Marc Thach Xuan Ky wrote:
>
> This is all very well but sometimes when people write 500 they
> really
> mean 512, so where does that leave you ?8-)
> Marc
Trying to pull my own hair out whilst wearing a straight jacket?
>
> s vermill wrote:
> >
> > Here's a perfectly illustrative example of ho
This is all very well but sometimes when people write 500 they really
mean 512, so where does that leave you ?8-)
Marc
s vermill wrote:
>
> Here's a perfectly illustrative example of how common it is to jumble all
> this terminology up...
>
> I often use a download test site at PC Pitstop:
>
>
Here's a perfectly illustrative example of how common it is to jumble all
this terminology up...
I often use a download test site at PC Pitstop:
http://www.pcpitstop.com/internet/Bandwidth.asp
I ran a quick download test that transferred a "500 KB" block of text to my
machine. It took 2.744 sec
Wow! I knew there was confusion out there about this, but I didnt realize
just how much (even on my part it would seem). Heres one possible source
of clarification:
http://www.speedguide.net/Cable_modems/bandwidth.shtml
and another:
http://www.scotsnewsletter.com/best_of/dtrct.htm
(not this S
I'll take another stab at an answer.
Cisco Nuts wrote:
>
> Hello,If the requirement is to configure 30% of the bandwidth
> on the
> serial port (1.544MB) for ipx traffic, how much will that be?I
> calculated
> (1.544 X 1024)/(30/100)?
Your bandwidth is 1.544 x 1000 x 1000 = 1,544,000 bits per
Cisco Nuts wrote:
>
> Hello,If the requirement is to configure 30% of the bandwidth
> on the
> serial port (1.544MB) for ipx traffic, how much will that be?I
> calculated
> (1.544 X 1024)/(30/100)? Is this how it's done or is there a
> right way to
> do this to get the actual value?Thank you.Since
Hello,If the requirement is to configure 30% of the bandwidth on the
serial port (1.544MB) for ipx traffic, how much will that be?I calculated
(1.544 X 1024)/(30/100)? Is this how it's done or is there a right way to
do this to get the actual value?Thank you.Sincerely,CN
--
Does switching on same card use backplane BW?
If, say, I am doing MLS ( L3 switching ) on a CAT 5000, and I setup two
hosts, one on port 1 and the other one port 2 on the same card ( ws-x5201R
which does the L3 MAC rewrite itself ), does this type of setup use any
backplane bandwidth?
Or does it
rom: "Chuck's Long Road"
>Reply-To: "Chuck's Long Road"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: BW Limit. [7:51407]
>Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 23:59:54 GMT
>
>for that matter, your English is better than mine. I can't tell the
>difference between "
ist 104 permit ip any host x.y.z.106
> access-list 104 permit ip any host x.y.z.107
> access-list 104 permit ip any host x.y.z.108
> access-list 104 permit ip any host x.y.z.109
>
>
> --
> coming soon:
>
> www.chuckslongroad.info
> ""Jose Tomas Pinal Salvador"
lvador"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello Group.
>
> Currently, I have a router Cisco 7513 with 7 WAN interfaces, 2 Fast
ethernet
> and 2 Giga ethernet. I can limit the BW genered by the 2 Fast Ethernet
with
> a Packetshaper mach
Hello Group.
Currently, I have a router Cisco 7513 with 7 WAN interfaces, 2 Fast ethernet
and 2 Giga ethernet. I can limit the BW genered by the 2 Fast Ethernet with
a Packetshaper machine but I am not allow to control the traffic in the 2
Giga Ethernet interface with the Packetshaper(the
What you are running on T1?
If you are running Frame Relay, use FRTS to configure the CIR.
Another way is to use rate-limit command on the interface.
Another way is to use class based queuing to allocate the bandwithd to
different class of services.
Nadeem
==
Fernando Shiran wrote:
> Hello,
, see this link on Cisco.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fqos
_r/qrfcmd8.htm
-Original Message-
From: Fernando Shiran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 10:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Limit Internet BW [7:
Use CAR comitted access rate
Marc Russell
www.ccbootcamp.com
""Fernando Shiran"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello,
>
> I do have a requirment to limit Internet Bandwidth among few sites. I do
> have a T1 and want to allow site A to be access bandwidth not m
Fernando,
To limit traffic there is basically two places :
Ingress and Egress (but usually on ingress) : Rate limit using "Commited
Access Rate - CAR"
Egress only : Shaping with "GTS"
Frank s.
Fernando Shiran wrote:
> Hello Larry,
>
> My problem is that the sites are at close Proximity. (
cb car
""Fernando Shiran"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello Larry,
>
> My problem is that the sites are at close Proximity. (inside a building)
And
> using ethernet Switch for the connections as the Internet link get
> terminated to the same switch. But using
look up the command rate-limit
-Original Message-
From: Fernando Shiran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 February 2002 15:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Limit Internet BW [7:34200]
Hello,
I do have a requirment to limit Internet Bandwidth among few sites. I do
have a T1 and want
Hello Larry,
My problem is that the sites are at close Proximity. (inside a building) And
using ethernet Switch for the connections as the Internet link get
terminated to the same switch. But using different subnets for two sites
with Vlans on the Switch.
I want Site B to keep from bursting the l
ndo Shiran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 10:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Limit Internet BW [7:34201]
Hello,
I do have a requirment to limit Internet Bandwidth among few sites. I do
have a T1 and want to allow site A to be access bandwidth not more than 256K
wh
Hello,
I do have a requirment to limit Internet Bandwidth among few sites. I do
have a T1 and want to allow site A to be access bandwidth not more than 256K
while site B can access full bandwidth without restricting.
I do have a Cisco 2620 as the Gatway router. All ideas greatly appreciated.
Re
Hello,
I do have a requirment to limit Internet Bandwidth among few sites. I do
have a T1 and want to allow site A to be access bandwidth not more than 256K
while site B can access full bandwidth without restricting.
I do have a Cisco 2620 as the Gatway router. All ideas greatly appreciated.
Re
ursday, January 03, 2002 12:29 PM
Subject: Redistribution bw EIGRP and IGRP [7:30827]
> Hello,I have RTA connected to BBR, running eigrp 1I have BBR connected to
> TS, running eigrp 1 and igrp 2 with redistribution configed bw themFrom
> TS, I cannot ping 4.4.4.2 the serial ip of RTAAnd
Hello,I have RTA connected to BBR, running eigrp 1I have BBR connected to
TS, running eigrp 1 and igrp 2 with redistribution configed bw themFrom
TS, I cannot ping 4.4.4.2 the serial ip of RTAAnd from RTA, I cannot ping
5.5.5.2, the serial ip of TS.The routing table of RTA does not show an
entry
ttcp might be worth looking into
its supposedly an undocumented command.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> is there a command to check the actual speed (BW) or max BW used on a
> Frame-Relay circ
: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 5:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: actual speed (BW) on a Frame-Relay circuit
This is actually more complicated than you think. :-) Which do you
want to know, the speed of the link or the
CCNP, CCDA
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 3:53 AM
Subject: actual speed (BW) on a Frame-Relay circuit
> this is only if I know that the link is a T1. But what if I don'
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: actual speed (BW) on a Frame-Relay circuit
This is actually more complicated than you think. :-) Which do you
want to know, the speed of the link or the available bandwidth? If it's
the latter, what do you mean by available? Do you want to know the CIR?
Or ho
lps and didn't just confuse the issue more. I may have
been imprecise, and if I have others will surely correct me.
Regards,
John
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/29/01 6:57:53 AM >>>
Hi,
is there a command to check the actual speed (BW) or max BW used on a
Frame-Rela
Hi,
is there a command to check the actual speed (BW) or max BW used on a
Frame-Relay circuit.
Thanks,
Tarry.
--
GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
http://www.gmx.net
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list
Try MRTG (www.mrtg.org) it's REALLY easy on Win32.
max hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi All,
> I was wondering if someone could tell me a good way to
> determine what the utilization, performance, BW,
>
Hi All,
I was wondering if someone could tell me a good way to
determine what the utilization, performance, BW,
congestion etc is for a frame-relay network.
I am trying to figure out the current network
condition and if I need additional BW for new remotes
sites that are about to be added to
rrill
Nasdaq
Network Engineering
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --
> From: pat[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: pat
> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 11:32 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: simple BW question
>
> Everryone:
>
>If I hav
Everryone:
If I have a 56K modem does that mean I have 56k
upstrem BW & 56 K down stream BW or I have total of 5k
BW.
The reason I am asking is I have 1MB BW from ISP.
The ISP feed comes into Firewall. most of traffic is
downstream that is traffic is going inside the
company
-
>
>
> Study Cisco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@groupstudy.com on 21/12/2000 12:26:53 am
>
> Please respond to Study Cisco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> To: "Scott McClure, CCNP, CCDA, MCNE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: leased link BW**
yes that is bcause that time the out going traffic was
less...but what i want to ask is my leased link is 64
kbits then why it is showing 62000 + 6000 kbits =
68000 k bits
--- "Scott McClure, CCNP, CCDA, MCNE"
<[EMAIL
IL PROTECTED]...
> > > hi
> > > i hav a 64 kb leased link and while monitoring
> > link
> > > load it show following readings, but i am not able
> > to
> > > understand
> > > that how it can exceed 64 kbits /sec.which the the
> >
gt; >
> > "Study Cisco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > hi
> > > i hav a 64 kb leased link and while monitoring
> > link
> > > load it show f
-
> > John Galt
> >
> >
> >
> > "Study Cisco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > hi
> > > i hav a 64 kb leased link and while monitoring
> > link
>
gt;
>
>
> "Study Cisco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > hi
> > i hav a 64 kb leased link and while monitoring
> link
> > load it show following readings, but i am not able
> to
&g
Study Cisco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> hi
> i hav a 64 kb leased link and while monitoring link
> load it show following readings, but i am not able to
> understand
> that how it can exceed 64 kbits /sec.whi
files,...
Study Cisco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> hi
> i hav a 64 kb leased link and while monitoring link
> load it show following readings, but i am not able to
> understand
> that how it can exceed 64 kbits /se
hi
i hav a 64 kb leased link and while monitoring link
load it show following readings, but i am not able to
understand
that how it can exceed 64 kbits /sec.which the the
actual bw. or is there any problem in my
understanding.pls tell
me
Thank-you Paul, Cory, and Lon. You offer a terrific service, Paul.
Priscilla
At 10:39 PM 12/14/00, Paul Borghese wrote:
>Two of our list members, Cory Williams and Lon Cameron have arranged for
>GroupStudy to be co-located at InFlow Inc (www.inflow.com). Our previous
>co-location facility was u
Two of our list members, Cory Williams and Lon Cameron have arranged for
GroupStudy to be co-located at InFlow Inc (www.inflow.com). Our previous
co-location facility was unable to provide the bandwidth needed for such a
large community. At our new location, we should see an immediate
improvemen
I have seen output of 'sh int to" like BW=4000k but the ring speed is 16M or
vice versa. How is that so?
Thanks.
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations
>Hi,
>
>is there a way to find out the actual bandwidth on the router.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Tary
How do you define bandwidth?
"What Problem are you trying to solve?"
***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not
directly to me***
Howard C. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Technical
Hi,
is there a way to find out the actual bandwidth on the router.
Thanks,
Tary
--
Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net
___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.gr
48 matches
Mail list logo
