Re: BGP Route Reflectors? [7:50573]

2002-08-03 Thread Phillip Heller
Well, route-reflectors and route-reflector-clients have an iBGP relationship with each other, yet the route-reflector-clients need not be part of the full mesh. iBGP speakers tell each other about locally injected routes, routes learned from ebgp neighbors, and routes learned from ibgp

Re: Route Reflection with Multiple POPs [7:48509]

2002-07-10 Thread Phillip Heller
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 04:42:25PM +, Lupi, Guy wrote: Let me preface this by saying that I am trying to learn more about large scale BGP design and operation. This question is on route reflectors when you have multiple POPs in seperate IGP domains. If you currently have one POP and

Re: Route Reflection with Multiple POPs [7:48509]

2002-07-10 Thread Phillip Heller
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 04:48:30PM -0400, Lupi, Guy wrote: When you say that OSPF scales very well in a heirarchy, I realize that there are a lot of factors involved. Let's assume that all routers in each POP with the exception of aggregation and core are in NSSA areas to control LSA's

Re: Route Reflection with Multiple POPs [7:48509]

2002-07-10 Thread Phillip Heller
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:27:08PM +, Lupi, Guy wrote: I know that you can run confederations and reflectors, and seperate levels of reflection, which Cisco refers to as nested reflection. Now my question is, how would you set up your bgp peering? Due to financial constraints I

Re: Route Reflection with Multiple POPs [7:48509]

2002-07-10 Thread Phillip Heller
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 01:28:08AM +, Lupi, Guy wrote: I had a feeling that would happen, I will try to clarify. I was not trying to say that there should be a central core site for the ISP's entire network, but for pieces of it. Lets take a state like New York, within it you have 3

Re: Route Reflection with Multiple POPs [7:48509]

2002-07-10 Thread Phillip Heller
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 01:14:07AM +, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: Did you mean there is no excuse for [not] having a very clean hierarchical addressing structure or I'm I missing something, as always..:- TIA Nigel You've got me. A dirty infrastructure addressing system is

Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]

2002-07-03 Thread Phillip Heller
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 02:44:43PM +, Vajira Wijesinghe wrote: Hi Group, I have a client who needs 188 T1 (all 1.544Mb serial lines) terminations to be done on the central site. Network is hub and spoke fashion. Pls advise the suitable Cisco router/routers on the central site,

Re: What is better? MLPP or load balancing with IOS [7:41249]

2002-04-12 Thread Phillip Heller
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:17:38PM -0400, Sayeed Mohammed wrote: Hello, I am planning to load balance 3 T1 lines going to same destination. I would like to know if somebody has implemented MLPPP for this purpose? Is it better than IOS load balancing? Cisco document says that MLPP is

Re: PPP Multilink studies - interesting results [7:21623]

2001-10-02 Thread Phillip Heller
Chuck, Round times will be roughly the same regardless of whether there's 1 T1 or 8 T1's in the multilink bundle. There is a limit to the speed bits will move in copper. However, the more T1's you have in the bundle, the more bits you can send at the same time. I'd suggest you retry your

Re: Slightly OT: 7500 Single Slot Reload [7:17699]

2001-08-29 Thread Phillip Heller
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 12:19:41PM -0400, John Neiberger wrote: We may need to upgrade our CIP software on a production 7513 during the day. We've been having some issues over the last couple of days and if things go south again we want to upgrade. In the past we haven't been able to do

Re: Juniper on FreeBSD [7:1303]

2001-04-19 Thread Phillip Heller
The Olive is simply the JunOS code running on a compatible PC. If you've got the JunOS package, make the LS120 image, get an intel based pc with an LS120 drive. The image should just boot. Regards, --phil On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, KY wrote: All, Any of you ever had luck on porting

RE: CCIE LAB scenario to trade

2001-04-05 Thread Phillip Heller
If you're looking for the actual labs, why don't you email [EMAIL PROTECTED] and ask them, I hear they have lots of real labs. I'm sure they'd love to trade you and they might even be willing to give you 5-10 in minimum security if you ask nicely. If you're looking for labs of similar

Re: CCIE lab scenarios to trade

2001-04-01 Thread Phillip Heller
I sincerely hope this is an April Fools joke. --phil On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, mike johnson wrote: hello, Wondering if anyone has any real CCIE lab scenarios to trade? I am scheduled for the CCIE lab in July. I am not too concern with Cisco NDA because I know that most people

Re: Tues funnies

2001-03-27 Thread Phillip Heller
The coolest part of the whole thing is the URL trickery. --phil On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Allen May wrote: If I owned that patent I would have only charged 2 cents per use. - Original Message - From: "Brandon Rose" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday,

Re: CCIE Lab tools?

2001-03-24 Thread Phillip Heller
No notes, no books (the IOS doc set is available as is the doc cd), no Internet access (well, except for the lab "log in" and "critique" pages.) Further, no cell phones, pagers, or pda's. Regards, --phil On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, AndyD wrote: I'm preparing for the CCIE lab. Does anyone know

Re: how to find snmp traffic for an interface

2001-02-27 Thread Phillip Heller
Another option would be to enable cache-flow on that interface, turn on flow-export and use cflowd to display utilization by protocol. For cflowd information, see http://www.caida.org/tools/measurement/cflowd (10 days to my lab, and counting!) Regards, --phil On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Tom Pruneau

Re: GSR 12008 Gigabit Ethernet line card

2001-02-18 Thread Phillip Heller
Wang, Next time this occurs, send the output of "show int", "show contr", "exec slot slot# sh contr tofab queues", and "exec slot slot# sh contr frfab queues". Also, the running config for the GigE interface on the GSR would be helpful. Regards, --phil On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Wang wrote:

RE: Performance of CEF over Fast Switching

2001-02-16 Thread Phillip Heller
one high-speed interface was recommended for the | 3620 |but I haven't found that info again. | |Considering the low level of traffic, what else could be | keeping the cpu |utilization up so high? Need more info. let me know! | |Kevin Wigle | | |- Original

Re: Can someone interpret this please?

2001-02-12 Thread Phillip Heller
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Kevin Wigle wrote: Dear group, Investigating a router that is starting to loaded down. When I do a sh proc cpu I get 50% or cpu utilization but the stats don't seem to add up to 50%. Is there another way to try and see where the 50% is coming from? sh

Re: Static Routes

2000-12-04 Thread Phillip Heller
2) how Can traffic be load shared between two redundant links on 1 to 3 ratio using static routing (i.e. 1 packet on one interface and 3 packets on the other.) I don't believe you can do this.not "balancing" like that. Do you have something against running

Re: Official Cisco Courseware

2000-12-03 Thread Phillip Heller
All my binders from official cisco classes contain black and white xerox pages, but the binder cover insert and spine insert are color. As each of the courses I took were presented by different companies, I would assume that this is correct. Regards, --phil On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Brian wrote:

Re: !H

2000-11-20 Thread Phillip Heller
Host unreachable. --phil On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Jason yee wrote: hi anyone knows what does the symbol !H means in traceroute results _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and

Re: !H not a complete answer

2000-11-20 Thread Phillip Heller
From cisco: "If the router receives a datagram which it is unable to deliver to it's ultimate destination because it knows of no route to the destination address, it replies to the originator of that datagram with an ICMP Host Unreachable message." An access-list denying icmp

RE: Subject: Default Ping Payload

2000-11-14 Thread Phillip Heller
Other patterns of interest are 0x2020 (minimum ones density), and 0x (alternating ones zeroes; good for finding misoptioned telco equip. on DS3's). --phil On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, Chuck Larrieu wrote: Interesting. It would appear that someone at Cisco had a better sense of humor

Re: EIGRP over OSPF and BGP

2000-11-13 Thread Phillip Heller
On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, Cthulu, CCIE Candidate wrote: Anyways, I got another one: Given: EIGRP 1 RTRA OSPF RTB BGP RTR C OSPF RTRD EIGRP1 I want RTRD and RTRA to become EIGRP peers and do the exchange routing update thing. Granted, they are not directly

Re: Upgrade IOS, boot image

2000-11-12 Thread Phillip Heller
copy tftp bootflash --phil On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, mak wrote: Hi, I would like to know "copy tftp flash" is used to upgrade IOS, how about upgrading boot image Thanks Regards, mak _ FAQ, list archives, and

Re: Yet another CCIE R/S Written Passed message...

2000-10-31 Thread Phillip Heller
I'd like to think so. Too bad they didn't break the score down by protocol, that would be quite helpful. Well, time to convince my employer to let me take home a bunch of routers for lab practice. --phil On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Chuck Church wrote: Wow, Nice score for not studying in a

Yet another CCIE R/S Written Passed message...

2000-10-30 Thread Phillip Heller
Interesting turn of events today turned out to be. I purchased a voucher long ago that expired 11/1/00, so I scheduled the exam for 10/30 thinking I'd call and postpone my exam till I was ready(which you can do). Unfortunately, you have to call 1 business day in advance. I had forgotten the

Re: How to get Console message and Debug output by telnet?

2000-10-19 Thread Phillip Heller
"term mon" --phil On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Andy Xing wrote: How can I get debug message display when I use telnet to config a router? Thanks in advanced Andy Xing _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

Re: path exists in BGP table, but no route in IP Routing table

2000-10-06 Thread Phillip Heller
Sean, I would assume that R3 also has two BGP routes to R2, but does not have an entry in the routing table either. Step 1 of the BGP decision process is to ignore routes with an inaccessible next hop. Make sure that R4 knows how to reach the interface(s) advertising the networks that R1 is

Re: Scripts!!!! and no budget!!!

2000-10-03 Thread Phillip Heller
Purchase a ~$10/month shell script, and investigate expect. Autoexpect is another utility to look into. --phil On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Cthulu, CCIE Candidate wrote: Hi, all, I am currently on an interesting assignment where I have to pull routing information and address

Re: OT: anyone has Redback experience?

2000-10-03 Thread Phillip Heller
I work with Redback stuff quite a bit. Mostly the SMS 1k and the SMS 1800. I'm just now starting to work with the SMS 10K. Pros: You'll swear they ripped off cisco's command parser and syntax Contexts are cool. Cons: Their QA process is a bit, umm, deficient. (hardware, and software)

Re: Juniper

2000-09-28 Thread Phillip Heller
Juniper devices are ok to work with. The hardest thing to get used to is the fact that JunOS is BSD by any other name. Configuration is essentially pretty easy. Of course, coming from a cisco world, I originally feared Juniper boxes, but now I don't mind them so much. --phil On Thu, 28

RE: Juniper

2000-09-28 Thread Phillip Heller
about replacing 2501's , or 3640's, or even 7500's. We are talking stuff used to terminate many multiple OC3 and higher? Correct? Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Phillip Heller Sent

Re: Bus Error.....

2000-09-20 Thread Phillip Heller
Piyush, If you have access to CCO, you can take the output of "sh stack" ("enable" first to get all pertinent data), and run it through the stack decoder. It will hopefully come up with the cause and associated bug ids. Research the specified bug ids, and cisco may document a known fix.

RE: BGP on the Brain - Design Issue

2000-09-05 Thread Phillip Heller
There are several ways you can affect how traffic enters your autonomous system. The most popular is prepending your autonomous system number 1 or more times on your outbound announcements. Though, some find that prepending is not granular enough. You can go a step further, and prepend