recovery measures, tarp, and the economic downturn, in terms of their impact
on the deficit.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, SenseArray
Email: i...@sensearray.com
Ph: +1 512 422 3588
___
chat mailing list
chat@freenetproject.org
Archived: http://news.gmane.or
genda", etc etc. The only thing that
seems to unite them is that they all hate Obama, they are almost all
republicans or republican-leaning, and 99.9% of them are white.
> Repeat after me, "Four legs good, two legs bad."
>
Yeah, Obama is a socialist because he implemented th
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Freetalk will be integrated in the node soon (how soon nobody knows),
What is the deal with this, it seemed perfectly functional months ago...?
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, SenseArray
Email: i...@sensearray.com
Ph: +1 512 422 3
I've submitted an announcement to Reddit and Digg - please vote, etc.
Reddit:
http://reddit.com/info/6e1ao/comments/
Digg:
http://digg.com/software/Freenet_0_7_Release_Candidate_1_now_available
Ian.
--
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
Skype: sanity
___
On 12/12/06, toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If we find an algorithm in a paper, can we use it in Freenet?
Of course we can. The appropriate response to the threat of software
patents is political action, which has been relatively successful in
Europe, the response is not to cave into them pre-
teven Castelein
___
chat mailing list
chat@freenetproject.org
Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/
listinfo/chat
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ian Clarke: Co-Founder &a
http://tinyurl.com/ydelq5If true, this would definitely answer much of the criticism about Sun as it relates to free software.Ian. Ian Clarke: Co-Founder & Chief Scientist Revver, Inc. phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/
great job of explaining the project (take it from me that it isn't easy when you only have a few seconds), and hopefully this will result in significant new interest in the project.Ian. Ian Clarke: Co-Founder & Chief Scientist Revver, Inc. phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http:/
I have the article, if someone is willing to translate I can mail it to them.Ian.On 27 Sep 2006, at 17:41, Ian Clarke wrote:On 27 Sep 2006, at 11:06, Michael A. Kuijn wrote: On Wednesday 27 September 2006 18:41, Ian Clarke wrote: Apparently there was an article about Freenet in Dutch
On 27 Sep 2006, at 11:06, Michael A. Kuijn wrote:
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 18:41, Ian Clarke wrote:
Apparently there was an article about Freenet in Dutch newsweekly
Nieuwe Revu about a month ago, written by a journalist who
infiltrated a child pornography ring on Freenet. He
?Ian. Ian Clarke: Co-Founder & Chief Scientist Revver, Inc. phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog ___
chat mailing list
chat@freenetproject.org
Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general
Unsubscribe at
This patent purports to cover the rather obvious idea of "using
substantially unique identifiers to identify data items, whereby
identical data items have the same identifiers":
http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/5978791.html
It was filed in October 1997, and is owned by Altnet, who are
c
We won't be officially announcing until later today (PST), so please
keep this quiet until we do (ie. hold off on those Digg and Slashdot
story submissions).
John Gilmore, employee no. 5 at Sun Microsystems, co-founder of the
EFF, and many other things, has generously donated $15,000 to the
Oh, and email addresses (if we don't already).Ian.On 15 Aug 2006, at 12:43, Matthew Toseland wrote:On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 11:56:49AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: I don't see why not, its public. Okay cool lets do it. (My view is that as long as we expunge all IPaddresses, and make it cl
I have had some complaints that the merchandise in the Freenet store at http://www.cafepress.com/freenetproject aren't cool enough, t-shirts should be black etc etc. If anyone would like to try their hand at some new stuff, please let me know.Ian. Ian Clarke: Co-Founder & Chief
e.org/gmane.network.freenet.generalUnsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chatOr mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ian Clarke: Co-Founder & Chief Scientist Revver, Inc. phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signe
mu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech Ian Clarke: Co-Founder & Chief Scientist Revver, Inc. phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog ___
chat mailing list
chat@freenetproject.org
Ar
project.org/ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.___chat mailing listchat@freenetproject.orgArchived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.generalUnsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chatOr mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ian Clarke: Co-Founder
.
With this in mind, I would ask that you visit our donations page on
the website, it can be found at:
http://freenetproject.org/donate.html
And please donate anything you can spare.
Many thanks,
Ian Clarke,
Freenet Project Coordinator.
On 24 Jun 2006, at 10:29, Josh Steiner wrote:
what was this? it just redirects to http://www.scientology.org/
Taking a website critical of you, and redirecting it to your own
website these guys have no sense of shame at their blatant
censorship effort, but I guess believing in interga
I think the fact that DNS has evolved into a primitive search engine
(typing www.dictionary.com to find a dictionary website) was always
rather ugly - and I'm not sure it is something we want to emulate.
Better to implement a proper search engine which can correctly
address the issue of map
We aren't doing too well so far:
http://board.planetpeer.de/index.php/topic,1730.0.html
___
chat mailing list
chat@freenetproject.org
Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mail
David, can you add a link to this in the Library Implementations
section of this page:
http://wiki.freenetproject.org/FreenetFCPSpec2Point0
Ian.
On 11 May 2006, at 23:54, David McNab wrote:
Hi Python hax0r5,
I've just checked into svn a whole new version of pyfcp, which
should be
goo
On 11 May 2006, at 01:35, David McNab wrote:
I've got a cron job which, once a day:
1. starts a transient freenet node
2. lets the node 'settle' for 60 seconds
3. does a round of freesite insertions
4. sits for another 60 seconds
5. shuts down the node
Given that the node has at least a co
That is nice to hear David, welcome back :-)
Ian.
On 10 May 2006, at 16:26, David McNab wrote:
Hi all,
I've been away from freenet for some time, largely due to the
frustration caused by Freenet's pathological unreliability in the
0.4,0.5 era as I was trying to get Freemail to work reliably.
On 7 May 2006, at 18:04, David McNab wrote:
Ian Clarke wrote:
So websites that use this will only work with users that have Firefox
and have installed the plugin?
...
Isn't it preferable to encourage people
to use the normal http://127.0.0.1:/ prefix?
Seems we've got two
This worries me, as it has worried me every time someone has
suggested it (it is suggested about once every 6 months on average):
On 7 May 2006, at 14:48, David McNab wrote:
A 2-minute recipe for getting Firefox to handle 'freenet:'-style URLs,
so that mainstream web pages can link to freesite
This makes a pretty persuasive argument for ditching the [freenet-
devl] subject tags on mailing list emails:
http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/qralston/writing/tagging-harmful/
If nobody can come up with a good argument against this, I suggest we
follow its advice and remove the Subject tags.
On 1 May 2006, at 06:40, Caco Patane wrote:
Look at this article were Freenet is named:
http://www.slyck.com/news.php?story=1169
"Both Winny and Share use Freenet code to help obscure the link
between IP addresses and shared folders, offering a certain level of
anonymity."
It's about leaked d
I think this might be what you are referring to:
http://freenetproject.org/papers/ccc/ccc-freenet-demo.tar.bz2
Note that it requires Java 1.5. Usage is *not* self explanatory, but
it is pretty simple, so make sure you read the README file.
Ian.
On 3 Apr 2006, at 04:58, Martin Ottehall wr
I was surprised to notice that Newsbyte hadn't continued his pathetic
battle to use Wikipedia as a soapbox for his views, and then I
noticed that my prediction came true and a Wikipedia editor had
banned him for his activities on the Freenet article. See [1].
Of course, Newsbyte, with his
Ah, I see - anyone who thinks it is inappropriate for you to link to
your own blog from a Wikipedia article must be a "Freenet fanboy".
Right. You are pathetic, you won't even admit you are wrong when
numerous independent people are telling you so. I suspect you are
close to being banned
just a test
___
chat mailing list
chat@freenetproject.org
Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ah, I see - anyone who thinks it is inappropriate for you to link to
your own blog from a Wikipedia article must be a "Freenet fanboy".
Right. You are pathetic, you won't even admit you are wrong when
numerous independent people are telling you so. I suspect you are
close to being banned
Many thanks to everyone that volunteered to help, but we have decided
that in the time available (only an hour), we are unlikely to have
time to do this :-(
We have put together a nice Java demo that we plan to share online
after we are done, and that people can play with.
Ian.
On 12/28/05, Ian
Oskar and I are giving a talk at 2pm tomorrow in Berlin at the
Berliner Conference Center, as part of the 22nd Chaos Communication
Congress. Unfortunately its a bit pricey, a day pass costs €25, or
€10 for students, but there are plenty of interesting talks going on.
We spent today putting togeth
Well, it seems that Newsbyte wasn't content just to abuse Wikipedia to
add links to his blog from the software patents article, but he also
decided to further abuse Wikipedia by adding links to his rantings
from the Freenet page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Freenet&diff=30257012&ol
Newsbyte,
This is offtopic, but your recent emails reminded me about it, I beg
the indulgence of the list.
Before I add you to my /dev/null list again, one thing I wanted to
say. Please please stop spamming Wikipedia with links to your blog, it
is *really* uncool.
Before you embarrass yourself b
]
* Stephane Bressan, National University of Singapore, Singapore
* Bernard Burg, Panasonic Research, USA
* Ian Clarke, Freenet Project, UK
* Yusuke Doi, TOSHIBA Corporation, Japan (co-chair)
* Debojyoti Dutta, University of Southern California, USA
* Achmad Nizar Hidayanto, University of Indonesia
At the risk of repeating myself - I think we should be conservative,
and that means Subversion.
My experience with distributed approaches has been one of confusion.
Ian.
On 22 Sep 2005, at 18:53, Matthew Toseland wrote:
There is a cvs2arch convertor. This is a bit of a hack though. It only
On 22 Sep 2005, at 17:27, Matthew Toseland wrote:
http://www.gnu.org/software/gnu-arch/
Anyone had any experience? There is already a port to freenet, and the
guy who wrote it might perhaps be persuaded to update it; if not, we
might, eventually. The description sounds good.
I have heard tha
On 22 Sep 2005, at 10:16, Alex R. Mosteo wrote:
I'm going to read too the "Using the Small-World Model to Improve
Freenet Performance" paper.
I wouldn't bother, it is flawed. That paper proposes to replace LRU
cache replacement with a mechanism that artificially enforces a
Kleinberg link d
On 21 Sep 2005, at 17:30, Alex R. Mosteo wrote:
Matthew Toseland wrote:
The main outstanding issue is how frequently we should do path
folding.
If it is too slow, it will take too long to converge. But if it is
too
fast, then oskar's routing algorithm won't be able to keep up. Is
there
on if you would rather not go through Paypal.
You can make a donation through the donations page on our website at:
http://freenetproject.org/index.php?page=donations
If, for whatever reason, you would like to make a donation through other
means, please contact me directly at [EMAIL PR
For those of you in the UK, there will be a piece on Freenet on
"Click Online", which airs at 8.30pm this evening on BBC News 24.
The piece is about 10 minutes into the show.
If anyone misses it, don't worry, the show is repeated at various
other times, and is also on BBC America and BBC W
A journalist for a prominent publication has asked me whether he
could speak to a user of Freenet that might have an interesting story
to tell about how/why they use the software. He is happy to keep
their identity confidential if that is important to them.
If you think you can help, pleas
No, my interview was for "Click Online", and won't go out for around
2 weeks.
Ian.
On 26 Aug 2005, at 20:18, Bob wrote:
Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hmm, sorry maybe it wasn't today after all (although it sounded
like it was).
There was a brief 'Internet issues' piece at 6:00pm again
On 13 Jul 2005, at 17:14, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 04:27:31PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
I'm not getting sucked into this, mainly because I share Matthew
Exon's position on this and he is doing a pretty good job of
defending it. Censorship by majority is just
I'm not getting sucked into this, mainly because I share Matthew
Exon's position on this and he is doing a pretty good job of
defending it. Censorship by majority is just as bad as censorship by
your government, if not worse in many cases.
Toad, if you lived in Iran just how far do you thi
What a terrible idea. Censorship by majority is still censorship.
Ian.
On 11 Jul 2005, at 16:17, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Here's a really whacky idea I came up with on the train back from
Strasbourg (please read the whole email before flaming me):
Personally I support Freenet being uncensorab
One of Newsbyte's trolling attempts seems to have made it on to
Slashdot:
http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?
sid=05/05/16/1212248&tid=156
Fortunately, many of the comments point out that Newsbyte is a troll
that hasn't contributed a single line of code to the project, so I
think
http://infoanarchy.org/ I suppose, although I don't think it is very
active these days.
Ian.
On 18 Apr 2005, at 16:31, Todd Walton wrote:
Anyone know of anything Slashdot-like that caters specifically to the
anonymity/crypto crowd?
-todd
___
chat mailin
On 26 Mar 2005, at 15:03, Jes wrote:
Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
See attachment (from
http://ice.citizenlab.org/blogimages/mpaa-freenet.png).
I do not find this amusing.
This is exactly how freenet is perceived by many (and what it has
become):
an anonymous p2p application, perfe
On 15 Mar 2005, at 14:25, Matthew Toseland wrote:
This is the one we discussed?
A and B both start sending packets to one another at the same time i.e.
equivalent of TCP simultaneous connect, which unlike the TCP version,
reasonably reliably works with UDP?
Correct.
This is not a deliberate featur
On 15 Mar 2005, at 11:40, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Dijjer doesn't do NAT-hopping iirc.
Yes it does, assuming we have the same definition of "NAT-hopping". It
uses a variation of "UDP hole punching" as described in [1], except
without needing a rendezvous server (well, one is needed the first time
On 14 Mar 2005, at 23:55, Greg Wooledge wrote:
Matthew Toseland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 01:33:35PM +, Ian Clarke wrote:
Perhaps you could clarify exactly what is wrong with Freenet working
out-of-the-box for 90% of our users? What is your better suggestion?
The
On 5 Mar 2005, at 04:05, A Nony Mouse wrote:
The bedraggled man in the rear corner of the room stood, cleared his
throat
and asked, "Will 0.7 still support us depraved windows users who, for
whatever reason, cannot move to *nix?"
I'm not really sure what prompted this question, but I am not aware
On 8 Mar 2005, at 23:17, Greg Wooledge wrote:
I don't doubt Matthew's abilities
or dedication, but I often doubt Ian's vision, with his tendency to say
things like, "If it works for Windows users, through a $50 black-box
NAT router, that's 90% of the market, and that's good enough for now."
I just
See attachment (from
http://ice.citizenlab.org/blogimages/mpaa-freenet.png).
I find this quite amusing :-)
Ian.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pastedGraphic1_tiff.DEFANGED-140
Type: application/defanged-140
Size: 50176 bytes
Desc: not availab
Much as I enjoy debate, the one pertaining to the appropriateness of my
deletion of NewsByte's @freenetproject.org account belongs on the chat
mailing list, not on tech, and definitely not on support.
I am happy to concede that I might have encouraged it by responding to
his comments here, but
Seriously, adverts in the
mainstream
press is great. I bet Bush is pro-induce though. There are freedom cons
and bigbiz cons, just like here there are smallbiz cons and bigbiz
cons... right? Hey this is the CHAT list!! :)
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 07:44:54AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
-BEGIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This can only be a good thing, the American Conservative Union is going
to run ads which oppose the Induce Act. The ad is linked at the bottom
of the press release, and it is a pretty succinct summary of why the
Induce Act is so wrong.
Go Republica
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7 Sep 2004, at 17:37, Newsbyte wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7 Sep 2004, at 15:50, Newsbyte wrote:
I can't but feel that, if you had been more supportive and open to
these
idea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7 Sep 2004, at 15:50, Newsbyte wrote:
I can't but feel that, if you had been more supportive and open to
these
ideas, we would long have had a testnetwork or the necessary
simulations.
Wrong. We have had both a test network, two if you count unsta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You are arguing against a strawman. I never entirely discounted
Oskar's argument, in fact, if you have been following devl you will
note that Toad will shortly be starting work on a simulation of NGR to
address some of the valid points Oskar made.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It isn't on a predetermined port - is it?
Ian.
On 1 Sep 2004, at 17:55, Toad wrote:
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 05:54:20PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well, this was the whole point of the distribution se
y,
or share it internally... I'm sure there are chinese groups quite
capable of redistributing Freenet.
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 08:09:37AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
From
http://journalism.berkeley.edu/projects/chinadn/en/archives/
002885.html
:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
From
http://journalism.berkeley.edu/projects/chinadn/en/archives/002885.html
:
It is an open secret that all Chinese Internet hosting services,
including wireless and instant messenger services, filter user
communication through key word blocking m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25 Aug 2004, at 19:23, Newsbyte wrote:
yes, well, this reminds me of the eternal flamewars on /. between the
merrits of BSD and GPL.
Not everyone sees it as black and white, however.
Call it FLOSS, then, or 'public source' or whatever. Point is, as l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25 Aug 2004, at 17:59, Newsbyte wrote:
Such a tool would BY DEFINITION not be open source. And if it had to
>run
in its own JVM there would be a major performance cost at least on
older
JVMs.
No, it wouldn't. In the sense of a GPL'ed Open source pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24 Aug 2004, at 18:24, Nick Tarleton wrote:
On Aug 23, 2004 8:04 PM, Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I hate to say it, but if you are that timid then I suggest you run a
mile from Freenet and anything like it.
Indeed, it seems I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24 Aug 2004, at 00:23, Nick Tarleton wrote:
On Monday 23 August 2004 04:05 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
On 23 Aug 2004, at 19:16, Nick Tarleton wrote:
I'm contemplating writing a FUQID-like program for Linux/KDE, and I'd
like to know a couple
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23 Aug 2004, at 19:16, Nick Tarleton wrote:
I'm contemplating writing a FUQID-like program for Linux/KDE, and I'd
like to know a couple of answers first:
1. Is there ANY CHANCE AT ALL that I could get in legal trouble, under
current US law, for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22 Aug 2004, at 07:33, Sven Hoffmann wrote:
i think we have a large problem with
the starting points/bookmarks that are used
on standard installations.
We strive to judge the front-page bookmarks on one criteria and one
criteria alone: How effective
Please don't cross-post to tech from chat without a good reason (and I
don't see why any of the recent cross-posts are justified). If people
wish to read posts appropriate to chat then they will subscribe to the
chat mailing list.
Ian.
___
chat maili
On 8 Aug 2004, at 01:49, Matthew Findley wrote:
Ok, I'll admit I was partly wrong.
"Partly"! That's quite an admission for someone who claimed they would
be anonymous yet who I was able to tell them the tiny little town they
lived in with about 20 seconds of research based on the information
co
y number of
free to use computers with internet connections at librarys and
collages across the country.
You could also use a wireless laptop and just go to various open
hotspots.
Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> On 6 Aug 2004, at 19:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
On 8 Aug 2004, at 01:04, Matthew Findley wrote:
If you could prove to a jury that it is the government who put the
stuff on freenet you will be perfectly safe.
Last time I checked, the US criminal justice system required proof of
guilt, not proof of innocence. Perhaps that all changed with the
On 6 Aug 2004, at 19:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The WWW is very anonymous. If I hadn't used my real name in my email
address there is no way you could tell who I am.
Thw WWW is anonymous if you are worried about being tracked down by a
computer illiterate 10 year old. If you are worried about
On 6 Aug 2004, at 18:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The is a big difference in knowing it can happen, and knowing it is
happening.
I don't think you can be any more or less certain that it is happening
with Freenet than with the USPS. I think it is a virtual certainty
that a given postman will de
On 6 Aug 2004, at 14:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I gave you a link to the New York state penal code definition of
criminal facilitation. Which spells out very clearly that one only
needs a probable knowledge that his or her actions are allowing for a
crime to occur.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.c
Sonax wrote:
I think you would get a much greater effect by setting a good example
you'r self and politly ask people who post off topic to use the relevant
lists, than you get with the aproch you use now.
I am polite in cases where people don't know any better, but in your
case you knew your post
Look, this is indeed getting silly, so perhaps we can relax, extinguish
the flames, and find some common ground.
Twice in the past a Freenet mailing list has been rendered useless
through off-topic posts. The first time was the Chat mailing list
several years ago which succumbed to flamewars o
Now which of the fucking folowing mails do "discuss bugs, and the implementation
of near-term new features"?
2 out of 3 of them do without question, and the one that doesn't is
certainly closer than an announcement for a non-Freenet related project.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet
Toad wrote:
Flamewar can continue on chat. Personally I think the first message was
perfectly valid and Ian's response wasn't.
Let me clarify for you since you are clearly unfamiliar with the remit
of this mailing list as outlined on our website. "This list is for
active developers to discuss bu
Why the fuck are you spamming the development list with this?
Every time someone inconsiderately decides to spam this with offtopic
posts (and no, saying the email is off topic in the subject is no
excuse) we get one step closer to restricting post privileges to those
that can exercise some self
account on this machine (logins by ssh), with a
public_html folder and cgi enabled. Only trusted developers would be
given access to the user account.
Is anyone in a position to donate these resources to the project? If so
- send me an email at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ian.
--
Just fixed another Watchme bug - most grateful if watchme users could
upgrade.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Founder & Coordinator, The Freenet Projecthttp://freenetproject.org/
Chief Technology Officer, Uprizer Inc.
p with this. You'd have
> to mirror every site referred to as soon as an article referring to it
> was posted, as the slashdot effect tends to hit within an hour or so of
> the referral being posted.
That is what I was suggesting, sorry i
does Google, and as far as I know, nobody complains about
it.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Founder & Coordinator, The Freenet Projecthttp://freenetproject.org/
Chief Technology Officer, Uprizer Inc. http://www.uprizer.com/
Personal
Of particular relevance is the "Dot" language:
http://www.research.att.com/~erg/graphviz/info/lang.html
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 11:42:27AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> If anyone out there fancies putting their Perl, Python, or
> whatever skills to an easy but interesting pr
like Graphviz
(http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz/)?
Any takers?
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Founder & Coordinator, The Freenet Projecthttp://freenetproject.org/
Chief Technology Officer, Uprizer Inc. http://www.uprizer
On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 09:16:48AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Ian Clarke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > Ok, my first cut at the "watchme" functionality is ready for beta
> > testing. I have done some preliminary testing and all seems to be
> > workin
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 05:53:00PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> Ok, my first cut at the "watchme" functionality is ready for beta
> testing. I have done some preliminary testing and all seems to be
> working as-expected.
Ok, an added instruction - if you are overwriting
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Founder & Coordinator, The Freenet Projecthttp://freenetproject.org/
Chief Technology Officer, Uprizer Inc. http://www.uprizer.com/
Personal Homepage http:/
to the watchme
seednodes.ref file
7) Run your node as normal
8) Try to use your node in a similar way that you do normally, but
remember that you have no expectation of anonymity whatsoever
(although it would still require a-little effort to figure out
> >phone number via my Telephone:231-1-775-0572 . which is my confidential
> >line.
> >Also furnish me with your own phone and fax numbers as I will be sending
> >you
> >all necessary registration documents immediately I receive your positive
> >response.
> >
> >T
are now using the debian version of mailman rather than a
custom-installed version which will make future upgrades much easier.
I will try to convert the old archives over soon.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Founder & Coordinator, The Freenet Pro
ing added to the
datastore and flushing out most of the data, but I changed the DataStore
code to prevent that over a year ago IIRC.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarkeian at freenetproject.org
Founder & Coordinator, The Freenet Projecthttp://freenetproject.org
to what specific suggestions you have (you obviously have some if you
are implying that there are serious flaws in the current design).
Ian.
--
Ian Clarkeian at freenetproject.org
Founder & Coordinator, The Freenet Projecthttp://freenetproject.org/
Chie
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
