disappearing default rip update [7:60937]

2003-01-13 Thread Vicuna, Mark
Hi All, Has anyone experience something similar to - the rip default not being shown in the route table and the rip database that is being sent by the upstream router? (Upstream router being a tier 2 provider). I have other routers hanging off the provider edge router that are receiving the

RE: OT-h323 proxy [7:60759]

2003-01-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, In the use-proxy PROXY remote-zone gk2 outbound-from terminal line, is PROXY your local zone name in the gatekeeper, besides, being your h323 proxy's h323-id? You should enter local zone name of the gatekeeper after use-proxy command, that local zone should be the zone to where the h323

RE: FR Low Latency Queuing (LLQ) [7:59820]

2003-01-13 Thread Ivan Yip
Hi, Is it a MUST to configure 'fragmentation' (under 1.5M wan link) when enabling LLQ (for voip over frame-relay)? How about if One side connection is FR but another is just a simply leased line? Thanks. rgds, ivan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60939t=59820

Pass IT certifications(IBM.CISCO,MICRO,ORACLE,INTE [7:60940]

2003-01-13 Thread ta ta
if you want to get it in a short time,you can write mail to me([EMAIL PROTECTED]), i will help you to get it and you do nothing but you must pay for them.the p rice is the lowest,for example(Include the charge of exam): CCIE(WRITTEN): 1500$ ocp(updated):500$ Message Posted at:

PIX Question [7:60941]

2003-01-13 Thread Arni V. Skarphedinsson
Hi Can anyone please tell me what the point of the following command is static (inside,outside) 157.157.146.13 157.157.146.13 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 Same IP address on the inside and the outside, I have seen this used on production networks, but can not figure out why, can anyone please

Re: can I use a /31 subnet to the link between 2 r [7:55586]

2003-01-13 Thread Amar
you can try an extended ping with the record bit set, maybe it tell you all routes in that case. Priscilla Oppenheimer a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Symon Thurlow wrote: Well, I would view an ISP who uses 1918 addresses in their public network a little warily.

RE: PIX Question [7:60941]

2003-01-13 Thread Symon Thurlow
I think that is to ensure that any traffic coming from the outside to the inside for that particular host will NOT get address translated (as long as you have a conduit or access list command that allows access). Symon -Original Message- From: Arni V. Skarphedinsson [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: PIX Question [7:60941]

2003-01-13 Thread Arni V. Skarphedinsson
Ok, But I am not quite sure I understand this, beacuse in this example the address is used as an privat address on the company´s internal network, and is not routed to the pix on the outside interface from hosts on the network, so If this is to bypass NAT, by what IP address do the hosts on the

RE: PIX Question [7:60941]

2003-01-13 Thread Marko Milivojevic
I's used when no NAT is performed. Kvepja, Marko. -Original Message- From: Arni V. Skarphedinsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: manudagur, 13. janzar 2003. 11:13 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PIX Question [7:60941] Hi Can anyone please tell me what the point of the

RE: PIX Question [7:60941]

2003-01-13 Thread Michael Tan
An application for this would be if you have a server with a global ip address assigned to it in your DMZ, then you don't want your PIX to translate your global from the outside. static (dmz,outside)157.157.146.13 157.157.146.13 netmask 255.255.255 0 0 Another case would be an intranet server,

IOS Router PIX VPN Monitoring [7:60948]

2003-01-13 Thread Albert Lu
Hello group, I'm looking to monitor VPNs via SNMP for up/down and traffic volume monitoring (maybe even send to MRTG). I just wanted to know if the PIX IOS MIB supports for this. Thanks Albert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60948t=60948

RE: PIX Question [7:60941]

2003-01-13 Thread Michael Tan
For static(inside,outside), I remember doing this in our lab where two PIXs connect one after the other. Disabling NAT static(inside,outside) for the transition network would simplify things. I guess you might just see this setup in a production network. Ü Message Posted at:

Cat6500 PSU interoperability [7:60949]

2003-01-13 Thread Andrew Larkins
Hi all, The cat 6500 power supplies - 1300W and 2500W. Can these 2 types be mixed in the same chassis or must they be the same type? Andrew Larkins BCom, CCNP, CCDP Bytes Technology Networks A Division of the Bytes Technology Group A Member of the Altron Group www.btgroup.co.za visit the press

RE: PIX Question [7:60941]

2003-01-13 Thread Symon Thurlow
Do any of your external devices have a route for the 157.157.x.x network, pointing to the PIX to get there? I have used this in the past to ensure that another local device outside the PIX could send syslog messages to a server behind it, using it's real address. Symon -Original

RE: PIX Question [7:60941]

2003-01-13 Thread Evans, TJ (BearingPoint)
It is just a static NAT of the internal address to an external address, in this case they happen to be the same address ... sometimes used in conjunction with conduits/ACL's to permit certain monitoring/syslog/tftp/etc. traffic to external devices (edge routers, for ex.) without exposing the

Cisco Network Academy [7:60952]

2003-01-13 Thread Roberts, Timothy
A friend of mine works for a local community college and is interested in starting up a Cisco Networking Academy. Is anyone familiar with how one goes about getting one of these started? Any information would be appreciated and passed on. Thanks Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message,

Cisco Networking Academy [7:60953]

2003-01-13 Thread Roberts, Timothy
A friend of mine works for a local community college and is interested in starting up a Cisco Networking Academy. Is anyone familiar with how one goes about getting one of these started? Any information would be appreciated and passed on. Thanks Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message,

RE: PIX Question [7:60941]

2003-01-13 Thread Arni V. Skarphedinsson
The thing is the the router external to the pix, does not have a route for the 157.157.0.0 network, considering that, whill this ever work ??? Although the address is a public IP address, this company uses it as an internal address, and It sould not be visible on the internet, also the server

Re: Network Academy Router Simulator [7:60894]

2003-01-13 Thread Johnny Routin
-- Johnny Routin )?) - Chee Kin Chan wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi all, Please do not ask from me the site. I would just like to know if there has been any form of violation. Thanks, cheekin Message Posted at:

Re: Cisco Network Academy [7:60952]

2003-01-13 Thread netman
It might be here: http://cisco.netacad.net/public/index.html Don - Original Message - From: Roberts, Timothy To: Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 7:03 AM Subject: Cisco Network Academy [7:60952] A friend of mine works for a local community college and is interested in starting up a

Re: VoIP from behind PIX [7:60859]

2003-01-13 Thread Steven A. Ridder
Just so I understand (crypto is a tough subject for me), if one knows the length of a packet before crypto processing, it becomes a weakness because(fill in the blank). Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... At 12:03 AM + 1/13/03, Steven

Re: fragmentation question [7:60643]

2003-01-13 Thread Steven A. Ridder
Thanks! I was just curious. What about L2 headers in Frame Relay Fragmentation (frf.12)? Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Steven A. Ridder wrote: Does anyone know if a packet is fragmented, that the specific values in a field are

RE: Pass IT certifications(IBM.CISCO,MICRO,ORACLE,INTE [7:60959]

2003-01-13 Thread cebuano
YES!!! Dude, send me your LEGAL name and I'll make sure I send the invitation to Cisco as well. Dude, you could make millions, even in jail. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 4:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Pass IT

RE: PIX Question [7:60941]

2003-01-13 Thread Evans, TJ (BearingPoint)
If there is no route for that block, including summarizations thereof (and no interface in that subnet), then it shouldn't go anywhere / be reachable. So the next question - does it work? * Can that machine get out, and if so ... try www.whatismyip.com ...

VIP memory sizing? [7:60962]

2003-01-13 Thread Lauren Child
Hiya, Anyone got any ideas on sizing memory for a VIP, short of getting default and seeing if it runs out? Normal router memory I can usually get about right, but I dont know the correlation between RSP memory and VIP memory. Ta Lauren Message Posted at:

Re: Network Academy Router Simulator [7:60894]

2003-01-13 Thread Tom Lisa
Materials provided by the Cisco Networking Academy program are for the exclusive use of students enrolled in the program even if they are free to them. Unless this instructor has received permission from Cisco to distribute it freely to anyone, he should have that area of the webpage password

DUPLEX MISMATCH cdp tells me - but all set ok [7:60964]

2003-01-13 Thread Valeri Marinski
Hi I have a problem with a Cat3548 and 2611 where i did set the ports on both to FULL DUPLEX and no errors are seen on the interfaces but the switch's CDP is keeping telling me %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH ... discovered is this some kind of IOS bug ? Any danger from this message or can i

Xyplex question... [7:60965]

2003-01-13 Thread Norman L Hawkins
i am trying to setup my xyplex for remote telnet sessions... whenever i telnet to the xyplex server, it crashes hard. I must recycle the power on it. has anyone had this similar problem ? thanks... Sign Up for Juno Platinum

Re: DUPLEX MISMATCH cdp tells me - but all set ok [7:60966]

2003-01-13 Thread The Long and Winding Road
yes it is a CDP ver 2 bug. I posted a similar report, including configs and outputs a week or two back, and someone was kind enough to let me know about his experiences in this matter. check back a couple of weeks in the archives. HTH -- TANSTAAFL there ain't no such thing as a free lunch

Re: IOS Router PIX VPN Monitoring [7:60967]

2003-01-13 Thread Julian Knott
Hi Albert, The following SNMP MIBs were created to support the Cisco VPN Device Manager (VDM) product, however, you can interogate these and I have attached a URL of a good document with an overview of how this is done. CISCO-IPSEC-FLOW-MONITOR- MIB CISCO-IPSEC-MIB

RE: VIP memory sizing? [7:60962]

2003-01-13 Thread Lupi, Guy
I usually get the max memory possible, but I believe that 128Mbps per VIP is the minimum required to run distributed CEF. -Original Message- From: Lauren Child [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 10:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VIP memory sizing? [7:60962]

RE: Cat6500 PSU interoperability [7:60949]

2003-01-13 Thread Frank Jimenez
Yes and no. In combined mode they may be different wattages. In redundant mode wattages must be identical. More detail at: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_c onfiguration_guide_chapter09186a008007e6f6.html Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: DUPLEX MISMATCH cdp tells me - but all set ok [7:60971]

2003-01-13 Thread Daniel Cotts
Here's an answer from a year ago from Eric B The CDP duplex error message may not mean you have a mis-match in the speed/duplex somewhere. The message occurs because CDP version 2 packets include duplex information. CDP version 1 doesn't include duplex info. If you have a older device that

CCNP Recertification [7:60972]

2003-01-13 Thread saj
Hi, Anyone has attempted CCNP recertification exam?How hard it is?Any idea? Thanks. Saj __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com Message Posted at:

PIX commands- add ports [7:60976]

2003-01-13 Thread John Chang
I want to create an object-group but I'm not sure which one to use and how to use it. I want to add a range of tcp ports and a few udp ports. How can I do it? Thank you. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60976t=60976

CCIP 640-910 MPLS [7:60977]

2003-01-13 Thread Marco Eulenfeld
hy all, is anyone here, who passed the 640-910 exam? i took it and failed by 5 points *argl*. i think that i misinterpret the ospf exhibitions ( the drawings aren't really good). any suggestions? kind regards, marco [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]

Re: disappearing default rip update [7:60937]

2003-01-13 Thread Francisco Sedano/Inf-Pronet
Are you still receiving it? (debug ip rip...)? And are you sure you aren't receiving any other default route via other -better admin distance- routing protocol? What do you see in a debug ip routing? Vicuna, Mark Enviado por: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 13/01/2003 09:13 Por favor, responda a

Re: fragmentation question [7:60643]

2003-01-13 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Steven A. Ridder wrote: Thanks! I was just curious. What about L2 headers in Frame Relay Fragmentation (frf.12)? They probably stay the same? The FR header doesn't have much in it, but what it does have should be in each fragment, I would think. But I'm not sure on that one. That's one we

RE: ip multicast [7:60813]

2003-01-13 Thread John Humphrey
239.0.0.0 thru 239.255.255.255 make up the multicast limited scope (224.0.0.1-238.255.255.255 are classified as globally scoped meaning that these are taken up by various protocols/applications). As far as I know, there is no CIDR/subnet mask notation for addresses in the Class D space. You can

response time between PIX with VPN [7:60981]

2003-01-13 Thread Mike Sweeney
I just set up a back to back PIX firewall test. Using IKE and IPsec with a laptop on either end. One is a 520 (6.2) and the other is a 501 (6.2) and Win2K and Win98 as clients. Everything works as it should but.. isnt there always a but? the traceroute response time is something like 800mS. When I

Re: response time between PIX with VPN [7:60981]

2003-01-13 Thread eric nguyen
it has nothing with the VPN tunnel but everything to do with DNS. if you specify the IP address in the /etc/hosts file, that will speed it up very quickly. I have the same setup like yours with the exception that I have franken pixes (Pix520) on both ends By the way, use version 6.2(2) on the

RE: response time between PIX with VPN [7:60981]

2003-01-13 Thread Edward Sohn
Mike, How are the PIXes connected? If via a crossover, you might be experiencing excessive collisions. I've tested a similar configuration as well, and I've found that placing a switch in between the two PIXes will eliminate the collisions. Ed -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: response time between PIX with VPN [7:60981]

2003-01-13 Thread Mike Sweeney
In answer to Eric, there is not any DNS involved as the traceroute is IP only... no name resolution needed. In answer Ed's comments, I have both plugged into a switch and so it's not *back to back* in the normal sense of the word. MikeS Message Posted at:

Re: response time between PIX with VPN [7:60981]

2003-01-13 Thread Sam Sneed
Check for duplex and speed settings on switch as well as interface errors and collisions. Mike Sweeney wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... In answer to Eric, there is not any DNS involved as the traceroute is IP only... no name resolution needed. In answer Ed's

CCNP 640-604 switching exam [7:60987]

2003-01-13 Thread David Ristau
Taking the 640-604 switching exam within the next week or two and my research shows, from the cisco site, although there was HSRP and ATM LANE questions on the 640-503 exam, these topis are not included on the 640-604 exam. Just wanted to confirm, thanks. Message Posted at:

RE: CCNP 640-604 switching exam [7:60987]

2003-01-13 Thread David Ristau
I ment 640-504 sorry, not 640-503 I fat fingered it. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60988t=60987 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and

Basic free training on the Switch 3550 [7:60989]

2003-01-13 Thread johnman johnman
HI Does anybody know where I Can get basic free training on the Cisco Switch 3550 ? Thanks _ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 Message Posted at:

Re: Basic free training on the Switch 3550 [7:60989]

2003-01-13 Thread Larry Letterman
johnman johnman wrote: HI Does anybody know where I Can get basic free training on the Cisco Switch 3550 ? Thanks _ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

RE: Connecting DSL to Synchronous Serial Port [7:60930]

2003-01-13 Thread Newell Ryan D SrA 18 CS/SCBT
Yes there is. From my experience with this I know that ADC sells a modular SDSL modem. You can use either an ethernet, RS-530, V.35, or RS-449 interface with this modem. The serial card is FLEX module with two data ports and 1 DSX port. The data port interfaces are a mini-SCSI 26 pin port. ADC

RE: response time between PIX with VPN [7:60981]

2003-01-13 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Is ping that slow too? What else did you try? FTP? TFTP? Traceroute and Telnet are sort of weird ways of testing response time, but a good start. Can you put a sniffer on one of the Windows machines and see where the delays are actually occuring? Try to distinguish between a slow network and

QoS suggestion [7:60994]

2003-01-13 Thread Ivan Yip
Hi, If I want to set the voice traffic have high priority and the rest will use fair queue, which cisco queuing method can achieve it? The hardware is 17xx or 26xx. Thanks. It looks like the LLQ or CBWFQ will have guaranteed bandwidth feature during congestion but seems not the solution I am

Re: Network Academy Router Simulator [7:60894]

2003-01-13 Thread Chee Kin Chan
Thanks. That is the confirmation I need. cheekin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60995t=60894 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and

Cisco IOS SSH Denial of Service Vulnerability [7:60996]

2003-01-13 Thread *** Ardi ***
I Just found this out from SANS Critical Vulnerability Analysis... HIGH: Cisco IOS SSH Denial of Service Vulnerability Affected Products: Cisco IOS versions 12.0S, 12.0ST, 12.1T, 12.1E, 12.1EA, 12.2, 12.2T, 12.2S. All products running these versions of IOS are vulnerable if the SSH server

OT: Confusion on CISSP requirements [7:60997]

2003-01-13 Thread Scott
I'm a CCIE with over 4 years of experience in networking and a college degree. Each position I have had required a small percentage of security related work. Does that satisfy the requirements or are they asking for 100% security work? Any help greatly appreciated. Message Posted at:

Re: Basic free training on the Switch 3550 [7:60989]

2003-01-13 Thread Amazing
check out the technical documents section on www.netmasterclass.net johnman johnman wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... HI Does anybody know where I Can get basic free training on the Cisco Switch 3550 ? Thanks

RE: CCIP 640-910 MPLS [7:60977]

2003-01-13 Thread THANGAVEL VISHNUKUMAR MUDALIAR
Hi, I passed it around 6 months back.I think the drawings were proper.You can refer some of the PDF's available on this in the web site. Kind Regards/Thangavel -Original Message- From: Marco Eulenfeld [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 11:53 PM To: [EMAIL

RE: Learning PIX [7:60919]

2003-01-13 Thread Symon Thurlow
Hi, I have done both, and it still does not work! I have a linux box on the external segment, and I can ping the external interface of the PIX from it. I can also ping the Linux box from the PIX, but not through it. I get the feeling the answer to this will be a doh!, but I can't see it at the

RE: Learning PIX [7:60919]

2003-01-13 Thread Daniel Cotts
Can the PIX ping hosts out on the Internet? Can the ping ping an internal host? Can that host ping the internal interface of the PIX? -Original Message- From: Symon Thurlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 11:31 AM To: Daniel Cotts; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

RE: Learning PIX [7:60919]

2003-01-13 Thread Symon Thurlow
An update, Even with debug ICMP trace enabled, if I try to ping through the PIX ( I have conduit permit icmp any any) I see nothing, also using a sniffer on the internal segment, I see my ping requests, but no replies. If I ping the inside interface, I get debug results. I am starting to think

RE: Learning PIX [7:60919]

2003-01-13 Thread Daniel Cotts
Good to do a show interface to make sure they are up. Might want to do a conduit permit icmp any any to do some ping tests. I'm assuming that your outside interface is reachable from the Internet. Verified? -Original Message- From: Symon Thurlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday,

Q on Lab8 ccbootcamp. [7:60993]

2003-01-13 Thread Rajesh Kumar
Hi team, I am finding difficult to follow on the Lab 8 of the ccbootcamp - Sec 1 z (cc) and Sec. 3 ( More BGP configuration ). Can somebody explain whats been asked there? Thanks, rajesh Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60993t=60993

Boson Router Simulator 4.0 [7:60936]

2003-01-13 Thread Steve Ringley
I would appreciate feedback from anyone who has actually used this product. Thanks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60936t=60936 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

RE: Learning PIX [7:60919]

2003-01-13 Thread Symon Thurlow
Yes to all! -Original Message- From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 January 2003 18:05 To: Symon Thurlow; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Learning PIX [7:60919] Can the PIX ping hosts out on the Internet? Can the ping ping an internal host? Can that host ping the

Re: PIX Question [7:60941]

2003-01-13 Thread Clayton Price
Could it be because a host on the outside may need to initiate a connection to the host on the inside. The PIX requires a NAT, even if it is to the same address. Evans, TJ (BearingPoint) wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... If there is no route for that block,

RE: CCNP 640-604 switching exam [7:60987]

2003-01-13 Thread Peri Sophos
There will be HSRP , Not ATM LANE :) -Original Message- From: David Ristau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 12:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCNP 640-604 switching exam [7:60987] Taking the 640-604 switching exam within the next week or two and my