RE: CISCO INTERNSHIP.....CCIE..... [7:36091]

2002-02-21 Thread Larry Letterman
there are some positions at Bank one in Illinois and ohio.. if your interested.. Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Marc Maxwell Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 9:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Flash SIMMs the same? [7:35876]

2002-02-21 Thread Ciscodog
I agree I just recently upgraded a bunch of 2611s and used flash that had 3600 IOS images on it - and used rommon mode to TFTP a 2611 IOS. -Tom - Original Message - From: "Scott Nawalaniec" To: Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:02 PM Subject: RE: Flash SIMMs the same? [7:35876] > FY

Re: Cat 5k system ram & flash [7:36170]

2002-02-21 Thread Ranma
It had better using a SUP-II engine with MSFC for the exam... ""Colin"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi > > I'm looking to buy a Cat 5k switch for my CCNP lab. How much System Ram > & Flash should a Sup I module have to be useful for my studies? How > about

Re: Access list question [7:36166]

2002-02-21 Thread Ranma
How about using Policy Route ? ""Amit Gupta"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello All, > > > I want to set up an access list on the MSFC so that > traffic from a particular vlan or a range of IP > addresses is forwarded through another serial > interface. > > My

Re: hop count in EIGRP? [7:36082]

2002-02-21 Thread Chuck
BTW, it occurs to me that we have had this discussion before. There being nothing in the routing table indicating IGRP or EIGRP hop counts, how does (E)IGRP "know" the diameter of the network of which it is a member? And why would it "care"? ;-> Maybe one of these days I'll daisy chain the router

Re: hop count in EIGRP? [7:36082]

2002-02-21 Thread Chuck
it gets complicated, routing protocols versus ip packets. first of all, if I understand correctly, all ip routing protocols use ip headers. The routing protocol packet is the payload, and not an entity unto itself. I have seen traces of OSPF packets showing IP TTL of various values. Someone share

Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.....CCIE..... [7:36091]

2002-02-21 Thread Mike Sweeney
I've sat through the dog and pony show.. short version: you sign up for the complete package of training.. you pay it up front.. something around 30-40K .. and they offer a convient loan package through FannieMay.. you sign a contract where X dollars (roughly half)are *forgiven* on completion of

Re: Boson's CCIE LAB Practice [7:36049]

2002-02-21 Thread Nick S.
havent seen the BOSON labs. but IPEXPERT is GOOD, CCBOOTCAMP labs are a must if you want to go for the lab. Have both of them. hth Nick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36173&t=36049 -- FAQ, list archives, and subsc

Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.....CCIE..... [7:36091]

2002-02-21 Thread Leslie McIntosh
Marc, I would think that with the Market being soft $50k for ONLY CCNA would be max. I have my CCNA and fit the bill, but I also have CNE5, A+, Network+ and a couple others w/ 6 years IT exp. I would think CCNP with minimal exp could bring 50k pretty easilly. As far as training, I have been he

RE: CISCO INTERNSHIP.....CCIE..... [7:36091]

2002-02-21 Thread Puckette, Larry (TIFPC)
The ole keep 'em uneducated and underpaid method I agree that is a typical corporate personnel practice, but not MY corporation. We get decent training( my latest 2 classes were for Checkpoint firewalls) and a lot of responsibilities, but still no pay. The 'typical behavior' represented here

IP helper-address, domain browsing & NAT [7:36089]

2002-02-21 Thread Kurdziel Peter
Does anyone know of any issues using the IP helper-address and domain browsing while using NAT? I have 2 locations, CA and NJ. CA has a connection to the internet, NJ does not. CA and NJ are connected via a point-to-point link via their serial insterfaces. With the help of NATting NJ now is able

Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.....CCIE..... [7:36091]

2002-02-21 Thread Marc Maxwell
ONe would hope that would be factored in. The high cost of living here, still doesn't automatically raise salaries I am afraid. The bootcamps eventually lower everyone's salary since they are churning out armies of 'qualified' people, that look somewhat the same on paper to many recruiters.

Re: Autonomous-system command [7:36067]

2002-02-21 Thread Chuck
the question is - what does the command do? it does not appear in the documentation. there is no apparent result using show ip protocol, or show ip anything else. if you can explain what the command "autonomous-system" does, I'm all ears. Chuck ""Anthony Toh"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: https to log in to a router - Possible?? [7:36143]

2002-02-21 Thread Chuck
if only because Cisco ought to be embarrassed at the half assed HTTP functionality. essentially worthless, IMHO Chuck ""Patrick Bass"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > IMO, they should remove HTTP access completely!! If you're looking for a > secure connection t

Re: https to log in to a router - Possible?? [7:36143]

2002-02-21 Thread Brian
That http thing is not a security plus i agree, i remember seeing an advisory on that a bit back.. Bri On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Patrick Bass wrote: > IMO, they should remove HTTP access completely!! If you're looking for a > secure connection to the router, try SSH, or use TACACS+... > > "

RE: Autonomous-system command [7:36067]

2002-02-21 Thread Anthony Toh
Hi, take a look at the protocol IGRP in the Cisco website. Maybe you can have a better understanding of what an Autonomous system number is all about. Anthony. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36175&t=36067 -- FAQ,

Re: https to log in to a router - Possible?? [7:36143]

2002-02-21 Thread Patrick Bass
IMO, they should remove HTTP access completely!! If you're looking for a secure connection to the router, try SSH, or use TACACS+... ""Cisco Nuts"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hum! Suprisingly it has the http built-in. I would think that they should > have im

Re: PIX 520 ---no console access [7:36138]

2002-02-21 Thread Sunil Soporie
Why replace RAM and not Flash or Both ? Sunil ""Thom Castognalia"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Sunil - Open up the PIX. Remove the flash card and the RAM. Re-install the > flash card and the RAM. See if that does the trick. If not, replace the RAM. > > TC

Cat 5k system ram & flash [7:36170]

2002-02-21 Thread Colin
Hi I'm looking to buy a Cat 5k switch for my CCNP lab. How much System Ram & Flash should a Sup I module have to be useful for my studies? How about a Sup II? Thanks Colin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36170&t=36170

Re: Access Lists are a bit mystifying [7:36164]

2002-02-21 Thread Annlee Hines
The key is to know which header the list statement is being applied to. Ports (source and destination) are a part of a TCP header or a UDP header. They are a means of identifying the application that is being multiplexed at the Transport Layer. IP headers do not have ports--they have source and d

Re: Access Lists are a bit mystifying [7:36164]

2002-02-21 Thread Anil Gupte
Actually my question was not clear, I think. My confusion is with the IP vs. TCP. In other words should it not be somthing like: deny ip any any eq 139 permit ip any any Why deny TCP and permit IP as opposed to deny IP and permit IP? Also, the purpose of these is that I am trying to block som

RE: Access Lists are a bit mystifying [7:36164]

2002-02-21 Thread Scott Nawalaniec
Hi Anil, Sometimes its scaring posting to this group. =) To answer your question, if you don't the permit IP any any command, there is an implicit deny rule at the end of an access-list, which will drop all traffic that you have not allowed through the access-list. The other two deny statement

Access list question [7:36166]

2002-02-21 Thread Amit Gupta
Hello All, I want to set up an access list on the MSFC so that traffic from a particular vlan or a range of IP addresses is forwarded through another serial interface. My Ip range is x.x.x.240 - x.x.x.255 We are using a Subnet Mask of /28 Any Clues ? Thanks in Advance Regards Amit _

Re: IDS 4210 help again [7:36047]

2002-02-21 Thread Chee Kin
The IP address is assigned to the command and control interface. The monitoring interface does not have IP address assigned to it. On a simple network setup, the monitoring interface is connected to the segment where the router connects to the firewall. You will need to turn on SPAN or port mon

Access Lists are a bit mystifying [7:36164]

2002-02-21 Thread Anil Gupte
Hi All! I watch this list occassionally (when I have time). This is my first post to this list, so be kind. :p) In the access list below: ** conf t int ethernet0/0 no ip access-list extended secure2 ip access-list extended secure2 deny tcp any any eq deny tcp any any eq 139 per

Re: 640-900 BSCI or 640-503 Routing [7:36158]

2002-02-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you are considering taking the CISSP exam at a later date, it would be better you take the BSCI exam. It was added when Cisco added the new set of CQS exams. The BSCI is more wide and extensive than the 640-503 exam. However, if you do not want to cover the additional materials, then go for th

Re: Re: China/Cisco connection [7:35946]

2002-02-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is also rumored that every cross-country electronic conversation anyone make is been recorded in a condensed form some where in the US. Conversations like telephone calls, Fax, emails, etc is been recorded and 'diagnosed' for some specific information, and could be reproduced and expanded where

RE: Console speed [7:36155]

2002-02-21 Thread Kumar, N K. Satish, NSPM
Confreg in ROMMON with a bootloader of 12.0 XE the highest speed you can go is only 9600!!! Thats my whole problem. > -Original Message- > From: Ranma [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 9:26 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Console speed [7

RE: Console speed [7:36155]

2002-02-21 Thread Daniel Cotts
The console speed is changed by the configuration register value. Also consider using the AUX port. > -Original Message- > From: NK Sat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 7:56 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Console speed [7:36155] > > > Hi guys, > I

Re: 640-900 BSCI or 640-503 Routing [7:36158]

2002-02-21 Thread Ranma
640-900 is for CCIP Certification (ISIS routing) is included... 640-503 is for CCNP 640-603 a new exam for CCNP new version. Release 2 days ago... now it is a beta New Version CCNP exam. ""Colin"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi > > I was looking at

640-900 BSCI or 640-503 Routing [7:36158]

2002-02-21 Thread Colin
Hi I was looking at the CCNP Exam page on the Cisco's web page and for the Routing exam, the had two test listed. They are 640-503 Routing and 640-900 BSCI. Why would one choose to take one exam over the other? When was the 640-900 BSCI test added? Thanks Colin Message Posted at: http:

Re: Console speed [7:36155]

2002-02-21 Thread Ranma
Re-start the router then BREAK it during it boot up and enter rommon>config it will ask you question one by one... choose the option of different console=speed here then reboot the machine again. ""NK Sat"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi guys, >

Re: https to log in to a router - Possible?? [7:36143]

2002-02-21 Thread Cisco Nuts
Hum! Suprisingly it has the http built-in. I would think that they should have implemented ssl functionality in the code than http >From: "Steven A. Ridder" >Reply-To: "Steven A. Ridder" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: https to log in to a router - Possible?? [7:36143] >Date: Thu, 21

Console speed [7:36155]

2002-02-21 Thread NK Sat
Hi guys, I am not able to change the console speed of my 7204 VXR at all.I wanted it at 115200 to do a xmodem But it just cannot beyond 9600 What am i missing here. r7#line con 0 r7(config-line)#speed 0 Failed to change line 0's speed Does 7204 VXR console cannot go beyond

RE: Autonomous-system command [7:36067]

2002-02-21 Thread Lupi, Guy
John, I don't know if you found an answer. Looks like this command is used to specify your AS number when you are running EGP, which is something like the precursor to BGP. There is actually a chapter on this in Doyle's Routing TCP/IP Volume II, chapter 1. HTH. >From CCO: autonomous-system (E

Re: hop count in EIGRP? [7:36082]

2002-02-21 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
At 05:45 PM 2/21/02, s vermill wrote: > > > > Well, a little messing around with the command line produced > > this: > > > > p1r1(config-router)#metric ? > > holddown Enable IGRP holddown > > maximum-hops Advertise IGRP routes greater than as > > unreachable > > weights Modify I

test [7:36152]

2002-02-21 Thread Joe Jia
test. Sorry Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36152&t=36152 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: hop count in EIGRP? [7:36082]

2002-02-21 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
At 08:05 PM 2/21/02, Chuck wrote: >to augment the other answers, the IP hop count is really the IP TTL value. >It can never exceed 255 You're confusing two issues. Remember the router has two jobs: forwarding packets and learning the topology. Hop count has to do with the latter and affects wha

RE: Re: China/Cisco connection [7:35946]

2002-02-21 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
At 07:13 PM 2/21/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Let's hope whoever has the power to control information on Internet only do >it for legitimate purpose. That would be nobody. (at least in most countries ;-) It's out of control. >But, I know that I asked for too much. > >Tony > > > >"Dominick Mari

Re: Access list question [7:36124]

2002-02-21 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
IP doesn't have an ACK bit. You mean TCP. Picky, picky, I know. ;-) Priscilla At 07:00 PM 2/21/02, Steven A. Ridder wrote: >I can get through it by just setting the ack bit in the IP packet on. >That's all it check for. Not very secure. >""Justin M. Clark"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]

cipt [7:36148]

2002-02-21 Thread tony paparazzo
Anyone take this yet..What is passing..What are some key areas to study.. Thanks Tony Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36148&t=36148 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/ci

RE: Access list question [7:36124]

2002-02-21 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
That's a good conceptual explanation. I would add that technically, it allows TCP packets that have the ACK bit set. In other words, it allows packets that are acknowledging another packet. That means it would not allow an incoming SYN used to set up a session, but it would allow a reply to a

Re: https to log in to a router - Possible?? [7:36143]

2002-02-21 Thread Steven A. Ridder
The router would have to have a web server with ssl built in, and I don't believe Cisco's do. ""Cisco Nuts"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello, > Is it possible to use https:// to access a router? I have just been > thinking about this and would like to kno

Re: hop count in EIGRP? [7:36082]

2002-02-21 Thread Chuck
to augment the other answers, the IP hop count is really the IP TTL value. It can never exceed 255 EIGRP defaults to 100 hops, so I would expect that the routing packet IP TTL is set at 100 at that point. Well ( checking the sniffer trace that Priscilla so thoughtfully supplied a couple of days

Re: Re: China/Cisco connection [7:35946]

2002-02-21 Thread Steven A. Ridder
It's a rumor. wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I only agree partially. On the other hand, US government put censorship on > the whole Internet, if anyone could remember what happened during US bombing > of the Serbs. The news said that a virus sent NATO secrets to a

https to log in to a router - Possible?? [7:36143]

2002-02-21 Thread Cisco Nuts
Hello, Is it possible to use https:// to access a router? I have just been thinking about this and would like to know if and how it would indeed be possible? An acl permitting 443 would not work as it is not for traffic originating from the router itself, correct? Is there like a access-cla

RE: CCIE Practical Volume I [7:36060]

2002-02-21 Thread Thom Castognalia
Is this book good for the written exam too? Where's the cheapest place to pick it up at? TC Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36141&t=36060 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/lis

RE: PIX 520 ---no console access [7:36138]

2002-02-21 Thread Thom Castognalia
Sunil - Open up the PIX. Remove the flash card and the RAM. Re-install the flash card and the RAM. See if that does the trick. If not, replace the RAM. TC Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36140&t=36138 -- FAQ, l

Re: Another access list question [7:36131]

2002-02-21 Thread Justin M. Clark
Thats, that just slipped my mind. Justin ""Brian"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > the last line doesnt permit everything, just icmp packets that are not > echo request, since those will be dropped by the second line. Looks like > the icmp approach is block ping

PIX 520 ---no console access [7:36138]

2002-02-21 Thread Sunil Soporie
Hi All, I recently upgraded Flash and RAM on a Cisco PIX 520 and it worked fine for a week.After a week or so in production it suddenly stopped , rebooted but no luck, I could not even console into it.What happend is after some time I had the console access again and everything is fine, no errors

RE: Re: China/Cisco connection [7:35946]

2002-02-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I only agree partially. On the other hand, US government put censorship on the whole Internet, if anyone could remember what happened during US bombing of the Serbs. The news said that a virus sent NATO secrets to an ICQ site, which was quickly deleted by an USA robot, and the robot notified gover

Re: Access list question [7:36124]

2002-02-21 Thread Brian
Which is why most people who are concerned use firewalls that actually keep a table of open connections. Brian On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Steven A. Ridder wrote: > I can get through it by just setting the ack bit in the IP packet on. > That's all it check for. Not very secure. > ""Justin M.

Re: Access list question [7:36124]

2002-02-21 Thread MADMAN
packets coming into the router that are part of a session initiated from within. I'm sure someone came be more eloquent in describing it though:) Dave "Justin M. Clark" wrote: > > can someone explain to me exactly what this line means: > > access-list 101 permit tcp any any established > >

Re: Another access list question [7:36131]

2002-02-21 Thread Brian
the last line doesnt permit everything, just icmp packets that are not echo request, since those will be dropped by the second line. Looks like the icmp approach is block ping, permit other icmp, which is a common approach. First match wins.. Bri On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Justin M. Clark wr

Re: Access list question [7:36124]

2002-02-21 Thread Steven A. Ridder
I can get through it by just setting the ack bit in the IP packet on. That's all it check for. Not very secure. ""Justin M. Clark"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > can someone explain to me exactly what this line means: > > access-list 101 permit tcp any any estab

Another access list question [7:36131]

2002-02-21 Thread Justin M. Clark
I have the following access list and am trying to make since of it. Here is what I have sofar with what I think the line does. 1. access-list 101 deny icmp any any redirect stop all redirects 2. access-list 101 deny icmp any any echo stop ping 3. access-list 101 deny ip 127.0.0.0 0.2

Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.....CCIE..... [7:36091]

2002-02-21 Thread Steven A. Ridder
In MA we have a high cost of living, so maybe that explains it. ""Larry Letterman"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I would have to assume that your ccna candidates > are paid well then..Most places in the midwest > pay ccnp people about 60K or so...as far as train

Re: Access list question [7:36124]

2002-02-21 Thread Brian
Or for a better explanation, see the ack bit discussion on http://www.daemon.org/tcp.html. Brian On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Justin M. Clark wrote: > can someone explain to me exactly what this line means: > > access-list 101 permit tcp any any established > > thanks > Justin Message Poste

RE: Access list question [7:36124]

2002-02-21 Thread David Jones
Justin, This is typically used in an Internet/NAT situation where you are allowing something from the Internet to come back in, only if it's a reply to a request that originated from inside your network. For instance, with a router connected to the Internet, you typically want an access-list app

Re: Access list question [7:36124]

2002-02-21 Thread Brian
If you're on your lan and go to an external website, you presumably want the data to be able to get back to you, you dont want to write a permit statement for the return traffic of every site people visit. This allows tcp traffic from any ip to any ip in the direction implied in the config.

Re: Access list question [7:36124]

2002-02-21 Thread Regis Thornton
""Justin M. Clark"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > can someone explain to me exactly what this line means: > > access-list 101 permit tcp any any established > > thanks > Justin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36125&t=36124 ---

Access list question [7:36124]

2002-02-21 Thread Justin M. Clark
can someone explain to me exactly what this line means: access-list 101 permit tcp any any established thanks Justin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36124&t=36124 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: ht

RE: CISCO INTERNSHIP.....CCIE..... [7:36091]

2002-02-21 Thread Larry Letterman
I would have to assume that your ccna candidates are paid well then..Most places in the midwest pay ccnp people about 60K or so...as far as training I have not been seeing many people in the last few classes I have attended. Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-

Re: hop count in EIGRP? [7:36082]

2002-02-21 Thread s vermill
> > Well, a little messing around with the command line produced > this: > > p1r1(config-router)#metric ? > holddown Enable IGRP holddown > maximum-hops Advertise IGRP routes greater than as > unreachable > weights Modify IGRP metric coefficients > However, setting the max-h

Re: hop count in EIGRP? [7:36082]

2002-02-21 Thread s vermill
> I have seen references to EIGRP hop count limits before. As I > mentioned in my first post, that seems related to Appletalk and > IPX support. However, a 'sh ip prot' will indeed produce a > line that stated "EIGRP maximum hopcount 100." Thus far, I > haven't been able to find a command to ch

Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.....CCIE..... [7:36091]

2002-02-21 Thread Marc Maxwell
I would be curious to know what type of contractual obligation is involved here. I would be willing to look at *something*, as long as it wasn't too binding (yeah right). And I *haven't* seen companies pay for training, at least not this (the good kind, that advances your career). Many if no

Re: hop count in EIGRP? [7:36082]

2002-02-21 Thread s vermill
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > It's possible it's just a holdover from IGRP which does limit > the diameter > of a network by checking the hop count. > > But EIGRP may limit the number of hops too, depending on which > document you > read. ;-) The following document says that the default max i

RE: PIX information [7:35294]

2002-02-21 Thread Mears, Rob
Any changes you make to the Pri PIX will be written to the SEC, no need to day anything. Good Idea to move the sec and do a Wr M Rob -Original Message- From: Evans, TJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PIX informa

Re: hop count in EIGRP? [7:36082]

2002-02-21 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
It's possible it's just a holdover from IGRP which does limit the diameter of a network by checking the hop count. But EIGRP may limit the number of hops too, depending on which document you read. ;-) The following document says that the default max is 100 but can be increased with the metric

Re: Delay Metric in EIGRP [7:36001]

2002-02-21 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Reposting. I never saw this one get posted. The EIGRP bandwidth metric is 2.56 billion divided by the real bandwidth. That's just how Cisco does it (and how Sniffer displays it). In this case, the bandwidth metric is 1657856, as the Sniffer reports. The network is reachable via a single, ordin

Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.....CCIE..... [7:36091]

2002-02-21 Thread Brian
I suspect the below is not as true as it used to be.. Brian On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Steven A. Ridder wrote: > A CCNA makes more than 50k. And you wouldn't have to pay your company to > work for them and get training. Most companies pay you and pay for your > training. > > -- > RFC 1149 C

Re: Delay Metric in EIGRP [7:36001]

2002-02-21 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
The EIGRP bandwidth metric is 2.56 billion divided by the real bandwidth. That's just how Cisco does it (and how Sniffer displays it). In this case, the bandwidth metric is 1657856, as the Sniffer reports. The network is reachable via a single, ordinary 1544 Kbps serial interface. Do the math.

Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.....CCIE..... [7:36091]

2002-02-21 Thread Patrick Ramsey
pay for an internship? sounds like I am in the wrong business all together... hehe >>> "Cisco Nuts" 02/21/02 04:54PM >>> That's right. A CCNA could potentially make more than $50K (with skills though) Here is what I don't understand: Jason states that his company is looking(note) for people w

RE: Trunk Modes Perspective [7:36016]

2002-02-21 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
Thanks, sometimes I forget the obvious :) Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: McIntosh, Leslie (US - Tulsa) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 3:54 PM To: 'Pierre-Alex GUANEL'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Trunk Modes Perspective [7:36016] Try Amazon. COM

Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.....CCIE..... [7:36091]

2002-02-21 Thread Cisco Nuts
That's right. A CCNA could potentially make more than $50K (with skills though) Here is what I don't understand: Jason states that his company is looking(note) for people while Sean mentions that you do have to actually sign up(note) for their program which he adds is not cheap?? So basically, l

RE: Trunk Modes Perspective [7:36016]

2002-02-21 Thread McIntosh, Leslie (US - Tulsa)
Try Amazon. COM, Barnes and Noble is out there and there are a bunch more book sales on the net, then you do not have to fight the traffic to find that book you want. Thank You, Leslie McIntosh Network Engineer Deloitte & Touche (918)461-4894 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From:

Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.....CCIE..... [7:36091]

2002-02-21 Thread Patrick Ramsey
ccna makes 50? uh maybe with a little experience Here in atlanta cna means squat >>> "Steven A. Ridder" 02/21/02 03:50PM >>> A CCNA makes more than 50k. And you wouldn't have to pay your company to work for them and get training. Most companies pay you and pay for your training.

Re: Delay Metric in EIGRP [7:36001]

2002-02-21 Thread Patrick Ramsey
ahhh you ole cut'n'paster :p :) >>> "Priscilla Oppenheimer" 02/21/02 02:51PM >>> Did anyone notice that I explained reliability and load backwards? ;-) It was a copy-and-paste error. Reverse the two explanations below please. Priscilla At 08:43 PM 2/20/02, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: >

Re: PIX Logs [7:36090]

2002-02-21 Thread Patrick Ramsey
50mb? What are you logging to? check out kiwisyslog and the various utils on their site www.kiwisyslog.com -Patrick >>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 02/21/02 01:37PM >>> Greetings all, I have a big pix log (50mb) and I need to clean it up to get src/dest and port numbers in a clean format. Do

RE: PIX v6.2 [7:35987]

2002-02-21 Thread Hartnell, George
Hummm, I too scanned the Cisco site for 6.2 and only found 6.1.2. I'd heard from the rumor-mill that 6.2 was "out", but perhaps that's incorrect. As I'm about ready to upgrade the failover 515UR, it'd be nice if I only had to do this once -- this year. Any speculation on that 6.2 release da

Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.....CCIE..... [7:36091]

2002-02-21 Thread Steven A. Ridder
Well in the good old days of the economy, I made more than that even before becoming a CCNA. I would never settle for 50k, even in this econ., especially as a CCIE. Plus, a CCIE IMO should already have exp., and lots of it. Otherwise it defeats the purpose of becoming a CCIE - cisco certified i

RE: CISCO INTERNSHIP.....CCIE..... [7:36091]

2002-02-21 Thread Sean Knox
A CCNA with little or no experience? Hardly. He's lucky to even land a job right now. I think this intern program is aimed at people new to the field. -Original Message- From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 12:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subj

Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.....CCIE..... [7:36091]

2002-02-21 Thread Steven A. Ridder
A CCNA makes more than 50k. And you wouldn't have to pay your company to work for them and get training. Most companies pay you and pay for your training. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""Sean Knox"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I've taken some classes at ICTP. From

RE: CISCO INTERNSHIP.....CCIE..... [7:36091]

2002-02-21 Thread Sean Knox
I've taken some classes at ICTP. From what I gather, their CCIE intern program works like this: you sign up for their CCIE program (which is not cheap I should add) and when you pass your CCIE written/lab (I vaguely remember that the CCIE written pass is all you need), you can work as a subcontrac

RE: Pin #6 - DSR - Why?? [7:36094]

2002-02-21 Thread s vermill
I suspect that you will get a fair number of responses since there are many variations on the use of this signal. I seem to recall reading that section and disagreeing somewhat on the author's comments. But the perspective was a Cisco one, so you can't fight City Hall. Asserting DSR is typicall

Re: CCIE Practical studies - review by Brad. [7:36038]

2002-02-21 Thread Paul Borghese
We have a complete archive of all messages sent at www.groupstudy.com. You may also try the Webboard for this group which has every message from the last six months. Take care, Paul - Original Message - From: "Rajesh Kumar" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 10:28 PM Subject: CCIE

Re: Delay Metric in EIGRP [7:36001]

2002-02-21 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Did anyone notice that I explained reliability and load backwards? ;-) It was a copy-and-paste error. Reverse the two explanations below please. Priscilla At 08:43 PM 2/20/02, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: >The delay part of the EIGRP composite metric is not measured. It's based on >the type of

Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.....CCIE..... [7:36091]

2002-02-21 Thread Brian
Perhaps its a new look on recruiting, they train u, get a slice of the dough for awhile?? Just speculating of course.. Brian On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Cisco Nuts wrote: > And upon finishing the program, how many years of slavery will we > unfortunate ones be indebted to your gracious compan

Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.....CCIE..... [7:36091]

2002-02-21 Thread Cisco Nuts
And upon finishing the program, how many years of slavery will we unfortunate ones be indebted to your gracious company? :-) Can you clarify this?? >From: "Jason Lee" >Reply-To: "Jason Lee" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: CISCO INTERNSHIP.CCIE. [7:36091] >Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:40

Pin #6 - DSR - Why?? [7:36094]

2002-02-21 Thread Cisco Nuts
Hello, The BCRAN course book mentions 8 pins being used for modem connections: Pins 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,20...Pin # 6 it says is not really used for modem connection and infact I don't even see that pin on the actual adapter. Then why is it mentioned and if it is actually used, when would it be used?

RE: PIX v6.2 [7:35987]

2002-02-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Where did you guys find the new 6.2 versions? I looked at Cisco's site, no luck. Thanksnabil Brian Zeitz cc:

RE: route selection in BGP [7:36088]

2002-02-21 Thread Brian Zeitz
I am not that familiar with BGP but I would say weight. Select the path with the highest administrative weight. * If weights are equal, prefer the route with the highest local preference; * If the local preferences are the same, prefer the route originated by this router; * If none of th

PIX Logs [7:36090]

2002-02-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greetings all, I have a big pix log (50mb) and I need to clean it up to get src/dest and port numbers in a clean format. Do you guys know of any freebie I can use to clean it? Thanks.Nabil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36090&t=36090 ---

route selection in BGP [7:36088]

2002-02-21 Thread Joep Hoet
Can someone solve this confusion regarding the route selection process in Cisco BGP. Suppose the route is sync and the next-hop is reachable, which is then thru? A) 1) highest weight 2) highest local preference 3) shortest AS-path 4) lowest origin code (IGPhttp://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?

RE: Autonomous-system command [7:36067]

2002-02-21 Thread John Neiberger
Thanks! I figured it must do something or they wouldn't have it there. :-) It's interesting that they don't have it in the command references any longer, though. You'd think that if you check the master index that all possible commands would be in there somewhere, but I couldn't find this one.

Re: hop count in EIGRP? [7:36082]

2002-02-21 Thread Steven A. Ridder
thanks! -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""s vermill"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Actually there are hop count limits that need to be adhered to when you > implement EIGRP for Appletalk and IPX. You can search on CCO and read all > about it. > > Steven A. Ridder wrot

RE: Autonomous-system command [7:36067]

2002-02-21 Thread Kane, Christopher A.
Checked one of my lab boxes, it's running 12.0(16) and had that command as well. Like you I searched cisco command ref online and couldn't find it. I have an old 11.1 command summary manual and found it on page 453. [no] autonomous-system (local-as) "To specify the local autonomous system that th

RE: hop count in EIGRP? [7:36082]

2002-02-21 Thread s vermill
Actually there are hop count limits that need to be adhered to when you implement EIGRP for Appletalk and IPX. You can search on CCO and read all about it. Steven A. Ridder wrote: > > Anyone know why there is a hop-count in EIGRP? It has a 1 byte > value, but > it doesn't limit the number of h

Re: Delay Metric in EIGRP [7:36001]

2002-02-21 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
A router sends the components of the metric. The recipient calculates the actual composite metric by working a bunch of black magic. The DUAL process and figuring out successors are separate from the metric calculation, but use the metric info. Here's a terrific paper on the topic: http://www

hop count in EIGRP? [7:36082]

2002-02-21 Thread Steven A. Ridder
Anyone know why there is a hop-count in EIGRP? It has a 1 byte value, but it doesn't limit the number of hops and it looks like routers don't use it in their calculations. Why is it there? -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36082&t=36082

  1   2   >