In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
I'm attempting to configure trunking on a C2924-XL switch runiing IOS
version Version 11.2(8.10)SA6 from file c2900XL-hs-mz-112.8.10 SA6.bin.
I've
read CCO enough to realize that the command under interface configuration
mode would be switchport mode
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
Hello,Are there any implications of using the clns routing and clns
router isis cmd. when configuring isis? I know this is not needed and
only used for clns routing but I see numerous examples on CCO where they
have used this cmd. Does not hurt but
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
hi, I am trying to plan for disaster recovery and the data that are to be
backup will be transfer between a 3548 switch via a gigabit link to Core
6006 as well as to a backup server via gigabit link, therefore , data will
be passing through a Fast
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
Any Thoughts? Does anybody could share any real example of using Server
Load Balancing in 6000 switches?
Never had the opportunity to play around with the CSM. Is there a specific
need to use the CSM? IOS SLB works well on 7200/6000/6500s with MSFCs.
Hi Rajesh,
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
I come across some situations where I could see some routes in the BGP
table, but those routes aren't there in the regular routing table. The
configuration has no sync configured and couldn't guess how to go
about it. Can somebody help
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
In SNMPv3 documents, the term trap no longer appears, but notification
does. So, I think they mean the same thing. But I didn't read the v3
documents very carefully. They are hard to read, and in my opinion, no
longer deserve the S in the acronym.
Milan,
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
I have problem that when I use local authentication on access-server for
ppp
authentication for semipermanent connection, the username that I use where
send to radius server. Can anybody tell me why this happens because it
shouldn't send
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
We have 2 7500 routers with CIPs installed. Recently the router started to
have its CPU shooting upto 90%. When show process cpu is run. It does not
show what process is causing this because none of the processes are or add
upto 80 or 90%. Only two
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
You'll find what's supported at .
Walk around in ../oid and ../v2 to get a look at the schemas and the oids.
Uh, guess the URL got lost somewhere after sending the mail. ;-) Try
ftp.cisco.com, the path is
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
I have been using EIGRP for our routing protocol for the last couple
years,
which is prettly great. The controversal of selecting the routing
protocol
came up again recently. I would like to have your opinion on EIGRP vs.
OSPF, which one is
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
EIGRP is not an IETF standard. You said below that the spec if available,
but that's not true. Cisco has lots of documentaton on EIGRP but they have
not released a specification for it.
AFAIK there used to be another company who manufactured routers
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
been very easy to configured and very fast converged comparing to
RIP/RIPv2.
Anything is fast compared to RIP/RIPv2 ;-)
It seems OSPF gets lots of favor as a stardard protocol. I am curious if
OSPF support load sharing on equal / unequal paths?
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
Is there a rule of thumb on specifying the network commands in an Ospf FR
topology?
AFAIK adding the network should be the same regardless of technology
used. I've always treated a FR/ATM PVC the same as a STM-16 SRP cct.
Ex. for netw. 10.10.10.1/24,
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
I am looking for some snmp OIDs or MIBs that I can incorporate into my
network management that will give me specific port counters - errors,
overall throughput per port and things like that. I have tried Cisco's
site
but cannot seem to find them.
In mail.net.groupstudy.assoc, you wrote:
I don quite understand what u mean. Is it a virus???
It's a bug, ie. error in the code.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62237t=11826
--
FAQ, list archives, and
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
I heard rumor to the effect that Cisco would introduce /31 mask support
for
serial p-t-p links. Anyone tried that yet? I keep forgeting to when on a
router with shiny new IOS.
It works well on all platforms I've used it on. Introduced in 12.2(2)T,
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
speaking of which, how big would the same IOS image be without Banyan,
DecNet, Apollo, and all the other obsolete garbage that contaminates them
now?
A bunch of stuff got purged in 12.2(13)T. The images not much of a reduction
in size though, new
In mail.net.groupstudy.assoc, you wrote:
I run several 1720's on my network 24x7 with no problems. I'm not sure
what's causing yours, but it doesn't sound like normal behavior to me.
It sounds like a software related problem (ie. bug), there used to be
a problem in pre 12.2(11)T (IP+/ADSL
18 matches
Mail list logo
