hi guys,
can netbios,using port 137, 138 and 139 be routed thru WAN ???
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71084&t=71084
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report mi
Right!
I want configure my 827 manually, not with CRWS. My connection is PPPoE with
a static IP. Also, I don't want make NAT on my router. If possible, I don't
want NAT on my PIX.
example:
DSL(static_ip)827-->Ethernet(static_ip)-->Outside(static_IP)506-->Inside(static_ip-if
possible)-->my Netw
Hello,
NetBIOS is a non-routeable protocol. If you want to transport it over WAN
links you will need to configure bridging. Check out:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/tech/tk331/tk660/technologies_tech_
note09186a0080093d4d.shtml
Regards,
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/re
Thank you for your answer Howard. Unfortunately I don't have enough
experience to answer in such depth as you did but maybe one day I'll get
there. :-)
PS. Isn't it good to see that experts participate in this forum too?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71088&t=70
This is very interesting. The URL that I posted earlier:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1835/products_config
uration_guide_chapter09186a00800ca801.html#xtocid18
is for IOS 12.2 Mainline.
>From the original message posted you can see that it is really ethernet
ports the guy i
Hi there,
I assume you want to connect your ADSL router to the internet? Yes, then you
have no other option than to use NAT. You were provided with one static IP
address and this valid address is routable on the internet. Therefore you'll
need typically an extended NAT to this address for all devi
How company procede when the workstation have a static IP? or with the
server?
I don't think is make with a NAT and PAT ?!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71092&t=71059
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
Excerpt:
The Cisco 1600 Series is not capable of supporting the WIC-2T due to lack of
Serial Communications Controllers.
The NM-1E2W, NM-1E1R2W, and NM-2E2W Network Modules do not have enough
performance power to support the WIC-2T due to hardware limitations.
This may also apply to the 1700. I
But, I have 6 static IP!!!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71091&t=71059
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAI
At 1:57 PM + 6/22/03, - jvd wrote:
>Thank you for your answer Howard. Unfortunately I don't have enough
>experience to answer in such depth as you did but maybe one day I'll get
>there. :-)
>
>PS. Isn't it good to see that experts participate in this forum too?
>
Ah, but you are missing some o
Mark E. Hayes wrote:
>
> The way I see it, which judging by the responses is wrong, you
> start a
> business by doing what you know how to do. I can't start a
> business
> making paper because I have no clue how to do that. A big
> corporation
> can do that by simply buying another company out. B
Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
> Would it be a good idea to make the CCIE Lab adaptive? 1st,
> everyone will
> try a screener test of overall technologies. Once you have
> finished, they
> will give you a lab book that they believe are more challenging
> to you. How
> many lab books do they have, maybe a
It could also simply be poor phrasing -- CCIE is considered overqualified
for the job, or (possibly) too specialized. If that sounds bizarre, think
from another angle: maybe the job is not so much Cisco-networking centric,
but does have some Cisco networking involved. A CCIE has focused almost
excl
RADIUS does encrypt the passwords, using MD5 IIRC.
Annlee
""Sales"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi,
>
> With tacacs+ you can certainly use one time passwords for 2 factor
> authentication such as SecureID. Tacacs+ is great if you need multiple
> privilege levels on a router. For
At 6:01 PM + 6/22/03, n rf wrote:
>Mark E. Hayes wrote:
>>
>> The way I see it, which judging by the responses is wrong, you
>> start a
>> business by doing what you know how to do. I can't start a
>> business
>> making paper because I have no clue how to do that. A big
>> corporation
>>
Hmmm that might work. However, while you say someone good with
concepts will do well, that is what I always thought earlier, until a
good amount of members on this list and "in the real world" insisted
that good knowledge of theory won't get you anywhere on the CCIE
exam, only "hardened practi
At 6:50 PM + 6/22/03, annlee wrote:
>It could also simply be poor phrasing -- CCIE is considered overqualified
>for the job, or (possibly) too specialized. If that sounds bizarre, think
>from another angle: maybe the job is not so much Cisco-networking centric,
>but does have some Cisco network
You could have a look at the 4500's.
A couple of 4506's or 4507's would up your performance and port count for
far less than you paid for your 6006 (relatively). As they are a fairly
recent addition, they 'should' have a fair lifespan before they become end
of life/sale.
I would guestimate at 4 to
Under what circumstances would you do this though. This may well be my lack
of understanding of all things Windows, so bear with me :-)
With DHCP, a broadcast is converted in to unicast and sent to the address
configured in the ip helper address. Presumably web traffic would not be a
broadcast, an
With only a /29, you're not going to get far without using NAT/PAT.
What is it that you are trying to do? Why don't you want to use NAT?
There may be other suggestions we can make to overcome this.
Bikespace
""Lamy Alexandre"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I need help for configure a
Have you put a default route on your 2500 pointing to the inside interface
of your ADSL router?
Otherwise it will not know how to get back to whoever is trying to telnet to
it.
Bikespace
""Iwan Hoogendoorn"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> My NAT is beiing arranged by my E-tech Modem/
I'd agree to NetBEUI not being routable, but surely NETBIOS over IP gotta be
routable!
What does a WINS server do for you, or LMHOST files?
Bikespace
""- jvd"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hello,
>
> NetBIOS is a non-routeable protocol. If you want to transport it over WAN
> link
Since your question already assumes these port ranges, it would
mean your question is really whether NetBIOS over TCP/IP can
be routed. And as such, it can, just like any other IP traffic.
""koh jef"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> hi guys,
>
> can netbios,using port 137, 138 and 139 b
rememeber the metric of RIP is hop count.
if u redistribue routes from other routing protocols to rip, u have to
config the default-metric with value smaller than 15. otherwises, the metric
will reach the max value and u cannot see the routes.
u can try "debug ip rip" to see more details
Message
annlee wrote:
>
> It could also simply be poor phrasing -- CCIE is considered
> overqualified
> for the job, or (possibly) too specialized. If that sounds
> bizarre, think
> from another angle: maybe the job is not so much
> Cisco-networking centric,
I think that's what it is. I found the job des
koh jef wrote:
>
> hi guys,
>
> can netbios,using port 137, 138 and 139 be routed thru WAN ???
NetBIOS uses UDP and TCP which run on top of IP, which is routable over an
IP internetwork, including WAN links.
Routers don't forward broadcasts though, by default. When NetBIOS runs over
UDP ports 1
Frederico Madeira wrote:
>
> Dave
>
> A: GW= 10.61.2.1 / HOST: 10.61.2.2
> B: GW= 10.60.60.9 / HOST: 10.60.60.8
> A --> B
>
> Traceroute from host in A to host B:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] tef]$ traceroute 10.60.60.8
> traceroute to 10.60.60.8 (10.60.60.8), 30 hops max, 40 byte
> packets
> 1 10.6
""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> At 6:50 PM + 6/22/03, annlee wrote:
> >It could also simply be poor phrasing -- CCIE is considered overqualified
> >for the job, or (possibly) too specialized. If that sounds bizarre, think
> >from another angle: maybe the job i
Hi all. I am going up for my CCDA cert and would like to know what are the
recommended books and material to study with?
Thanks.
-
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i
2500-s0-88.1.201.1/16--88.1.201.2/24-s1/0--2611--e0/0--88.1.77.2/24---88.1.77.1/24-f0/42-3550
I can ping from router 2500 to 88.1.77.1 even if I disable proxy-arp of
2611's s1/0.
There isn't any dynamic or static routing except a default route on 3550 to
2611.
I can't understand this. Does I
This seems to be quite obvious to me. If the packet is generated from the
2500 router , it knows that 88.1.0.0/16 is on serial 0 (directly
connected). The packet reaches 2611 which has 88.1.77.1 directly conected.
The return packet can also flow as 88.1.201.1 is directly conected. But this
is true
31 matches
Mail list logo
