Does anyone know, has anyone performed a successful install of CW2K on an
Intel build of Solaris ?
Mahalo!
Joe
Try not to become a man of success, but rather try to become a man of
value.
- Albert Einstein
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62168t=62168
Hi all
What about the new BGP beta exam?
will it be a new CCIP elective one?
Regards
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62169t=62169
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
raj,
solarwinds will not give u a map. try whatsupgold http://www.ipswitch.com/
it is very good, cheap and easy to use
Tunde
- Original Message -
From: Raj
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 6:26 PM
Subject: Solarwinds Professional [7:62121]
I have installed solarwinds prof.
Hello,
If I have a bunch of routers connected via frame-relay and ospf the
requirement is to configure DLSW peers between them, would I configure
remote-peers with tcp or frame-relay? (if the requirement did not
specifically state any).Thank you.Sincerely,CN
Hello Claudio,
No luck.I denied the tunnel intf. itself in the access-list and still
same problem. The ospf neighbor relation goes down...
R6-C#sh access-lists 199
Extended IP access list 199
deny ip 120.20.59.0 0.0.0.255 120.20.59.0 0.0.0.255
permit ip 120.20.0.0 0.0.255.55
the CCIE RS lab ios version is newer than 12.1(3)?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62174t=62174
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and
I have a question,the ospf area 0 has /27 bits network,can use area 0 rane
to summary to /24 bits netw,and advertise to others area?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62173t=62173
--
FAQ, list archives, and
Hello.
vijay anandcd sagte:
hi friends
i want to know abt the CCSI certification,want to know how to achive
itno informaion in cisco site abt this CCSI certification,,so if
anybody knows abt this kindly send me few words
First you need a Cisco Learning Partner (CLP) like Global
I would use TCP. Although there are more header, all is up to TCP - link
failures, retransmission...
Cisco Nuts @groupstudy.com em 30/01/2003 08:58:17
Favor responder a Cisco Nuts
Enviado Por: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Assunto:DLSW remote-peer -
Hello Paul,
Thank you very much for your reply.
If I have a FR p2p intf. and if I need to configure the Dlsw peers using
FR encap. is there a way to map llc2 to the dlci #?
This is only possible on a FR multipoint or physical intf. but not on a
p2p subif.
So if not, then is tcp and fst the
Ultimately the functionality would be the same, I prefer to use the least
amount of hardware possible to acheive a result, I feel it makes
troubleshooting and administration easier. That being said I would use a
layer 3 switch in this situation.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a strange problem or serious problem.
I configured a Cisco 1605R router which was configured before. This time, I
only changed E0 and E1 ip address, and default route through the console.
After that, I put it into the server room, booted it up, but I couldn't ping
the interfaces. I
Yes. As long as Charles knows he's not doing any filtering within his
architecture, the filtering must be done at his ISP. But like I said
earlier, the only way to be sure is running debug on the router and tcpdump
on the host while downloading to see where the packets are dropped.
Mossburg,
If it is a loopback address lets say 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.252 the router
will see the netblock local to the router. Lets say the other end is
192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252 Point-to-point. Try putting a route statement ip
route 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.255 out the interface. This creates a more
Hi Thomas,
The answer is looking around and do some sniffing. The easy answer
which I just used in a lab environment is to use an access-list to deny
and fragments. We used it mainly to test IPX with GRE and force IPX to
negotiate a bigger packet size than the standard 570 (I think). Use the
Hello,Have 2 routers in a FR netw. configured for Dlsw using FR encap
with one side configured with just the promiscuous keyword only and the
frame-relay map llc2 cmd. The other side is configured with the
remote-peer and the frame-relay map llc2 cmd. Just to confirm: that this
does not work,
Random thoughts:
Flash card is not inserted. I'd imagine in that case it would boot to
rommon.
Power supply is defective/ plug into router is bent. Then I'd expect no
lights. Assuming the lights work - can you see the router boot?
Console port is damaged. If you have another router try connecting
A layer 3 switch is a switch with an RSM in it so the functionality would be
the same as a router on a stick. You are still going to route once switch
many(CAM table).
Daniel Ladrach
CCNP, CCNA
WorldCom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Does this exam count for 1 Certification (CCIP)?
Amin Moustafa wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi all
What about the new BGP beta exam?
will it be a new CCIP elective one?
Regards
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62188t=62169
I have not been able to find it on ANY platform other than the 12000 and
1, regardless of IOS version. I know Cisco tech docs state it is on all
IOS versions 12.0 or newer but I have not found that to be the case. Let me
know if you find out different.
Brad
Petru Stefan wrote in message
Thanks to all who have responded and requested more information. Below is a
more embellished picture:
Internet-BIG_ROUTER-FR-2500HUB---AS5300---D/U Users
We are the ISP, in this case, which is why I can say no content filtering is
occuring. We have several of these small
saw this one today. sorry for the formatting or lack thereof.
Hey Cthulu, this help with your problems?
*MSDE MAY MAKE PRODUCTS VULNERABLE TO SLAMMER
By Shawna McAlearney
Several factors contributed to the success of the Slammer worm; the most
noteworthy is that many victims don't know that
Group,
I have following routers for sale. Would prefer buyer within Toronto or
Canada to avoid shipping charges. I had purchased these routers in 2001
{May}. All the routers are in good condition.
2501/2502/2503/2504 2511 - All with 16MB Flash/Ram - IOS 12.2 Enterprise
Plus
/ Ram
I'd be careful here. Wouldn't this only be the case (that you would route
once, switch many) if you configure MLS on the both the switch and router?
i.e. it's possible to have a switch trunk it's vlans to an external router,
but without MLS, your router would still process *all* packets crossing
Hi Ladrach
I tried with the route statement. it worked perfectly. but the problem is
when i am running the routing protocol. i have given detailed configs for 3
different cases in the previous mails.
Regards
Deepak
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62193t=62134
Deepak N wrote:
HI All
I have simple configuration of HDLC connected back to back.
If i give ip unnumbered at one end and the static ip address at
the other end, I cant ping the either end. But when i give show
ip int brief, it shows the line and protocol are up.
If i give ip unnumbered
Hello,If I have RTA running OSPF with networks 1, 2, 3 and Eigrp with
netw. 4 connected to RTB also running Eigrp . To mutually redistribute
Ospf and Eigrp, would just a passive-interface under Eigrp to netws. 1, 2
and 3's intf. work or would I also have to configure a route-map under
ospf
1) define functionality
2) define difference
in either case, the net result is the same. for inter-vlan
forwarding on the
same box, the integrated L3 switch will be faster because a)
electrons don't
have to travel as far and b) the stripping and rewriting of L2
headers can
be more
Hi Vermill
Now I got the point. So when i am using the numbered interface, the router
tries to reach the next hop via the next hop ip address, in my case it is
behind the directly connected interface.But it has no way of finding the
next hop ip address behind the unnumbered interface. So it was
Amin Moustafa wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
What about the new BGP beta exam?
will it be a new CCIP elective one?
My guess is that Cisco is replacing the MCAST+QOS course with BGP and
making it a required part of CCIP certification, not as an elective.
-dre
Deepak N wrote:
Hi Vermill
Now I got the point. So when i am using the numbered
interface, the router tries to reach the next hop via the next
hop ip address, in my case it is behind the directly connected
interface.But it has no way of finding the next hop ip address
behind the
It's also supported on the 7500 and 7200 series routers.
Dave
Brad wrote:
I have not been able to find it on ANY platform other than the 12000 and
1, regardless of IOS version. I know Cisco tech docs state it is on
all
IOS versions 12.0 or newer but I have not found that to be the
The router is probably in the same rack as the switch. The cable is probaby
very short. The fact that electrons have to travel across it is not a
consideration. They travel at about 2/3 the speed of light.
Priscilla
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
wrote in message
[EMAIL
where did the other 1/3 of the speed go ?
:)
Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
Cisco Systems
The router is probably in the same rack as the switch. The
cable is probaby
very short. The fact that electrons have to travel across
it is not a
consideration. They travel at about 2/3 the speed of
Larry Letterman wrote:
where did the other 1/3 of the speed go ?
:)
Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
Cisco Systems
Scenic overlooks, bathroom breaks, and whatnot. There isn't much worth
stopping off for in the vacuum of space. It's kinda like the eastern half
of my state. Hit
It depends. If networks 1,2,3,4 are all subnets of a major network then
EIGRP will advertise the major network unless you turn some knobs. Chuck
recently pointed out that from IOS 12.0 subnets could be advertised with the
network a.b.c.d wildcard mask line.
If network 4 is its own network then it
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
The router is probably in the same rack as the switch. The cable is
probaby
very short. The fact that electrons have to travel across it is not a
consideration. They travel at about 2/3 the speed of light.
I
Glad you got it figured out and I hope you learned some reason(s) not
to do unnumbered. I can't think of and good reasons for it and if you
running out of addresses I have an RFC full of them for you;)
Dave
Deepak N wrote:
Hi Vermill
Now I got the point. So when i am using the numbered
Hmmm, IOS imgaes that are approaching, (in some cases exceeding) 20M ;)
Dave
Larry Letterman wrote:
where did the other 1/3 of the speed go ?
:)
Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
Cisco Systems
The router is probably in the same rack as the switch. The
cable is probaby
very
Larry Letterman wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
where did the other 1/3 of the speed go ?
:)
consider your relative speed running from building to building on the Cisco
campus a) under current conditions, b) if there were no asphalt, but only
soft mud, or c) if
MADMAN wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hmmm, IOS imgaes that are approaching, (in some cases exceeding) 20M ;)
speaking of which, how big would the same IOS image be without Banyan,
DecNet, Apollo, and all the other obsolete garbage that contaminates them
now?
Previously NetSaint. http://www.nagios.org/
Has anyone been using this??? I'm considering implementing it.
-Original Message-
From: Tunde Kalejaiye [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 3:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Solarwinds Professional
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in
message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
The router is probably in the same rack as the switch. The
cable is
probaby
very short. The fact that electrons have to travel across it
is not a
consideration. They
I have a 3600 router that current supports PPTP win2K clients using win2K
client. I do not wnat to use Cisco client for VPN.
What I am trying to do is authenticate using digital certificates. The Cert
server is Win2K certificate server. I used a MS machine as VPN server with
certificates and it
MADMAN wrote:
Glad you got it figured out and I hope you learned some
reason(s) not
to do unnumbered. I can't think of and good reasons for it and
if you
running out of addresses I have an RFC full of them for you;)
Dave,
I heard rumor to the effect that Cisco would introduce /31 mask
The Long and Winding Road wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
MADMAN wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hmmm, IOS imgaes that are approaching, (in some cases exceeding) 20M ;)
speaking of which, how big would the same IOS image be
Hello all
I am trying to forward some voip call to another router from voip termination
router. But how i do not know how to do this
any help would be apriciated
thanks in advance
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62216t=62216
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
I heard rumor to the effect that Cisco would introduce /31 mask support
for
serial p-t-p links. Anyone tried that yet? I keep forgeting to when on a
router with shiny new IOS.
It works well on all platforms I've used it on. Introduced in 12.2(2)T,
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
speaking of which, how big would the same IOS image be without Banyan,
DecNet, Apollo, and all the other obsolete garbage that contaminates them
now?
A bunch of stuff got purged in 12.2(13)T. The images not much of a reduction
in size though, new
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kaj J. Niemi) wrote:
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
I heard rumor to the effect that Cisco would introduce /31
mask support for
serial p-t-p links. Anyone tried that yet? I keep
forgeting to when on a
router with shiny new IOS.
It works well on all
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kaj J. Niemi) wrote:
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
speaking of which, how big would the same IOS image be
without Banyan,
DecNet, Apollo, and all the other obsolete garbage that
contaminates them
now?
A bunch of stuff got purged in 12.2(13)T. The images
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in
message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
The router is probably in the same rack as the switch. The
cable is
probaby
very short. The fact that electrons have to travel across it
is not a
consideration. They
Oops. The last one was a Null Post. I meant to hit the Quote button and hit
the Post button instead.
I do have a few comments, though, of course. :-) See below.
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in
message
[EMAIL
MADMAN wrote:
Hmmm, IOS imgaes that are approaching, (in some cases
exceeding) 20M ;)
I'm not sure what your point it, other than to be funny :-), but I do have
to say that it doesn't matter that it's a 20 MB file when talking about the
file travelling across a fraction of an inch within a
In mail.net.groupstudy.assoc, you wrote:
I run several 1720's on my network 24x7 with no problems. I'm not sure
what's causing yours, but it doesn't sound like normal behavior to me.
It sounds like a software related problem (ie. bug), there used to be
a problem in pre 12.2(11)T (IP+/ADSL
This isn't entirely correct. You can have a private IP address on your
outside interface and have it NAT'd to a public IP address and then
terminate the tunnel there. I am assuming this is what you are doing. Yes
it can be done.
Yes it will work with IKE Mode Configuration which is the same
One more thing - Is anyone running the latest version of the LMS suite on an
Ultra-II ?
I have a choice between an Ultra-II with dual 166Mhz, 512Mb RAM, or a Dell
2400 with Dual P-III 500Mhz and 512 MB RAM.
I figured that the native port on Solaris would perform better. Any
suggestions ?
Thanks
Anyone using these? Since they are EOL I am forced to buy used ones.
Just wanted to know if there are any inherent problems. I am looking for
3 PRI lines to an Inter-Tel PBX.
Steve
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62227t=62227
(combining two of Priscilla's posts)
At 10:52 PM + 1/30/03, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
MADMAN wrote:
Hmmm, IOS imgaes that are approaching, (in some cases
exceeding) 20M ;)
I'm not sure what your point it, other than to be funny :-), but I do have
to say that it doesn't matter that
I am in need of any suggestions/comments on the following migration path.
Currently 7000 Router in the Core over 30 Frame PVC to remote sites with
MC3810.
Running only data right now, but deploying VoIP with Avaya ECLIPS solution.
I would like to stay with Cisco Routers and MC3810 will be end of
I am running ios ver 12.1.17 on my 2500 and it
supports TTCP. TTCP also available on MSFC1/MSFC2.
Han.
--- MADMAN wrote:
It's also supported on the 7500 and 7200 series
routers.
Dave
Brad wrote:
I have not been able to find it on ANY platform
other than the 12000 and
1,
Try http://www.80211planet.com/
Good tutorials and a great starting point.
/JS
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62232t=62104
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
62 matches
Mail list logo
