docs in cisco site are also very informative... sometimes i find them better
than any book
- Original Message -
From: Tel Khan
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 6:15 AM
Subject: RE: Recommended study books for CCNP routing (BSCN) [7:43713]
Hi,
I have the following;
640-503 -
I originally configured and maintain several Cisco routers at work so I'm
not a TOTAL dumbass when it comes to routers but I sure do feel like one
about now.
I have a couple of 2500's and a 2600 router with a couple of back to back
cables. I'm not doing something correctly to allow the units to
I have not seen an IOS that offers the ability to rewrite Next_Hop on an
IBGP connection. The behavior of the GSR in this case is what you should
expect. Juniper on the other hand will rewrite Next_Hop in this same
scenario and one needs to keep that in mind if you happen to work with both.
At 03:57 AM 5/9/02, Larry Letterman wrote:
Update the IOS to something modern...
Do you work for TAC? Cisco IOS 10.3 could certainly handle ping just fine.
;-)
I have a guess. Notice that the serial link has a subnet mask of
255.255.255.252. This is a subnet mask that you typically see on a
Mark,
If I'm reading your situation correctly, I think the problem
comes from the back-to-back FR link. We use 2600 routers in labs
to emulate FR switching between two or more FRAD routers, like
this:
R1/FRADR3/FRswchR2/FRAD
Since your goal is to get R1 and R2 to communicate in a
Where I come from (Southern Oregon) entire school systems, companies,
universities are run with 2500s still using 10.3. If it ain't broke, don't
fix it! We're a little behind the times. Nonetheless 10.3 was stable and
had enough functionality for many basic networks. There's no reason to
At 01:18 PM 5/9/02, mark wrote:
I originally configured and maintain several Cisco routers at work so I'm
not a TOTAL dumbass when it comes to routers but I sure do feel like one
about now.
I have a couple of 2500's and a 2600 router with a couple of back to back
cables. I'm not doing something
did you try putting on the clock rate on the dce end of the cable. to tell
what end you have, do a show controllers s on the interface you are using.
dont trust what the cable says physically on it.
-Original Message-
From: mark
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 5/9/02 12:18 PM
Subject: Let
Why don't you post your interface configs on both routers and also a show
interface output of both routers.
That will help in assisting you with the problems you are having.
From: mark
Reply-To: mark
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Let the flamin' begindumbass beginner question
I originally configured and maintain several Cisco routers at
work so I'm not a TOTAL dumbass when it comes to routers but I
sure do feel like one about now.
I have a couple of 2500's and a 2600 router with a couple of
back to back cables. I'm not doing something correctly to allow
the
set the clock-rate and just use HDLC. You only need to set the
clocking on one side.
-Original Message-
From: mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:19 PM
To: cisco
Cc: mark
Subject: Let the flamin' begindumbass beginner question [7:43759]
I originally
Whoopsies.forgot the space
The command is:
Router (config-if)# clock rate 56000
Sorry about the misinformation!!
-Brian
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=43769t=43759
--
FAQ, list archives, and
mark wrote:
I just need to know where to start with them. If
it's not a clock rate issue, have I given enough info for anyone to give me
an educated guess as to what I'm doing wrong? If not, what other info can I
provide?
A snipet from the output of sh run, specifically for your serial
Use PPP or HDLC encapsulation on each end.
PPP PPP
or
HDLC HDLC
On the router with the DCE end of the cable set the clock rate.
interface serial 0
encap ppp
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.252
clock rate 64000
For more detail see:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/116/ppp_back.html
I agree with Mr. Ridder. Although I used the Sybex book for CCNA and CCDA,
I found the Cisco Press books quite sufficient for all of the CCNP exams.
Mike W.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=43736t=43713
--
FAQ,
On the DCE cable side ( use show controller serial X to determine DTE or DCE
cable ) you will need the following command:
in interface configuration test#(config-if)clock rate ( use help to
find the different clock rates )
Doug
-Original Message-
From: mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I didn't say 10.3 would not handle it, did I...I just said to update the
ios because its old...
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: why I can't use normal ping in new
Inline
Mohamed el-Komy wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Dear all,
I found all the discussions in the study group about CCIE routing and
switching (written or lab).can anyone help me about experiences
through
CCIE communication and services .I read what existing on Cisco
My intention is not to flame anyone, but to draw attention as to how we
approach basic troubleshooting of network connectivity issues.
I will think that before trying to solve this Gentleman's problem some facts
should be gathered first, as most response to his e-mail have suggested.
At the
CAR is to drop packets on an incoming interface if they exceed a certain
threshold. It's also known as policing in FR terms. It really has nothing
to do with QoS (it does, but it's not the correct application for this
situation).
Your best bet is to take his PBX traffic, and reprioritize it
I am tired of the limitations of Outlook Express as a news client and was
wondering what I should use as a replacement. I would like to keep a simple
archive of messages pulled off of groupstudy, and I am finding that OE is
not the way to go.
Thank you,
John Dorffler
CCIE #6677
Message
If it ain't broke...
Dave
Larry Letterman wrote:
I didn't say 10.3 would not handle it, did I...I just said to update the
ios because its old...
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 09,
Based on your post above, as the lab is the same general knowledge, would
you need to keep taking it, providing you have passed it once, to get more
than one CCIE? Or would the various written exams suffice? Just curious.
Message Posted at:
Thanx, Steve. I have since got more clarification on the whole CAR scenario
and someone recommended using LLQ instead. What do you think? Also, why do
you say to reprioritize from 6 to 46? What will that buy me?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=43780t=43757
Learn GRE and forget IP tunnels.
ira wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hallo list,
What is the difference btw. GRE tunnel and IP-IP
tunnel?
Why should I use one and not the other and when?
I am currently using GRE tunnels .
Thanks.
I am having a similar problem. We have users with iPaq handhelds connecting
to 3000 series with Movian client. Movian client 1.0 works, but the newest
Movian does not work. Version 2.0 I believe. But, version 2.0 does work if
the username/password is internal user to the concentrator. We do
Uh, what? I don't understand your question. If you're saying that you're
thinking that you can just keep getting more than one C/S CCIE by taking
that lab over and over again (but by passing different C/S writtens), then
the answer is absolutely not. Contrary to what many people believe, there
In terms of LLQ, that's exactly what I recommend.
As for the 46 instead of 6, in DiffServ, you have 64 classes, and the
higher the value, the more important the data is considered. In a converged
network, your voice is the most important traffic because if you have a web
page, a video and a
Would upgrading solve his problem?
At 03:00 PM 5/9/02, Larry Letterman wrote:
I didn't say 10.3 would not handle it, did I...I just said to update the
ios because its old...
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer
To:
Sent:
James,
Just go into the properties for NAT in RRAS and cut on the DNS service.
Point the NAT box to the ISP's DNS, and point your internal clients to the
NAT box as both thier DNS server and Default Gateway. Alternatively, you
could just cut the NAT DHCP allocator on and set all of the clients
The main differences are in the port types (fiber or copper) and the
software. The Enterprise software on the 1900 is needed if you want to do
any VLANs or actually have a pseudo-IOS. The standard edition only comes
with the menu system.
Brian Hill
CCNP, CCDP, MCSE 2000 (Charter Member),
MCSE+I
Bulent,
Thank you for the reply. I am afraid you may have misunderstood this
problem. Allow me to be more clear:
192.168.0.1 - 192.168.0.150 - Host A - 128.59.39.3
| (dual homed
server)
|
|
|
|
Yes, this exam is challenging infact. A lot of new
things that classic ccie books are not covering yet. I
won't advise anybody to sit for this exam untill you
feel that you are ready for ccie lab as Shahid already
mentioned.
They took all old stuff out, so no dumps are going to
help now, and even
Hi,
I have the following;
640-503 - Routing Exam Cert guide by Clare Gough
640-504 - Switching Exam Cert guide by Tim Boyles an Dave Hucaby
640-505 - Remote Access Cert Guide by Brian Morgan
640-506 - Supoort Cert Guide by Amir S.Ranjbar
I used both Cisco an Sybex for the Routing i'm now
I believe your issue may relate to the single IP stack on 2000. Try
defaulting traffic to the internet and adding a static route to the internal
network opposed to specifying the gateway on the internal IP interface.
Also I would go as far as disabling any NETBIOS on the external interface
for
I will be on vacation from 5-7-02 to 5-22-02. Any matter regarding network
management please forward to Bob Taylor @ 213-979-0032. Thanks.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=43791t=43791
--
FAQ, list archives, and
dear all,
I have connected my Cisco DMS to AccessServer 5350 .
Whenever I made a call using Access Server , either it is answered or not
answered , the DMS shows the call being answered. however it is not being
answered.
Scenario
I wanted to pose a question to you guys that is really bugging
At 4:15 PM -0400 5/9/02, John Huston wrote:
Learn GRE and forget IP tunnels.
The major application of IPIP of which I'm aware is transmission of
digital TV and the like. I remember when working in the
Unidirectional Link Routing working group at the IETF, while GRE was
probably preferred,
in OSPF, each router has a link state database so it knows of all
paths and doesnt have the need for split horizon
At 06:40 AM 5/10/2002 +0900, Jenkins, Buddy wrote:
Read Doyle Chapter 11. Read the questions at the end of the
chapter. RIP/IGRP use split horizon. OSPF does not. That is the
Great info.
You mentioned that the tweaking will work if one installed Cisco VPN client
before installing EnterNet. Does it mean that one will be have to un-install
the EnterNet PPPoE client if it was installed before the Cisco VPN client ?
Elijah Savage wrote in message
news:[EMAIL
Hello,
I have RTA configed as a FR hub with multipoint subif. I have RTB, RTC and
RTE configed as spokes using only the serial intf. - FR network type
Non-Broadcast. Have 1 single FR map statement on the spokes pointing to the
hub. Have 3 map statements on the hub pointing back to each of the
Ive managed to get 3 Intel nics, a BX mobo, P2 350, 256meg ram and a isa
16meg flash card for next to nothing (less than $150)
:)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=43796t=43696
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription
Just wondering if its possible to cascade two of the above switches the
same sort of way you can with Baystack 450's?
The Bay's use cascade modules to increase the port density but keep
everything in the same broadcast domain and make it seem like you have one
48 port switch instead of 2x24
Let me know if you get this running PixOS.
Where did you get the flash card from?
Kris Keen wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Ive managed to get 3 Intel nics, a BX mobo, P2 350, 256meg ram and a isa
16meg flash card for next to nothing (less than $150)
:)
You use Gigastack gbics for the cascading.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Get in my head:
http://sar.dynu.com
Keith Woodworth wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Just wondering if its possible to cascade two of the above switches the
same sort of way you can with
Thanks Galo!
I will try that.
-h
- Original Message -
From: Galo Villacis
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 7:17 PM
Subject: Re: dual-homed hosts problems [7:43677]
I believe your issue may relate to the single IP stack on 2000. Try
defaulting traffic to the internet and adding a
Hello all,
Next month I will be moving from Orlando to Raleigh. I was wondering if
someone in the group might have a few suggestions on where I might be able
to find a job (in Raleigh) to gain hands-on experience working with Cisco
equipment. My experience thus far is primarily lab experience.
Hi.. Can you tell me what is the function of the following command ? My
previous administrator configured it. But we found that the we can!t surf
the net thru this router. The www traffic take very long time to load and
pass thru this router. But after I issue !'no ip inspect name fw
Hi, there,
Could any body can tell me what the following two sentences mean?
1. An interface using an extended IP access list cannot be autonomously
switched;
2. Dynamic access lists cannot be silicon switched and may affect silicon
switching performance.
both of them are excerpted from page
Hi,
I saw two Cisco press books in the market.
1. BSCN course book
2. CCNP routing exam prep guide.
Which would be better from exam point of view ?
-Original Message-
From: Michael Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 6:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
My roommate took the 640-607 today (new CCNA test). Unfortunately, he didn't
pass. We discussed afterwards the material he saw on the test. I was
surprised at the depth (relative to CCNA level) necessary on a variety of
subjects- a good deal, from my experience (and probably everyone else's)
The 'fixup protocol ftp strict 21' is generally
suggested for passive ftp. This is to make sure
servers are the only ones that can send the PASV
command. This closed a security hole in the past.
Michael Le, CCIE #6811
--- Jeffrey Reed wrote:
Are there any special considerations when allowing
Hi,
i wrote the new ccna test (640-607) a few days back and passed with great
marks (974)
I thought the test was quite easy. I prepared for the test using the 640-507
book from SYbex by todd lamelle.
I studied that book quite thoroughly and answered all the questions in that
book .
The
Autonomous switching is one of several switching types available. Process
switching is the slowest (main system processor has to switch the packets,
very slow) and autonomous is one of the faster switching methods (packets
match a cache entry and are switched on the interface processor itself).
I took the test about 2 months ago, and I thought it was very easy, even
cold. I haven't read any of the study guides, so I can't tell you how close
they match, but I can tell you the things that stood out to me:
-No configuration questions
-Some basic troubleshooting
-Mostly design (i.e. what
OSPF isn't as hard on routers as you might think, as long as the network is
reasonably well designed and the IP structure is hierarcical (SP?). The
worst part of OSPF is the CPU utilization under a diffusing computation, but
if your network is fairly stable, diffusing computations shouldn't
56 matches
Mail list logo
