Andrew
I qualified for this as well. Cisco sent me an email about it the other day
and today I received the qualifying confirmation. You can find further
information at the following URLs.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/learning/learning_certification_program_updates.html
Agreed
We have it functioning in a production environment currently. Basically ,
point your devices to the CSACS and then point the CSACS to the Secure ID
server.
It is a nice feature but can take a bit of patience at first. Not everyone
likes to carry a fob around with them to authenticate.
Mario,
The following may help you out. I found them by searching Cisco with
privilege level configuration
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/tech/tk583/tk547/technologies_tech_note09186a008009465c.shtml
Remember if you do not give them the privilege level to the configuration
command then
Spencer,
I asked our ANS rep and the Cisco NetPro group the same question back in
March. There were two things that I could have done.
You should be able to ask Cisco for the bin file. Check with your account
rep to see if they can get the file for you. If not there is a backout plan
authored
. They cannot connect to the Concentrator until they click on
the ok/close button of the notification screen. Anyone that does have the
required version does not see the notification.
I hope this helps.
Kim Graham
CCNP, CCDA, CCSP
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f
. Good luck!!
Kim Graham
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=69861t=69746
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL
There is a Sybex book out that covers the pix 6.2. I know a few people that
have used it for this exam and have liked it. Other than that there is only
the configuration guides on CCO. I used the old Cisco press book (helped a
bit but not much), CCO/blueprint and alot of digging through the
You did not mention if you were trying to replicate across versions. I
found that if you tried to replicate from one version to another it came up
with the same errors you have mentioned. It looked to have started but not
produced the desired results. The documentation also states that you
I have to concur with Anan with how nice the new interfaces are to
maneuver. Last week I had the pleasure of taking the new IDS course version
3.0 and had a chance to work with the parts. They were fairly easy to learn
and produce results. If you only have a few sensors the IEV (IDS Event
Congrats as well. I hope to be writing this one mid February.
By CSIDS i am understanding you wrote the 9E0-100 correct? and not the
earlier version of this exam.
Kim / Zukee
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61781t=61655
Basically it performs as per stated. We have VPN users that come into our
concentrator from all over North American and abroad. They have used a
variety of cable, dsl, dial-up providers and for the most part do not have
any issues. Split tunnelling has been enabled up until now.
As for private
Disabling split tunneling is being visited. As TJ has pointed out there are
several different reasons why it is/can be implemented in different
scenarios. This configuration was in place before I started. It is my job
to upgrade the concentrator at which time the security policies associated
Agreed. No use in letting it go stail. It was hard work to obtain and not
as much hopefully to keep.
Kim / Zukee
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61145t=60920
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
Maybe I should have asked if anyone is studying for the CCSP? What exams
have you accomplished and what is your next step? I may be amungst the
group of first participants in this set of exams (v3) and others are waiting
to get information concerning the exams before attempting. *grins*
Kim /
This is a fairly good link on object groups. There is not an awful lot of
information on them as of yet but possibly an advanced search off of the
Cisco TAC website may pull some hits. I had asked my Cisco rep the same
type of questions and this is what I was given.
Great to know I am not alone. I noticed you all were doing the earlier exam
and not the new one. Any particular reason? From my understanding you can
mix versions of tests to come to the same conclusion.
Andrew I follow your same thought patterns to a point. It would not feel
right getting a
Over the next sevaral weeks I will be studying for this exam. Thus thought
to start a thread to see if anyone else would like to discuss it as they
prepare for the exam.
Has anyone taken the exam? Without violating the NDA can you let us know the
scale of difficulty, relevant information or links
If you have version 6.2 you can use the nat outside command. This command
does exactly what you are asking. It allows for networks that have the same
addressing scheme to connect to each other without having to do any
re-addressing. I have included some links from CCO. If you do not have an
Is this the QoS/Mcast exam you are speaking of? I am looking at writing it
sometime mid December as preparation for the CCIE and as part of the CCIP
track.
Kim / Zukee
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55696t=55603
O'Reilly has a book called Cisco IOS Access Lists. It is 250 pages and
covers a few topics. Basics, Security Policies, Routing Policies, Debugging
Lists, Route Maps etc.. I have read bits and pieces of this book and have
found it to be not a bad book.
Kim
Message Posted at:
Check your flash for crash info files. You can read through these and or
download them to add to your TAC case. You have a memory error and may need
to swap out a stick of memory.
Searching Cache Error Exception 4700 and Cache Parity Exception 4500
separately gives you many links that will
You will not loose the configuration if you follow the steps correctly. All
it does is allow you to reset the password to one you can use.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/474/pswdrec_2500.html#sample
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=53851t=53848
Thanks for the heads up. I was signing up this evening to take the
existing CSPFA over the weekend. So I gave myself an extra week in hopes to
save $200 CDN.
The MCNS looked to good to turn down at that price. So I will see if
squeaking by can be acheived. I have 20 days to go over the blue
Now onto the lab :)
Kim
From: Persio Pucci
Date: 2002/08/02 Fri PM 03:17:07 EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: not very good, but good enough... [7:50547]
... to pass!!! :)
Just came back from my Vue Testing Center where I took the 350-001
today... I
got a 73% grade, which is
I am new to the pix so please verify these entries before you try them
(older version of pix) you need to add conduit statements. This version of
PIX (6.2(2)) may be able to use access lists so check on that prior to
putting in the conduits. Once you have entered the conduit statements clear
Top Down Network Designs,
thank you Pricillia. Are there any others?
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
Kim Graham
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49668t=49668
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info
We are using it. The person who is developing it for our team is jumping
through alot of hoops. Some of the hoops are company defined ones others
are Ciscos. So far we have been able to do long distance VC (Toronto to
Florida) and a few other places without too much trouble. It seems to be
The other day I was delving a bit into spanning tree and I came across
something that puzzled me.
Searching out which device was the root bridge I found the MAC address (BID)
on the root bridge to be all zero's. (show spantree snippets).
Spanning tree mode PVST+
Spanning tree type
We are creating a lab at work to support a few functions. One of the
functions is a training lab for CCIE prep. We use 4006 switches in our
closets and will be a part of this lab.
My question is: If we use a SupIII engine in a 4006 how different is it
from a 3550? Or would a 65xx work? We may
is concerned you DO NOT need to worry about that.
Absolutely there is
no diff. between CAT 4k with sup3 with 3550 switches. You have no problems
in using it.
Rajesh
Kim Graham wrote:
We are creating a lab at work to support a few functions. One of the
functions is a training lab for CCIE
a VLAN designation?
Kim
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer
Date: 2002/07/11 Thu PM 03:20:41 EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: All 0's MAC Root Bridge [7:48578]
Kim Graham wrote:
The other day I was delving a bit into spanning tree and I came
across something that puzzled me
We currently have 4006's SupII in our closets and they have no trouble
handling the traffic (240 ports). If you want to go IOS you can move up to
the SupIII engine on this unit. They interface with our 6513's via gig
uplinks and to date we have not had any issues with the 4006's or the gig
this will probably develop into one of those
tests you dread to take.
Kim Graham
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47986t=47986
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct
Congrats Dan. :)
I too found the CIT a bit difficult and I was doing nothing but support at
the time of writting the exam (nocling, backbone support). Thus, logically,
it should have been a bit easier for myself.
Now you can have a break and think about the next step. :)
Kim
From: Dan
Over the next few months I am going to take steps towards completing my
CCDP. It looks to be the best way to gain some design
background/information that can help me on a future qwest, CCIE. It should
also help me with my present position.
Questions or thoughts that come to mind are reference
Thanks Dan for the heads up on the Sybex material. I will not waist my time
on it then.
Kim
From: Dan Penn
Date: 2002/07/03 Wed PM 05:31:30 EDT
To: 'Kim Graham' ,
Subject: RE: Starting to prepare for CCDP [7:48042]
I don't know about CCDP, but for CCNP Sybex is terrible! I
After all is said and done the test was good. Some of the questions were
strangely worded. Those ones I used the gut feeling, close the eyes, click
the mouse approach to answering. Either I did not have many of those or
scored correctly on the ones I did come across.
The course I took really
This brings up a question. I understand that after the initial hi I will
be handling your requests please use me as your destination mac address.
(Router talking to client).
But what happens when the initial router fails and HSRP kicks in? After an
unreachable, would ClientA send out an arp or
I like the book. Others may not. It all depends on what you like in a
troubleshooting book.
The book is laid out to let you gain an understanding (fairly technical and
indepth) of a protocol. Then it delves into a series of commands, snapshots
of outputs and goes onto explain the output.
IE:
Hello to everyone
Over the past few months I have pondered the question of Should I or
Shouldn't I. The Should I won. Now to lay down a plan of action.
Thus my question to those that are currently studying, passed the CCIE
written and or lab is this.
What was your method of studying?
40 matches
Mail list logo
