Re: BCRAN [7:3118]

2001-05-04 Thread W Jones
The main focus point as the Cisco course suggests is Remote Access. If you can understand all that is listed in the Cisco Press book, you will be okay. Think remote access and study towards that and all will be well. WJ >From: "Terence Lee" >Reply-To: "Terence Lee" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: Serial condition [7:3146]

2001-05-04 Thread Vincent Chong
1) Call your service provider to check the status of the line. 2)Misconfigured on router. HTH Vincent ""Hawthorne, Mike MM"" Can anyone explain this condition!!! > > > SBCEN5_8TH_FLOOR_PHASE1#sh int s0 > Serial0 is down, line protocol is up > Hardware is HD64570 > Description: MSWAP

OSPF virtual link Question [7:3154]

2001-05-04 Thread Vincent Chong
Hi; The following scenario [RouteA area0][area0 RouterB area1]<--[area1 RouterC area4] | | | | |__Virtual link___| Does this topology is valid in OSPF? I belive that the configuration has topo

Re: Serial condition [7:3146]

2001-05-04 Thread EA Louie
ummm... ugly? You don't state if there is a problem (such as the terminals attached to the controller not communicating with the front-end, or the FEP can't see the controller - I guess you forgot to let us know in the excitement of the moment), but this link might help: http://www.cisco.com/uni

Re: OSPF virtual link Question [7:3154]

2001-05-04 Thread Charles Lehmann
Configuration topology is okay. In this case you have area 1 as a transit area. It should work fine without any authentication. The thing to know, however, is that the configuration command is a bit misleading: (config-router)#area n virtual-link partner-router-id Where n is, in this case 1. The r

BCMSN Exams [7:3157]

2001-05-04 Thread Mr. Oletu Hosea Godswill, CCNA
Hi All, Am bill to write this exam next week. I need some helping tips: 1. What is the pass mark for the exam? 2. Am using the Cisco press book for BCMSN by Karen Webb. Is this book enough? Surprising, this book did not cover topics like DDR, Cisco TAC/CCO, ATM/LANE, etc which I gather from cisc

Re: BCMSN Exams [7:3157]

2001-05-04 Thread Charles Lehmann
Hi there, 1) I passed BCMSN this week (2.5.2001) and the pass mark was 699. However, i heard (through the grapevine) that the pass mark is question-dependent and that it is usually somewhere between 600 and 700. 2) Should be enough. The Cisco-press books is more or less a 1-to-1 copy of the cours

Re: OSPF virtual link Question [7:3154]

2001-05-04 Thread Vincent Chong
Hi; Due to the mail system incompatiable, the message was truncated, I will provide more information to let you guys have more information. Area 0 is formed by Router A and Router B Area 1 is formed by Router B and Router C Area 4 is formed by Router C only. Router C set up a virtual link wi

Order of taking CCNP exams [7:3160]

2001-05-04 Thread Kigunda Mbogo
Hi, I am to start reading for CCNP exams. Can someone tell me in which order I should use in taking the four exams. particularily should i start with routing and then switching, or vice verser. am planning to take one exam after the other. This is my first posting so bear with me. Best Regards,

CCIE Written ...really dumb Q`s [7:3161]

2001-05-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Memo from Steve Skinner of PricewaterhouseCoopers Start of message text sorry , my brain has turned to mush...pleae help Q1 out fo these routers which is best in enterprsie 3600,7500,1 ?.. Q2 if a routers gets a GNS request what will it do a

Re: Order of taking CCNP exams [7:3160]

2001-05-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] (rfonteyn)
I think it 's all the same, I did CIT (jan 08), CCIE R&S Drake test (April 20) and Foundations (April 27). I have some three years experience, but I've been too lazy to take the exams sooner. My comments? Take CIT at the end, it tests your knowledge of the previous tests. Foundations seems hard

RE: ATM Module for 2600 [7:3032]

2001-05-04 Thread Stephen Skinner
cheers chuck that is a top tool.. >From: "Chuck Larrieu" >Reply-To: "Chuck Larrieu" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: ATM Module for 2600 [7:3032] >Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 11:15:34 -0400 > >You more choices today than you did several months ago. But there are only >7 >cards I can find

1603 router [7:3165]

2001-05-04 Thread Sujal G. Ajmera
Hi, In the Cisco documentation manual, it doesn't mention that WIC-2T can be used but it does say that WIC-1T can be used. Any thoughts on this? TIA Sujal Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3165&t=3165 -- FAQ, li

Re: CCIE Written ...really dumb Q`s [7:3161]

2001-05-04 Thread Vincent Chong
Hi; 1) 7500 series for big enterprise 3600 is suitable for small enterprise or branch. You pick one. 2) Router will not broadcast SAP table. Router rather matintain their own sap table. If the sap client could not find the sever in the local segment, the sap clie

Re: ATM Module for 2600 [7:3032]

2001-05-04 Thread Curtis Phillips
The is no interface support for ATM OC-3 on the 2600 platform. There is support on the 3600 however. Curtis - Original Message - From: "Stephen Skinner" To: Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 7:34 AM Subject: RE: ATM Module for 2600 [7:3032] > cheers chuck > > that is a top tool.. > > > >

Re: 1603 router [7:3165]

2001-05-04 Thread Vincent Chong
No. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/sewn__y2.htm ""Sujal G. Ajmera"" Hi, > > In the Cisco documentation manual, it doesn't mention that WIC-2T can be > used but it does say that WIC-1T can be used. > > Any thoughts on this? > > TIA > > Sujal > FAQ, list archives, and subscription

Re: OSPF virtual link Question [7:3154]

2001-05-04 Thread Charles Lehmann
I don't know what you mean by OSPF area rule, nor by the virtual link rule, but: In order to route from one of "not-backbone OSPF area" to another "not-backbone OSPF area", you need to cross the backbone area (area 0). For this reason, if one has two chained areas that do not "share" the backbone

What are the differences between Caslow's Volume 1 and 2 ? [7:3169]

2001-05-04 Thread Jim Shaw
Hi, Folks. I have read Caslow's "Bridges, Routers and Switches for CCIEs" volume one. Has anyone examined the differences between volume 1 and 2. Is volume 2 still recommended if you have covered volume one, or are there only a few additional topics that can be reviewed separately? Thanks. M

Re: Order of taking CCNP exams [7:3160]

2001-05-04 Thread Circusnuts
Depends on how schooled you are. Myself- I'd not studied for a cert. exam in 2 years, so I started with the BCMSN (Switching). The Switching exam is mainly wrote memorization. I took them in this order: Switching (easy), BCRAN (hard), Support (easy), & Routing (hard). I was most concerned with

Re: OSPF virtual link Question [7:3154]

2001-05-04 Thread Circusnuts
Vincent- this is a textbook scenario for virtual links to Area 0. You must realize that you will be building a 1 way LSA tunnel (configured on both sides). How you look @ this, is that Router C is broke. It can't inform Area 4 because it's not an ABR. You need to make the connection "from & thr

Re: OSPF virtual link Question [7:3154]

2001-05-04 Thread Vincent Chong
Hi; Thank you. Vincent Chong Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3173&t=3154 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosur

Outbound access lists [7:3174]

2001-05-04 Thread Hans Stout
Hello colleagues, I am trying to configure outbound access lists between 4 FastEthernet subinterfaces (with 4 different VLANs configured), so that the VLANs cannot communicate with each other. The problem is that inbound access lists work fine, but when I configure outbound access lists (e.g.

RE: 2924XL for sale [7:2721]

2001-05-04 Thread Hire, Ejay
I've got a Catalyst 2924-XL-Enterprise Modular Switch with a 2 port 100baseFX card and 4 port 10/100BaseT card included that I would like to sell for $1000. It includes the newest 12.05 IOS, Doc CD and Console Cable, all in the original boxes... I wouldn't normally post like this to the group, b

Re: Passed CCIE written exam [7:3140]

2001-05-04 Thread Katson PN Yeung
Congrad Vincent, When and where will be your lab test? ""Vincent Chong"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi everyone; > > After 3 days intensive and fast track study, I decided to take > exam today. > > I finally passed the exam. It's my

Re: what material about CCIE written exam [7:3177]

2001-05-04 Thread Katson PN Yeung
There are a lot. 1. Interconnections 2nd ed. 2. Cisco LAN switching 3. I.R.A 4. TCP/IP illustrated vol1. 5. ICRC and ACRC. 6. Caslow's B.R.S for CCIEs. "yudaocai" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > ciscocisco#,hi#! > I passed the ccnp last month . I

Re: Last minute Tips on CCIE written Exam [7:3085]

2001-05-04 Thread Mari Misato
Even if you pass, I don't think you'll be respected because of your notorious name in the IT market in Hong Kong. >From: "Vincent Chong" >Reply-To: "Vincent Chong" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Last minute Tips on CCIE written Exam [7:3085] >Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 14:54:49 -0400 > >Hi; > >

FW: 1603 router [7:3165]

2001-05-04 Thread Jim Shaw
If I recall, I plugged a WIC-2T into a 1604 last year. The version of IOS I was using wouldn't recognize the card (sorry, can't remember the version and haven't got unit any more). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vincent Chong Sent: Friday

CCDA Question [7:3180]

2001-05-04 Thread Jim Dixon
Hello Group, I think this question has the wrong idea about which answer is correct here. What does the group think? Am I missing something? Sorry your Answer (E) is Incorrect! CCDA - Cisco Certified Design Associate Access lists can be used to control traffic on an internetwork. What statemen

MCSE [7:3181]

2001-05-04 Thread RANMA
Sgd zmrvdq, ne bntqrd, hr sgzs hs cndrm's. Sn rdd sghr, hlzfhmd rszmchmf hm eqnms ne z lhqqnq gnkchmf zm zqqnv onhmshmf sn xntq qhfgs. Sgdm sgd hlzfd ne sgd zqqnv hm sgd lhqqnq vhkk zkrn onhms sn xntq qhfgs. Sgd jdx sn sgd oqnakdl gdqd hr sn zrj sgd qhfgs ptdrshnm, vghbg hr: Vgzs cndr z lhqqnq qdu

RE: static route help: sprint thinks its impossible.... [7:3182]

2001-05-04 Thread Hire, Ejay
You have two problems. Problem 1:) Rip is operating in classfull mode, and not propagating correct information. Solution: Change to RIP version 2 which is classless, and make sure IP Classless is set in the routers. Problem 2:) The acquired company is operating in non-RFC compliant Private I

Re: Last minute Tips on CCIE written Exam [7:3085]

2001-05-04 Thread Circusnuts
Am I missing something- when I read posts like this ??? Phil - Original Message - From: Mari Misato To: Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 10:11 AM Subject: Re: Last minute Tips on CCIE written Exam [7:3085] > Even if you pass, I don't think you'll be respected because of your > notorious na

RE: 2924XL for sale [7:2721]

2001-05-04 Thread Tom
Thanks, but I was really more interested in knowing where someone would get them at a price so low. See, I sell work for a Silver Partner and we pay about $1200 for them, direct from Cisco. Tech data and other distributors don't have any better pricing. Oh well, Tom -Original Message

Re: UPgrade Cisco 3000 to 2500 Router [7:2303]

2001-05-04 Thread Circusnuts
Carl- as far as the memory, it depends what model of 3000 you have. You can get away with running pre- Y2K 9.1(b) boot ROM's. I know the 11.0(10c) are what is talked about most, but I have (5) 3000 routers in my lab running both version of boot ROM's (with 12.0 IOS). The main difference is, I p

Re: 2924XL for sale [7:2721]

2001-05-04 Thread Jason Baker
there are several auction places on the net.. ebay is one, yahoo is another. Regards, Jason Baker - Original Message - From: "Hire, Ejay" To: Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 11:55 PM Subject: RE: 2924XL for sale [7:2721] > I've got a Catalyst 2924-XL-Enterprise Modular Switch with a 2 p

RE: MCSE [7:3181]

2001-05-04 Thread Charles Manafa
I totally agree, apart from the fact that $#%^&*! isn't *&^%$#"! Good luck with your mnbvcxzlkjhg > -Original Message- > From: RANMA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 04 May 2001 15:24 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: MCSE [7:3181] > > > Sgd zmrvdq, ne bntqrd, hr sgzs hs cndrm's. Sn

RE: Cisco PIX vs Checkpoint FIrewall-1 [7:2878]

2001-05-04 Thread Jim Brown
Security holes in lower layers? Where did you come up with that, your Cisco rep? -Original Message- From: Eugene Nine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 5:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco PIX vs Checkpoint FIrewall-1 [7:2878] PIX goes up to layer 4, so

Re: 2924XL for sale [7:2721]

2001-05-04 Thread Brian
I think he wanted to know where to get a NEW one for that price. Bri - Original Message - From: "Jason Baker" To: Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 7:39 AM Subject: Re: 2924XL for sale [7:2721] > there are several auction places on the net.. ebay is one, yahoo is another. > > > Regards,

Re: MCSE [7:3181]

2001-05-04 Thread David Chandler
Is this a sneak peak at IOS 13.x ??? :-> DaveC RANMA wrote: > > Sgd zmrvdq, ne bntqrd, hr sgzs hs cndrm's. Sn rdd sghr, hlzfhmd rszmchmf hm > eqnms ne z lhqqnq gnkchmf zm zqqnv onhmshmf sn xntq qhfgs. Sgdm sgd hlzfd ne > sgd zqqnv hm sgd lhqqnq vhkk zkrn onhms sn xntq qhfgs. Sgd jdx sn sgd

Re: Last minute Tips on CCIE written Exam [7:3085]

2001-05-04 Thread Stephen Skinner
hahahahaha very funny..YOU GO GIRL! stvee >From: "Mari Misato" >Reply-To: "Mari Misato" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Last minute Tips on CCIE written Exam [7:3085] >Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 10:11:10 -0400 > >Even if you pass, I don't think you'll be respected because of your

Re: CCDA Question [7:3180]

2001-05-04 Thread Darren Crawford
Where did you get this? We all know that there's a "deny all" at the end of an access list. At 10:13 AM 05/04/2001 -0400, Jim Dixon wrote: >Hello Group, > >I think this question has the wrong idea about which answer is correct here. >What does the group think? >Am I missing something? > >Sorry y

Re: Order of taking CCNP exams [7:3160]

2001-05-04 Thread Adam Hickey
Since I am in the middle of my CCNP right now, I am curious if the relative difficulty of each test, as listed by Phil, is generally the concensus here in the group Switching (easy), BCRAN (hard), Support (easy), Routing (hard)? I've only taken the Routing so far (studying for BCRAN now), an

Re: Last minute Tips on CCIE written Exam [7:3085]

2001-05-04 Thread RamG
He is expressing the bad experience he had with VC in trading CCIE materials "I think". I was also a victim. Thanks / RamG Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3193&t=3085 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription in

Re: Cisco PIX vs Checkpoint FIrewall-1 [7:2878]

2001-05-04 Thread Brian
In a serious enterprise of scale, I would indeed consider using both a pix and a server based firewall. Bri - Original Message - From: "Jim Brown" To: Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 7:44 AM Subject: RE: Cisco PIX vs Checkpoint FIrewall-1 [7:2878] > Security holes in lower lay

Re: CCDA Question [7:3180]

2001-05-04 Thread Kevin Wigle
looks like the question just has a mistake on the letter of the correct answer. Answer E is correct and the explanation says "deny all" Some practice exams aren't very good when they jumble up the order of the answers. The answer files don't adapt to the new letter an answer may get. I betcha a

Re: Order of taking CCNP exams [7:3160]

2001-05-04 Thread Brian
I would also use momentum, and take the tests covering material of greatest familiarity to me first. As an example, I have all service provider and little enterprise experience, so I would go routing bcran switching support Bri - Original Message - From: "Adam Hickey" To: Sent: F

RE: CCDA Question [7:3180]

2001-05-04 Thread Jim Dixon
Yea It came straight from Cramsession's Question a day CCDA list. www.brainbuzz.com -Original Message- From: Darren Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 9:37 AM To: Jim Dixon; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCDA Question [7:3180] Where did you get this? We

Re: Cisco PIX vs Checkpoint FIrewall-1 [7:2878]

2001-05-04 Thread Allen May
PIX can do url filtering with Websense. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/so/neso/sqso/csap/wbsn_rg.htm Allen May - Original Message - From: "Jason Roysdon" To: Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 10:25 PM Subject: Re: Cisco PIX vs Checkpoint FIrewall-1 [7:2878] > You can run traffic throu

Re: MCSE [7:3181]

2001-05-04 Thread simonis
David Chandler wrote: > > Is this a sneak peak at IOS 13.x ??? :-> > > DaveC > I thought it was ROT-13 =) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3201&t=3181 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www

RE: 2924XL for sale [7:2721]

2001-05-04 Thread Chris Dahl
Go to CNET Shopper for price comparisons. Drill on Networking/Switches and cases/Eth & Feth switches, non-stackable. www.shopper.com Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 10:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

Re: NAT question [7:3050]

2001-05-04 Thread Greg Smythe
That's sorta what I did, make DNS entries for the internal IP addresses, then point the servers to those. A bit of a pain, but it works... I was looking for a more elegant solution (-: Thanks to all that replied! Greg - Original Message - From: "Lupi, Guy" To: Sent: Thursday, May 03,

Re: Order of taking CCNP exams [7:3160]

2001-05-04 Thread Circusnuts
> Switching (easy), > BCRAN (hard), > Support (easy), > Routing (hard)? Sorry guys, the Easy & Hard comments were totally subjective. I have NOC & design experience, so the Support & Switching were pretty much a walk in the park. The Hard tests where ones I actually had to learn a large portion

RE: Cisco PIX vs Checkpoint FIrewall-1 [7:2878]

2001-05-04 Thread Maness, Drew
I don't think it is security holes at a lower layer. Checkpoint installs what they call a shiv between the network and data link layer to protect the IP stack. And if you were to take advantage of OS security flaws you would be doing it at the Session Layer and above, not the lower layers. Abo

RE: Cisco PIX vs Checkpoint FIrewall-1 [7:2878]

2001-05-04 Thread Carroll Kong
At 10:44 AM 5/4/01 -0400, Jim Brown wrote: >Security holes in lower layers? Where did you come up with that, your Cisco >rep? > >-Original Message- >From: Eugene Nine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 5:01 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Cisco PIX vs Checkpoi

RE: OSPF virtual link Question [7:3154]

2001-05-04 Thread Hire, Ejay
A virtual link allows an ABR to Hop accross a transit area to reach area 0. Generally speaking, they are to be avoided. Virtual links are more acceptable in a migration situation, or if Area 0 has been segmented (I.e. as a temp fix). The little book of common sense says if it isn't broke then th

Re: 2924XL for sale [7:2721]

2001-05-04 Thread Adam Hickey
He probably can't - that's why most of us buy from ebay and not retailers Adam Hickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ "And One!" - Original Message - From: "Brian" To: Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 7:46 AM Subject: Re: 2924XL for sale [7:2721] > I think he wanted to kno

HSRP and set spantree root design question [7:3208]

2001-05-04 Thread Kim Seng
I have a switches internetwork with: S1 S2 C1 C2 D1 D2 A1 A2 S= server farm switch (Routing with MSFC) C= Core switch (Layer 2 only) D= Distribution switch (Routing with MSFC) A= Access switch A1 (is VLAN2) is connected to both D1 and D2. A2 (is VLAN3) is connected t

RE: Cisco Certification Digest V2 #1251 [7:3210]

2001-05-04 Thread Mann, Chris
unsubscribe cisco-digest [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3210&t=3210 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure vi

Re: Cisco router difference [7:3114]

2001-05-04 Thread Circusnuts
Eeekkk... The 4000 came as 4 Meg FLASH card & 16 RAM maximum build (11.3(11a) is the highest IOS you can run). Their boot images are on ROM's & were only updated to a max of 10.0. A kit was sold to make this router a 16/16 box. The traditional 4000M can run 16 Megs FLASH (2 SIMM bays) & 16 Meg

RE: MCSE [7:3181]

2001-05-04 Thread Dyson Kuben
Do you speak any English? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3211&t=3181 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL

Re: Cisco PIX vs Checkpoint FIrewall-1 [7:2878]

2001-05-04 Thread Allen May
I installed the GUI for the PIX but haven't used it yet. Letting something else build my config just seems weird ;) Almost like job security making a flushing noise...rofl. - Original Message - From: "Maness, Drew" To: Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 10:29 AM Subject: RE: Cisco PIX vs Chec

Re: Cisco PIX vs Checkpoint FIrewall-1 [7:2878]

2001-05-04 Thread Eugene Nine
Well I opened a can of worms with this one. I do know of web sense, I beleive I have read that Cisco is not going to be selling it in the future, someone correct me if I am wrong there. So far a properly configured PIX has never been beat, there have been news stories of PIX's that have been bea

Re: Cisco PIX vs Checkpoint FIrewall-1 [7:2878]

2001-05-04 Thread simonis
"Maness, Drew" wrote: > > > But today firewalls protect the IP stack. While they are running, yes. You can cause the software to crash, often leaving the machine, and the network, exposed. This is one of the big problems with a software firewall. >A

Study Material for 9E0-570 VPN exam [7:3215]

2001-05-04 Thread Cooper, David
Anybody know what the best material to study for this exam? I am working towards the Security Specialist and have passed the MCNS and Adv Firewall already. Is the MCNS book good enough for this exam also. I noticed alot of redundancy between the Firewall and MCNS exams. Thanks Dave Cooper - CCNP,

RE: CCDA [7:2971]

2001-05-04 Thread Greg Macaulay
Kevin, I'm not sure that you're not still sleepin' -- so to speak I just checked the CCDA and CCDP requirements. You are correct that the CCNA is NOT a prerequisite for the CCDA (I'm too old to recall whether the CCNA WAS ONCE a requirement!!-- but I don't think so!). However, in order to obt

RE: Cisco PIX vs Checkpoint FIrewall-1 [7:2878]

2001-05-04 Thread Jim Brown
On the flushing noise. It sounds more like job security to me! Which is better, to have an effective, understandable security policy that is easily managed through a GUI, or a complex command line driven attempt at a security policy. The job security is in not making stupid mistakes in policy desi

Re: Seeking opinions on the following hardware for Lab.. [7:3196]

2001-05-04 Thread Ed Dombrowski
As you stated you will want a high end switch. I would think you would also want at least one router with a Fast Ethernet interface that supports ISL trunking (like a 2620 ect) coming from the switch. In addition you would probably want something like a 2523 (8 serial, 1 Token, 1 BRI) This will se

Re: Study Material for 9E0-570 VPN exam [7:3215]

2001-05-04 Thread Davy
Hello, did you pass the MCSN and Adv Firewall using only MCSN book? Thanks Davy ""Cooper, David"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Anybody know what the best material to study for this exam? I am working > towards the Security Specialist and have passed the MCNS

RE: 2924XL for sale [7:2721]

2001-05-04 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
I have great experience with LanBlvd reg. Cisco products. http://www.lanblvd.com/productpage.cfm?prodid=208 They have the 2924-XL-EN for $1,069.00 Hth, Ole Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: CCIE Written ...really dumb Q`s [7:3161]

2001-05-04 Thread JZ
> Q2 > if a routers gets a GNS request what will it do > > a ignore it > b pass to next sever on segment > c pass to nearest server To me, the best one would be (a). because the router will do one of the two things when it gets GNS -- ignore it, or reply to it. It will never pass the GNS to anyon

Re: CCDA [7:2971]

2001-05-04 Thread Traceroute
how old, just curious??? - Original Message - From: "Greg Macaulay" To: Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 11:34 AM Subject: RE: CCDA [7:2971] > Kevin, > > I'm not sure that you're not still sleepin' -- so to speak > > I just checked the CCDA and CCDP requirements. You are correct that the >

Protocol Analyzer [7:3222]

2001-05-04 Thread Victor Chan
I have use netmonitor to capture some packet. What is a good protocol analayzer or a tool that decodes that info? I can not read it to understand the information I have gathered. Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3222&t=3222 --

Re: BCMSN Exams [7:3157]

2001-05-04 Thread Kevin Schwantz
I passed BCMSN this week and the pass mark was 699. There are very few configuration questions and I only had one fill in the blank config question. Make sure you know what switch is good for what situation as I got about 7 of these questions. ""Charles Lehmann"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECT

OT: Traffic analyzer [7:3223]

2001-05-04 Thread Roberts, Timothy
I am looking for a tool that will perform a similar function to traceroute but will log the results and build reports from those results. So basically something that will test throughput from host->network->host and report where any slow downs occurred. Thanks Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail

Re: CCDA [7:2971]

2001-05-04 Thread Kevin Wigle
Greg, to my recollection - yes, CCNA was once required to get CCDA. That's what I did "in the beginning". But the easiest way to check is probably to look at the front of many of the older CCxx books - they all had a chapter on certification and what was required. Unfortunately, I don't have o

Re: CCDA [7:2971]

2001-05-04 Thread Kevin Wigle
not sure if you're asking how old the oldest CCNP/CCDP is... (hey Greg!!!) or how long ago CCDA required CCNA or how old I am... I'll assume the second. I did CCNA/CCDA around Dec 1999/Jan 2000 and I thought CCDA required it then. As for Greg Kevin Wigle

Re: Traffic analyzer [7:3223]

2001-05-04 Thread Allen May
I seem to remember reading a readme file about something in the contribution section of MRTG that does something similar to this. It was some kind of latency report that required replacing ping.exe and running the perl script. I could be wrong...I don't have it installed here in front of me to ch

Re: Serial condition [7:3146]

2001-05-04 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
At 02:48 AM 5/4/01, Hawthorne, Mike MM wrote: >Can anyone explain this condition!!! > > >SBCEN5_8TH_FLOOR_PHASE1#sh int s0 >Serial0 is down, line protocol is up Is this for real?? How can the line protocol be up if the interface is down? On a Cisco test (which I realize has little to do with rea

Digest [7:3230]

2001-05-04 Thread John O. Watkins
Does anyone know if this list has a "Digest" feature? Let me know. Thanks, John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3230&t=3230 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html

Re: CCDA [7:2971]

2001-05-04 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
CCDA never required CCNA. CCDP always has and still does. That takes a lot of people by surprise. I may be one of the older CCDPs!? I used to tell my age in hex, but it has letters in it now, so it's not a joke that normal people get. Priscilla At 02:37 PM 5/4/01, Kevin Wigle wrote: >not sure

Re: 1603 router [7:3165]

2001-05-04 Thread andyh
WIC-2Ts are for 2600s only - don't work in 1700s or 3600s either Andy - Original Message - From: "Sujal G. Ajmera" To: Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 1:01 PM Subject: 1603 router [7:3165] > Hi, > > In the Cisco documentation manual, it doesn't mention that WIC-2T can be > used but it doe

Re: OT: Traffic analyzer [7:3223]

2001-05-04 Thread simonis
"Roberts, Timothy" wrote: > > I am looking for a tool that will perform a similar function to traceroute > but will log the results and build reports from those results. So basically > something that will test throughput from host->network->host and report > where any slow downs occurred. > Than

Re: Digest [7:3230]

2001-05-04 Thread Karen E Young
John, Go to www.groupstudy.com. On the right hand side about half way down there's a "List Manager" heading. It allows you to subscribe to the digest version of the professional list. HTH, Karen *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 5/4/2001 at 2:49 PM John O. Watkins wrote: >Do

RE: CCDA [7:2971]

2001-05-04 Thread Chuck Larrieu
I am 0x33 and I know I'm not the oldest CCNP/CCDP around, on this list or at my place of employment. ( although some days it sure feels like it :-> ) So, PO, you're now sweet 0x1C ? ;-> chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Priscil

Re: HSRP and set spantree root design question [7:3208]

2001-05-04 Thread Karen E Young
You might want to look at the UplinkFast and BackboneFast features. These features allow fast switchover to redundant links on switches running spanning-tree in the case of a failure. HTH, Karen *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 5/4/2001 at 11:54 AM Kim Seng wrote: >I have a

Disable telnet port [7:3237]

2001-05-04 Thread Victor Chan
How do you disable telnet port on the cisco router 2524 and 2610? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3237&t=3237 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report miscondu

RE: 1603 router [7:3165]

2001-05-04 Thread LeBrun, Tim
Oh contraire - I have several WIC-2Ts working in 3640s. Tim LeBrun CCNA, CCDA Phone: 864-587-3831 Fax: 413-825-0402 Cell: 864-621-8044 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: andyh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 3:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 1603

Cisco Security Bootcamp (4 days) [7:3240]

2001-05-04 Thread Cooper, David
Anyone attended this course? I am scheduled in a couple of weeks and wondered if it was worth it and what all is covered. Thanks Dave Cooper - CCNP, CCDP, NNCSS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3240&t=3240 -- FAQ

RE: Disable telnet port [7:3237]

2001-05-04 Thread Chuck Larrieu
By "telnet port" do you mean TCP port 23. Or do you mean the VTY's themselves? If the latter, the most effective way is to require a login but set no password. Eg Line vty 0 4 Login HTH Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Victor C

Re: 2924XL for sale [7:2721]

2001-05-04 Thread Kelly D Griffin
April 1st through April 28th, Cisco ran a special for resellers that would give Gold and Silver partners 42% off of retail. That special is over and we are now back to normal discounts. The price at LAN Blvd needs to be updated because he is selling below his cost at this point. Kelly D Griffin

OT: RFC 1149 is in use [7:3244]

2001-05-04 Thread John Hardman
Hi All Checkout http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-5825807.html?tag=tp_pr RFC 1149 in a successful test! -- John Hardman CCNP MCSE Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3244&t=3244 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscri

RE: 2924XL for sale [7:2721]

2001-05-04 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
Well, that's the same story I hear everytime I mention LanBlvd to anyone, but the fact is that they have been selling Cisco equipment for the lowest prices since I started buying from them 8 months ago, and I am sure that they will sell you that switch for that price. I had a long discussion with

Re: 2924XL for sale [7:2721]

2001-05-04 Thread Kelly D Griffin
Try to buy SMARTnet maintenance on one of their items. Can't be done because they are open box, on the wholesale market. Check a serial number on one and call Cisco to find out its history. You won't like what you hear. www.startechmicro.com is another one of these resellers. They are not aut

RE: 2924XL for sale [7:2721]

2001-05-04 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
I don't know if you're right or not, but I have not been in a need for SMARTnet maintenance on any of those devices I have bought from them, and I doubt that anyone who needs this 2924-XL switch for their homelab wants to pay for anything else than the switch itself. I contacted Cisco about the f

RE: RFC 1149 is in use [7:3244]

2001-05-04 Thread Chuck Larrieu
Something only Linux fanatics would do. Obviously they have too much time on their hands. ( among other things now ;-> ) ( flames to /dev/null ) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 2:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

RE: RFC 1149 is in use [7:3244]

2001-05-04 Thread sdonoho
I hope RFC 1149 isn't covered in the CCIE lab exam! Scott Donoho CCNP > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 4:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: OT: RFC 1149 is in use [7:3244] > > > Hi All > > Checkout

RE: Cisco PIX vs Checkpoint FIrewall-1 [7:2878]

2001-05-04 Thread Dave Chappell
This might be of interest: http://www.roble.com/docs/fw1_or_pix.html Dave -Original Message- From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 10:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco PIX vs Checkpoint FIrewall-1 [7:2878] In a serious enterprise of scale, I wo

RE: Disable telnet port [7:3237]

2001-05-04 Thread Jacques Atlas
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Chuck Larrieu wrote: |By "telnet port" do you mean TCP port 23. Or do you mean the VTY's |themselves? | |If the latter, the most effective way is to require a login but set no |password. |Eg | |Line vty 0 4 |Login anyone know if you can _disable_ telnet to a cisco and only ss

Re: RFC 1149 is in use [7:3244]

2001-05-04 Thread EA Louie
I want nothing to do with the "dropped bits" from RFC 1149. thank you very much -e- - Original Message - From: "John Hardman" To: Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 2:31 PM Subject: OT: RFC 1149 is in use [7:3244] > Hi All > > Checkout > http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-5825807.html?tag

RE: Disable telnet port [7:3237]

2001-05-04 Thread Chuck Larrieu
There is no option "no service telnet" on the IOS I have available to me. Your choice would then become an access-list denying telnet to appropriate router interfaces. You can also apply access lists to the vty ports to limit who can telnet in. nope, can't delete the vty lines either. HTH Chuck

RE: RFC 1149 is in use [7:3244]

2001-05-04 Thread Brian Dennis
If you go into the CCIE lab and see a pigeon loft in your rack you're just out of luck I guess. I wonder what the config would look like for it. interface Pigeon 0/0 encapsulation feather ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0 foot-band id 47.0001...0001.00 source-bridge winged no ip pi

  1   2   >