Hi All,
I have been using EIGRP for our routing protocol for the last couple years,
which is prettly great. The controversal of selecting the routing protocol
came up again recently. I would like to have your opinion on EIGRP vs.
OSPF, which one is refered? What's the weakness and advantage? T
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
> I have been using EIGRP for our routing protocol for the last couple
years,
> which is prettly great. The controversal of selecting the routing
protocol
> came up again recently. I would like to have your opinion on EIGRP vs.
> OSPF, which one is refe
EIGRP easy to configure & optimised for Cisco kit. Use OSPF if mixed vendor
environment and if network is large scale. Requires good configurqtion
knowledge as much less plug and play than EIGRP. Also OSPF is true link
state so faster convergence and better scalability. EIGRP is enhanced
distance v
OSPF
no hop limit
link state
have 2 know how to configure it
bandwith is the metric
supportes areas therefore scalls well
supports area and net summarization
supportes cidr, vlsm
fast to converge
supports demand cicuits
standard based
djikstra is the algo
used in large environments
EIGRP
advanced
Good answers. Here are a few additional comments.
OSPF is an IETF standard, which has the following advantages:
You have access to the RFCs that describe it, which can help when
troubleshooting and designing network changes, even though the RFCs aren't
very readable.
Engineers from around the w
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
> EIGRP is not an IETF standard. You said below that the spec if available,
> but that's not true. Cisco has lots of documentaton on EIGRP but they have
> not released a specification for it.
AFAIK there used to be another company who manufactured routers
Interesting! I learned OSPF on BSCN book but never deploy it. EIGRP has
been very easy to configured and very fast converged comparing to RIP/RIPv2.
It seems OSPF gets lots of favor as a stardard protocol. I am curious if
OSPF support load sharing on equal / unequal paths? Thanks All for the
inpu
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
> been very easy to configured and very fast converged comparing to
RIP/RIPv2.
Anything is fast compared to RIP/RIPv2 ;-)
> It seems OSPF gets lots of favor as a stardard protocol. I am curious if
> OSPF support load sharing on equal / unequal paths?
O
actually rip is faster than IGRP
""[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kaj J. Niemi)"" a icrit dans le
message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
>
> > been very easy to configured and very fast converged comparing to
> RIP/RIPv2.
>
> Anything is fast compared to RIP/RIPv2 ;-)
>
9 matches
Mail list logo