RE: CCIE # 12026 - Longish [7:73135]

2003-07-30 Thread Akusika Papaa
Congratulation and great job. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of NKP Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 11:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE # 12026 - Longish [7:73135] Hi All , Its my turn to send the e-mail today . Tht subject says it

RE: Gigabit Copper Switch [7:73116]

2003-07-30 Thread Ismail Al-Shelh
Thanks larry :) Ismail -Original Message- From: Larry Letterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 11:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Gigabit Copper Switch [7:73116] Ismail, The stackwise mentioned below is the way to interconnect 3750's by using a

multihoming [7:73229]

2003-07-30 Thread Ali Al-Sayyed
Hi all i have the following setup so I am please if any body can help me for configuration or if it possible to implement or not and how. We have this customer and we need to apply load sharing with automatic failover (take in consideration the customer have firewall) . so did any body know how

RE: CCDA (DESGN 640-861) [7:73184]

2003-07-30 Thread Constantin Tivig
I just passed the exam and I didn't find any specific q on ipx, appletalk. Of course you should know the basics...right? C -Original Message- From: Fathalla Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 8:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCDA (DESGN 640-861) [7:73184]

lab [7:73228]

2003-07-30 Thread Vijay Anand
hello all, is anyone talking ccie lab exam on sept month in b'lore?? thanx VijayAnand SMS using the Yahoo! Messenger;Download latest version. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73228t=73228 -- FAQ, list

multihoming [7:73230]

2003-07-30 Thread Ali Al-Sayyed
Hi all i have the following setup so I am please if any body can help me for configuration or if it possible to implement or not and how. We have this customer and we need to apply load sharing with automatic failover (take in consideration the customer have firewall) . so did any body know how

Logging ICMP on a PIX [7:73232]

2003-07-30 Thread Patrick Donlon
Do anyone know how to log ICMP traffic that is allowed through a PIX?? I can see denied ICMP no problem. I can log all my other traffic with logging trap debug set, but it can't see ICMP traffic passing through the firewall. Is this normally behaviour for 6.2(2)? Cheers Pat Message Posted

Re: Cat 4000 Modules [7:73213]

2003-07-30 Thread byf
yes,you can remove it with power on , Stevo P4HkO{OPBNE :[EMAIL PROTECTED] I just bought a WS-X4148-RJ module for my Cat4006. Is this a hot-swappable module?? Stevo Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73231t=73213

mutlihoming problem with grapgh [7:73233]

2003-07-30 Thread Ali Al-Sayyed
Hi all i have the following setup so I am please if any body can help me for configuration or if it possible to implement or not and how. We have this customer and we need to apply load sharing with automatic failover (take in consideration the customer have firewall) . so did any body know how

Re: lab [7:73228]

2003-07-30 Thread S H
Hi Yes ... I will be gorging for it :) Vijay Anand wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] hello all, is anyone talking ccie lab exam on sept month in b'lore?? thanx VijayAnand SMS using the Yahoo! Messenger;Download latest version. Message Posted at:

CCIE lab ... Fast track [7:73235]

2003-07-30 Thread H T
Hello, I am working on chapter 18 CCIE Practical Studies volume 1 Is there any one like to work it out with me??? Cheers, HT Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73235t=73235 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription

Re: Provider VPN Caveats [7:73207]

2003-07-30 Thread Network Phantom
John Neiberger wrote: I've been researching different types of service provider VPNs in general and Qwest's PRN, in particular. From what I can gather their PRN is a 2764-based VPN offering using IPSec tunneling. I've run into two fairly obvious caveats already and I'm wondering what other

RE: 6500 10/100 line card COIL numbering [7:73194]

2003-07-30 Thread Walker, James - Is
Dave, Blade 3 is bad. Open a TAC case, if you have support, and get the blade replaced. Jim -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 3:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 6500 10/100 line card COIL numbering [7:73194] Hi, I have a

RE: IPTV 3425 [7:73202]

2003-07-30 Thread Ç Ç
Hi Mike thanks for the info about the IPTV 3425. Along with the box, I have the IPTV Content Manager, Server and Viewer CD. I guess that that is the software. However, should I install it to another place, as there is no CD Rom in that 3425? I should install it to another normal server and

RE: NM-1HSSI w/kentrox DataSMART T3/E3 [7:73129]

2003-07-30 Thread Jablonski, Michael
Yeah it's a HSSI cable... CAB-HSI1 is the part. Telco is using the default HDLC for encapsulation. I've got telco coming out today to test the line. According to Kentrox's doc, a T3 w/HSSI interface has an allowed range of 1-35MHz; or 45 if both are set to 45MHz. I currently have the transmit

RE: CCIE # 12026 - Longish [7:73135]

2003-07-30 Thread George Murage
Congratulations and thanks for the tips! -Original Message- From: Akusika Papaa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 7:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE # 12026 - Longish [7:73135] Congratulation and great job. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: 6500 10/100 line card COIL numbering [7:73194]

2003-07-30 Thread Salvatore De Luca
If I am not mistaken... port 3/19 is your culprit.. -Sal Walker, James - Is wrote: Dave, Blade 3 is bad. Open a TAC case, if you have support, and get the blade replaced. Jim -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 3:49 PM

Re: VOIP Minutes [7:73210]

2003-07-30 Thread Bruce Enders
Chuck, I just returned from India doing some IP Telephony training. According to the students there your description is close, but not fully descriptive. What is being discussed is something called foreign end hop-off (in telephone jargon). This practice is loosely defined as calls originating in

Gigabit Copper Switch [7:73116]

2003-07-30 Thread Ismail Al-Shelh
Hi chuck, I think they cisco mentioned it officially , yesterday I read some documents about the 3750 , and I found that you can take for example 3 port from the first switch and 4 ports from the second one and as much as you can take from the other stacked switch and bundle them in a way they

Re: 6500 10/100 line card COIL numbering [7:73194]

2003-07-30 Thread MADMAN
That has already been done. After changing out the module we started seeing this same error on a port in mod 7 also! It is probably a sup card that is the problem. Thanks BTW Thanks for those that responded, the Coil does start with 0!! Dave Walker, James - Is wrote: Dave,

Re: Gigabit Copper Switch [7:73116]

2003-07-30 Thread Tom Martin
Don't forget that you are still limited by the Cross-stack maximum speed. You won't be able to get 90-Gbps across the 32-Gbps stack backplane. Ismail Al-Shelh wrote: Hi chuck, I think they cisco mentioned it officially , yesterday I read some documents about the 3750 , and I found that

RE: Gigabit Copper Switch [7:73116]

2003-07-30 Thread Reimer, Fred
No, only eight ports can be bundled per etherchannel. Fred Reimer - CCNA Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally

RE: NM-1HSSI w/kentrox DataSMART T3/E3 [7:73129]

2003-07-30 Thread Jablonski, Michael
Resolved!!! Turns out our equipment provider sent us the wrong cable They sent the HSSI Null Modem cable (CAB-HNUL) and not the CAB-HSI1! Thanks for everyone's insight. Cheers, MKJ -Original Message- From: Jablonski, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003

Re: VOIP Minutes [7:73210]

2003-07-30 Thread quot;Chuck Whose Road is Ever Shorte
thanks for the update. it's not a matter of long winded answers to simple questions, but rather there are no simple answers when government regulation is part of the question :- Bruce Enders wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Chuck, I just returned from India doing some IP Telephony

12.3T Not for 2500 and 2600 ? [7:73249]

2003-07-30 Thread bill cisco-guy
Anyone see any anouncement on 12.3 being last relase of IOS for 2500 and 2600 routers. The new T line does not have any images for anything other than the XM series of the 2600 and the 2691. I guess this partly because they repackaged all the images and smallest thing they have is called IPBASE

ISDN SNMP Question [7:73250]

2003-07-30 Thread Robert Perez
Hi all, I want to monito a cisco 2600 isdn to determine when it is up. Is there a MIB I can watch that changes when the ISDN comes up and then changes back to the original value when it goes down? Thx. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73250t=73250

Re: Provider VPN Caveats [7:73207]

2003-07-30 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 9:54 PM + 7/29/03, Chuck Whose Road is Ever Shorter wrote: BTW, I think it was dre who suggested I read the RFCs, which I've started to do, and suggested I check out the www.lightreading.com website. That site is great! I did do a search on Kompella vs. Kompella. I feel that

Wed's funnies [7:73251]

2003-07-30 Thread COULOMBE, TROY
There is a url... Just me searching for catos software... http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/browse/index.pl?i=Software%20Produc tsf=841 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73251t=73251 -- FAQ, list archives, and

RE: 12.3T Not for 2500 and 2600 ? [7:73249]

2003-07-30 Thread Reimer, Fred
All of those routers are EOL'd. They can't support them forever (although the non-XM 2600's surely didn't last too long)... Fred Reimer - CCNA Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email

OT: SSL Remote Access VPNs [7:73253]

2003-07-30 Thread John Neiberger
We've researched a couple of SSL VPN products like the Neoteris box, for example, and we're starting to look into a few others. We're looking for something to allow secure remote access to select internal applications. Support for telnet, SSH, and TN3270 is required, and we prefer clientless

VPNs: L2 vs L3 [7:73255]

2003-07-30 Thread John Neiberger
As some of you can tell I'm on a VPN-related kick lately. Sorry. I just finished reading an interview with Luca Martini and that got me interested in finding out more about L2 VPNs. I'm already getting fairly familiar with RFC 2764-style L3 VPNs, particularly Qwest's PRN offering. After

Re: 12.3T Not for 2500 and 2600 ? [7:73249]

2003-07-30 Thread
Reimer, Fred wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] All of those routers are EOL'd. They can't support them forever (although the non-XM 2600's surely didn't last too long)... well, this is one way to solve the problem of CCIE glut - make it impossible for folks to be able to afford the

Re: Ping from Router. What's my address? [7:73196]

2003-07-30 Thread Nakul Malik
by default the exit interface -Nakul s vermill wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] David Vital wrote: This issue came up today during a round table on a real problem we were having and no-one seemed to know the answer. Router A has a loopback address address and redundant paths to

RE: OT: SSL Remote Access VPNs [7:73253]

2003-07-30 Thread Joseph Brunner
www.netscaler.com their box does compression, and it has so many dos prevention and other killer things it blows away the competition. We went with it based on the performance it had during a syn flood blizard, and their ssl vpn rocks! Message Posted at:

Re: 12.3T Not for 2500 and 2600 ? [7:73249]

2003-07-30 Thread John Neiberger
Chuck Whose Road is Ever Shorter 7/30/03 4:36:57 PM Reimer, Fred wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] All of those routers are EOL'd. They can't support them forever (although the non-XM 2600's surely didn't last too long)... well, this is one way to solve the problem of CCIE glut -

RE: OT: SSL Remote Access VPNs [7:73253]

2003-07-30 Thread spiegel john
How does it compare with other vendors - Neoteris?? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73259t=73253 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and

Re: L2 vs L3 [7:73255]

2003-07-30 Thread dre
John Neiberger wrote in message ... bulk of their traffic. When considering a move to VoIP or expanded video conferencing this can create some traffic shaping issues. For VoIP, you want to consider a control/data plane that makes this traffic forwarding optimal...the topology is of less

Re: L2 vs L3 [7:73255]

2003-07-30 Thread John Neiberger
John Neiberger wrote in message ... bulk of their traffic. When considering a move to VoIP or expanded video conferencing this can create some traffic shaping issues. For VoIP, you want to consider a control/data plane that makes this traffic forwarding optimal...the topology is of less

CCIE Lab experience! [7:73263]

2003-07-30 Thread Alex Cosic
Hi there, I have finished my CCNP exam. Well, I live in Sydney, Australia and I still could not find job. I wish to carry on with CCIE. I do not have problem with passing writing CCIE exam, but what about practical exam of 2 days duration. I have found some programs on the net. But is it enough

Re: 65XX mmfc recovery [7:73261]

2003-07-30 Thread Todd Veillette
Yes, upgrade of the cat os went fine with high availability. The images are there. One of the msfc is 100% and up in production as I left it alone. The msfc's don't sync their bootflash just the sup's. The upgrade boot loader image is on the msfc bootflash, and the actual 12 full version is on