by a recursive crawl starting at the FProxy Gateway page. 13. Bugs, suggestions etc - please email me - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cheers David ----- Original Message - From:

[freenet-chat] Harpoon - your new Freenet search engine

2001-07-01 Thread David McNab
Hi fellow Freenetters, It gives me pleasure to announce 'Harpoon', a new Freenet search engine residing on the WWW. Harpoon is a true crawler, which indexes all the currently viewable freesites. So you can search on words which occur within current freesite pages. It is my intention to keep an

[freenet-chat] FreeWeb now LAN-Friendly

2001-06-29 Thread David McNab
As of now, FreeWeb can talk to Freenet nodes on other machines. Previously, FreeWeb was unable to communicate with a node unless the node and FreeWeb were running on the same machine. So, the 'node address' item in the FreeWeb config window is now working, and FreeWeb is now LAN-friendly. As us

[freenet-chat] ISPs will decide the outcome (was: Finding a key on your node)

2001-06-28 Thread David McNab
From: "Greg Wooledge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Would it be hard for an ISP to block out just Freenet traffic? >Yes, because Freenet runs on arbitrary TCP/IP ports. (The plurality of >nodes are running on port 19114, because some of the Freenet packages >default to that, but there are a great numb

Re: [freenet-chat] Re: [svlug] The End Game From Microsoft. Really.

2001-06-28 Thread David McNab
As I see it, one very real threat with M$ comes from its financial wealth, which can be used to put heavy pressure on cash-strapped university CS departments. In New Zealand, despite the massive economic boom happening here, universities are on the brink of closure. For any CS professor faced wi

[freenet-chat] Throttling Fred

2001-06-27 Thread David McNab
Hi, I've set the bandwidth throttle settings on Fred, but it still consumes all my available bandwidth. Are there any esoteric tricks or settings to make sure bandwidth settings are actually adhered to? Cheers David ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PRO

Re: [freenet-chat] Sharing datastore between windows and linux

2001-06-27 Thread David McNab
From: "Greg Wooledge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Check your store_N file. There may or may not be directory paths in >there (either full directories like "/home/freenet/data/N/tNNN" >or partial ones like "N/tNNN"). I wasn't able to check that. For some reason, my .freenetrc got cr

Re: [freenet-chat] Node list

2001-06-26 Thread David McNab
From: "Jay Tamboli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >I wonder if any ISP's would forbid a user from running >a node, provided that node doesn't constantly saturate a >broadband connection. My ISP has an explicit policy forbidding the use of 'servers'. They clarified this to me as meaning any piece of automa

Re: [freenet-chat] Sourceforge down again?

2001-06-23 Thread David McNab
  Seems to be just the SF shell login and the SF site itself. SF project sites are unaffected (it seems).   - Original Message - From: David McNab To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 01:44 Subject: Re: [freenet-chat] Sourceforge down again

Re: [freenet-chat] Sourceforge down again?

2001-06-23 Thread David McNab
SF has been a target for crackers lately. I notice that dev tools like compilers are no longer available from shell logins.   The main freenet site is still up though. (is it not hosted on SF?)   - Original Message - From: Stefan Reich To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday

Re: [freenet-chat] Sourceforge down again?

2001-06-23 Thread David McNab
down from my end too   - Original Message - From: Stefan Reich To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 01:28 Subject: [freenet-chat] Sourceforge down again? I tried to connect to http://www.sourceforge.net from three different networks - they all fai

Re: [freenet-chat] [Fwd: Hague Diplomatic Conference Ends, Badly for Now]

2001-06-20 Thread David McNab
My first reactions: 1) Steganography time for Freenet. 2) Thankfully New Zealand is not a signatory to the Convention - Original Message - From: "Seth Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 00:10 Sub

Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Node operators responsibility

2001-06-19 Thread David McNab
stick you IP address on messages sent. - Original Message - From: "Aaron Guy Davies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 07:20 Subject: Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Node operators responsibility > On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, David McN

Re: [freenet-chat] Rebrithing, no flame intended

2001-06-19 Thread David McNab
> I just saw a 20/20 episode last night about rebirthing and it talked > about how a little girl died in a terrible accedint during the rebirthing > therapy. Here's an interesting study into society and human habits of perception. Firstly, one thing the media will never tell you is that the fata

Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Node operators responsibility

2001-06-18 Thread David McNab
> One has to wait and see > if the issue will be cleared up by an ammendment of the MDStV and the TDG or > if the Federal Constitutional Court will have to settle the dispute. A good way to expedite this would be to: 1) Find all the innocent online service providers you can within Germany, wh

Re: [freenet-chat] htl=1 vulnerability for KSKs.

2001-06-18 Thread David McNab
> I believe the inform.php stuff only limits you to getting the same IPs > once per day. Personally, I don't like it. I think it makes Freenet > unreliable, and I don't think it's actually preserving anyone's > privacy or anonymity. Ahh, that's what anonymising proxy servers are for... There's th

Re: [freenet-chat] Node operators responsibility

2001-06-18 Thread David McNab
> it seemed that [a German] ISP's operator can be arrested for storing > illegal material on his proxies hard disk. Although IANAL, I think the > same will apply here. That sounds dangerous. It obliges all internet service providers to act as information police. Goodbye privacy and free expressi

[freenet-chat] Proposal: New 'windows' mailing list

2001-06-17 Thread David McNab
I'd like to suggest the creation of a new Freenet mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list would be for Freenet issues that are specific to Windows users, including: * the interminable barrage of 'freenet doesn't work' messages * windows-based development - clients, fred installers, other softw

[freenet-chat] Non-English Speakers Needed

2001-06-16 Thread David McNab
Hi, Some correspondence from a German guy gave me the idea to internationalise FreeWeb. The more languages FreeWeb is available in, the better. Sadly, for now, we'll have to limit the languages to those that can be rendered in UTF-8 strings - this will include languages based on the Latin (A-Z)

Re: [freenet-chat] New FreeWeb Release - 0.1.3.1

2001-06-16 Thread David McNab
From: "Ian Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Ah, ok, you should probably rename the file on the website to reflect >the new version. OOPS - my whiz-wank automatic package building/releasing script is not quite automatic enough. The thing needs to prompt for release ID, then amend filenames and html l

[freenet-chat] New FreeWeb Release - 0.1.3.1

2001-06-16 Thread David McNab
Just a quick announcement of the new release of FreeWeb. Firstly, in response to the Content of Evil webmaster, I have successfully browsed FreeWeb inserted sites in FProxy. Also, I have verified the validity of the inserted manifests. If you find your Freesites not coming up in FProxy, increase

Re: [freenet-chat] OK - fess up

2001-06-15 Thread David McNab
t; Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 18:16 Subject: Re: [freenet-chat] OK - fess up > On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 12:52:02AM -0400, Mark J. Roberts wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 05:40:56PM +1200, David McNab wrote: > > > Alright alright, > > > > > > Who planted t

Re: [freenet-chat] OS holy wars (was: Nostalgia (moved from devl))

2001-06-14 Thread David McNab
> What if you have a business with 100s of 'old' computers? Its a nice > deal Microsoft and hardware vendors have eh? > ... > For the most > part it is vendors not wanting to offend Microsoft by releasing code to > help Linux or any other OS. This seems to be the heart of the issue. Absolutely co

Re: [freenet-chat] OK - fess up

2001-06-14 Thread David McNab
able me to surf them faster. Cheers David - Original Message - From: "Mark J. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 16:52 Subject: Re: [freenet-chat] OK - fess up > On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 05:40:56PM +1200, David McNab wrote: >

[freenet-chat] OK - fess up

2001-06-14 Thread David McNab
Alright alright, Who planted the &*$%&@ spider-repellant in Freenet? Namely, the [EMAIL PROTECTED] file, configured to exclude everything? ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat

[freenet-chat] OS holy wars (was: Nostalgia (moved from devl))

2001-06-14 Thread David McNab
> While I have the Anything-but-Windows Spotlight, I'd like to point out > that Windows 2000 requires a substantial amount of hardware to run on, > whereas Linux runs on a 386+. I'm going to step out on a limb and say you > probably paid mucho money to upgrade to a new PC just so you could run W2k

Re: [freenet-chat] Linux has a long way to go

2001-06-12 Thread David McNab
> I snicker every time I see the messages > about which version works with which version of Windows. Look how > much trouble it is making installation on Windows easy. Sure, some people > have problems on Linux with Kaffe, but that is ancient Java. That's not due to windows, but to Freenet being

[freenet-chat] Linux has a long way to go

2001-06-12 Thread David McNab
The purpose of this flame-baiting post is to restore some balance of argument to this normally windows-bashing milieu. 3 months ago, I signed up for a long-awaited DSL connection. Of the modems available on the market, the Alcatel Speed Touch USB attracted me, especially since at the time I was f

Re: [freenet-chat] Ian's Wedding

2001-06-10 Thread David McNab
> From Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) [web1913]: > > Sycophant \Syc"o*phant\, n. > 1. An informer; a talebearer. [Obs.] ``Accusing sycophants, >of all men, did best sort to his nature.'' --Sir P. Sidney. > > 2. A base

[freenet-chat] Ian's Wedding

2001-06-10 Thread David McNab
Heard on freenet IRC earlier today: Bold Magazine (LA hollywood gozzip rag) : June : p44 Headline: "Young, Single, Rich!" Subhead: "L.A.'s hottest millionaire power players." #2 - Ian "Infoanarchist" Clarke "How about 24-year-old Ian Clarke?... ...with dark good looks reminiscent of a young

[freenet-chat] FreeWeb: major update v0.1.3.0 - goodbye 'pseudo-DNS'

2001-06-10 Thread David McNab
Hi all, FreeWeb 0.1.3.0 has just been released. With this version, all the controversial 'pseudo-DNS' features have been removed once and for all. Therefore, FreeWeb is now 100% compatible with standard Freenet conventions. Also, the FreeWeb website has had a major makeover, with a new section

[freenet-chat] FProxy MUST DIE!!

2001-06-09 Thread David McNab
I was willing to put up with FProxy up till now, and passively accept it as the 'Official Freenet HTTP Interface'. But three things have convinced me that it needs to immediately take Tim McVeigh's place on death row: 1) Performance - I tried streaming an MP3 off Freenet, and ended up with ears

[freenet-chat] FreeWeb on Linux

2001-06-09 Thread David McNab
Hi all, I've just tested FreeWeb on Linux using the Wine emulator and am pleased to announce that the damn thing actually seems to work - the proxy and the site insertion :)) The only obvious failure is the online help. Not a problem though since it's just html files. To install on Linux, you'l

Re: [freenet-chat] Flea In Your Ear

2001-06-09 Thread David McNab
ORBS, eh? So *that's* why my ISP has been blacklisted from emailing to certain ISPs! Nice idea - frig off the spammers, but with a downside - why punish innocent users for the sins of their ISP. Especially when the bounced email didn't mention anything about Open Relay Servers being the problem.

[freenet-chat] Freenet Shareware :)

2001-06-06 Thread David McNab
Just a quick one in case you're not already aware... Freenet was recently included in the shareware/freeware CD enclosed within Australian Personal Computer magazine. :) ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman

[freenet-chat] Freenet 24/7

2001-06-05 Thread David McNab
" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "David McNab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 02:02 Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Exponential Key Index Insertion > From: "David McNab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > (excuse me thinking out loud here, but

[freenet-chat] Any http/https experts out there?

2001-06-05 Thread David McNab
Hi, Are there any http/https gurus out there? Preferably someone with windows access? I need help with a couple of fine points. Please email me directly: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or IRC me at irc.debian.org #freenet (my nick is heretic108). Cheers David ___

<    1   2   3   4   >