Hi Group,
Today I passed the DQoS exam with this I complete the Cisco IP Telephony
Support Certification.
About the exam it is the easiest of the 3 exams in this track.You have 90 min
to answer 60 questions and passing score is 720.
Kind Regards/Thangavel
Hi Ivan,
Comments within lines
From: Ivan Yip Hi All, I am a little bit confused about LLQ. Below
is my understanding after digesting some documentation and feedback from
others. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
1. LLQ=PQ+CBWFQ and PQ is defined by using 'priority'
You are correct.
2. if using
I'm sure this question has been asked a million times, but the archives
aren't giving me the answer I'm looking for. I have spent hours on this,
yet I still couldn't configured out what went wrong...
WorkstationA -- RTA --- Frame-Relay Switch --- RTB -- WorkstationB
When I initiate traffic by
Hi,
Please encure that LLQ( when u use Priority command) is supported on
following IOS
LLQ on Frame-Relay supported on Ver 12.1(2)T(Your config has frame-relay)
and on other interfaces u need 12.0(7)T...
-Original Message-
From: Ivan Yip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
One important info I missed out is that I am making a call from the dialer
program on my pc to a regular telephone in the PSTN network.The destination
is able to hear my voice on his speaker(PSTN phone) but I am not able to
hear his voice on my headset connected to my PC.Hope this gives some
Can anyone explain the above and why they do not use the Ethernet_II format?
Many thx
Ken Farrington
Global Networks, Barclays Capital, 5 The North Colonnade, Canary
Wharf, London, E14 4BB
* Tel
Don't use 7 on the password line.
You also need a 'login' command.
Line con 0
Password xxx
login
-Original Message-
From: Richard Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 12:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: why con 0 password doesn't work??
At 12:14 PM + 12/30/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone explain the above and why they do not use the Ethernet_II format?
Many thx
Well, I can't say exactly why the developers did do it, but it's
reasonable to assume that newer protocols are being implemented using
the newer 802.3
Hello people,
I have a problem in my 7206 when I insert a Port Adapter ATM OC3 (PA-A3-OC3)
in the chassis, then the Multilink of E1's is down.
This device has a PA-8T-V35, in this PA is possible run E1 connections, and
PA-FE-TX.
In this router there are 5 E1 connections, 3 E1 connections are
Unfortunatelly I don´t think there is one that do not require a login.
Here is an example that summarizes the explanation:
For example, there are 3 flows, with the following packet size:
A - 1000 bytes
B - 1000 bytes
C - 1000 bytes
The required bandwidth is:
A = 20 %
B= 50%
C= 30%
The
At 5:34 AM + 12/30/02, Kenny Smith wrote:
Hi.. When I was setting up my router configuration. It prompts me for secret
password and enable password. But I want to how why I still need enable
password when I have the enable secret? When I type Enable, i will be
required to type in my secret
At 5:49 AM + 12/30/02, The Long and Winding Road wrote:
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
At 3:00 AM + 12/29/02, Lan Wong wrote:
Greetings,
snip some things
I'll also throw out a general question. A post not long ago asked to
Unfortunetly I cant share anything else not because I dont want to but
because these machines are owned by another customers. I am planning on
following up with my customer to see if he can get some info from his
customer in regards to what happend. Once I know I will post it. Thanks
again.
Howard, I second the vote for a discussion.. assuming all parties can keep
it civil and not have degenerate into the *mine is better then yours*... I
know different vendors have different goals and ways to obtain the goals
with their products. It would interesting to hear about the differences.
Hi Shahin,
My name is Reza and I am also in Northern Virginia area (Reston) and working
on my CCIE (RS). I noticed that you want to work with some one who is
interested in CCIE Security, Do you have your CCIE RS already or just
interested in security?.
Look forward to hear from you.
Thanks
Reza
Try setting the speed on the router interfaces. I've run into this before
where the Ether ports were still trying to negotiate the speed even though
the switchport may be hard set to 10 / full.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59966t=59929
Hi Group,
I am very very confused about DLSW over ISDN. I tried to simulate the CCO
example
at:-
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/tech/tk331/tk336/technologies_tech_note0
9186a0080093ecb.shtml
Firstly, by following the example exactly, I managed to get everything to
work.
However, according
Actually several years back the K designation was what is now refered
to as J or Enterprise, D was IP, IPX and Appletalk or Deasktop.
oh the simple daze...
Dave
s vermill wrote:
Please take special note of the k feature set. Someone had a sense of
humor but was apparently found out.
Looking for a serious, dependable, reliable, honest, smart, literate, etc.
study partner with *high* levels of motivation. Think we can do a full CCNP
in six months?
Looking for BCSI study partner(s), and if it gels well, CCNP study
partner(s), in the San Francisco area. Not much into driving in
Well, as a first step to civility, I've changed the name of the
thread to something neutral.
At 3:19 PM + 12/30/02, MikeS wrote:
Howard, I second the vote for a discussion.. assuming all parties can keep
it civil and not have degenerate into the *mine is better then yours*... I
know
Team,
I was just having a discussion with a co-worker about how companies lay
cable across the pond and how they troubleshoot cable splices etc. Does
anybody have any documentation or Video they can share on this? We're just
curious on how all this works. If you do this type of work let me
Sounds like they have cleaned up this exam alot.
When I took the exam it was disgusting, full of errors. In a few instances
there were questions with no possible correct answers.
Congratulations.. on to the next - never ends huh ;)
--
Thank you,
Colin McNamara
Office 925-251-0174
Cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone explain the above and why they do not use the
Ethernet_II format?
STP comes from IEEE as does 802.3. It would have been politically messy for
IEEE to ask the DIX consortium for an EtherType when they were busy
obsoleteing the DEC/Intel/Xerox (DIX) Ethernet
Not the Doc CD but it should contain what you need:
http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/Support/PSP/psp_view.pl?p=Internetworking:NAT
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/556/12.html#2
Drew
-Original Message-
From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2002 5:58 PM
Hi Everyone,
I have a 1700 Cisco router connected to a T1. I would like to lock it
down and only allow port 80 to transmitt data for security purposes.
Any suggestions would be great.
Thanks
[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name
of james.gruggett.vcf]
I am working on my CCNA test and need all the materials/questions regarding
to this test.
Firass Hadi
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59976t=59976
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
To allow out only traffic sourced from TCP port 80:
!
access-list 100 permit tcp any eq 80 any
!
interface serial 0
ip access-group 100 out
!
That's how you would do it, but it's extremely unusual
to suppress traffic based on source ports...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
ALL of the materials?? Wow, that's going to be tough, but here you go:
www.cisco.com
Good luck,
John
Hadi, Firass A. 12/30/02 1:54:22 PM
I am working on my CCNA test and need all the materials/questions
regarding
to this test.
Firass Hadi
Message Posted at:
so, no other outbound traffic at all, nothing else from the corp lan? You
want people on the lan to be able to web surf or do you want to run a web
server and allow that traffic thru? Just want to dbl check.
Bri
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, James Gruggett wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I have a 1700
Hi everybody...
I configured SNMP in my cisco2621, but I can4t obtain information about it.
I have this message...
SNMP Error:
no response received
SNMPv1_Session (remote host: ip.of.remote.host [ip.of.remote.host].161)
community: public
request ID: 1982719325
Interesting question. Some thoughts from someone that does have a PhD
in CS (dissertation in networking, a dozen or so publications, a handful
in IEEE journals). I initially went into gradual school to teach and do
research, but after spending two summers during grad school as an intern
in
selcuk wrote:
Hi
if you set the enable secret then enable password is useless
regards
I think the issue was that you could boot up into an older version of IOS
and it wouldn't understand enable secret which is newer than enable. Without
the enable password, someone could make
I guess they shouldn't have been running the Simple Network Access Kerberos
Emulation (SNAKE) protocol! :-)
Priscilla
Jenny McLeod wrote:
I came across this on a completely non-IT mailing list.
Thought some might be amused by it.
An interesting tech support problem...
The phone rings:
In that case there are a number of companies from which you can get
study materials:
Boson (More tests than you can shake a stick at)
IPExpert (Mostly CCIE prep but they have some other good stuff)
CertificationZone (Good stuff for all levels)
Hello Computers (Good stuff for all levels)
Going back to something from the previous thread...
(LaWR wrote...)
BTW, I am not so sure I agree that lab writing is a CCIE skill set. I'd
like
you to elaborate more on why you believe that the ability to write a good
lab is indicative of CCIE level skill. Maybe some other folks have some
I was running an exchange server and someone hacked in. I am trying to
secure the network. What do you reccomed?
[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name
of james.gruggett.vcf]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59987t=59975
If I am thinking of this correctly and thinking from the Point of View of
the packet, traffic that leaves my PC leaves with a random source port to a
well known (most of the time) port such as port 80. So I think that the eq
80 needs to go after the second any to signify destination port of 80 as
Reading Doyle's V1 book. Page 195 mentions that when an update with a
hop count higher than that in the routing table is received for a route,
the route will go into holddown for 180 [sic] seconds (three update
periods).
In the cisco page (below) for the timers basic command, the page
states
Jenny McLeod formed electrons to say:
Going back to something from the previous thread...
(LaWR wrote...)
BTW, I am not so sure I agree that lab writing is a CCIE skill set. I'd
like
you to elaborate more on why you believe that the ability to write a good
lab is indicative of CCIE level skill.
Pedro,
If you issue show snmp it should indicate snmp packets received and sent.
Is the router receiving? The same show command will also show snmp errors.
Can you issue the show snmp command and share the results?
-Bob
- Original Message -
From: Pedro do Valle
To:
Sent: Monday,
We should also ask developers how they test their labs. An untested lab
won't work. Most developers learn this the hard way. I've worked with many
developers who have learned it the hard way over and over and over again
and still insist on creating lab steps that they don't test. It won't work
for
At 10:51 PM + 12/30/02, bergenpeak wrote:
Reading Doyle's V1 book. Page 195 mentions that when an update with a
hop count higher than that in the routing table is received for a route,
the route will go into holddown for 180 [sic] seconds (three update
periods).
I agree with you, but there
bergenpeak wrote:
Reading Doyle's V1 book. Page 195 mentions that when an update
with a
hop count higher than that in the routing table is received for
a route,
the route will go into holddown for 180 [sic] seconds (three
update
periods).
That's to avoid the count-to-infinity problem.
Travis,
I've often wondered the same thing. I dug this up on google. Amazingly
it dates back to the 1890s!
http://www.atlantic-cable.com/
Chuck Church
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59994t=59994
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I am thinking of this correctly and thinking from the Point
of View of
the packet, traffic that leaves my PC leaves with a random
source port to a
well known (most of the time) port such as port 80. So I think
that the eq
80 needs to go after the second any to
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Chuck Church wrote:
I've often wondered the same thing. I dug this up on google.
Amazingly
it dates back to the 1890s!
http://www.atlantic-cable.com/
Well apparently I failed to send my post to the whole list and I just
replied to the original poster. Anyway here
Sorry to disappoint you, but I think they were running a MS SQL server
and were hit by the SQL Snake. (A current virus/worm floating around).
;-)
Priscilla Oppenheimer 12/30/02 01:44PM
I guess they shouldn't have been running the Simple Network Access
Kerberos
Emulation (SNAKE) protocol! :-)
You have to keep in mind the fact that Doyle wrote the Vol.1 book based
on IOS 11.3. He's supposed to have a second edition in the works with
Ciscopress but it's not clear if/when it will get published. For current
studies, your best bet is to test out the commands/features in 12.x.
HTH.
Its unconfirmed, (i.e.: I do not believe it yet) but our CW2000 admin
claimed CW2000 needed it for something. Before that came up I assumed that
it was no longer needed except on 2500 series and other routers that had an
old boot rom that did not support enable secret.
Kenny Smith wrote in
Hi All,
Has anyone experienced the following:
mc3810 bootstrap 12.0(6r)T4
IOS: mc3810-a2jk8sv5-mz.122-13.T.bin and mc3810-a2jk8sv5-mz.122-13.bin
memory: 64mb dram/16mb flash
I upgraded the bootrom to utilise 64mb dram / 16mb flash. I am able to
load the above ios code when in rommon mode.
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
We should also ask developers how they test their labs. An untested lab
won't work. Most developers learn this the hard way. I've worked with many
developers who have learned it the hard way over and over and
bergenpeak wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Interesting question. Some thoughts from someone that does have a PhD
in CS (dissertation in networking, a dozen or so publications, a handful
in IEEE journals). I initially went into gradual school to teach and do
Very good :) better then some others I heard this year.. although my
daughter's band came up with something like an *twelve days after
christmas*.. they had to warn the parents ahead of time so not to offend
some.. it was very funny.. but then geeks tend to find humor in the oddest
of places ;)
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Bolton, Travis D [LTD] wrote:
I was just having a discussion with a co-worker about how companies lay
cable across the pond and how they troubleshoot cable splices etc. Does
anybody have any documentation or Video they can share on this? We're
just
curious on how all
Hi.. I found that I can't console in to my Catalyst 5505 set based switch.
I plugged in to console port in the supervisor and used the hyperterminal
normal setting 9600-8-N-1-None, but I can't get any output.
I also checked the configuration of the catalyst5505 and found nothing about
the 5000's use a regular patch cable, not a rolled cable...
make sure thats what you have first
Richard Campbell wrote:
Hi.. I found that I can't console in to my Catalyst 5505 set based
switch.
I plugged in to console port in the supervisor and used the hyperterminal
normal setting
56 matches
Mail list logo
